Skip to main content
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine logoLink to American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
editorial
. 2020 Jan 15;201(2):134–136. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201910-2052ED

Coming to “Grp(s)” with Senescence in the Alveolar Epithelium

Nichelle I Winters 1, Jonathan A Kropski 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC6961746  PMID: 31794253

According to the current paradigm of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) pathogenesis, injury to and dysfunction of the lung epithelium play a major role in driving the disease process (1). Over the past two decades, studies of families with PF implicated rare mutations in genes related to surfactant biology as monogenic causes of PF (2), and subsequent work from multiple groups has indicated that at least a subset of surfactant protein mutations lead to misfolding of the proprotein, leading to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR) (35). Although surfactant protein mutations appear to be rare causes of adult PF, evidence of UPR activation in the lung epithelium is a common, if not ubiquitous, feature of IPF lungs (6, 7). Studies using several different pharmacologic UPR inducers and transgenic mouse models have demonstrated links between UPR activation, epithelial cell death by apoptosis or necroptosis (4, 5, 8, 9), and chronic inflammation (10). Conceptually, these studies suggest that high-level expression of misfolded proteins can overwhelm ER chaperone function, promoting a proinflammatory epithelial cell phenotype and premature death of the alveolar epithelium. Consistent with this hypothesis, global haploinsufficiency for the ER chaperone Grp78 (glucose-related peptide 78, also known as the immunoglobulin heavy-chain chaperone protein, Bip) appears to worsen experimental fibrosis (11). However, a clear understanding of the mechanisms linking lung epithelial UPR activation to parenchymal fibrosis has remained frustratingly elusive.

In this issue of the Journal, Borok and colleagues (pp. 198–211) provide new insights into the mechanisms through which the ER chaperone Grp78 plays a homeostatic role in the lung epithelium and protects against alveolar inflammation and fibrosis (12). Focusing specifically on the role of Grp78 in type II alveolar epithelial (AT2) cells, the authors generated novel tamoxifen-inducible, AT2-cell–specific, Grp78-deficient mouse models. By day 14 after tamoxifen administration, these mice developed patchy histologic fibrosis, increased lung collagen content, and reduced lung compliance. Consistent with the authors’ hypothesis, deletion of Grp78 in AT2 cells led to evidence of downstream UPR activation, including increased levels of Grp94 and Chop, and increased apoptosis in the lung epithelium. In most mice, by 90 days after tamoxifen treatment, there was resolution of injury and fibrosis. Lineage-tracing studies indicated that epithelial repair was mediated primarily by mobilization and proliferation of unlabeled (i.e., Grp78-competent) cells. This finding suggested a potential role of Grp78 in the regulation of AT2 progenitor potential.

The authors hypothesized that rather than being a direct effect of Grp78, this process could be mediated by UPR-driven induction of senescence. Using an elegant precision-cut lung-slice model, they demonstrated that mitigation of ER stress and apoptosis/senescence through administration of TUDCA, a pan-caspase inhibitor, and dasatinib/quercetin, respectively, led to enhanced resolution of hallmarks of fibrotic change and senescence. Although a protective role for TUDCA was previously demonstrated in mice (13), remarkably, these observations were also recapitulated in slices from human IPF lungs, suggesting that targeting these pathways may be an avenue for possible therapeutic intervention.

As the authors note, the impact of the Sftpc-CreER transgenic construct introduces complexity into interpretation of these studies. As demonstrated in the study, this construct leads to a functionally SP-C null allele, and therefore all Grp78-deficient mice were either haploinsufficient for SP-C or were SP-C null. It is difficult to ascertain how this impacts the findings. Loss or reduction of a highly expressed and processed protein may have reduced the burden on the ER quality-control systems and potentially mitigated the phenotypic severity and/or persistence to some degree. Conversely, prior work indicates that SP-C null mice have exaggerated injury responses and delayed injury repair (14). Regardless of these complexities, the net effect of simultaneously modulating levels of SP-C and Grp78 clearly alters the balance of the ER stress response in AT2 cells, leading to a profibrotic state.

Notably, it is becoming increasingly evident that the UPR pathway likely plays a significant role outside of the alveolar compartment in the context of fibrosis. For example, it was recently demonstrated that the UPR-regulated transcription factor XBP1 is critical for regulation of airway mucus secretion (15), and transgenic mice overexpressing Muc5b in the secretory cells appear to have increased fibrotic susceptibility in experimental models (16). A link between the UPR and senescence in the airway epithelium has not yet been established; however, several recent reports have described the presence of senescent basal-like cells in IPF lungs (17, 18), raising the possibility that this mechanism could play a broader role in the pathologic remodeling of the fibrotic lung epithelium.

This study has several significant implications. First, it adds to the growing body of evidence that widespread injury to AT2 cells is sufficient to trigger an acute inflammatory and fibrotic response in mice (10, 1923). One question that has remained unresolved is why only a subset of models of AT2 injury lead to significant fibrosis; for example, LPS and influenza are both capable of causing severe alveolar injury but only minimal parenchymal fibrosis. This study suggests that the induction of a senescent phenotype in surviving AT2 cells may be one of the critical mechanisms that promote parenchymal fibrosis. Second, and perhaps more importantly, this work provides tantalizing evidence that alveolar epithelial senescence actively inhibits the resolution of fibrosis in a therapeutically targetable manner. Although further studies are clearly required to better elucidate the underlying mechanism, this finding suggests that cross-talk between the senescent epithelium and local mesenchymal populations is a central driver of lung fibrosis. With a growing understanding of the pathobiology linking epithelial senescence to fibrosis, there is reason to be optimistic that future therapies targeting senescence and its paracrine consequences in the lung epithelium will be able to improve outcomes for patients with PF.

Supplementary Material

Supplements
Author disclosures

Footnotes

Supported by NIH grants T32HL094296 (N.I.W.) and R01HL145372 (J.A.K.), the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (J.A.K.), and Department of Defense grant W81XWH-19-1-0415 (J.A.K.).

Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201910-2052ED on December 3, 2019

Author disclosures are available with the text of this article at www.atsjournals.org.

References

  • 1.Pardo A, Selman M. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: new insights in its pathogenesis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2002;34:1534–1538. doi: 10.1016/s1357-2725(02)00091-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Thomas AQ, Lane K, Phillips J, III, Prince M, Markin C, Speer M, et al. Heterozygosity for a surfactant protein C gene mutation associated with usual interstitial pneumonitis and cellular nonspecific interstitial pneumonitis in one kindred. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:1322–1328. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200112-123OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mulugeta S, Nguyen V, Russo SJ, Muniswamy M, Beers MF. A surfactant protein C precursor protein BRICHOS domain mutation causes endoplasmic reticulum stress, proteasome dysfunction, and caspase 3 activation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2005;32:521–530. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2005-0009OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lawson WE, Cheng D-S, Degryse AL, Tanjore H, Polosukhin VV, Xu XC, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress enhances fibrotic remodeling in the lungs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:10562–10567. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107559108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bridges JP, Wert SE, Nogee LM, Weaver TE. Expression of a human surfactant protein C mutation associated with interstitial lung disease disrupts lung development in transgenic mice. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:52739–52746. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M309599200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lawson WE, Crossno PF, Polosukhin VV, Roldan J, Cheng D-S, Lane KB, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress in alveolar epithelial cells is prominent in IPF: association with altered surfactant protein processing and herpesvirus infection. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008;294:L1119–L1126. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00382.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Korfei M, Ruppert C, Mahavadi P, Henneke I, Markart P, Koch M, et al. Epithelial endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis in sporadic idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178:838–846. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200802-313OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Takezaki A, Tsukumo S-I, Setoguchi Y, Ledford JG, Goto H, Hosomichi K, et al. A homozygous SFTPA1 mutation drives necroptosis of type II alveolar epithelial cells in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J Exp Med. 2019;216:2724–2735. doi: 10.1084/jem.20182351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Torres-González E, Bueno M, Tanaka A, Krug LT, Cheng D-S, Polosukhin VV, et al. Role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in age-related susceptibility to lung fibrosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2012;46:748–756. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2011-0224OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Katzen J, Wagner BD, Venosa A, Kopp M, Tomer Y, Russo SJ, et al. An SFTPC BRICHOS mutant links epithelial ER stress and spontaneous lung fibrosis. JCI Insight. 2019;4:126125. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.126125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ayaub EA, Kolb PS, Mohammed-Ali Z, Tat V, Murphy J, Bellaye P-S, et al. GRP78 and CHOP modulate macrophage apoptosis and the development of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. J Pathol. 2016;239:411–425. doi: 10.1002/path.4738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Borok Z, Horie M, Flodby P, Wang H, Liu Y, Ganesh S, et al. Grp78 loss in epithelial progenitors reveals an age-linked role for endoplasmic reticulum stress in pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;201:198–211. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201902-0451OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hsu H-S, Liu C-C, Lin J-H, Hsu T-W, Hsu J-W, Su K, et al. Involvement of ER stress, PI3K/AKT activation, and lung fibroblast proliferation in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:14272. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14612-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lawson WE, Polosukhin VV, Stathopoulos GT, Zoia O, Han W, Lane KB, et al. Increased and prolonged pulmonary fibrosis in surfactant protein C-deficient mice following intratracheal bleomycin. Am J Pathol. 2005;167:1267–1277. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61214-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen G, Ribeiro CMP, Sun L, Okuda K, Kato T, Gilmore RC, et al. XBP1S regulates MUC5B in a promoter variant-dependent pathway in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis airway epithelia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200:220–234. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201810-1972OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hancock LA, Hennessy CE, Solomon GM, Dobrinskikh E, Estrella A, Hara N, et al. Muc5b overexpression causes mucociliary dysfunction and enhances lung fibrosis in mice. Nat Commun. 2018;9:5363. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07768-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Habermann AC, Gutierrez AJ, Bui LT, Yahn SL, Winters NI, Calvi CL, et al. Single-cell RNA-sequencing reveals profibrotic roles of distinct epithelial and mesenchymal lineages in pulmonary fibrosis [preprint] bioRxiv. 2019 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba1972. [accessed 2019 Oct 20]. Available from: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/753806v1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Adams TS, Schupp JC, Poli S, Ayaub EA, Neumark N, Ahangari F, et al. Single cell RNA-seq reveals ectopic and aberrant lung resident cell populations in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [preprint] bioRxiv. 2019 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba1983. [accessed 2019 Oct 20]. Available from: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/759902v3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sisson TH, Mendez M, Choi K, Subbotina N, Courey A, Cunningham A, et al. Targeted injury of type II alveolar epithelial cells induces pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:254–263. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200810-1615OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Alder JK, Barkauskas CE, Limjunyawong N, Stanley SE, Kembou F, Tuder RM, et al. Telomere dysfunction causes alveolar stem cell failure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:5099–5104. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504780112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Povedano JM, Martinez P, Flores JM, Mulero F, Blasco MA. Mice with pulmonary fibrosis driven by telomere dysfunction. Cell Reports. 2015;12:286–299. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.06.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Naikawadi RP, Disayabutr S, Mallavia B, Donne ML, Green G, La JL, et al. Telomere dysfunction in alveolar epithelial cells causes lung remodeling and fibrosis. JCI Insight. 2016;1:e86704. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.86704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nureki S-I, Tomer Y, Venosa A, Katzen J, Russo SJ, Jamil S, et al. Expression of mutant Sftpc in murine alveolar epithelia drives spontaneous lung fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2018;128:4008–4024. doi: 10.1172/JCI99287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplements
Author disclosures

Articles from American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine are provided here courtesy of American Thoracic Society

RESOURCES