Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson. 2019 Dec 20;311:106672. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2019.106672

Succinyl-DOTOPA: An effective triradical dopant for low-temperature dynamic nuclear polarization with high solubility in aqueous solvent mixtures at neutral pH

Wai-Ming Yau 1, Jaekyun Jeon 1, Robert Tycko 1,*
PMCID: PMC6964257  NIHMSID: NIHMS1548055  PMID: 31887554

Abstract

We report the synthesis of the nitroxide-based triradical compound succinyl-DOTOPA and the characterization of its performance as a dopant for dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) experiments in frozen solutions at low temperatures. Compared with previously described DOTOPA derivatives, succinyl-DOTOPA has substantially greater solubility in glycerol/water mixtures with pH > 4 and therefore has wider applicability. Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (ssNMR) measurements at 9.39 T and 25 K, with magic-angle spinning at 7.00 kHz, show that build-up times of DNP-enhanced, cross-polarized 13C ssNMR signals are shorter and that signal amplitudes are larger for glycerol/water solutions of L-proline containing succinyl-DOTOPA than for solutions containing the biradical AMUPol, with electron spin concentrations of 15 mM or 30 mM, resulting in greater net sensitivity gains from DNP. In similar measurements at 90 K, AMUPol yields greater net sensitivity, apparently due to its longer electron spin-lattice and spin-spin relaxation times. One- and two-dimensional 13C ssNMR measurements at 25 K on the complex of the 27-residue peptide M13 with the calcium-sensing protein calmodulin, in glycerol/water with 10 mM succinyl-DOTOPA, demonstrate the utility of this compound in DNP-enhanced ssNMR studies of biomolecular systems.

Keywords: solid state NMR, dynamic nuclear polarization, low-temperature magic-angle spinning

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1548055-f0008.jpg

Introduction

The introduction of nitroxide-based biradicals as dopants for dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) experiments on frozen solutions in 2004 [1, 2] was a major contributing factor for the growth of DNP-related activity in the solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (ssNMR) community. A variety of biradical dopants have been developed subsequently with improved performance under various experimental conditions [317]. In 2010, we reported that the nitroxide-based triradical compound DOTOPA has favorable properties for low-temperature DNP, under certain conditions producing larger DNP-enhanced signals and more rapid build-up of nuclear spin polarizations under microwave irradiation [18]. We subsequently described a series of DOTOPA derivatives that have greater solubility at neutral or basic pH in water/glycerol mixtures than does the original DOTOPA compound [19]. Favorable properties of DOTOPA have also been reported by others [20].

Although we have used DOTOPA and DOTOPA derivatives in several published studies [2126], their solubility is still a limitation, leading to sample-to-sample variations in DNP-enhanced signals and build-up times. Our previously described DOTOPA derivatives are also not useful in experiments where low glycerol-to-water ratios are required, such as studies of transient intermediates that are prepared by rapid mixing and freeze-trapping [27].

In this paper, we report the synthesis and DNP properties of a new derivative, succinyl-DOTOPA, which is highly soluble at neutral and basic pH. In experiments on frozen glycerol/water solutions of 13C-enriched L-proline at 9.4 T, 25 K, and magic-angle spinning (MAS) frequencies up to 7 kHz, we show that succinyl-DOTOPA produces greater DNP-enhanced, cross-polarized 13C NMR sensitivity than does the commercially available biradical AMUPol [6] at equivalent electron spin concentrations. At 90 K, greater sensitivity is obtained with AMUPol, apparently because the 1.5 W microwave power available to us in these experiments is not sufficient to saturate electron spin transitions in succinyl-DOTOPA. Measurements of temperature-dependent electron spin relaxation times T1e and T2e provide insight into the DNP properties of these compounds.

Materials and methods

Synthesis of 4-{N,N-di-[2-(succinate, sodium-trimethylamine salt)-3-(TEMPO-4’-oxy)-propyl]}-amino TEMPO (succinyl-DOTOPA)

Succinyl-DOTOPA was prepared by reacting DOTOPA with succinic anhydride (Fig. 1). Succinic anhydride and sodium bicarbonate were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich, and Mallinckrodt, respectively. DOTOPA was synthesized as described previously [18]. All solvents were reagent grade and used without further purification. Silica column chromatography was performed on silica gel (130–270 mesh, 60 Å pore size, Sigma-Aldrich). Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) data were recorded on a Thermo Scientific UltiMate 3000 LC-MS system, equipped with a MSQ Plus single quadrupole mass spectrometer with electrospray ionization.

Fig. 1:

Fig. 1:

Synthesis of succinyl-DOTOPA (iii) by reaction of DOTOPA (i) with succinic anhydride (ii).

Succinic anhydride (1.0 g, 10 mmol) was mixed with sodium bicarbonate (1.0 g, 12 mmol) and DOTOPA (314 mg, 0.5 mmol) in 7.5 ml ethyl acetate as described by Lugemwa et al. [28]. The mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. After filtration, the residue was washed with ethyl acetate (5.0 ml) three times and dried under nitrogen gas. After loading the filtrate on the silica gel column using CH2Cl2 with 0.5% triethylamine, 1–3% methanol with 0.5% triethylamine was applied to elute the final product. After removing the organic solvents and drying under vacuum overnight, we obtained a 90% yield of red oily product. LC-MS data (Figs. S1a and S1b) indicated a mass of 828.10 Da (C41H71N4O133*, theoretical average mass = 828.02 Da).

