Skip to main content
Bioactive Materials logoLink to Bioactive Materials
. 2020 Jan 11;5(1):34–43. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.12.001

In vitro corrosion resistance of a Ta2O5 nanofilm on MAO coated magnesium alloy AZ31 by atomic layer deposition

Chang-Yang Li a,1, Chi Yu a,1, Rong-Chang Zeng a,d,, Bo-Cheng Zhang b,∗∗, Lan-Yue Cui a, Jun Wan b, Yang Xia c
PMCID: PMC6960486  PMID: 31956734

Abstract

Micro-arc oxidation (MAO) coating with outstanding adhesion strength to Mg alloys has attracted more and more attention. However, owing to the porous structure, aggressive ions easily invaded the MAO/substrate interface through the through pores, limiting long-term corrosion resistance. Therefore, a dense and biocompatible tantalum oxide (Ta2O5) nanofilm was deposited on MAO coated Mg alloy AZ31 through atomic layer deposition (ALD) technique to seal the micropores and regulate the degradation rate. Surface micrography, chemical compositions and crystallographic structure were characterized using FE-SEM, EDS, XPS and XRD. The corrosion resistance of all samples was evaluated through electrochemical and hydrogen evolution tests. Results revealed that the Ta2O5 film mainly existed in the form of amorphousness. Moreover, uniform deposition of Ta2O5 film and effective sealing of micropores and microcracks in MAO coating were achieved. The current density (icorr) of the composite coating decreased three orders of magnitude than that of the substrate and MAO coating, improving corrosion resistance. Besides, the formation and corrosion resistance mechanisms of the composite coating were proposed.

Keywords: Magnesium alloys, Micro-arc oxidation, Atomic layer deposition, Coatings

Graphical abstract

Image 1

Highlights

  • A Ta2O5 nanofilm through ALD is deposited on MAO coated Mg alloy AZ31.

  • The Ta2O5 nanofilm is mainly present in the form of amorphousness.

  • The micropores and microcracks of MAO coating are effectively sealed.

  • Formation and corrosion resistance mechanisms of composite coatings are proposed.

1. Introduction

Magnesium (Mg) and its alloys are a new generation of biodegradable implant materials with good biocompatibility and similar mechanical properties to human bones [[1], [2], [3], [4]]. As a bone nail or plate, it will automatically degrade after satisfying a certain service period, preventing the injury of secondary surgery [5]. However, the excessively fast corrosion rate of Mg alloys limits its applications [6]. The α-Mg reacted with OH- produces hydrogen during the corrosion process, and the excessively fast corrosion rate causes gas to accumulate, leading to localized allergic reactions [7]. Therefore, it is urgent for the development of an effective anti-corrosion coating in the current scale application of Mg alloys.

At present, surface modification technologies, including micro-arc oxidation (MAO) [[8], [9], [10]], chemical conversion treatment [[11], [12], [13]], layer by layer [14,15], etc., have been applied to protect Mg alloys. MAO treatment is one of the most effective surface technologies, which is applied to an electrochemical method to form a stable oxide film to improve the corrosion resistance of Mg alloys [[16], [17], [18]]. The oxide film is in-situ grown on the Mg alloy substrate and has excellent adhesion to the substrate [19].

Note that, MAO coated Mg alloy has many micropores and microcracks. Aggressive ions intrude the MAO/substrate interface through the through pores, resulting in galvanic corrosion [20]. Therefore, it is necessary to further provide protection by post-processing such as sealing. Furthermore, MAO coating sealed methods according to the principle mainly include hydration reaction [21], alkali treatment [22], inorganic [23,24] and organic filling materials [17,25].

The hydration reaction [21] and the alkali treatment [22] are to place the MAO coating in boiling water or an alkaline solution (e.g. NaOH) to form a hydroxide (e.g. Mg(OH)2) and generate volume expansion, achieving the purpose of sealing. However, the above methods are very limited. Because Mg(OH)2 could also lose H2O molecules into an oxide film in a dry environment and the pore size returned to its original size.

Inorganic material fillings (e.g. sol-gel) and organic material fillings (e.g. polylactic acid (PLA)) are used as sealers. As a physical sealing, the sol-gel coating inevitably generates microcracks during drying, resulting in the reduction of long-term corrosion resistance [23,24]. In addition, Zeng et al. [25] prepared a MAO/PLA composite coating on Mg–1Li–1Ca alloy, which showed that the effective life of MAO coatings in simulated body fluids was only over 50 h. After soaking for 140 h, the PLA coating exhibited a bubble-drop phenomenon. The main reason was that PLA had a high-water permeability, and was mechanically or physically combined with MAO coating, that is, the binding force was weak. Although these methods have a certain protective effect, the weak bonding force is easy cause organic coating to peel off. The hydrolysis of organic coatings also is a problem for long-term protection.

Atomic layer deposition (ALD) [26,27] with the features of self-limiting and self-saturating can achieve of film thickness on the order of monoatomic layers. And completely uniform and conformal film coverage is achieved on a three-dimensional structure with a large aspect ratio. Therefore, ALD technology can be effectively used to seal the surface micropores of the MAO coating. In addition, it has been reported that tantalum (Ta) is more corrosion resistant and biocompatible than the currently used stainless steel and titanium (Ti) alloys [28], especially porous Ta metal [29], and high porosity, suitable pore size and three-dimensional structural characteristics [30,31]. Wang et al. [29] fabricated porous Ta and Ti with the same parameters using the 3D printing technology, which found that they had similar mechanical capabilities to trabecular bone in vitro and in vivo, and had the same human bone marrow mesenchyme stem cells proliferation and differentiation ability as porous Ti, indicating good mechanical compatibility and biocompatibility. Xu et al. [32] prepared a β-Ta2O5 coating on the Ti–6Al–4V alloy. The results of in vitro cell culture revealed that the adhesion and proliferation of mouse embryonic fibroblast cells on the β-Ta2O5 coated substrate was better than that of the bare substrate, reflecting its excellent biocompatibility. And the good corrosion resistance and biocompatibility of Ta metal are closely related to the dense oxides of the outer layer, attracting more and more attention, especially in the field of orthopedics.

In this study, a dense tantalum oxide (Ta2O5) film was prepared on MAO coated Mg alloy AZ31 by the ALD technique to seal the micropores and improve corrosion resistance. The corrosion resistance of the composite coating was evaluated, and the formation and corrosion resistance mechanisms were proposed.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials and specimen preparation

Mg alloy AZ31 with a size of 20 mm × 20 mm × 5 mm was as-extruded and supplied by the Shandong Yin Guang Yu Yuan Light Metal Precision Molding Co., Ltd., China, which included 2.5–3.0 wt% Al, 0.7–1.3 wt% Zn, Mn > 0.20 wt%, Si ≤ 0.3 wt%, Cu ≤ 0.05 wt%, Ni ≤ 0.005 wt%, Fe ≤ 0.005 wt% and balanced Mg. Prior to the preparation of the coating, the samples were ground to 1500 grit, rinsed in deionized water, degreased in ethanol and dried in warm air.

2.2. Preparation of MAO coating

The MAO treatment device consisted of a pure Ti plate served as the cathode, a power supply unit controlled by a single chip micyoco (SCM) and a stirring/cooling system [17]. MAO procedures were conducted in a phosphoric electrolyte, containing 8 g/L of phytic acid and 10 g/L of NaOH. The MAO coating was treated at a gradually increasing voltage from 0 to 250 V with a frequency of 100 Hz and the duty cycle of 50% oxidized for 5 min at room temperature.

2.3. Fabrication of MAO/Ta2O5 coating

Ta2O5 films were deposited on the MAO coated Mg alloy AZ31 through ALD using a KE-Micro T200A atomic layer deposition system where the Ta and O sources were tris(diethylamido)(tert-butylimido)tantalum (C16H39N4Ta, CAS:169896-41-7) and H2O, respectively. A cylindrical shaped reactor with a diameter of 200 mm was used. During the deposition process, Ta, H2O sources and delivery lines were kept at 130, 20 and 150 °C, respectively. The Ta concentration was controlled by changing the frequency of the C16H39N4Ta precursor cycle. High-purity N2 (99.999%) was used as the carrier and purging gas with a constant flow rate of 8 sccm (Standard Cubic Centimeter per Minute) throughout all cycles during the ALD process. One complete Ta2O5 ALD cycle was carried out through the gas filling of C16H39N4Ta and H2O with 0.1 and 0.015 s pulse, respectively, followed by the purge of N2 for 60 s to eliminate the oversupplied C16H39N4Ta, H2O and by-products, preventing chemical vapor deposition from occurring. The growth rate of Ta2O5 was about 0.1 nm per cycle, which was similar to formerly published results [33,34]. The entire ALD deposition process was performed for 500 cycles.

2.4. Surface analysis

A field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, Nova NanoSEM 450, USA) was employed to discern the surface morphologies of MAO and MAO/Ta2O5 coatings and chemical compositions of the coatings was detected through an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS). Crystallographic structures of the substrate, MAO coating, and MAO/Ta2O5 coating were analyzed by an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Rigaku D/MAX2500PC, Japan) with a Cu target (λ = 0.154 nm) at 8°/min scanning rate over 2θ range from 5 to 80°. And the corrosion morphologies after immersion in Hank's solution for 294 h were also observed using FE-SEM. Chemical compositions of MAO/Ta2O5 coating were further determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALab250, Thermo Scientific, US) with an Al Kα X-ray source.

2.5. Corrosion resistance evaluations

Potentiodynamic polarization (PDP) curves and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were performed on an electrochemical workstation (PAR Model 2273, Princeton, USA) connected to a three-electrode cell with coated and uncoated samples as the working electrode with an exposed area of 1 cm2, a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as the reference electrode and a platinum electrode as the counter electrode. All electrochemical measurements were conducted in Hank's solution (8.0 g/L NaCl, 1.0 g/L C6H6O6 (Glucose), 0.35 g/L NaHCO3, 0.4 g/L KCl, 0.14 g/L CaCl2, 0.1 g/L MgCl2·6H2O, 0.06 g/L MgSO4·7H2O, 0.06 g/L KH2PO4 and 0.06 g/L Na2HPO4·12H2O) at room temperature. Potentiodynamic polarization curves were derived at a sweep rate of 1 mV/s from −2.0 to −0.8 V/SCE. In EIS measurements, the frequency ranged from 100 kHz to 10 mHz and the amplitude of the sinusoidal potential signal was 10 mV/SCE. The equivalent circuits of EIS were fitted with the ZSimpWin software.

Hydrogen evolution tests were measured to evaluate the corrosion behavior of the substrate and its coatings during immersion in Hank's solution at 37.5 ± 0.1 °C for 294 h. The ratio of the sample surface area to the medium volume was approximately 40 mL/cm2. The method for the hydrogen evolution test was reported in our previous literature [17]. All tests were repeated in triplicate.

3. Results

3.1. Surface morphologies

Fig. 1 shows a comparison of SEM images of (a) MAO and (b, c) MAO/Ta2O5 coatings. It could be seen that MAO coating (Fig. 1a) had typical microporous and microcrack structures, resulting from the generation of a large number of sparks and bubbles on the substrate under high-temperature and high-voltage conditions. After the Ta2O5 coating was prepared using ALD, the microcracks and microporous on the MAO coating surface were significantly reduced, and the convex portions were slightly enlarged in Fig. 1b and c. The MAO/Ta2O5 coating mainly contained Mg, O, Ta, P and trace Na and C elements (Fig. 1d–i). The distribution of Ta elements was very uniform. Mg elements were mainly derived from the substrate and MAO coating, O elements from MAO and Ta2O5 coatings and P element from the phytic acid in the electrolyte, indicating that the Ta2O5 was successfully and uniformly deposited on the surface of MAO samples. Furthermore, according to our previous reports [8,35], the thickness of the MAO coating was approximately 3 μm. Moreover, the deposition rate of Ta2O5 was 0.1 nm per cycle. Thence, the coating thickness of Ta2O5 after 500 cycles was about 50 nm.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

SEM images of (a) MAO and (b, c) MAO/Ta2O5 coatings; elemental mapping images of (d) Mg, (e) O, (f) Ta, (g) P, (h) Na, and (i) C for MAO/Ta2O5 coating.

Fig. 2 illustrates the XRD patterns of (a) the substrate, (b) MAO coating and (c) MAO/Ta2O5 coating. Obviously, the typical diffraction peaks of α-Mg including (100), (002), (101), (102), (110), (103), (200), (112), (201) and (004) were observed in all samples (JCPDS 65–3365). It can be seen that both MAO (Fig. 2b) and MAO/Ta2O5 (Fig. 2c) coatings contained the diffraction peaks of MgO including (200) and (220) (JCPDS 65–0476). And diffraction peaks intensity of MgO in the MAO/Ta2O5 coating was lower than that of the MAO coating. Strangely, no diffraction peaks of any Ta2O5 were detected, which could be ascribed that Ta2O5 existed in the form of amorphousness. In addition, the diffraction peaks of MgO in MAO/Ta2O5 coating were weakened, which might be resulted from the cover of the outer Ta2O5 coating. These can be confirmed by the EDS analysis in Fig. 1 and the next XPS analysis in Fig. 3.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

XRD patterns of (a) substrate, (b) MAO coating and (c) MAO/Ta2O5 coating.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

XPS survey scan of (a) MAO/Ta2O5 coating and high resolutions of the (b) Ta 4d, (c) Ta 4f and O 2s, (d) O 1s, (e) N 1s and (f) C 1s peaks.

XPS was performed to understand the composition and chemical bonding of the surface of MAO/Ta2O5 coating. Fig. 3 displays that XPS survey scan of (a) MAO/Ta2O5 coating, and high resolutions of the (b) Ta 4d, (c) Ta 4f and O 2s, (d) O 1s, (e) N 1s and (f) C 1s peaks. All data were calibrated by standard spectrogram C 1s at 284.6 eV. It could be seen that MAO/Ta2O5 coating surface mainly contained C, O, N and Ta elements. Especially, the spectrum of Ta 4d (Fig. 3b) was divided into Ta2O5 with continuous double peaks at 241.31 eV and 229.65 eV [36] and the spectrum of Ta 4f and O 2s (Fig. 3c) were decomposed into multiple peaks, corresponding to Ta2O5 (27.28 eV and 25.36 eV) [37,38] and N–Ta (21.07 eV) [39,40]. Moreover, the peak of N–Ta indicated that the precursor source of C16H39N4Ta did not completely react with H2O during the ALD deposition process. The spectrum of O 1s (Fig. 3d) corresponded to Ta–O (530.63 eV) [41], further confirming the existence of Ta2O5. The spectrum of N 1s (Fig. 3e) was differentiated into N–C at 404.43 eV and N–Ta at 401.04 eV, which also indicated that the Ta source was not completely oxidized. The spectrum of C 1s (Fig. 3f) consisted of C–C at 284.60 eV and N–C at 283.00 eV, which agreed with the results of the N 1s peak, and also proved the residue of Ta source. In summary, the Ta2O5 coating was successfully prepared through ALD.

3.2. Electrochemical tests

Fig. 4 demonstrates that the PDP curves of (a) substrate, (b) MAO coating and (c) MAO/Ta2O5 coating in Hank's solution. The relevant electrochemical parameters are counted in Table 1. It could be seen that the corrosion current density (icorr) of the coated samples was smaller than that of the substrate, which could be ranged in increasing order: MAO/Ta2O5 coating < MAO coating < the substrate. Furthermore, the icorr of MAO/Ta2O5 coating decreased three orders of magnitude than that of the MAO coating, from 1.05× 10−6 A/cm2 to 2.23 × 10−9 A/cm2. This might be because Ta2O5 layer prepared through ALD blocked the micropores and microcracks in MAO coating, effectively improving corrosion resistance. The corrosion potential (Ecorr) decreased from −1.42 V/SCE for the substrate to −1.70 V/SCE for MAO coating, indicating the presence of micro-galvanic effect [20]. And the Ecorr increased from −1.70 V/SCE for MAO coating to −1.44 V/SCE for MAO/Ta2O5 coating, suggesting a decline in the tendency of corrosion initiation owing to thermodynamics [35,42]. That is, MAO coated samples by the ALD treatment significantly reduced the presence of micropores and microcracks in MAO coating, making the coating flatter and blocking the entry of aggressive ions into the substrate through micropores and microcracks.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

PDP curves of (a) substrate, (b) MAO coating and (c) MAO/Ta2O5 coating in Hank's solution.

Table 1.

Comparison of Ecorr and icorr with different treatment processes.

Samples Ecorr (V/SCE) icorr (A/cm2)
substrate −1.42 5.88×10−6
MAO coating −1.70 1.05×10−6
MAO/Ta2O5 coating −1.44 2.23×10−9

Bode plots of (Ⅰ) substrate, (Ⅱ) MAO coating and (Ⅲ) MAO/Ta2O5 coating immersed in Hank's solution are shown in Fig. 5a. The higher the impedance modulus are |Z|, at lower frequencies, the better corrosion resistance of the samples gets. The order of |Z| values could be ranged in increasing order: substrate < MAO coating < MAO/Ta2O5 coating. Moreover, the |Z| of MAO/Ta2O5 coating increased three orders of magnitude than that of the substrate, and two orders of magnitude than that of the MAO coating. These results disclosed that MAO coating modified through the ALD deposition of Ta2O5 film had a good corrosion resistance and provided better protection for the substrate. And Nyquist curves of (Ⅰ) substrate, (Ⅱ) MAO coating, and (Ⅲ) MAO/Ta2O5 coating are illustrated in Fig. 5b–d. The greater the radius of curvature is, the better the corrosion resistance of the samples gets. As we can see, the MAO/Ta2O5 coating had the largest radius of curvature, meaning the best corrosion resistance.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

(a) Bode plots and (b–d) Nyquist curves and corresponding equivalent circuits of (Ⅰ) substrate, (Ⅱ) MAO coating and (Ⅲ) MAO/Ta2O5 coating immersed in Hank's solution.

The corresponding equivalent circuits of (Ⅰ) substrate, (Ⅱ) MAO coating and (Ⅲ) MAO/Ta2O5 coating are displayed in Fig. 5b–d, in order to further understand the corrosion resistance of the samples. And the corresponding fitting data are listed in Table 2. Rs represents the solution resistance. R and C imply the resistance and capacitance of the corresponding coating, respectively. Rct symbolizes charge transfer resistance. CPE means constant phase component. Obviously, for the substrate, the high-frequency region was composed of a constant phase component (CPE1) and a charge transfer resistance (Rct) corresponding to the electrical double layer at the interface of the substrate surface and solution. And the middle-frequency region consisting of C1 and R1 represented the oxidation layer formed in the air [43,44]. The low-frequency region consisted of the inductance (L) and resistance (RL), meaning pitting of substrate and peeling of the corrosion product film [35]. For the MAO coating, the constant phase elements (C1) and resistance (R1) represented the porous outer layer, and the capacitance (CPE1) and charge transfer resistance (Rct) represented a dense inner layer [10]. Unfortunately, in the low-frequency region, the presence of inductance (L) meant that pitting occurred. The MAO/Ta2O5 coating consisted of R1 (Ta2O5 film), R2 (MAO coating) and Rct (charge transfer resistance). In addition, the larger Rct means better corrosion resistance of the samples. In Table 2, the value of Rct ranged in the order: substrate < MAO coating < MAO/Ta2O5 coating. That is, the MAO/Ta2O5 coating had the best corrosion resistance.

Table 2.

Electrochemical data obtained via equivalent circuit fitting of EIS curves.

Samples substrate MAO coating MAO/Ta2O5 coating
Rs (Ω·cm2) 82.98 59.57 54.93
R1 (Ω·cm2) 2.13 × 103 1.79 × 103 3.48 × 103
R2 (Ω·cm2) 1.09 × 107
RL (Ω·cm2) 79.19 2.52 × 104
Rct (Ω·cm2) 6.09 × 102 1.23 × 105 3.99 × 106
CPE1−1·sn·cm−2) 1.45 × 10−5 4.42 × 10−6 1.81 × 10−8
CPE2−1·sn·cm−2) 2.46 × 10−5 9.08 × 10−8
C1 (F·cm−2) 9.34 × 10−4 1.49 × 10−7 7.22 × 10−7
n1 0.84 0.62 0.93
n2 0.52 0.78
Chi squared 7.56 × 10−4 4.45 × 10−3 6.69 × 10−3

3.3. Immersion tests

The hydrogen evolution experiment is to further evaluate the corrosion resistance of the samples under long-term immersion. And the (a) hydrogen evolution rate (HER) curves and (b) partial enlargement HER image of substrate, MAO coating and MAO/Ta2O5 coating immersed in Hank's solution for 294 h are demonstrated in Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

(a) HER curves and (b) partial enlargement HER images of substrate, MAO coating and MAO/Ta2O5 coating immersed in Hank's solution for 294 h.

According to the changes of HER, it could be divided into three stages. In the first stage (0–5 h), the HERs of all samples raised rapidly to a peak due to the large amount of gas generated from the corrosion of α-Mg. For MAO and MAO/Ta2O5 coatings, corrosive media would penetrate the substrate through coating defects. In the second stage (5–168 h), HERs of all samples rapidly decreased and reached equilibrium, which was ascribed that corrosion products were deposited onto the exposed substrate. In the third stage (168–294 h), the HERs of the substrate and MAO coating increased, then tended to be stable, which was attributed that the corrosion product film was destroyed. Conversely, the HER of MAO/Ta2O5 coating was essentially unchanged, indicating that the MAO coating modified by ALD treatment had a better corrosion resistance.

3.4. Corrosion morphologies analysis

Macro-morphologies of (a) substrate, (b) MAO coating and (c) MAO/Ta2O5 coating immersed in Hank's solution for 294 h are shown in Fig. 7. As shown in Fig. 7a, AZ31 substrate was corroded, especially near the edge region with a deep etch pit, indicating that the corrosion was very serious. For the MAO coating in Fig. 7b, a large number of etch pits were found near the edges of the sample and the pre-punched locations. Note that, most areas of the MAO/Ta2O5 coating were intact after long-term soaking and the traces on the sample surface were mostly scratches formed when the sample was stored later. Thus, the corrosion resistance of the sample treated through the ALD technique was effectively improved, which was consistent with the corrosion rate in Fig. 6.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Macro-morphologies of (a) substrate, (b) MAO coating and (c) MAO/Ta2O5 coating immersed in Hank's solution for 294 h.

Fig. 8 illustrates SEM images of (a) substrate, (b) MAO coating and (c, d) MAO/Ta2O5 coating immersed in Hank's solution for 294 h. A large number of cracks were observed on the substrate surface in Fig. 8a. The MAO coating also had a large number of cracks, and the structure of the micropores became smaller, which might be micropores were blocked through the corrosion products (Fig. 8b). However, the original microcracks in MAO coating expanded into large cracks after soaking, which could be ascribed that the aggressive ions invaded the substrate along micropores and microcracks, producing a large amount of hydrogen to cause cracking of the coating and accelerate corrosion. In addition, the MAO/Ta2O5 coating was relatively complete in Fig. 8c. However, pits were found in some areas of the MAO/Ta2O5 coating (Fig. 8d), which meant the initiation of pitting corrosion, and then corrosion would propagate around the pits as immersion time. Furthermore, according to our previous research [8,12], pitting might be located near the intermetallic compound Al–Mn phase.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

SEM images of (a) substrate, (b) MAO coating and (c, d) MAO/Ta2O5 coating immersed in Hank's solution for 294 h.

EDS mappings are shown in Fig. 9 for (a) substrate, (b) MAO coating and (c, d) MAO/Ta2O5 coating immersed in Hank's solution for 294 h. For the substrate and MAO coating, the corroded samples mainly contained Mg, O, P and Ca elements. And the presence of P and Ca elements meant the deposition of corrosion products (Ca–P products). Conversely, the MAO/Ta2O5 coating mainly contained Mg, O, P and Ta elements, and the Ta element was still uniformly distributed. The Ca element was not detected, indicating that there was no deposition of corrosion products on the surface. Also, the pitting area of MAO/Ta2O5 coating contained some P, O and Ca elements, as well as fewer Mg elements, which indicated that the corrosion products were deposited in the corroded area. Although not Al or Mn elements were detected, pitting might occur near the second phase (i.e. Al–Mn phase) in the Mg alloy AZ31 according to our previous research [8,12].

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

SEM images and EDS mappings of (a) substrate, (b) MAO coating and (c, d) MAO/Ta2O5 coating immersed in Hank's solution for 294 h.

4. Discussion

4.1. Comparison of corrosion resistance

Fig. 10a shows the different cycles time (i.e. different thicknesses) of Ta2O5 film on MAO coating of (Ⅰ) 500- and (Ⅱ) 1000-cycles. The thickness of the 500-cycles Ta2O5 film was approximately 50 nm, which corresponding icorr was 2.23 × 10−9 A/cm2. The thickness of the 1000-cycles Ta2O5 was approximately 100 nm, and the corresponding icorr was decreased 50% and reached 1.06 × 10−9 A/cm2. Obviously, as increasing times of cycles, the thickness of the Ta2O5 film increased and icorr decreased. That is, the corrosion resistance of Ta2O5 film was enhanced significantly with thickness.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

(a) Different cycles time of Ta2O5 film on MAO coating of (Ⅰ) 500- and (Ⅱ) 1000-cycles; (b) a comparison of the corrosion resistance of several composite coatings based on MAO coated substrates.

Fig. 10b demonstrates a comparison of the corrosion resistance of several composite coatings based on MAO coated substrate. Cui et al. [35] constructed a PMTMS coating on the surface of MAO coated Mg alloy AZ31. The icorr was reduced from 2.40 × 10−7 A/cm2 for the MAO coating to 2.86 × 10−8 A/cm2 for the MAO/PMTMS composite coating. Li et al. [8] prepared a Mg(OH)2 coating on the surface of MAO coated Mg alloy AZ31 by in situ growth method, and the corresponding icorr decreased from 3.72 × 10−7 A/cm2 to 5.69 × 10−8 A/cm2. Chitosan coating was prepared on the surface of MAO coated Mg–1Li–1Ca by Yu et al. [17], and its corrosion resistance was limited. Zeng et al. [25] prepared a PLA coating on the surface of MAO coated Mg–1Li–1Ca, which the icorr of the MAO/PLA composite coating decreased one order of magnitude lower than that of the MAO coating. The above composite coatings were all organic coatings, and the risk of organic coatings being easily hydrolyzed and detached might cause coating failure, which in turn led to a decrease in corrosion resistance. In this study, the icorr of the MAO/Ta2O5 coating decreased three orders of magnitude than that of the MAO coating, greatly improving corrosion resistance. The results revealed that Ta2O5 film with dense and smooth and good corrosion resistance was prepared on the surface of MAO coating based on the advantages (self-limiting and self-saturating method) of ALD technology and the excellent corrosion resistance of Ta metal.

4.2. Formation mechanism of MAO/Ta2O5 coating

ALD technology is a self-limiting and self-saturating method to form a thin film through alternately introducing a gas precursor pulse into the reaction chamber and occurring a surface chemical reaction on the substrate surface. Obviously, the deposition of Ta2O5 using ALD is a discontinuous process consisting of several semi-reactive sequences. Taking Ta[N(CHCH3)2]3[NHC(CH3)3] as Ta source and water vapor as O source, the whole reaction could be divided into two steps in Fig. 11a. The first step (Reaction 1), Ta[N(CHCH3)2]3[NHC(CH3)3] was introduced into the reaction chamber in the form of a gas. Then, a reaction occurred on MAO coating surface (a large number of –OH active sites on MAO coating surface) to rob the H of MAO-OH* (* representing a functional group adsorbed on the deposition surface) and form the intermediate layer Ta–O–Ta[N(CHCH3)2]3*. And a by-product NH2C(CH3)3 was formed in this process. After the reaction was completed, the remaining Ta source and reaction by-products were purged bypassing high-purity nitrogen [45,46]. The second step (Reaction 2), an excess of O source (i.e. water vapor) was introduced to react with the reactive site –N(CHCH3)2 of the intermediate layer to obtain a layer of Ta2O5 and reaction by-products [47]. Due to the steric hindrance effect, the O source would first react with –NHC(CH3)3 and then replaced the –N(CHCH3)2 groups. After the residual gas was purged with high purity nitrogen, one cycle ended. A Ta2O5 film was obtained in each cycle, and each of the half-reacted precursors could be adsorbed inside the micropores and microcracks of MAO coating. Finally, a dense Ta2O5 coating was obtained after a plurality of cycles of deposition (Fig. 11b).

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Schematic illustration of MAO/Ta2O5 coating through ALD for (a) 1 and (b) 500 cycles and (c) the reaction equation of Ta2O5.

Reaction 1

Ta[N(CHCH3)2]3[NHC(CH3]3(g)+MAOOH(s)TaOTa[N(CHCH3)2]3(s)+NH2C(CH3)3(g) (1)

Reaction 2:

H2O(g)+Ta[N(CHCH3)2](s)TaOH(s)+NH(CHCH3)2(g) (2)

And Fig. 11c demonstrates the reaction of Ta2O5 as follows:

2Ta[N(CHCH3)2]3[NHC(CH3)3](g)+5H2O(g)Ta2O5(s)+2NH2C(CH3)3(g)+6NH(CHCH3)2(g) (3)

4.3. The corrosion resistance mechanism of MAO/Ta2O5 coating

The MAO coated sample treated by ALD deposition of Ta2O5 was more complete than the substrate and the single MAO coating. This was mainly because ALD technology was used to prepare nano-scale film based on two continuous and periodic self-limiting half-reactions. And the dense Ta2O5 could well seal microcracks and through holes. The Ta2O5 film acted as a physical barrier in the corrosive medium and could effectively block the entry of aggressive ions, thereby effectively protecting the substrate from corrosion during the immersion test. Through the PDP curves, EIS plots and immersion test, it could be clearly found that the MAO/Ta2O5 coating had good corrosion resistance. However, there were still some nano-gaps during the deposition process. As the immersion time increased, the aggressive ions would penetrate the Ta2O5 nano-layer through these gaps. Therefore, the hydrogen produced through the chemical reaction between H2O and α-Mg would eventually lead to local damage of the Ta2O5 nanofilm, causing the pitting corrosion (as shown in Fig. 12).

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12

Schematic illustration of the corrosion resistance mechanism of the MAO/Ta2O5 coating.

5. Conclusions

  • (1)

    The Ta2O5 nanofilm deposited on MAO coating by ALD technology effectively sealed the micropores and microcracks in MAO coating, and the film was evenly distributed without obvious defects.

  • (2)

    Ta2O5 nanofilm was mainly present in the form of amorphousness.

  • (3)

    Electrochemical test results showed that the icorr of MAO/Ta2O5 coating decreased three orders of magnitude than that of the substrate and MAO coating. Conversely, due to the porous and microcracked structure of the MAO coating, the improvement in corrosion resistance was limited. The hydrogen evolution experiments also revealed that the MAO/Ta2O5 coating had the best corrosion resistance.

  • (4)

    Pitting corrosion occurred on the MAO/Ta2O5 coating. And the corrosion initiated near the intermetallic compound Al–Mn particles and then gradually expanded outward.

Author contribution

Chang-Yang Li: Data Curation, Writing - original draft, Chi Yu: Methodology, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing - original draft, Rong-Chang Zeng: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing, Bo-Cheng Zhang: Conceptualization, Resources, Writing - review & editing. Lan-Yue Cui: Writing - review & editing. Jun Wan: Resources, Yang Xia: Supervision.

Declaration of competing interest

None.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Lian Guo and Yong-Feng Zhou for them assistance with the experiments. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51571134 and 51601108) and the SDUST Research Fund (2014TDJH104).

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.

Contributor Information

Rong-Chang Zeng, Email: rczeng@foxmail.com.

Bo-Cheng Zhang, Email: zhangbocheng@ifet-tsinghua.org.

References

  • 1.Li L.Y., Cui L.Y., Zeng R.C., Li S.Q., Chen X.B., Zheng Y., Kannan M.B. Advances in functionalized polymer coatings on biodegradable magnesium alloys-A review. Acta Biomater. 2018;79:23–36. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yu X.B., Huang W., Zhao D.W., Yang K., Tan L.L., Zhang X.Z., Li J.L., Zhang M., Zhang S., Liu T., Wu B.L., Qu M.J., Duan R.M., Yuan Y.S. Study of engineered low-modulus Mg/PLLA composites as potential orthopaedic implants: an in vitro and in vivo study. Colloids Surf., B. 2019;174:280–290. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.10.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zou Y.H., Wang J., Cui L.Y., Zeng R.C., Wang Q.Z., Han Q.X., Qiu J., Chen X.B., Chen D.C., Guan S.K., Zheng Y.F. Corrosion resistance and antibacterial activity of zinc-loaded montmorillonite coatings on biodegradable magnesium alloy AZ31. Acta Biomater. 2019;98:196–214. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wang J.L., Witte F., Xi T.F., Zheng Y.F., Yang K., Yang Y.S., Zhao D.W., Meng J., Li Y.D., Li W.R., Chan K.M., Qin L. Recommendation for modifying current cytotoxicity testing standards for biodegradable magnesium-based materials. Acta Biomater. 2015;21:237–249. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hou L.D., Li Z., Pan Y., Sabir M., Zheng Y.F., Li L. A review on biodegradable materials for cardiovascular stent application. Front. Mater. Sci. 2016;10:238–259. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Xia D.D., Liu Y., Wang S.Y., Zeng R.C., Liu Y.S., Zheng Y.F., Zhou Y.S. In vitro and in vivo investigation on biodegradable Mg-Li-Ca alloys for bone implant application. Sci. China Mater. 2019;62:256–272. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li L.Y., Cui L.Y., Liu B., Zeng R.C., Chen X.B., Li S.Q., Wang Z.L., Han E.H. Corrosion resistance of glucose-induced hydrothermal calcium phosphate coating on pure magnesium. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019;465:1066–1077. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li C.Y., Fan X.L., Zeng R.C., Cui L.Y., Li S.Q., Zhang F., He Q.K., Kannan M.B., Jiang H.W., Chen D.C., Guan S.K. Corrosion resistance of in-situ growth of nano-sized Mg(OH)2 on micro-arc oxidized magnesium alloy AZ31-Influence of EDTA. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2019;35:1088–1098. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Feng Y.S., Ma X., Chang L., Zhu S.J., Guan S.K. Characterization and cytocompatibility of polydopamine on MAO-HA coating supported on Mg-Zn-Ca alloy. Surf. Interface Anal. 2017;49:1115–1123. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li C.Y., Feng X.L., Fan X.L., Yu X.T., Yin Z.Z., Kannan M.B., Chen X.B., Guan S.K., Zhang J., Zeng R.C. Corrosion and wear resistance of micro-arc oxidation composite coatings on magnesium alloy AZ31-The influence of inclusions of carbon spheres. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2019;21:1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Peng W., Chen J.X., Shan X.F., Wang Y.C., He F., Wang X.J., Tan L.L., Yang K. Mg-based absorbable membrane for guided bone regeneration (GBR): a pilot study. Rare Met. 2019;38:577–587. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fan X.L., Huo Y.F., Li C.Y., Kannan M.B., Chen X.B., Guan S.K., Zeng R.C., Ma Q.L. Corrosion resistance of nanostructured magnesium hydroxide coating on magnesium alloy AZ31: influence of EDTA. Rare Met. 2019;38:520–531. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cui L.Y., Wei G.B., Zeng R.C., Li S.Q., Zou Y.H., Han E.H. Corrosion resistance of a novel SnO2 -doped dicalcium phosphate coating on AZ31 magnesium alloy. Bioact. Mater. 2017;3:245–249. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen L., Li J.A., Chang J.W., Jin S.B., Wu D., Yan H.H., Wang X.F., Guan S.K. Mg-Zn-Y-Nd coated with citric acid and dopamine by layer-by-layer self-assembly to improve surface biocompatibility. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2018;61:1228–1237. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ji X.J., Gao L., Liu J.C., Wang J., Cheng Q., Li J.P., Li S.Q., Zhi K.Q., Zeng R.C., Wang Z.L. Corrosion resistance and antibacterial properties of hydroxyapatite coating induced by gentamicin-loaded polymeric multilayers on magnesium alloys. Colloids Surf., B. 2019;179:429–436. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.04.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yuan W., Li B., Chen D.F., Zhu D.H., Han Y., Zheng Y.F. Formation mechanism, corrosion behavior, and cytocompatibility of microarc oxidation coating on absorbable high-purity zinc. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2018;5:487–497. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yu C., Cui L.Y., Zhou Y.F., Han Z.Z., Chen X.B., Zeng R.C., Zou Y.H., Li S.Q., Zhang F., Han E.H., Guan S.K. Self-degradation of micro-arc oxidation/chitosan composite coating on Mg-4Li-1Ca alloy. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2018;344:1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sedelnikova M.B., Komarova E.G., Sharkeev Y.P., Tolkacheva T.V., Khlusov I.A., Litvinova L.S., Yurova K.A., Shupletsova V.V. Comparative investigations of structure and properties of micro-arc wollastonite-calcium phosphate coatings on titanium and zirconium-niobium alloy. Bioact. Mater. 2017;2:177–184. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kannan M.B., Walter R., Yamamoto A., Khakbaz H., Blawert C. Electrochemical surface engineering of magnesium metal by plasma electrolytic oxidation and calcium phosphate deposition: biocompatibility and in vitro degradation studies. RSC Adv. 2018;8:29189–29200. doi: 10.1039/c8ra05278f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cui L.Y., Zeng R.C., Guan S.K., Qi W.C., Zhang F., Li S.Q., Han E.H. Degradation mechanism of micro-arc oxidation coatings on biodegradable Mg-Ca alloys: the influence of porosity. J. Alloy. Comp. 2017;695:2464–2476. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang Z.C., Tang Yi X.J. Study on the micro-arc oxidation and surface treatment of AZ91D magnesium alloy. J. Xiamen Univ., Nat. Sci. 2006;45:292–295. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kim Seong Jong, Kim Jeong Il, Okido M. Sealing effects of anodic oxide films formed on Mg-Al alloys. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2004;21:915–920. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shan D.Y., Zhang R.F., Han E.H. Effect of Al2O3 thin film on corrosion resistance of pure Mg and its anodic coating. Mater. Sci. Forum. 2005;488–489:865–868. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cai Q.Z., Wang D., Luo H.H., Wei B.K. Sealing of micro-arc oxidation coating on magnesium alloy by SiO2 sol sealing agent. Special Cast. Nonferrous Alloys. 2006;26:612–614. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zeng R.C., Cui L.Y., Jiang K., Liu R., Zhao B.D., Zheng Y.F. In vitro corrosion and cytocompatibility of a microarc oxidation coating and poly(L-lactic acid) composite coating on Mg-1Li-1Ca alloy for orthopedic implants. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016;8:10014–10028. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b00527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Miikkulainen V., Leskelä M., Ritala M., Puurunen R.L. Crystallinity of inorganic films grown by atomic layer deposition: overview and general trends. J. Appl. Phys. 2013;113 021301-021301-021301-021101. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Johnson R.W., Hultqvist A., Bent S.F. A brief review of atomic layer deposition: from fundamentals to applications. Mater. Today. 2014;17:236–246. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Deng J.C., Wang Y. The metal tantalum in orthopedic applications. J. Biomed. Eng. 2011;28:420–422. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang H., Su K.X., Su L.Z., Liang P.P., Ji P., Wang C. Comparison of 3D-printed porous tantalum and titanium scaffolds on osteointegration and osteogenesis. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019;104:109908. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.109908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rodriguez Contreras A., Guillem Marti J., Lopez O., Manero J.M., Ruperez E. Antimicrobial PHAs coatings for solid and porous tantalum implants. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces. 2019;182:110317. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.06.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lu J., Zheng X.P., Wang Z.Q. Application of porous tantalum implant in treatment of bone defect. Chin. J. Reparative Reconstr. Surg. 2012;26:244–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Xu J., Bao X.K., Fu T., Lyu Y.H., Munroe P., Xie Z.H. In vitro biocompatibility of a nanocrystalline β-Ta2O5 coating for orthopaedic implants. Ceram. Int. 2018;44:4660–4675. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Salmi L.D., Puukilainen E., Vehkamäki M., Heikkilä M., Ritala M. Atomic layer deposition of Ta2O5/polyimide nanolaminates. Chem. Vap. Depos. 2009;15:221–226. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kim M., Kim W., Lee T., Kim H. Growth characteristics and electrical properties of Ta2O5 grown by thermal and O3-based atomic layer deposition on TiN substrates for metal-insulator-metal capacitor applications. Thin Solid Films. 2013;542:71–75. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cui L.Y., Gao S.D., Li P.P., Zeng R.C., Zhang F., Li S.Q., Han E.H. Corrosion resistance of a self-healing micro-arc oxidation/polymethyltrimethoxysilane composite coating on magnesium alloy AZ31. Corros. Sci. 2017;118:84–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jara A., Fraisse B., Flaud V., Fréty N., Gonzalez G. Thin film deposition of Ta, TaN and Ta/TaN bi-layer on Ti and SS316-LVM substrates by RF sputtering. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017;309:887–896. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Egorov K.V., Lebedinskii Y.Y., Markeev A.M., Orlov O.M. Full ALD Ta2O5-based stacks for resistive random access memory grown with in vacuo XPS monitoring. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015;356:454–459. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fan Y.Z., Cheng X. Porous IrO2-Ta2O5 coating modified with carbon nanotubes for oxygen evolution reaction. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016;163:E209–E215. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Volpi F., Cadix L., Berthomé G., Blanquet E., Jourdan N., Torres J. XPS studies of the ALD-growth of TaN diffusion barriers: impact of the dielectric surface chemistry on the growth mechanism. Microelectron. Eng. 2008;85:2068–2070. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Woo J.C., Kim C.I. Dry etching of TaN thin film using CH4/Ar inductively coupled plasma. Vacuum. 2011;86:1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mehdipour M., Tabaian S.H., Firoozi S. Effect of IrO2 crystallinity on electrocatalytic behavior of IrO2-Ta2O5/MWCNT composite as anodes in chlor-alkali membrane cell. Ceram. Int. 2019;45:19971–19980. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cui L.Y., Liu H.P., Zhang W.L., Han Z.Z., Deng M.X., Zeng R.C., Li S.Q., Wang Z.L. Corrosion resistance of a superhydrophobic micro-arc oxidation coating on Mg-4Li-1Ca alloy. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2017;33:1263–1271. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ding Z.Y., Cui L.Y., Chen X.B., Zeng R.C., Guan S.K., Li S.Q., Zhang F., Zou Y.H., Liu Q.Y. In vitro corrosion of micro-arc oxidation coating on Mg-1Li-1Ca alloy-The influence of intermetallic compound Mg2Ca. J. Alloy. Comp. 2018;764:250–260. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wang Y., Ding B.H., Gao S.Y., Chen X.B., Zeng R.C., Cui L.Y., Li S.J., Li S.Q., Zou Y.H., Han E.H., Guan S.K., Liu Q.Y. In vitro corrosion of pure Mg in phosphate buffer solution-Influences of isoelectric point and molecular structure of amino acids. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019;105:110042. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liu X.M., Yang Q.Y., Li Z.Y., Yuan W., Zheng Y.F., Cui Z.D., Yang X.J., Yeung K.W.K., Wu S.L. A combined coating strategy based on atomic layer deposition for enhancement of corrosion resistance of AZ31 magnesium alloy. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018;434:1101–1111. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chang M.L., Wang L.C., Lin H.C., Chen M.J., Lin K.M. Investigation of defects in ultra-thin Al2O3 films deposited on pure copper by the atomic layer deposition technique. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015;359:533–542. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yang Q.Y., Yuan W., Liu X.M., Zheng Y.F., Cui Z.D., Yang X.J., Pan H.B., Wu S.L. Atomic layer deposited ZrO2 nanofilm on Mg-Sr alloy for enhanced corrosion resistance and biocompatibility. Acta Biomater. 2017;58:515–526. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bioactive Materials are provided here courtesy of KeAi Publishing

RESOURCES