Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology logoLink to International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology
. 2018 Aug 1;11(8):3867–3875.

Does cyclin E and p57kıp2 expression have prognostic and survival value in colorectal adenocarcinoma?

Tumay Ozgur 1, Ahmet Taner Sumbul 2, Mehmet Yaldız 3, Muhyittin Temiz 4, Abdurrahman Akdağ 5
PMCID: PMC6962821  PMID: 31949774

Abstract

Introduction: Colorectal cancer is still one of the main causes of cancer death in the world. There is a continous need for novel biomarkers for diagnose, treatment modalities and follow-up. Cyclin E and p57KIP2 as the positive and negative regulators of cell cycle seem to be an important target for investigations. Materials and methods: In a retrospective setting, primary colorectal adenocarcinoma cases examined in Mustafa Kemal University, School of Medicine, Pathology Department between 2008-2015 were reviewed. Immunohistochemical expressions of cyclin E and p57KIP2 in 80 pairs of colorectal carcinoma and adjacent normal mucosal tissues were evaluated and the findings were compared with clinicopathological parameters and survival time. Results: There were no statistically significant difference between two groups both in cyclin E and p57KIP2 stained tissues (P>0.05). There were 40 (50%) patients in high-expression group and 40 (50%) patients in low-expression group for cyclin E. p57KIP2 was negative in 55 (68.75%) patients and positive in 25 (31.75%) patients. There were no statistically significant relation between p57KIP2 and cyclin E expressions with clinicopathologic parameters defined as age, gender, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, depth of invasion, nodal involvement, emergency in operation, perforation before operation and overall survival except that there was significant relation between p57KIP2 expression and histological grade (P=0.012). Conclusions: Immunohistochemical studies of cyclin E and p57KIP2 should be performed with larger series of patients supported by more detailed technical research methods to be candidates as predictive markers for treatment modalities and prognostic factors.

Keywords: Cyclin E, p57KIP2, colorectal adenocarcinoma, immunohistochemistry

Introduction

Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death in the world, and according to World Health Organization GLOBOCAN database, incidence and mortality rates of colorectal cancer are 9.7% and 8.5%, respectively (http://globocan.iarc.fr/) [1]. The basic risk assesment and therapeutic approach is accomplished by pathologic stage and histologic subtype with the aid of different biomarkers in newly diagnosed colorectal cancer [2]. But there is a need for new biomarkers for risk assesment, early diagnose, treatment modalities and predicting response to therapy protocols with this lethal disease.

Proteins involved in the control of the cell cycle like cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and their inhibitors are among the novel therapeutic targets and are of great interest for new investigations. Among them CDK4-6 inhibitors are new agents targeting the cell cycle and have shown promising effect in breast cancer and gynecologic tumors [3,4]. The fundemantal ability of cancer cells is to sustain chronic proliferation by supporting the cell cycle independently [5].

Abnormalities in the cell cycle are a leading factor in tumor progression and there are several regulators for governing the cell cycle. Cyclins activate cyclin-dependent kinase and control the progression of cells through the cell cycle [6,7]. Cyclin E, which includes full-length (FL) cyclin E, low-molecular weight (LMW) cyclin E and total molecular cyclin E (full-length plus low-molecular weight), is one of the most important regulators of cell cycle by playing a role in G1 phase, G1-S transition and causing chromosomal instability. Abnormalities in cell cycle may lead to malignant transformation and tumor progression. Notably, cyclin E has been defined as a poor prognostic marker in various solid organ carcinomas including breast. Interestingly overexpression of cyclin E has been related with lower clinical benefit rate and progression-free survival from some recombinant monoclonal antibody therapy agents in advanced breast cancer patients [8,9]. But there are conflicting data about the role of cyclin E in colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRA) [2,10,11].

The gene encoding p57KIP2 is on chromosome 11p15. 5 [12], that often undergoes maternal allele loss of heterozygosity in neoplasia. p57KIP2 is known to be the negative regulators of cell cycle belonging to KIP family. The CIP/KIP family is composed of p21WAF1/CIP1, p27KIP1 and p57KIP2. These proteins share a conversed N-terminal domain and inhibit a broad range of CDKs by binding to several cyclin/CDK complexes, including cyclin D/CDK4 (or CDK6), cyclin E/CDK2 and cyclin A/CDK2 contribute to passage of cells through the G1, S, G2, and M phases of the cell cycle [13]. p57KIP2 also suppresses cellular transformation by binding to proliferating-cell nuclear antigen [14] inhibits the conversion of conditionally immortal cells to the fully immortal phenotype [15], overexpression of p57KIP2 induces cellular senescence, and arrests cells in G, phase completely [12], Its role in carcinogenesis and metastasis to lymph nodes of tumor remains unclear [16].

There are limited data searching the role of p57KIP2 in colorectal carcinogenesis with its interaction by another cell cycle regulator; cyclin E [16,17]. The aim of our study is to search the expression patterns of cell cycle regulators cyclin E and p57KIP2 in our CRA series and their relations with clinopathologic parameters and survival rates.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective archival study including 80 patients diagnosed with colonicadenocarcinoma in the Pathology Department of Mustafa Kemal University, School of Medicine between 2008-2015. Only patients that were diagnosed with resection specimens and had no neo-adjuvant chemotherapy were included in this study.

The ethical committee on human research at our institution approved the protocol for all human research with number 4298783/05001 date 17/01/2015. The haematoxylin eosin (HE) stained cross sections of the cases have been re-evaluated for histopathology on the basis of prognostic factors. The preparate representing the tumor in the best manner was selected.

Sections of 3-4 mm thickness were cut from the paraffin blocks of these preparations and then were de-paraffinized and rehydrated through a graded series of alcohol, microwave antigen retrieval method was used, followed by incubation with cyclin E (HE12): sc-247 (monoclonal mouse antibody, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA) and P57KIP2 (C-20): sc-1040 (poyclonal rabbit antibody, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA).

Immunohistologic staining (IHS) was applied. Cytoplasmic and nuclear staining in normal testis tissue for cyclin E and nuclear staining in fetal kidney for p57KIP2 accepted as positive controls. Immunoreactivity scored by nuclear immunostaining in tumor for cyclin E and p57KIP2 was calculated as the percentage of positive epithelial cells in relation to the total number of cells encountered in at least 5-10 representative high power fields (500-1000 neoplastic epithelial cells).

The immunoreactivity was interpreted by light microscopy. Staining was evaluated only in areas with well-preserved tissue morphology and away from necrosis or artifact. Staining was found in the nucleus, and tumor cells showed a range of intensities of staining.

Every stained nucleus was considered positive, irrespective of intensity. In agreement with previous studies [11,18], cases were regarded as negative when <2% of the tumour nuclei showed staining or no staining at all (for the detection of cyclin E and p57KIP2).

Statistical analysis

The collected data were analyzed by using the SPSS version 21.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Tumor and non-tumor tissues of colorectal cancer patients were compared by paired t-test and Spearman’s correlation test. Clinicopathologic parameters, p57KIP2, and cyclin E comparisons of tumor cases were performed with Pearson Chi-Square non-parametric test. The postoperative survival rate was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method, and differences in survival rates were assessed with log-rank test. Cox regression test was used for univariate and multivariate analysis. P values <0.05 were deemed significant.

Results

Cyclin E and p57KIP2 expression were investigated immunohistochemically in CRA patients’ cancerous and normal tissues (Figures 1, 2, 3 and 4). While the relative expression levels of cyclin E in CRA patients’ cancerous and non-cancerous tissues were found to be a mean of 14.9167 and 4.8194, p57KIP2 expression levels were 1.1667 and 1.5556, respectively. There were no statistically significant difference between two groups both in cyclin E and p57KIP2 stained tissues (P>0.05). But there was apositive correlation between cyclin E and p57KIP2 expressions in cancerous tissues (r=0.409) (Figure 5A, 5B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Strong nucleer cyclin E expression in carcinoma tissue (Cyclin E ×200).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Weak and focal expression of cyclin E in adjacent normal mucosa (Cyclin E ×200).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

P57KIP2 expression of adenocarcinoma (p57KIP2 ×200).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

P57KIP2 expression in surface epithelium of normal colonic mucosa (p57KIP2 ×200).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

A, B. Cyclin E and p57KIP2 expressions in carcinoma and normal mucosa.

To study the relationships of clinicopathological characteristics and cyclin E expression with p57KIP2 in CRA patients, patients were divided into two groups. Cyclin E expression levels were divided into high and low-expression groups according to mean value, and p57KIP2 expression was grouped as negative or positive.

There were 40 (50%) patients in high-expression group and 40 (50%) patients in the low-expression group for cyclin E. The relation between cyclin E expression level and age, gender, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, histological grade, depth of invasion, nodal involvement, emergency in operation, and perforation before operation was investigated and we did not find any statistically significant relation between these parameters and cyclin E relative expression levels. p57KIP2 was negative in 55 (68.75%) patients and positive in 25 (31.75%) patients.

There were no statistically significant correrelations between p57KIP2 expression and clinicopathologic parameters defined as age, gender, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, depth of invasion, nodal involvement, emergency in operation, and perforation before operation but there was a significant correlation between p57KIP2 expression and histological grade (P=0.012) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Association of Cyclin E and p57 expressions with clinicopathologic factors

Variable Cyclin E expression p57 expression

Low (n) High (n) p value Negative (n) Positive (n) p value
Age 61.37±14.3235 60.20±15.1322 0.722 60.58±14.6675 61.24±14.9088 0.854
Gender
    Male 20 14 0.129 13 12 0.334
    Female 20 26 33 22
Histologic type
    Well, moderate 30 24 0.152 42 12 0.012
    Poor, mucinous 10 16 13 13
Depth of invasion
    T1, T2 4 7 0.339 7 48 0.235
    T3, T4 36 33 4 21
Location
    Colon 31 24 0.091 37 18 0.672
    Rectum 9 16 18 7
Lymph node metastasis
    Absent 20 23 0.453 27 16 0.364
    Present 20 17 28 9
Lymphovascular invasion
    Absent 24 31 0.091 40 15 0.255
    Present 16 9 15 10
Perineural invasion
    Absent 29 31 0.606 44 16 0.126
    Present 11 9 119
Emergency in operation
    Absent 28 32 0.302 40 20 0.486
    Present 12 8 15 5
Perforation at initial evaluation
    Absent 36 35 0.723 50 21 0.365
    Present 4 5 5 4
Liver metastasis
    Absent 35 34 0.745 48 21 0.694
    Present 5 6 7 4

For the relationship of clinicopathological characteristics with cyclin E and p57KIP2 expression levels with patients’ survival, univariate analysis of clinicopathological factors and cyclin E and p57KIP2 was done. Of the 80 patients, 35 (43.48%) died within the follow-up period. The cumulative overall survival rate was 56.3%. There were 7 (43.8%) deaths in the low-cyclin E expression group and 28 (56.9%) in high-expression group. There were 22 (62.9%) deaths in the p57KIP2 negative expression group and 12 (37.1%) in the p57KIP2 positive expression group (Figure 6A, 6B). Survival time was associated with the depth of invasion (P=0.05, r=-0.313) in the p57KIP2 group and there was a negative correlation between p57KIP2 positive expression group and survival time (r=-0.324). No correlationswere found with other clinicopathologic characteristics both for cyclin E and p57KIP2. (Table 2).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

A, B. Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival in colorectal cancer patients according to Cyclin E and p57KIP2 expression.

Table 2.

Univariate analysis of clinicopathological factors for overall survival

Variable Number Hazard ratio 95% CI ** p value
Age
    ≤65 53 1 0.764-3.179 0.223
    >65 27 1.558
Gender
    Male 34 1 0.524-2.790 0.655
    Female 46 1.210
Histologic grade
    Well, moderate 54 1 0.403-2.025 0.804
    Poor, mucinous 26 0.903
Depth of invasion
    T1, T2 11 1 0.359-3.521 0.841
    T3, T4 69 1.124
Location
    Colon 55 1 0.445-3.266 0.714
    Rectum 25
Lymph node metastasis
    Absent 43 1 0.707-2.988 0.309
    Present 37 1.454
Lymphovascular invasion
    Absent 55 1 0.137-3.179 0.603
    Present 25 0.659
Perineural invasion
    Absent 60 1 0.988-19.884 0.052
    Present 20 4.443
Emergency in operation
    Absent 60 1 0.299-2.888 0.898
    Present 20 0.929
Perforation at initial evaluation
    Absent 71 1 0.410-7.776 0.439
    Present 9 1.786
Liver metastasis
    Absent 69 1 0.330-2.931 0.977
    Present 11 0.984
**

p<0.05.

Cyclin E and p57KIP2 expression levels, clinicopathologic characteristics, and overall survival were searched by Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, and Cox-regression test. There was no statistically significant correlation (P>0.05) between cyclin E and p57KIP2 expression, clinicopathologic characteristics, and overall survival (Table 2).

Also, the relation of cyclin E and p57KIP2 expressions with carcinomas localised left and right colon was interrogated. There was no statistically significant correlation (P>0.05).

Discussion

There is a need to find new prognostic biomarkers which may be applied in clinical practice for the identification of patients with CRA who have higher survival potential. The detection of these markers may aid in risk stratification and cyclin E with p57KIP2 may be included in the list of possible candidates.

Abnormalities in the expressions of cell cycle regulatory genes might lead to neoplastic transformation, dysregulation in positive or negative regulators by aberrant or lost expression, resulting in malignant transformation of cells.

Cyclin E, a positive regulator of the cell cycle, has a leading role in malignant transformation of cancer cells and tumorigenesis due to chromosomal instability with resulting metastasis [19-22].

There are several studies supporting overexpression of cyclin E in CRA carcinogenesis [11,23-25]. Yasui et al. defined cyclin E expression in 56% of adenocarcinomas; compared to this study we have found higher cyclin E expression rates of 80% in our series [24]. There are some studies demonstrating high expression levels of cyclin E in their CRA patient groups. Some studies indicate that higher levels of cyclin E expression might be related to gene amplification, chromosomal instability, and play a role in colorectal carcinogenesis [26,27]. We also have low and high cyclin E expressing CRA groups which might also show the role of these carcinogenesis pathways in our patients.

Bioabnormalities in the mucosa adjacent to tumor are shown in a few reports that included mucosa adjacent to tumor in their studies [22,25,28]. Sutter et al. showed overexpression of cyclin E with corresponding normal mucosal samples in their 20 patient series by immunohistochemistry. They defined scattered staining of the nuclei by cyclin E with lower averages compared to tumor tissue [25].

On the other hand Qi et al. explored cyclin E1 expression in 50 rectal cancer and 16 pericarcinoma tissues and found higher protein expression levels in carcinoma compared to pericarcinoma tissues suggesting a synergistic effect of cyclin E in development and progression of rectal cancer [29].

We have also included normal mucosal samples of the same cancer patients and found expression in both of the groups; there was difference in expression levels in tumor and normal mucosal samples but it was not statistically significant. Therefore it is possible to show that there are different alterations in macroscopically normal mucosa of CRA patients. There are conflicting results about cyclin E expression and its correlation with clinicopathological parameters including prognosis. The clinicopathologic characteristics of our patients correlated with low and high expression groups of cyclin E; unfortunately there was not any statistically significant difference. There are also studies that were not successful in showing a correlation [11,25,30]. Iochim et al. also detected cyclin E overexpression in 18 of 60 cases but expression did not correlate with conventional clinicopathological features [11].

However, in a study conducted by Li et al., a decrease in cyclin E was associated with some of the parameters like tumor size, mucinous type, venous invasion, and poor prognosis [17]. Moreover, Perea et al. also proved that lack of cyclin E expression might be an indicator of poor prognosis and a marker of advanced stage disease [31]. But it should be cautioned that number in their study group [28] was less than ours (80) which could explain the differences in results among various studies. p57KIP2 has an important role in neoplastic transformation of various human cancers but its expression has been shown limited in numbers of studies in CRA [16,32-34]. Li et al. investigated 189 primary CRA and 22 normal mucosa specimens for p57KIP2 immunohistochemically and found a significant decrease in primary carcinomas. Beside this, Noura et al. examined the expression of p57KIP2 in 110 pairs of colorectal non-tumor and cancer tissues. Their immunohistochemical analysis showed weak expression in normal mucosa compared to cancer tissues [16,17]. We have also studied cancer and adjacent normal mucosa to compare expression paterns and show the development of neoplasia. We determined p57KIP2 in both of the sample groups but unfortunately could not determine a significant difference in expression levels or patern. The limitation of our study was the smaller sample size and a different clone of the immunohistochemical reagent. Some reports have also investigated the relationship of p57KIP2 with clinicopathologic parameters and survival time. Li et al. could not show a correlation of p57KIP2 with clinicopathologic indices but the patients having loss of this protein tended to show poorer prognosis. Noura et al. found correlation of p57KIP2 and large tumor size or female gender. They stated that p57KIP2 did not influence the prognosis [16,17]. We have also searched with the same analysis and determined the relation of p57KIP2 with histopathologic differentiation. Interestingly, positive p57KIP2 expression was related with poorer survival time.

One of the main goals of our study was to explore the interaction of these two proteins (cyclin E and p57KIP2) in the same CRA cases due to their roles in the cell cycle. The positive correlation between cyclin E and p57KIP2 expressions in cancerous tissues (r=0.409) proved the imbalance of positive and negative regulators in the neoplastic process.

To date, studies are investigating right and left colon cancers that are suggested to be oncologically different [35,36]. We also evaluated cyclin E and p57KIP2 expression, grouping our cases according to their localisation as left and right side,searching the role of cancer pathways. There was no statistically significant correlation.

Some aspects of our study did not support our hypothesis. The immunohistochemical methods might be affected by many factors: laboratory conditions, antibody clone, and most importantly number of patients in a single center.

In conclusion; immunohistochemical studies of cyclin E and p57KIP2 might have additional roles in colorectal carcinogenesis but before accepting as potential prognostic and predictive biomarkers for CRA, we need larger series of patients supported by more detailed technical research methods.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Tacettin İnandı from the Department of Public Health for his help in statistical analysis. This study was financially supported by Mustafa Kemal University Scientific Research Committee (Grant No: 13401).

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Sumbul AT, Gogebakan B, Ergun S, Batmaci CY, Tonyali O, Yaldiz M. miR-204-5p expression in colorectal cancer: an autophagy-associated gene. Tumor Biol. 2014;35:12713–719. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2596-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhou YJ, Xie YT, Gu J, Yan L, Guan GX, Liu X. Overexpression of cyclin E isoforms correlates with poor prognosis in rectal cancer. EJSO. 2011;37:1078–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.08.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Corona SP, Ravelli A, Cretella D, Cappelletti MR, Zanotti L, Dester M, Gobbi A, Petronini PG, Generali D. CDK4/6 inhibitors in HER2-positive breast cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017;112:208–14. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kim YT, Zhao M. Aberrant cell cycle regulation in cervical carcinoma. Yonsei Med J. 2005;46:597–613. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2005.46.5.597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Siu KT, Rosner MR, Minella AC. An integrated view of cyclin E function and regulation. Cell Cycle. 2012;11:57–64. doi: 10.4161/cc.11.1.18775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Koff A, Cross F, Fisher A, Schumacher J, Leguellec K, Philippe M, Roberts JM. Human cyclin E, a new cyclin that interacts with two members of the CDC2 gene family. Cell. 1991;66:1217–28. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90044-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Scaltriti M, Eichhorn PJ, Cortes J, Prudkin L, Aura C, Jiménez J, Chandarlapaty S, Serra V, Prat A, Ibrahim YH, Guzmán M, Gili M, Rodríguez O, Rodríguez S, Pérez J, Green SR, Mai S, Rosen N, Hudis C, Baselga J. Cyclin E amplification/overexpression is a mechanism of trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ breast cancer patients. PNAS. 2011;108:3761–66. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014835108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Keyomarsi K, Tucker SL, Buchholz TA, Callister M, Ding Y, Hortobagyi GN, Bedrosian I, Knickerbocker C, Toyofuku W, Lowe M, Herliczek TW, Bacus SS. Cyclin E and survival in patients with breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1566–75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Grabowski P, Schrader J, Wagner J, Hörsch D, Arnold R, Arnold CN, Georgieva I, Stein H, Zeitz M, Daniel PT, Sturm I. Loss of nuclear p27 expression and its prognostic role in relation to cyclin E and p53 mutation in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:7378–84. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Iochim E. Expression patterns of cyclins D1, E and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p21-waf1/cip1, p27kip1 in colorectal carcinoma: correlation with other cell cycle regulators(pRb, p53 and Ki-67 and PCNA) and clinicopathological features. Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62:1736–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01105.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lee MH, Reynisdottir I, Massague J. Cloning of p57KIP2, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor with unique domain structure and tissue distribution. Genes Dev. 1995;9:639–49. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.6.639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Diebold J, Dopfer K, Lai M, Lohrs U. Comparison of different monoclonal antibodies for the immunohistochemical assessment of cell proliferation in routine colorectal biopsy specimens. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1994;29:47–53. doi: 10.3109/00365529409090436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Watanabe H, Pan ZQ, Schreiber-Agus N, De-Pinho RA, Hurwitz J, Xiong Y. Suppression of cell transformation by the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor p57KIP2 requires binding to proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sei U S A. 1998;95:1392–97. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nijjar T, Wigington D, Garbe JC, Waha A, Stampfer MR, Yaswen P. p57Kip2 expression and loss of heterozygosity during immortal conversion of cultured human mammary epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 1999;59:5112–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Noura S, Yamamoto H, Sekimoto M, Takemasa I, Miyake Y, Ikenaga M, Matsuura N, Monden M. Expression of second class of KIP protein p57KIP2 in human colorectal carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 2001;19:39–47. doi: 10.3892/ijo.19.1.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Li JQ, Wu F, Usuki H, Kubo A, Masaki T, Fujita J, Bandoh S, Saoo K, Takeuchi H, Kuriyama S, Ishida T, Imaida K. Loss of p57KIP2 is associated with colorectal carcinogenesis. Int J Oncol. 2003;23:1537–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rath-Wolfson L, Bergman M, Ori Y, Goldman A, Ram E, Koren R, Salman H. Expression of cyclin E in stage III colorectal carcinoma. Oncol Lett. 2013;5:145–48. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lim YJ, Kim YH, Ahn GH, Chun HK, Jang WY, Lee JH, Son HJ, Rhee PL, Kim JJ, Paik SW, Yoo BC, Rhee JC. Cyclin E, p27 and mutant p53 do not predict the prognosis in AJCC stage II colorectal carcinomas. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2004;44:314–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bagheri-Yarmand R, Biernacka A, Hunt KK, Keyomarsi K. Low molecular weight cyclin E overexpression shortens mitosis, leading to chromosome missagregation and centrosome amplification. Cancer Res. 2010;70:5074–84. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rajagopalan H, Jallepalli PV, Rago C, Velculescu VE, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Lengauer C. Inactivation of hCDC4 can cause chromosomal instability. Nature. 2004;428:77–81. doi: 10.1038/nature02313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li JQ, Miki H, Ohmori M, Wu F, Funamoto Y. Expression of cyclin E and cyclindependent kinase 2 correlates with metastasis and prognosis in colorectal carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2001;32:945–53. doi: 10.1053/hupa.2001.27116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Corin I, Larsson L, Bergström J, Gustavsson B, Derwinger K. A study of the expression of Cyclin E and its isoforms in tumor and adjacent mucosa, correlated to patient outcome in early colon cancer. Acta Oncol. 2010;49:63–69. doi: 10.3109/02841860903268049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yasui W, Kuniyasu H, Yokozaki H, Semba S, Shimamoto F, Tahara E. Expression of cyclin E in colorectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas: correlation with expression of Ki-67 antigen and p53 protein. Virchows Arch. 1996;429:13–19. doi: 10.1007/BF00196815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sutter T, Dansranjavin T, Lubinski J, Debniak T, Giannakudis J, Hoang-Vu C, Dralle H. Overexpression of cyclin E protein is closely related to the mutator phenotype of colorectal carcinoma. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2002;17:374–80. doi: 10.1007/s00384-002-0390-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kitahara K, Yasui W, Kuniyasu H, Yokozaki H, Akama Y, Yunotani S, Hisatsugu T, Tahara E. Concurrent amplification of cyclin E and CDK2 genes in colorectal carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 1995;62:25–28. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910620107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Donnellan R, Chetty R. Cyclin E in human cancers. FASEB J. 1999;13:773–80. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.13.8.773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chen LC, Hao CY, Chiu YS, Wong P, Melnick JS, Brotman M, Moretto J, Mendes F, Smith AP, Bennington JL, Moore D, Lee NM. Alteration of gene expression in normal-appearing colon mucosa of APC(min) mice and human cancer patients. Cancer Res. 2004;64:3694–700. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Qi F, Yuan Y, Zhi X, Huang Q, Chen Y, Zhuang W, Zhang D, Teng B, Kong X, Zhang Y. Synergistic effects of AKAP95, Cyclin D1, Cyclin E1, and Cx43 in the development of rectal cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8:1666–73. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhou YJ, Wan FL, Yao LH, Feng LY. Prognostic value of cyclin E and its relation to blood vessel invasion in rectal cancer. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008;11:167–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Perea H, Alvaro E, Rodriguez Y, Gravalos C, Sanchez-Tome E, Rivera B, Colina F, Carbonell P, González-Sarmiento R, Hidalgo M, Urioste M. Approach to early onset colorectal cancer: Clinicopathological, familial, molecular and immunohistochemical charecteristics. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:3697–703. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i29.3697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Okamoto A, Hussain SP, Hagiwara K, Spillare EA, Rusin MR, Demetrick DJ, Serrano M, Hannon GJ, Shiseki M, Zariwala M, et al. Mutations in the p16INK4/MTS1/CDKN2, p15INK4B/MTS2, and p18 genes in primary and metastatic lung cancer. Cancer Res. 1995;55:1448–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bozdogan O, Atasoy P, Batislam E, Basar MM, Basar H. Significance ofp57(Kip2) down-regulation in oncogenesis of bladder carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study. Tumori. 2008;94:556–62. doi: 10.1177/030089160809400418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Holm R, Forsund M, Nguyen MT, Nesland JM, Trope CG. Expression of p15INK4b and relationship with clinicopathological features and prognosis in patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 2013;8:e61273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lee MS, Menter DG, Kopetz S. Right versus left colon cancer biology: integrating the consensus molecular subtypes. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15:411–19. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Li P, Xiao Z, Braciak TA, Ou Q, Chen G, Oduncu FS. A relationship to survival is seen by combining the factors of mismatch repair status, tumor location and age of onset in colorectal cancer patients. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0172799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES