Abstract
We present a 4-year-old girl with persistent anterior fontanelle and narrow sloping shoulders. The X-ray imaging revealed widely open anterior fontanelle, supernumerary teeth, and absence of clavicles. Therefore, the diagnosis was cleidocranial dysplasia, which is a rare autosomal dominant skeletal disease, caused by the mutation in the gene on 6p21 encoding transcription factor CBFA1 (runt-related transcription factor 2—RUNX2). The girl remains under close surveilance, her anterior fontanelle closed spontaneously at the age of 9 years.
Keywords: Clavicle, Skull, Fontanelle, Ossification, Cleidocranial dysplasia
INTRODUCTION
Cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) is a rare (prevalence 1:1,000,000) autosomal dominant disorder resulting in skeletal anomalies, such as patent fontanels, late closure of cranial sutures and rudimentary or absent clavicles [1–9]. The diagnosis of CCD remains incidental due to the rare occurrence of this disorder.
CASE REPORT
A 4-year-old girl of healthy parents with an uneventful family and personal history was referred by the general paediatric practitioner and a paediatric neurologist because of ‘soft skull’, a widely open anterior fontanelle with vertical and horizontal diameters of 4 and 3 cm, respectively, and short stature, to rule out hypothyroidism, rickets or other metabolic bone disorders (hypophosphatasia, osteogenesis imperfecta and pycnodysostosis). Both parents were healthy, both 180 cm tall (mother 97th percentile; father 50th percentile) and of very muscular athletic stature, with fully palpable clavicles. She was the product of first pregnancy, full term (40th gestational week), birth weight 3,670 g, birth length 50 cm, with normal psychomotor development. At the age of 4 years, her height was 98 cm (−1.8 SD; 10th percentile), weight 13 kg (−2 SD), and body mass index 13.5 (−1.2 SD). Upon presentation, she had strikingly narrow, sloping shoulders that could be opposed at the midline, muscular hypotonia, bell-shaped chest, hypoplastic distal phalanges, hypertelorism, mandibular retrognathism, low nasal bridge together with non-palpable clavicles (Figure 1). The serum levels of creatinine, sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphate, magnesium, free thyroxine, thyroid stimulating hormone, parathyroid hormone and the serum activity of alkaline phosphatase, aspartate-aminotransferase and alanin-aminotransferase were within the appropriate reference ranges. Spinal bone mineral density (L1–L4) was within normal reference range, either age- or height-related (−1.8 SD Z-score; within ± 2SD Z-score). Wrist X-ray was normal, without any rachitic changes and with appropriate bone age. The X-ray of the skull revealed widely open large fontanelle, and impacted supernumerary teeth (Figure 2). On chest X-ray, a bell-shaped thorax was apparent and the clavicles were completely absent (Figure 3A and B). Therefore, the diagnosis was CCD (MIM 119600).
Figure 1.

The girl with CCD. Note the narrow, sloping shoulders and pear shaped skull.
Figure 2.

Skull X-ray revealing widely open anterior fontanelle.
Figure 3.

(A and B) Chest X-ray: bell-shaped thorax and bilateral absence of clavicles.
Our patient was checked annually and we observed a slow spontaneous closure of the fontanelle, completed at the age of nine years and confirmed by the X-ray. Nowadays, the anterior fontanelle is not palpable and the skull X-ray revealed the fontanelle closure with a thin layer of bone tissue. Currently, the girl is 13-year-old, doing well, under close stomatologic surveillance, her hearing is not impaired, and ear infections never occurred. Her growth curve is stable, body height remained all the time between −1.4 SD and −1.7 SD; 10th percentile, respectively. Final height prediction based on calculated mid-parental height was 174 ± 5cm (75th–97th percentile). Therefore, in spite of her growth being stable without any changes exceeding two growth chart lines, her body height remains below expected age-related values. At the time, this article is being written genetic assessment is underway.
DISCUSSION
CCD (synonyms cleidocranial dysostosis, osteodental dysplasia and Marie–Sainton Disease) was first described in 1898 by Pierre and Sainton [10,11]. In 1951, Jackson reported 70 CCD individuals in a large family of 356 relatives [12]. The relevant gene, Core Binding Factor Alpha-1 (CBFA1) or Runt Related Transcription Factor 2 (RUNX2; MIM 600211), has been mapped to the short arm of chromosome 6p21 in 1993 [13]. RUNX2 is a member of the runt family of transcription factors and its expression is restricted to developing osteoblasts and a subset of chondrocytes [1–3]. In CCD patients, chromosomal translocations, deletions, insertions, nonsense and splice-site mutations, as well as missense mutations of the RUNX2 gene have all been described [2]. Approximately 70% of patients have point mutations in RUNX2 gene and <20% are due to copy number variations [6]. RUNX2 mutations result in defective intramembranous and endochondral ossification [4]. Besides patent anterior fontanelle, late closure of cranial sutures and absent or rudimentary clavicles, patients with CCD frequently present with late erupting secondary dentition, impacted and supernumerary teeth, an inverted pear-shaped calvaria, hypertelorism, general midface retrusion, high palate, mandible prognathism, brachydactyly, pubic bone abnormalities, such as wide pubic symphysis and short stature [1,3,5,7–9]. There is no clear phenotype-genotype correlation and a wide spectrum of clinical features ranging from dental abnormalities to all CCD manifestations exists in the affected children [2,3,5,6,9].
Individuals with CCD spectrum disorder are at increased risk of developing recurrent sinus and ear infections leading to conductive hearing loss [1,3,7]. There is no causal therapy in CCD; management of CCD patients consists predominantly of preventive measures, such as trauma prevention, skull protection and efficient treatment of otitis and sinusitis. Dental care is represented by orthodontic treatment, removal of the supernumerary teeth and, eventually, orthognathic preprosthetic surgery [1,3,5–7]. In case of stunted growth, growth hormone treatment was reported as beneficial [8]. Regarding our patient, both parents were tall, with palpable clavicles and without history of late closure of anterior fontanelle; therefore, CCD in their daughter was most probably the result of de novo mutation. The course and outcome in our CCD patient was quite favourable, as the anterior fontanelle has closed spontaneously at the age of nine years. Also her growth chart was stable, compared to other children with CCD where body height might drop below −2 SD at the age of 4–8 years, respectively [14].
CONCLUSION
Paediatricians should be aware of CCD as a cause of late closure or persistence of anterior fontanelle and distinguish such finding from rickets. The absence of clavicles may go unrecognised; therefore, the CCD diagnosis is often delayed.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
FUNDING
None.
ETHICAL APPROVAL
All procedures performed were fully in accordance with the current EU legislative. The authors declare that ethics approval was not required for this case report. Signed informed consent for participation and publication of medical details was also obtained from the parents of the presented child. Confidentiality was ensured at all the stages.
REFERENCES
- 1.Machol K, Mendoza-Londono R, Lee B. Cleidocranial dysplasia spectrum disorder. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Stephens K, Amemiya A, editors. GeneReviews® [Internet] Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Seattle; 2006. Jan 3, 1993–2019. [updated 2017 Nov 16] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Otto F, Kanegane H, Mundlos S. Mutations in the RUNX2 gene in patients with cleidocranial dysplasia. Hum Mutat. 2002;19:209–16. doi: 10.1002/humu.10043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Farrow E, Nicot R, Wiss A, Laborde A, Ferri J. Cleidocranial dysplasia: a review of clinical, radiological, genetic implications and a guidelines proposal. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29:382–39. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004200. https://10.1097/SCS.0000000000004200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zheng Q, Sebald E, Zhou G, Chen Y, Wilcox W, Lee B, et al. Dysregulation of chondrogenesis in human cleidocranial dysplasia. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;77:305–12. doi: 10.1086/432261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Karagüzel G, Aktürk FA, Okur E, Gümele HR, Gedik Y, Okten A. Cleidocranial dysplasia: a case report. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2010;2:134–6. doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.v2i3.134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Greene SL, Kau CH, Sittitavornwong S, Powell K, Childers NK, MacDougall M, Lamani E. Surgical management and evaluation of the craniofacial growth and morphology in cleidocranial dysplasia. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29:959–65. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Matthews-Brzozowska T, Hojan-Jezierska D, Loba W, Worona M, Matthews-Brzozowski A. Cleidocranial dysplasia-dental disorder treatment and audiology diagnosis. Open Med (Wars) 2018;13:1–8. doi: 10.1515/med-2018-0001. https://10.1515/med-2018-0001.eCollection 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Çamtosun E, Akıncı A, Demiral E, Tekedereli İ, Sığırcı A. A cleidocranial dysplasia case with a novel mutation and growth velocity gain with growth hormone treatment. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2018 doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2018.2018.0211. https://10.4274/jcrpe.0211. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dinçsoy Bir F, Dinçkan N, Güven Y, Baş F, Altunoğlu U, Kuvvetli SS, et al. Cleidocranial dysplasia: clinical, endocrinologic andmolecular findings in 15 patients from 11 families. Eur J Med Genet. 2017;60(3):163–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2016.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Marie P, Sainton P. On hereditary cleido-cranial dysostosis. Rev Neurol. 1898;6:835. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bick EM. The classic on hereditary cleido-cranial dysostosis. Clin Orthop. 1968;58:5–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jackson WPU. Osteo-dental dysplasia (cleido-cranial dysostosis). The “Arnold head”. Acta Med Scand. 1951;139:292–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nienhaus H, Mau U, Zang KD, Henn W. Pericentric inversion of chromosome 6 in a patient with cleidocranial dysplasia. Am J Med Genet. 1993;46:630–1. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320460605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jensen BL. Somatic development in cleidocranial dysplasia. Am J Med Genet. 1990;35:69–74. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320350113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