The solubility of succinyl-DOTOPA in glycerol/water (40:60 volume ratio) as a function of pH at 24° C was determined by preparing a solution with [succinyl-DOTOPA] = 48 mM at pH 9.5, then reducing the pH in steps of 0.5 units by addition of HCl. After each step, insoluble material was removed by centrifugation and the concentration was determined by optical absorbance at 430 nm, using an extinction coefficient for nitroxide groups equal to 11 cm−1 M−1. Results in Fig. S1c indicate a solubility above 15 mM at pH < 4.0.

Sample preparations

13C5,15N-L-proline was dissolved at a concentration of 100 mM in 2H2O:12C3,2H8-glycerol:1H2O (50:40:10 ratio of initial volumes) with 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.5. 12C3,2H8-glycerol was purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc. Stock solutions of 75 mM succinyl-DOTOPA and 754 mM AMUPol (based on absorbance at 430 nm, with an extinction coefficient for nitroxide groups of 11 cm−1 M−1) were prepared in 2H2O with 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 8, and were included in the glycerol/water mixtures to achieve the desired dopant concentrations. An additional sample of 13C5,15N-L-proline in the same solvent mixture was prepared with 5 mM DyCl3 and 5 mM disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (5 mM Dy-EDTA).

For measurements on the calmodulin/M13 complex, 20 μl of a 11 mM solution of unlabeled calmodulin in 2H2O and 9.2 μl of a 12 mM solution of selectively 15N,13C-labeled M13 in 2H2O were combined with 3.5 μl of 326 mM CaCl2 in 2H2O, 7.5 μl of 200 mM Tris buffer in 1H2O (pH 8.0), 5.0 μl of 75 mM succinyl-DOTOPA in 2H2O, and 30 μl of 12C3,2H8-glycerol. M13 was synthesized on the 0.1 mmol scale by automated solid-phase methods (Protein Technologies Tribute synthesizer) using standard fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl (Fmoc) chemistry and a Fmoc-Met-Wang resin (0.53 mEq/g, Peptides International, Inc.), and was purified by high-performance liquid chromatography, using a water/acetonitrile gradient with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid and a preparative C18 reverse-phase column. Bovine calmodulin was obtained as a lyophilized powder from Ocean Biologics.

ssNMR measurements

DNP-enhanced ssNMR measurements were performed at 9.4 T (400.9 MHz and 100.8 MHz for 1H and 13C NMR frequencies, respectively), with a Bruker Avance III spectrometer console and the home-built DNP-MAS ssNMR probe described previously [25, 29], which uses zirconia rotors (O’Keefe Ceramics, Inc.) with 4.0 mm outer diameters and maximum sample volumes of 80 μl. Rotor caps and drive tips were obtained from Revolution NMR, LLC. An extended interaction oscillator (Communications and Power Industries, LLC) and quasi-optical interferometer (Thomas Keating Ltd.) provided circularly polarized microwaves at 263.9 GHz with 1.5 W power [25].

Sample solutions in MAS rotors were frozen by immersion in liquid nitrogen, then loaded into the pre-cooled DNP-MAS ssNMR probe below the NMR magnet. The probe was then raised into the magnet, with the transfer line (carrying helium or nitrogen) attached and with the sample spinning (and remaining frozen) throughout this process.

One-dimensional (1D) 13C ssNMR spectra were obtained with 1H-13C cross-polarization (CP), using a 13C radio-frequency (RF) field strength of 29 kHz and 1H RF field strengths of 43 kHz, 37 kHz, and 33 kHz at νMAS values of 7.00, 4.00 and 2.00 kHz, respectively. Two-pulse phase modulated (TPPM) 1H decoupling [30] was applied during 13C signal acquisition, with an 80 kHz decoupling field. 1H polarization build-up times TDNP (or spin-lattice relaxation times T1 for the Dy3+-doped sample described below) were measured with the saturation-recovery method, using a train of 16 π/2 pulses with 10 ms delays to saturate the initial nuclear spin polarizations of both 1H and 13C. In all other measurements, recycle delays were then set to 1.26TDNP (or 1.26T1). DNP signal enhancement factors ε for 13C are ratios of signal areas with and without microwave irradiation, from spectra obtained with 1H-13C CP. Signal areas were obtained by integrating the full13C spectra, including MAS sidebands.

Sample cooling and temperature control

For measurements at a nominal sample temperature of 25 K, samples were cooled with helium as previously described [25, 29, 31]. The liquid helium tank gauge pressure (2.5 psi) and helium transfer line needle valve opening were adjusted to produce a temperature of 25 ± 2 K for a sample of KBr powder at MAS frequency νMAS = 7.00 kHz, as determined from the temperature-dependent 79Br spin-lattice relaxation rate [32]. Sample temperatures were not significantly different at νMAS = 2.0 kHz or 4.0 kHz. The same conditions, which correspond to a liquid helium consumption rate of approximately 2.0 liters per hour, were then used for DNP measurements on frozen proline solutions.

For measurements at a nominal sample temperature of 90 K, a liquid helium tank (Cryofab model CMSH-10) was filled with liquid nitrogen instead of liquid helium. The same transfer line was used (Janis Research model FHT-ST) and no other modifications were required for liquid nitrogen cooling. At 90 K and νMAS = 7.0 kHz, liquid nitrogen consumption was 0.5 liters per hour.

During measurements at 90 K, sample temperatures were determined from the temperature-dependent peak wavelength of photoluminescence (PL) from a thin film of CdSeS/ZnS core/shell quantum dots (QDs), which was painted on the outer surface of the MAS rotor as previously described [33]. QDs were purchased from Ocean NanoTech (product number QSP-665) and co-dissolved with varnish (Lake Shore Cryotronics, VGE-7031) in toluene, with approximately 5 μl of varnish and 0.15 mg of QDs in 100 μl toluene. The QD solution was applied to the MAS rotor surface and dried in air to create the desired film. PL spectra were excited by a battery-powered laser operating at 405 nm with 200 mW power and detected with a fiber optic spectrometer (StellarNet, Inc., model CXR-100). To carry the excitation and PL emission light, two multimode optical fibers (400 μm diameter, 0.39 numerical aperture, Thorlabs part number FT400UMT) were inserted into the MAS module of our DNP-MAS ssNMR probe through holes in the Teflon fitting that connects the transfer line to the MAS model (see Fig. 1 of ref. [25]). In this way, the ends of the two optical fibers were positioned between turns of the solenoidal radio-frequency (RF) sample coil, approximately 2 mm from the MAS rotor surface.

Fig. S2 shows the temperature dependence of the PL peak wavelength, calibrated against sample temperatures that were determined simultaneously from 79Br spin-lattice relaxation rates of a spinning KBr powder sample, cooled with liquid helium. Although the QDs used in these measurements have longer PL wavelengths than the QDs used in the original demonstration of this method for determining sample temperatures under MAS [33], the sensitivity to temperature is approximately the same (i.e., 13 nm change in PL peak from 50 K to 250 K). Based on the PL spectrum, which was monitored continuously during DNP measurements, sample temperatures were maintained at 90 ± 2 K.

EPR measurements

For temperature-dependent electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements, dopants were dissolved in 2H8-glycerol/2H2O (40:60 ratio of initial volumes) at 0.1 mM concentrations. Electron spin-lattice (T1e) and spin-spin (T2e) relaxation times were measured from 20 K to 90 K in 10 K increments with the magnetic field at 1.1956 T, using a Bruker Elexsys EPR spectrometer. T1e measurements used an echo-detected inversion-recovery pulse sequence (π − trec − π/2 − δt − π − δt, with δt = 0.6 μs and incremented trec). T2e measurements used a standard spin echo sequence (π/2 − techo/2 − π − techo/2 with incremented techo).

Results

Fig. 2 shows 1D 13C and 1H ssNMR spectra of a frozen 13C5,15N-L-proline solution containing 10 mM succinyl-DOTOPA at 25 K with νMAS= 2.00, 4.00, and 7.00 kHz. Spectra are shown with and without microwave irradiation. For comparison, spectra of a solution containing 15 mM AMUPol, so that the total electron spin concentration ce,tot is also 30 mM, are shown in Fig. S3. Spectra of these samples at 90 K are shown in Figs. S4 and S5. Spectra of frozen 13C5,15N-L-proline solutions with ce,tot = 15 mM and ce,tot = 45 mM (5 mM and 15 mM succinyl-DOTOPA, 7.5 mM and 22.5 mM AMUPol) were also obtained (data not shown).

Fig. 2:

Fig. 2:

13C (left) and 1H (right) ssNMR spectra of a frozen glycerol/water solution of 15N,13C-L-proline containing 10 mM succinyl-DOTOPA at 25 K, with MAS frequencies of 7.00 kHz (a), 4.00 kHz (b), and 2.00 kHz (c). The magnetic field strength was 9.39 T. Blue spectra were obtained with microwave irradiation and with two scans, using 1.5 W of circularly polarized microwaves at 263.9 GHz. Red spectra were obtained without microwave irradiation and with 32 scans.

Fig. 3 shows the DNP build-up times TDNP for all six samples at the two temperatures and three values of νMAS, obtained from saturation-recovery measurements with 1H-13C CP and 13C signal detection. The saturation-recovery data and single-exponential fits are shown in Figs. S6 and S7. Values of TDNP are roughly inversely proportional to dopant concentration, consistent with the simplistic idea that (on the average) each dopant molecule polarizes a volume around itself that is inversely proportional to the dopant concentration. For the same value of ce,tot, TDNP is smaller when succinyl-DOTOPA is used, consistent with the idea that the fraction of dopant molecules that participate in the cross-effect DNP mechanism is larger for the triradical succinyl-DOTOPA than for the biradical AMUPol. Values of TDNP at 25 K and 90 K are nearly equal and do not depend strongly on νMAS, especially for samples that contain succinyl-DOTOPA.

Fig. 3:

Fig. 3:

Dependence of the build-up time for cross-polarized 13C ssNMR signals under microwave irradiation (TDNP) on MAS frequency and dopant concentration at 25 K and 90 K, for frozen glycerol/water solutions of 15N,13C-L-proline containing either succinyl-DOTOPA (left) or AMUPol (right). Values of TDNP were determined from single-exponential fits to build-up curves in Figs. S6 and S7.

The DNP-enhanced 13C ssNMR sensitivity is proportional to the absolute 13C signal area with microwave irradiation and inversely proportional to TDNP0.5. Signal areas divided by TDNP0.5 are plotted as functions of ce,tot in Fig. 4, for the three values of νMAS, two temperatures, and two dopants. Under our experimental conditions, succinyl-DOTOPA produces significantly greater cross-polarized 13C ssNMR sensitivity at 25 K, with ce,tot = 15 mM or ce,tot = 30 mM. At 90 K, AMUPol produces greater or equal sensitivity. In addition, for samples containing succinyl-DOTOPA, sensitivities at 25 K are greater than at 90 K by factors of 9–12 at νMAS= 7.00 kHz, factors of 9–18 at νMAS = 4.00 kHz, and factors of 14–26 at νMAS = 2.00 kHz. For samples containing AMUPol, sensitivities at 25 K are greater than at 90 K by factors of 3–6 at νMAS = 7.00 kHz, factors of 3–11 at νMAS = 4.00 kHz, and factors of 9–10 at νMAS = 2.00 kHz. Leavesley et al. have also reported that dopants with multiple unpaired electrons yield smaller TDNP values and greater overall sensitivity in DNP experiments at 4 K without MAS [20].

Fig. 4:

Fig. 4:

Dependence of the net DNP-enhanced, cross-polarized 13C sensitivity (13C signal area in arbitrary units with microwave irradiation divided by TDNP0.5) on electron spin concentration and temperature for frozen glycerol/water solutions of 15N,13C-L-proline containing either succinyl-DOTOPA (blue or green symbols at 25 K or 90 K, respectively) or AMUPol (red or yellow symbols at 25 K or 90 K, respectively). Data are shown for MAS frequencies of 7.00 kHz (left), 4.00 kHz (middle), and 2.00 kHz (right).

Data in Fig. 4 show that the differences in 13C ssNMR sensitivity at 25 K between samples containing succinyl-DOTOPA or AMUPol become smaller at higher electron spin concentrations. At an electron spin concentration of 45 mM, the average volume per electron spin is 36.8 nm3 = (3.33 nm)3. Given that the diameter of a succinyl-DOTOPA molecule is roughly 1.5 nm, one expects the distinction between triradical and biradical dopants to become less pronounced at such high concentrations.

These measurements of sensitivity do not include the temperature dependence of noise in the spectra. In practice, noise in our measurements does not change significantly between 90 K and 25 K because only the sample coil is cooled by the cryogens, whereas other components of the probe circuit remain near 180 K.

Tables 1 and 2 contain the complete results for 1H and 13C signals, DNP enhancement factors ε (ratio of signal areas with and without microwave irradiation), TDNP values, and 13C sensitivities for samples containing succinyl-DOTOPA or AMUPol. For comparison, results are also given for a frozen glycerol/water solution of 13C5,15N-L-proline containing 5 mM Dy-EDTA, which reduces the 1H T1 value but does not produce DNP [31]. Compared with this Dy3+-doped sample, samples with 5 mM or 10 mM succinyl-DOTOPA exhibit roughly 30-fold greater cross-polarized 13C sensitivity with microwave irradiation at 25 K and νMAS = 7.00 kHz.

Table 1:

Summary of measurements of 13C and 1H signal amplitudes, DNP enhancement factors s, and build-up times TDNP at 25 K. Although signal amplitudes are in arbitrary units, all 13C signal amplitudes in Tables 1 and 2 are on the same scale and can be directly compared with one another. All 1H signal amplitudes are also on the same scale and can be directly compared with one another. The 13C sensitivity is defined as the 13C signal amplitude with microwaves on divided by the square root of TDNP For the sample doped with Dy-EDTA, build-up times are spin-lattice relaxation times T1, independent of microwave irradiation. 13C TDNP values are build-up times with 1H-13C cross-polarization.

sample MAS frequency (kHz) 13C signal, μwaves on, 2 scans 13C signal, μwaves off, 32 scans 13C ε 13C TDNP (or T1) 1H signal, μwaves on, 2 scans 1H signal, μwaves off, 32 scans 1H ε 1H TDNP (or T1) relative 13C sensitivity
5 mM succinyl-DOTOPA 2.0 611 158 61.9 5.40 ± 0.49 138 83 26.7 4.56 ± 0.01 263
4.0 526 106 79.0 5.37 ± 0.11 118 52 36.6 4.92 ± 0.01 227
7.0 401 78 82.8 5.46 ± 0.07 139 41 54.9 5.54 ± 0.01 172
10 mM succinyl-DOTOPA 2.0 555 86 102.9 2.90 ± 0.15 129 50 41.7 2.26 ± 0.02 326
4.0 381 72 84.1 2.62 ± 0.06 111 28 64.3 2.78 ± 0.01 235
7.0 260 45 92.1 2.58 ± 0.14 100 23 68.3 3.19 ± 0.01 161
15 mM succinyl-DOTOPA 2.0 393 62 100.8 1.34 ± 0.08 117 24 78.7 0.72 ± 0.01 339
4.0 307 53 92.3 2.08 ± 0.02 98 21 73.0 1.16 ± 0.02 213
7.0 173 32 85.3 1.99 ± 0.03 89 17 86.5 1.51 ± 0.01 123
7.5 mM AMUPol 2.0 479 154 49.7 7.35 ± 0.19 114 59 31.1 5.38 ± 0.01 177
4.0 419 103 65.2 9.17 ± 0.17 103 52 31.4 6.34 ± 0.01 138
7.0 244 30 128.5 10.32 ± 0.26 89 25 57.7 8.83 ± 0.01 76
15 mM AMUPol 2.0 418 132 50.7 3.32 ± 0.08 116 57 32.9 3.08 ± 0.01 229
4.0 447 99 71.9 3.78 ± 0.09 104 49 33.7 3.36 ± 0.01 230
7.0 244 30 128.5 4.63 ± 0.03 96 26 59.3 3.83 ± 0.01 114
22.5 mM AMUPol 2.0 570 80 114.1 3.00 ± 0.23 257 54 76.5 2.93 ± 0.01 329
4.0 364 67 87.2 3.12 ± 0.07 105 33 50.9 3.25 ± 0.02 206
7.0 222 38 98.8 3.00 ± 0.14 97 20 76.4 3.32 ± 0.01 128
5 mM Dy-EDTA 2.0 167 4.17 ± 0.02 96 5.08 ± 0.01 5.1
4.0 153 3.00 ± 0.03 95 4.85 ± 0.01 5.5
7.0 164 3.31 ± 0.01 74 4.11 ± 0.01 5.6

Table 2:

Same as Table 1, but for measurements at 90 K. 13C TDNP values are build-up times with 1H-13C cross-polarization.

sample MAS frequency (kHz) 13C signal, μwaves on, 2 scans 13C signal, μwaves off, 32 scans 13C ε 13CTDNP (or T1) 1H signal, μwaves on, 2 scans 1H signal, μwaves off, 32 scans 1H ε 1H TDNP (or T1) Relative 13C sensitivity
5 mM succinyl-DOTOPA 2.0 44 26 26.9 5.49 ± 0.60 16 20 13.5 4.85 ± 0.01 19
4.0 56 31 29.1 5.34 ± 0.08 20 18 17.8 5.21 ± 0.01 24
7.0 44 25 28.5 5.38 ± 0.03 20 18 18.2 5.26 ± 0.01 19
10 mM succinyl-DOTOPA 2.0 36 24 23.7 2.78 ± 0.11 14 18 13.1 2.80 ± 0.02 21
4.0 27 22 19.5 2.42 ± 0.43 14 17 13.9 2.74 ± 0.01 16
7.0 21 18 19.3 2.54 ± 0.12 17 16 17.3 2.34 ± 0.02 13
15 mM succinyl-DOTOPA 2.0 15 18 12.9 1.56 ± 0.05 10 17 10.1 1.37 ± 0.01 13
4.0 18 18 15.6 1.61 ± 0.12 12 16 12.2 1.42 ± 0.01 12
7.0 15 15 15.8 1.76 ± 0.03 13 15 14.1 1.51 ± 0.01 10
7.5 mM AMUPol 2.0 55 18 48.0 8.59 ± 0.05 25 14 29.3 8.98 ± 0.01 20
4.0 55 12 75.7 8.09 ± 0.08 27 14 31.4 8.03 ± 0.02 18
7.0 84 15 89.2 8.50 ± 0.03 44 13 51.9 8.21 ± 0.01 26
15 mM AMUPol 2.0 42 16 43.0 4.24 ± 0.11 22 14 24.6 5.35 ± 0.02 23
4.0 135 17 129.2 4.29 ± 0.02 61 14 67.8 4.62 ± 0.01 69
7.0 60 11 83.0 4.04 ± 0.03 49 13 58.9 4.81 ± 0.02 28
22.5 mM AMUPol 2.0 66 15 72.4 2.48 ± 0.24 26 7 60.8 2.85 ± 0.01 38
4.0 32 9 56.7 1.72 ± 0.15 15 11 21.9 2.52 ± 0.01 18
7.0 36 7 84.6 2.47 ± 0.15 21 10 35.0 2.69 ± 0.01 21
5 mM Dy-EDTA 2.0 46 5.37 ± 0.02 25 4.53 ± 0.01 1.2
4.0 35 5.92 ± 0.01 19 5.23 ± 0.02 0.9
7.0 30 6.17 ± 0.02 20 5.29 ± 0.02 0.8

Fig. 5 compares cross-polarized 13C signal areas without microwave irradiation for samples containing succinyl-DOTOPA, AMUPol, and Dy-EDTA. At 25 K, samples containing either succinyl-DOTOPA or AMUPol show strong depolarization effects [26, 34], i.e., reduced signal areas relative to the sample containing Dy-EDTA. The extent of depolarization increases with increasing ce,tot and with increasing νMAS With ce,tot = 15 mM and ce,tot = 30 mM and with νMAS = 7.00 kHz, samples containing AMUPol show larger depolarization effects than do samples containing succinyl-DOTOPA. The opposite is true under certain other conditions.

Fig. 5:

Fig. 5:

Dependences of cross-polarized 13C signal areas, without microwave irradiation, on MAS frequency for frozen glycerol/water solutions of 15N,13C-L-proline containing succinyl-DOTOPA (blue symbols), AMUPol (red symbols), or Dy-EDTA (black symbols) with the indicated concentrations. Data are shown for measurements at 25 K (a) and 90 K (b).

Differences between samples containing succinyl-DOTOPA or AMUPol may be attributed in part to differences in electron spin relaxation properties. Fig. 6 shows the temperature dependences of T1e and T2e for the two dopants in frozen glycerol/water solutions, measured at an EPR frequency of 33.6 GHz. T1e values for AMUPol are significantly larger than those for succinyl-DOTOPA. Assuming that this is also true at 263.9 GHz, the larger T1e value at 25 K may contribute to the stronger dependence of depolarization on νMASfor AMUPol in Fig. 5a.

Fig. 6:

Fig. 6:

Temperature-dependences of the electron spin-lattice (T1e, left ) and spin-spin (T2e, right) relaxation times in frozen glycerol/water solutions of succinyl-DOTOPA (blue symbols) and AMUPol (red symbols) at 1.1956 T.

At 25 K and ce,tot = 15 mM, depolarization effects at νMAS= 2.00 kHz are small, suggesting that T1e values for both AMUPol and succinyl-DOTOPA are less than approximately 0.5 ms at 263.9 GHz, since depolarization is expected to be negligible when νMAST1e < 1 [26]. At 25 K, ce,tot = 15 mM, and νMAS = 7.00 kHz, greater depolarization is observed for the sample containing AMUPol, suggesting that T1e for AMUPol is approximately 100 μs, while T1e for succinyl-DOTOPA is somewhat shorter. With ce,tot = 30 mM or 45 mM, samples containing either AMUPol or succinyl-DOTOPA show significant depolarization at νMAS= 2.00 kHz, consistent with simulations showing that intermolecular electron-electron couplings can enhance depolarization [26]. The observation that samples containing succinyl-DOTOPA exhibit greater depolarization (i.e., smaller cross-polarized 13C ssNMR signals) with ce,tot = 30 mM or 45 mM and with νMAS= 2.00 kHz or 4.00 kHz is not readily explained. Apparently, the quantitative aspects of depolarization can be sensitive to multiple parameters, including T1e, νMAS, dopant concentration, and dopant structure (e.g., intramolecular electron-electron distances and nitroxide orientations). Reductions in ssNMR signals due to other paramagnetic effects [35] may also contribute to the results in Fig. 5.

At 90 K, T2e for AMUPol is also significantly larger than T2e for succinyl-DOTOPA. The relatively rapid electron spin-lattice and spin-spin relaxation in succinyl-DOTOPA at 90 K may reduce the achievable level of saturation of electron spin transitions, leading to the lower DNP-enhanced 13C sensitivity for samples containing succinyl-DOTOPA at 90 K under our experimental conditions. We estimate that the Rabi frequency for electron spins in our experiments is approximately 200 kHz (corresponding to 0.5 W of circularly polarized microwave power on a 1 cm2 area). Higher microwave powers are likely to produce greater DNP-enhanced 13C sensitivity for samples containing succinyl-DOTOPA at 90 K. In earlier experiments on a frozen solution containing a different DOTOPA derivative (DOTOPA-ethanol), we found that DNP-enhanced 13C signals became nearly independent of microwave power above 0.8 W at 25 K, but continued to increase beyond 1.2 W at 100 K [25].

Discussion

Data presented above show that succinyl-DOTOPA is a useful DNP dopant for ssNMR measurements on biological or organic molecules in frozen glycerol/water solutions. Of particular interest for experiments in our laboratory [23, 27], DNP build-up times at 25 K are consistently shorter in samples that contain succinyl-DOTOPA than in samples that contain AMUPol (Fig. 3), and cross-polarized 13C sensitivity at νMAS = 7.00 kHz is greater by factors of 2.3 and 1.4 at electron spin concentrations of 15 and 30 mM, respectively (Fig. 4). The higher sensitivity under these experimental conditions is due to both the smaller TDNP values and the larger DNP-enhanced 13C signals, which reflect a weaker depolarization effect for succinyl-DOTOPA (Fig. 5). The weaker depolarization effect apparently results at least in part from a shorter T1e (Fig. 6).

At 90 K, samples containing AMUPol show greater cross-polarized 13C sensitivity at νMAS = 7.00 kHz (Fig. 4). This observation is probably a consequence of lower saturation of electron spin transitions, due to the short T1e and T2e values of succinyl-DOTOPA at 90 K (Fig. 6).

At νMAS = 7.00 kHz, the highest 13C sensitivity in our DNP-enhanced measurements at 25 K (Table 1, 5 mM succinyl-DOTOPA) is greater than the highest 13C sensitivity at 90 K (Table 2, 15 mM AMUPol) by a factor of 6.1. This corresponds to a reduction in the time required to achieve a given signal-to-noise ratio by a factor of 37. Because experiments at 25 K require cooling with liquid helium, in practice our experiments at 25 K are typically limited to total measurement times of 12 h or less [23, 27]. Comparable experiments at 90 K would require measurement times of about 18 days. At 25 K and νMAS = 7.00 kHz, the 13C sensitivity for a sample containing 5 mM succinyl-DOTOPA is greater than the 13C sensitivity for a Dy3+-doped sample by a factor of 31, meaning that use of DNP can reduce total measurement times by factors greater than 900.

In a previous publication, we described several DOTOPA derivatives (DOTOPA-Ethanol, DOTOPA-NH, DOTOPA-4OH, DOTOPA-3OH-Methoxy) with solubilities slightly above 10 mM in glycerol/water mixtures at pH 7.4 [19]. At 25 K, νMAS ≈ 6.7 kHz, and 10 mM dopant concentration, these compounds produced TDNP values in the 2.6–3.8 s range and ε values in the 94–128 range (for cross-polarized 13C ssNMR signals of melittin). These TDNP and ε values are very similar to those of succinyl-DOTOPA under similar experimental conditions. Thus, the DNP performance of DOTOPA derivatives is largely independent of variations in their chemical structures. The primary advantage of succinyl-DOTOPA is its greater solubility above pH 5 (Fig. S1c). This is an important practical advantage. Experiments with the previously-described DOTOPA derivatives required that they be dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) before addition to the glycerol/water solution, resulting in final DMSO contents of roughly 2–5%. The previously-described DOTOPA derivatives were also not useful in experiments with relatively low glycerol concentrations [27], due to insufficient solubility.

Finally, to illustrate the applicability to systems of genuine biochemical interest, Fig. 7 shows 1D and 2D 13C-13C spectra of a frozen solution of the complex of calmodulin with the 27-residue peptide M13 [36], with uniform 15N and 13C labeling of four amino acids in M13. This sample contained 1.5 mM M13, 3.0 mM calmodulin, and 15 mM CaCl2 and was doped with 10 mM succinyl-DOTOPA. The sample volume was 75 μl, corresponding to 113 nmol of M13. Spectra were recorded at 25 K with νMAS = 7.00 kHz. The value of TDNP for cross-polarized 13C signals was determined to be 4.6 s at 25 K. Comparison of signal areas in 1D spectra with and without microwave irradiation (Fig. 7a) indicates an apparent DNP enhancement factor of ε ≈ 140. A 2D spectrum with good signal-to-noise was obtained in 40 min (Fig. 7b).

Fig. 7:

Fig. 7:

(a) 1D 13C NMR spectra at 25 K of the M13/Ca2+/calmodulin complex in frozen glycerol/water containing 10 mM succinyl-DOTOPA. Spectra were recorded with microwave irradiation and 4 scans (blue) or without microwave irradiation and 128 scans (red). The sample contains 1.5 mM of the 27-residue M13 peptide, uniformly 15N,13C-labeled at Phe8, Ile9, Ala10, and Val11. The MAS frequency was 7.00 kHz. (b) 2D 13C-13C NMR spectrum of the same sample at 25 K with microwave irradiation, using a 25 ms spin diffusion mixing period between t1 and t2 periods. A 1D slice at 65 ppm is shown above the 2D spectrum. The 2D spectrum was acquired in 40 min, using a 5.9 s recycle delay, 100 complex t1 points, and a 40.0 μs t1 increment. Contour levels increase by successive factors of 1.3.

Supplementary Material

1
  • The nitroxide-based triradical succinyl-DOTOPA is highly soluble in glycerol/water solutions and performs well in low-temperature dynamic nuclear polarization experiments.

  • At 25 K, 9.39 T, and 7.00 kHz magic-angle spinning, succinyl-DOTOPA gives higher overall cross-polarized 13C solid state NMR sensitivity than does the biradical AMUPol.

  • At 90 K, AMUPol gives higher overall sensitivity, attributable to its longer electron spin relaxation times.

  • Experimental results for a peptide/calmodulin complex in glycerol/water at 25 K verify the utility of succinyl-DOTOPA.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health. J.J. was supported by a Korean Visiting Scientist Training Award from the Korea Health Industry Development Institute. We thank Dr. Thomas Schmidt for assistance with EPR measurements.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  • [1].Hu KN, Yu HH, Swager TM, Griffin RG, Dynamic nuclear polarization with biradicals, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 126 (2004) 10844–10845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Song CS, Hu KN, Joo CG, Swager TM, Griffin RG, Totapol: A biradical polarizing agent for dynamic nuclear polarization experiments in aqueous media, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 128 (2006)11385–11390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Dane EL, Maly T, Debelouchina GT, Griffin RG, Swager TM, Synthesis of a BDPA-TEMPO biradical, Org. Lett, 11 (2009) 1871–1874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Dane EL, Corzilius B, Rizzato E, Stocker P, Maly T, Smith AA, Griffin RG, Ouari O, Tordo P, Swagert TM, Rigid orthogonal bis-TEMPO biradicals with improved solubility for dynamic nuclear polarization, J. Org. Chem, 77 (2012) 1789–1797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Zagdoun A, Casano G, Ouari O, Lapadula G, Rossini AJ, Lelli M, Baffert M, Gajan D, Veyre L, Maas WE, Rosay M, Weber RT, Thieuleux C, Coperet C, Lesage A, Tordo P, Emsley L, A slowly relaxing rigid biradical for efficient dynamic nuclear polarization surface-enhanced NMR spectroscopy: Expeditious characterization of functional group manipulation in hybrid materials, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 134 (2012) 2284–2291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Sauvee C, Rosay M, Casano G, Aussenac F, Weber RT, Ouari O, Tordo P, Highly efficient, water-soluble polarizing agents for dynamic nuclear polarization at high frequency, Angew. Chem.-Int. Edit, 52 (2013) 10858–10861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Zagdoun A, Casano G, Ouari O, Schwarzwalder M, Rossini AJ, Aussenac F, Yulikov M, Jeschke G, Coperet C, Lesage A, Tordo P, Emsley L, Large molecular weight nitroxide biradicals providing efficient dynamic nuclear polarization at temperatures up to 200 K, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 135 (2013) 12790–12797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Munoz-Gomez JL, Marin-Montesinos I, Lloveras V, Pons M, Vidal-Gancedo J, Veciana J, Novel PTM-TEMPO biradical for fast dissolution dynamic nuclear polarization, Org. Lett, 16 (2014) 5402–5405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Voinov MA, Good DB, Ward ME, Milikisiyants S, Marek A, Caporini MA, Rosay M, Munro RA, Ljumovic M, Brown LS, Ladizhansky V, Smirnov AI, Cysteine-specific labeling of proteins with a nitroxide biradical for dynamic nuclear polarization NMR, J. Phys. Chem. B, 119 (2015) 10180–10190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Jagtap AP, Geiger MA, Stoppler D, Orwick-Rydmark M, Oschkinat H, Sigurdsson ST, BCTOL: A highly water-soluble biradical for efficient dynamic nuclear polarization of biomolecules, Chem. Commun, 52 (2016) 7020–7023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Kubicki DJ, Casano G, Schwarzwalder M, Abel S, Sauvee C, Ganesan K, Yulikov M, Rossini AJ, Jeschke G, Coperet C, Lesage A, Tordo P, Ouari O, Emsley L, Rational design of dinitroxide biradicals for efficient cross-effect dynamic nuclear polarization, Chem. Sci, 7 (2016) 550–558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Sauvee C, Casano G, Abel S, Rockenbauer A, Akhmetzyanov D, Karoui H, Siri D, Aussenac F, Maas W, Weber RT, Prisner T, Rosay M, Tordo P, Ouari O, Tailoring of polarizing agents in the BTurea series for cross-effect dynamic nuclear polarization in aqueous media, Chem.-Eur. J, 22 (2016) 5598–5606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Rogawski R, Sergeyev IV, Li YJ, Ottaviani MF, Cornish V, McDermott AE, Dynamic nuclear polarization signal enhancement with high-affinity biradical tags, J. Phys. Chem. B, 121 (2017) 1169–1175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Albert BJ, Gao CK, Sesti EL, Saliba EP, Alaniva N, Scott FJ, Sigurdsson ST, Barnes AB, Dynamic nuclear polarization nuclear magnetic resonance in human cells using fluorescent polarizing agents, Biochemistry, 57 (2018) 4741–4746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Bothe S, Nowag J, Klimavicius V, Hoffmann M, Troitskaya TI, Amosov EV, Tormyshev VM, Kirilyuk I, Taratayko A, Kuzhelev A, Parkhomenko D, Bagryanskaya E, Gutmann T, Buntkowsky G, Novel biradicals for direct excitation highfield dynamic nuclear polarization, J. Phys. Chem C, 122 (2018) 11422–11432. [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Mentink-Vigier F, Marin-Montesinos I, Jagtap AP, Halbritter T, van Tol J, Hediger S, Lee D, Sigurdsson ST, De Paepe G, Computationally assisted design of polarizing agents for dynamic nuclear polarization enhanced NMR: The ASYMPOL family, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 140 (2018) 11013–11019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Sani MA, Zhu SY, Hofferek V, Separovic F, Nitroxide spin-labeled peptides for DNP-NMR in-cell studies, Faseb J, 33 (2019) 11021–11027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Thurber KR, Yau WM, Tycko R, Low-temperature dynamic nuclear polarization at 9.4 T with a 30 mW microwave source, J. Magn. Reson, 204 (2010) 303–313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Yau WM, Thurber KR, Tycko R, Synthesis and evaluation of nitroxide-based oligoradicals for low-temperature dynamic nuclear polarization in solid state NMR, J. Magn. Reson, 244 (2014) 98–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Leavesley A, Jain S, Kamniker I, Zhang H, Rajca S, Rajca A, Han S, Maximizing NMR signal per unit time by facilitating the e-e-n cross effect DNP rate, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 20 (2018) 27646–27657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Thurber KR, Tycko R, Prospects for sub-micron solid state nuclear magnetic resonance imaging with low-temperature dynamic nuclear polarization, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 12 (2010) 5779–5785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Potapov A, Thurber KR, Yau WM, Tycko R, Dynamic nuclear polarization-enhanced H-1-C-13 double resonance NMR in static samples below 20 K, J. Magn. Reson, 221 (2012) 32–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Potapov A, Yau WM, Ghirlando R, Thurber KR, Tycko R, Successive stages of amyloid-β self-assembly characterized by solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance with dynamic nuclear polarization, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 137 (2015) 8294–8307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Potapov A, Yau WM, Tycko R, Dynamic nuclear polarization-enhanced C-13 NMR spectroscopy of static biological solids, J. Magn. Reson, 231 (2013) 5–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Thurber K, Tycko R, Low-temperature dynamic nuclear polarization with helium-cooled samples and nitrogen-driven magic-angle spinning, J. Magn. Reson, 264 (2016) 99–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Thurber KR, Tycko R, Perturbation of nuclear spin polarizations in solid state NMR of nitroxide-doped samples by magic-angle spinning without microwaves, J. Chem. Phys, 140 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Jeon J, Thurber KR, Ghirlando R, Yau WM, Tycko R, Application of millisecond time-resolved solid state NMR to the kinetics and mechanism of melittin self-assembly, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A, 116 (2019) 16717–16722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Lugemwa FN, Shaikh K, Hochstedt E, Facile and efficient acetylation of primary alcohols and phenols with acetic anhydride catalyzed by dried sodium bicarbonate, Catalysts, 3 (2013) 954–965. [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Thurber KR, Potapov A, Yau WM, Tycko R, Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance with magic-angle spinning and dynamic nuclear polarization below 25 K, J. Magn. Reson, 226 (2013) 100–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Bennett AE, Rienstra CM, Auger M, Lakshmi KV, Griffin RG, Heteronuclear decoupling in rotating solids, J. Chem. Phys, 103 (1995) 6951–6958. [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Thurber KR, Tycko R, Biomolecular solid state NMR with magic-angle spinning at 25 K, J. Magn. Reson, 195 (2008) 179–186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Thurber KR, Tycko R, Measurement of sample temperatures under magic-angle spinning from the chemical shift and spin-lattice relaxation rate of Br-79 in KBr powder, J. Magn. Reson, 196 (2009) 84–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Tycko R, Remote sensing of sample temperatures in nuclear magnetic resonance using photoluminescence of semiconductor quantum dots, J. Magn. Reson, 244 (2014) 64–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Mentink-Vigier F, Paul S, Lee D, Feintuch A, Hediger S, Vega S, De Paepe G, Nuclear depolarization and absolute sensitivity in magic-angle spinning cross effect dynamic nuclear polarization, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 17 (2015) 21824–21836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Corzilius B, Andreas LB, Smith AA, Ni QZ, Griffin RG, Paramagnet induced signal quenching in mas-DNP experiments in frozen homogeneous solutions, J. Magn. Reson, 240 (2014) 113–123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Crivici A, Ikura M, Molecular and structural basis of target recognition by calmodulin, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomolec. Struct, 24 (1995) 85–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES