Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Jan 16;15(1):e0227666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227666

Identification of putative Type-I sex pheromone biosynthesis-related genes expressed in the female pheromone gland of Streltzoviella insularis

Yuchao Yang 1, Jing Tao 1,*, Shixiang Zong 1,*
Editor: J Joe Hull2
PMCID: PMC6964838  PMID: 31945099

Abstract

Species-specific sex pheromones play key roles in moth sexual communication. Although the general pathway of Type-I sex pheromone biosynthesis is well established, only a handful of genes encoding enzymes involved in this pathway have been characterized. Streltzoviella insularis is a destructive wood-boring pest of many street trees in China, and the female sex pheromone of this species comprises a blend of (Z)-3-tetradecenyl acetate, (E)-3-tetradecenyl acetate, and (Z)-5-dodecenyl acetate. This organism therefore provides an excellent model for research on the diversity of genes and molecular mechanisms involved in pheromone production. Herein, we assembled the pheromone gland transcriptome of S. insularis by next-generation sequencing and identified 74 genes encoding candidate key enzymes involved in the fatty acid biosynthesis, β-oxidation, and functional group modification. In addition, tissue expression patterns further showed that an acetyl-CoA carboxylase and two desaturases were highly expressed in the pheromone glands compared with the other tissues, indicating possible roles in S. insularis sex pheromone biosynthesis. Finally, we proposed putative S. insularis biosynthetic pathways for sex pheromone components and highlighted candidate genes. Our findings lay a solid foundation for understanding the molecular mechanisms underpinning S. insularis sex pheromone biosynthesis, and provide potential targets for disrupting chemical communication that could assist the development of novel pest control methods.

Introduction

Lepidoptera sex pheromones, which are usually secreted by female moths to attract conspecific males, play a key role in sexual communication, and are used as a monitoring and trapping tool in integrated pest management programs [13]. In general, moth sex pheromones are composed of two or more components in a unique ratio, and are classified into four types (Type-I, Type-II, Type-III, and Type-0) according to their site of production, chemical structure, and biosynthetic features [4]. Type-I sex pheromones are alcohols and their derivatives (acetates and aldehydes) with long straight chains (C10–C18) which are used by most moths [1, 5]. Type-II sex pheromones are composed of C17–C23 hydrocarbons with two or three double bonds at the three, six, or nine positions, or their corresponding epoxide derivatives [1, 5]. Compared with Type-I and Type-II sex pheromones, Type-III sex pheromones with one or more methyl branches possess distinct biosynthetic features, and these components include C17–C23 saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons, as well as functionalized hydrocarbons [5]. Type-0 sex pheromones, short-chain secondary alcohols or ketones similar to some general plant volatile compounds, are utilized by the oldest non-ditrysian lineages of Lepidoptera species and are thought to represent the ancestral type of sex pheromone [57]. Moth sex pheromones, particularly Type-I, are mainly biosynthesized in and released from the sex pheromone gland (PG) located at the inter-segmental membrane between the eighth and ninth abdominal segments [4, 8].

The general biosynthesis pathway for Type-I sex pheromones in moths is well established; they are synthesized de novo through modified fatty acid biosynthesis pathways, and several enzymatic reactions are indispensable, including desaturation, oxidation, reduction, and acetylation [1, 4, 912]. All carbon atoms of the fatty acid are derived from acetyl-CoA, acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) converts acetyl-CoA into the fatty acid precursor malonyl-CoA [13], and fatty acid synthetase (FAS) produces palmitic acid (C16) or stearic acid (C18) using acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA as substrate and NADPH as reducing agent [1415]. Double bonds are introduced into the acyl chain at specific positions by desaturases (DESs), of which seven (Δ5 [16], Δ6 [17], Δ9 [18], Δ10 [19], Δ11 [20], Δ12 [11], and Δ14 [21]) have been identified in Lepidoptera species based on signature motifs. For instance, Δ9-desaturases have been divided into two groups: one with a substrate chain length preference of C16 >C18 (NPVE motif), and the other with a substrate chain length preference of C18 >C16 (KPSE motif) [22]. Subsequently, the unsaturated fatty acid is subjected to chain-shortening by β-oxidation, generating sex pheromone precursors of specific chain length [23], and the carbonyl carbon is modified to form an oxygenated functional group, such as an aldehyde, alcohol, or acetate ester, and these modifications involve some key biosynthesis enzymes; fatty acyl-CoA reductase (FAR) converts these acyl chains into fatty alcohols that act as actual sex pheromone components in various moths [2426], but most fatty alcohols are either oxidized into the corresponding aldehyde by dehydrogenases [2728] or esterified to form acetate esters by acetyltransferase (ATF) [2931], resulting in the final functional groups.

Streltzoviella insularis (Staudinger) (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) is a destructive wood-boring pest and occurs in many provinces and cities in China. It mainly damages various street trees, such as Fraxinus americana, Ginkgo biloba, Sophora spp., and Ulmus spp., causing great economic losses to urban forestry [3234]. The female sex pheromone of S. insularis is a blend of (Z)-3-tetradecenyl acetate (Z3-14:OAc), (E)-3-tetradecenyl acetate (E3-14:OAc), and (Z)-5-dodecenyl acetate (Z5-12:OAc) [3536], and these acetate esters are typical of Type-I sex pheromones. These different components indicate the involvement of different desaturases, β-oxidases, and reductases during sex pheromone production. Characterization of the genes encoding putative key enzymes involved in this process may not only help to elucidate the sex pheromone biosynthesis pathway in S. insularis, but may also provide potential targets for disrupting sexual communication for pest control purposes. Hence, in the present study, we first constructed a transcriptome library of S. insularis PGs and identified a series of genes that might be involved in sex pheromone biosynthesis. Tissue expression patterns and phylogenetic analysis were performed to postulate the potential functions of the identified genes. Based on the results, we propose putative biosynthetic pathways for the sex pheromone components in S. insularis.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

S. insularis is not on the List of Endangered and Protected Animals in China. The Beijing Municipal Bureau of Landscape and Forestry issued a permit for field collection.

Sample collection

S. insularis individuals were collected from Fraxinus americana at Beijing Forestry University North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China, in May 2017. Damaged trunks were chopped down, taken to the laboratory, and larvae inside trunks were fed on the phloem and xylem of the host under natural environmental conditions. Adult moths were sexed after emergence according to the genitalia. The pheromone gland and associated ovipositor valves, as well as parts of the terminal abdominal segments (together abbreviated as PG) were dissected from 1-day-old and 2-day-old female adults during the scotophase, which is reported to be the calling period of this moth [35, 37]. In addition, antennae and legs were also collected at the same time, immediately placed in RNAlater (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA), and stored at -80°C.

RNA extraction

Total RNA was extracted from 15 PGs (seven PGs from 1-day-old females and eight PGs from 2-day-old females) using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions, with three biological replicates. RNA purity was evaluated with a NanoDrop 2000 instrument (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA), and RNA concentration was measured using a Qubit RNA Assay Kit and a Qubit 2.0 Fluorimeter (Life Technologies, CA, USA). RNA integrity was determined by an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA), and RNA degradation and contamination were monitored by 1% agarose gels to ensure the quality of the RNA samples for subsequent transcriptome sequencing.

cDNA library construction and Illumina sequencing

cDNA library construction and Illumina sequencing of samples were performed at Shanghai Majorbio Bio-pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). According to the TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation Guide V2 (Illumina), mRNA was purified from total RNA using Oligo (dT) magnetic beads, then fragmented by adding fragmentation buffer. Random hexamer primers were used to synthesize first-strand cDNA, followed by synthesis of the second strand using dNTPs, RNaseH, and DNA polymerase I. All remaining overhangs were converted into blunt ends via polymerase. After end-repair, poly-A tailing, and ligation of adapters, 150–200 bp cDNA fragments were purified using an AMPure XP system (Beckman Coulter, Beverly, MA, USA), and 3μl USER Enzyme (NEB, USA) was incubated with size-selected, adaptor-ligated cDNA at 37°C for 15 min followed by incubation at 95°C for 5 min, prior to PCR amplification. PCR products were purified using an AMPure XP system, and library quality was assessed on the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system. Finally, S. insularis cDNA libraries were sequenced on an Illumina Hiseq 4000 platform, and paired-end reads were generated.

Sequence assembly and functional annotation

To obtain the clean reads, the raw reads were processed to remove low-quality reads and adapter sequences. Then, GC Content, Q20 and Q30 were used to assess the sequencing quality. The qualified reads assembly was carried out with the short reads assembling program-Trinity [38]. The largest alternative splicing variants in the Trinity results were called unigenes. The annotation of unigenes was performed by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) BLASTx searches against the non-redundant (Nr) protein database, with a cut-off E-value of 10−5. Unigenes were also annotated using other protein databases including Gene Ontology (GO) [39], Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins (COG) [40], and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) [41]. The longest open reading frame (ORF) for each unigene was determined by the NCBI ORF Finder tool (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/gorf.html). Fragments per kilobase of exon per million mapped reads (FPKM) values were calculated by RSEM (RNA-Seq by Expectation-Maximization) with default parameters represented gene expression in S. insularis PG tissue [42].

Identification of putative genes involved in sex pheromone biosynthesis

Putative unigenes involved in sex pheromone biosynthesis of S. insularis were confirmed by analysis with the BLASTx program. All candidate pheromone biosynthesis-activating neuropeptide receptor (PBANR), acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC), fatty acid synthase (FAS), desaturase (DES), acyl-CoA oxidase (ACO), acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (ACD), enoyl-CoA hydratase (ECH), L-3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase (HCD), 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase (KAT), fatty acyl-CoA reductase (FAR), alcohol dehydrogenase (AD), aldehyde reductase (AR) and acetyltransferase (ATF) genes were manually checked by tBLASTn in NCBI online.

Sequence and phylogenetic analyses

Amino acid sequences of candidate desaturases were aligned with those of other insect species using ClustalW by MEGA (Version 5.0) [43]. Phylogenetic tree construction was performed using the neighbor-joining method as implemented in MEGA (Version 5.0) with a p-distance model and pairwise deletion of gaps. Bootstrap support of tree branches was assessed by re-sampling amino acid positions 1000 times [44]. Phylogenetic trees were colored and arranged using FigTree (Version 1.4.2) [45].

Expression analysis by quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR)

Expression patterns of putative ACC and DES genes in different tissues (antennae, legs, and PGs) were analyzed by RT-qPCR using a Bio-Rad CFX96 PCR System (Hercules, CA, USA). Total RNA was extracted from 25 antennae, 10 legs, and 15 PGs of female moths following the method described above, and transcribed into cDNA using a PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (No. RR047A; TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan). Gene-specific primers were designed using Primer 3 Plus (http://www.bioinformatics.nl/cgi-bin/primer3plus/primer3plus.cgi) and are listed in S1 Table. The S. insularis actin gene served as an internal reference gene. Each RT-qPCR mixture was composed of 12.5 μl of TB Green Premix Ex Taq II (Tli RNaseH Plus; No. RR820A; TaKaRa), 1 μl of forward primer (10 μM), 1 μl of reverse primer (10 μM), 2 μl of cDNA, and 8.5 μl of sterilized H2O. RT-qPCR cycling parameters were as follows: 95°C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 5 s and 60°C for 30 s, and 65°C to 95°C in increments of 0.5°C for 5 s to generate melting curves. To check reproducibility, each reaction for each tissue was performed with three biological replicates and three technical replicates. Negative controls without template were included in each experiment. Relative expression levels were calculated according to the comparative 2-ΔΔCt method (the amplification efficiency was close to 100% for 12 genes) [46]. Leg samples were used for calibration, and actin was used for calculating and normalizing target gene expression, and correcting for sample to sample variation. Data in the form of means ± standard error (SE) from different samples were subjected to one-way nested analysis of variance, followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference tests, implemented in SPSS Statistics 22.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA).

Results and discussion

Illumina sequencing and unigene assembly

We constructed cDNA libraries utilizing mRNAs from S. insularis PG tissue samples as template with an Illumina Hiseq 4000 platform, and included three biological replicates. A total of 63,881,910, 54,395,274, and 58,219,720 raw reads were obtained from each library. After removing low-quality reads and adaptors, we finally acquired 60,708,992, 51,561,536, and 55,208,486 clean reads, respectively (Table 1). Subsequently, assembly of all clean reads together resulted in 30,307 unigenes with an N50 value of 2072 bp, an average length of 1385 bp, and a longest length of 26,771 bp. Raw reads have been deposited in the NCBI SRA database under accession number SRP179142.

Table 1. Summary of sequencing results.

Raw data Clean data
Repeat 1 Repeat 2 Repeat 3 Repeat 1 Repeat 2 Repeat 3
Read number 63,881,910 54,395,274 58,219,720 60,708,992 51,561,536 55,208,486
Base number 9,646,168,410 8,213,686,374 8,791,177,720 9,000,405,945 7,640,975,358 8,189,668,630
Q20 (%) 97.11 96.94 97.03 98.27 98.18 98.24
Q30 (%) 93.08 92.73 92.98 94.92 94.71 94.92
GC (%) 46.69 47.02 44.4 46.57 46.87 44.26

Homology searching and functional annotation

Among the 30,307 unigenes, 16,304 (53.80%) were successfully matched using the BLASTx homology search (cut-off E-value of 10−5) to entries in the NCBI Nr protein database. The best matches were obtained for Danaus plexippus sequences (30.62%), followed by Bombyx mori (25.94%), Papilio xuthus (2.54%), and Acyrthosiphon pisum (1.63%), as shown in Fig 1.

Fig 1. Species distribution based on homology searches of S. insularis unigenes against the NCBI Nr protein database.

Fig 1

GO annotation was used to classify the unigenes into three functional groups (molecular function, cellular component, and biological process) according to the GO categories. Of 30,307 unigenes identified in S. insularis, 8053 (26.57%) were annotated. As shown in Fig 2, 20,072 unigenes were assigned to the ‘molecular function’ category, and ‘binding’ (4141 unigenes, 43.14%) and ‘catalytic activity’ (3695 unigenes, 38.49%) were the most highly represented terms in this category. A total of 12,115 unigenes were assigned to GO terms in the ‘cellular component’ category, and ‘cell part’ (2409 unigenes, 19.88%) and ‘cell’ (2409 unigenes, 19.88%) were the most abundant terms. A further 20,072 unigenes were assigned to GO terms in the ‘biological process’ category, and the main terms were ‘cellular process’ (4329 unigenes, 21.56%) and ‘single-organism process’ (3326 unigenes, 16.57%). In addition, all unigenes were searched against the COG database for functional prediction and classification, and the results showed that 3865 unigenes (12.75%) could be assigned to 25 specific categories (Fig 3); ‘signal transduction mechanisms’ (567 unigenes, 14.67%) was the largest group, and ‘cell motility’ (5 unigenes, 0.13%) was the smallest group. Furthermore, KEGG annotation was used to divide unigenes into five KEGG pathways (cellular processes, environmental information processing, genetic information processing, metabolism, and organismal systems; Fig 4). Most unigenes were assigned to the ‘processes’ branch, and ‘global and overview maps’ (1251 unigenes, 28.07%) was the most highly represented term.

Fig 2. GO classification of S. insularis unigenes.

Fig 2

Fig 3. COG classification of S. insularis unigenes.

Fig 3

Fig 4. KEGG classification of S. insularis unigenes.

Fig 4

Pheromone biosynthesis-activating neuropeptide receptor (PBANR)

The biosynthesis of Type-I sex pheromones in female moths has been shown to be regulated by a C-terminally amidated 33 amino acid neuropeptide termed PBAN that is released from the subesophageal ganglion in the brain and transported through the hemolymph to the PG [4748]. The binding of PBAN to its receptor in the PG cell membrane will induce the opening of Ca2+ channels causing the influx of extracellular Ca2+, which then initiates sex pheromone production [4950]. PBANR, a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), was first cloned from the PG of Helicoverpa zea [51]. PBANR has since been identified in Bombyx mori [52] and other Lepidoptera species [49, 53]. PBANRs exist as PBANR multiple isoforms (PBANR-As, -A, -B, and -C) based on alternative splicing of the C-terminus [54]. The various isoforms play different functional roles in the ligand-induced internalization [55], a phase of GPCR feedback regulation and desensitization in diverse moth species [5657]. Herein, we identified a single PBANR in the S. insularis PG transcriptome that is 84% identical to Mamestra brassicae PBANR isoform B (ARO85772.1) and is very low in abundance (0.56 FPKM; Table 2 and S1 Text). The number of PBANR-encoding genes in the S. insularis PG was in accordance with Plutella xylostella [25], Agrotis segetum [58], and Agrotis ipsilon [59]. In addition, previous studies identified three isoforms of PBANR in Ostrinia nubilalis [60] and Mamestra brassicae [61]. However, we did not discover other isoforms of PBANR in our transcriptomic data, which may be explained by lower expression levels in S. insularis.

Table 2. Putative sex pheromone biosynthesis-related genes identified in the S. insularis pheromone gland transcriptome.

Name Gene length (bp) ORF length (bp) Intact ORF FPKM value Best BLASTX match
Function ACC number Species Score E-value Identity
PBANR
SinsPBANR 1538 1224 Yes 0.56 pheromone biosynthesis activating neuropeptide receptor isoform B ARO85772.1 Mamestra brassicae 726 0 84%
ACC
SinsACC1 723 399 No 3.60 PREDICTED: acetyl-CoA carboxylase XP_013185423.1 Amyelois transitella 164 2E-42 63%
SinsACC2 7616 7101 Yes 28.33 PREDICTED: acetyl-CoA carboxylase isoform X3 XP_013146614.1 Papilio polytes 8781 0 90%
FAS
SinsFAS1 312 273 No 0.28 fatty acid synthase BAM19658.1 Papilio xuthus 153 3E-42 88%
SinsFAS2 8170 7173 Yes 90.41 fatty acid synthase AGR49310.1 Agrotis ipsilon 3623 0 81%
SinsFAS3 301 87 No 1.00 PREDICTED: fatty acid synthase XP_013141731.1 Papilio polytes 177 2E-49 85%
SinsFAS4 459 441 No 0.42 fatty acid synthase 1 AKD01760.1 Helicoverpa assulta 209 5E-65 62%
SinsFAS5 310 135 No 0.59 fatty acid synthase-like XP_021208123.1 Bombyx mori 164 4E-47 69%
DES
SinsDES1 244 225 Yes 1.81 PREDICTED: acyl-CoA Delta(11) desaturase-like XP_011561954.1 Plutella xylostella 134 2E-36 77%
SinsDES2 449 267 Yes 1.15 acyl-CoA Delta(11) desaturase-like XP_026752209.1 Galleria mellonella 168 4E-48 80%
SinsDES3 864 825 No 0.71 acyl-CoA delta-11 desaturase AAL16642.1 Argyrotaenia velutinana 394 5E-135 63%
SinsDES4 350 228 No 1.20 stearoyl-CoA desaturase 5-like XP_026757907.1 Galleria mellonella 171 2E-49 75%
SinsDES5 305 192 No 0.86 stearoyl-CoA desaturase 5-like XP_021195328.1 Helicoverpa armigera 186 5E-56 80%
SinsDES6 1278 1002 Yes 65.89 desaturase ARD71185.1 Spodoptera exigua 496 1E-172 70%
SinsDES7 1200 996 Yes 4.82 acyl-CoA Delta(11) desaturase-like XP_028166624.1 Ostrinia furnacalis 531 0 78%
SinsDES8 2500 1032 Yes 361.30 acyl-CoA Delta(11) desaturase XP_028982113.1 Diachasma alloeum 345 6E-108 52%
SinsDES9 2947 1143 Yes 5.42 desaturase AAQ74260.1 Spodoptera littoralis 590 0 74%
SinsDES10 7148 1962 Yes 3.36 acyl-CoA-delta9-3a-desaturase ABX71810.1 Dendrolimus punctatus 628 0 87%
SinsDES11 911 393 Yes 1.15 putative C-5 sterol desaturase KPJ05936.1 Papilio machaon 395 4E-134 81%
SinsDES12 483 111 Yes 1.47 fatty acyl desaturase AHW98356.1 Cydia pomonella 98.6 2E-21 77%
SinsDES13 1476 984 Yes 22.89 desaturase AIM40219.1 Cydia pomonella 581 0 85%
SinsDES14 1435 1128 Yes 0.41 desaturase AIM40222.1 Cydia pomonella 638 0 80%
SinsDES15 1563 966 Yes 86.74 sphingolipid delta(4)-desaturase DES1 XP_004930794.1 Bombyx mori 612 0 89%
SinsDES16 1484 1017 Yes 1.66 desaturase ARD71181.1 Spodoptera exigua 515 2E-179 72%
SinsDES17 2225 1062 Yes 426.07 acyl-CoA Delta(11) desaturase-like isoform X1 XP_021183600.1 Helicoverpa armigera 624 0 82%
ACO
SinsACO1 405 363 No 1.10 probable peroxisomal acyl-coenzyme A oxidase 1 XP_026758799.1 Galleria mellonella 215 1E-63 73%
SinsACO2 2480 2013 Yes 42.90 PREDICTED: probable peroxisomal acyl-coenzyme A oxidase 1 XP_013188704.1 Amyelois transitella 1166 0 85%
SinsACO3 2792 2070 Yes 1.92 peroxisomal acyl-coenzyme A oxidase 3 XP_022819471.1 Spodoptera litura 1181 0 80%
SinsACO4 3173 2097 Yes 11.84 peroxisomal acyl-CoA oxidase 3 AID66678.1 Agrotis segetum 1165 0 77%
SinsACO5 375 189 No 0.57 PREDICTED: probable peroxisomal acyl-coenzyme A oxidase 1 XP_014367103.1 Papilio machaon 236 5E-77 89%
SinsACO6 2104 1899 No 26.85 probable peroxisomal acyl-coenzyme A oxidase 1 isoform X1 XP_022821900.1 Spodoptera litura 964 0 73%
SinsACO7 1919 1893 No 9.16 PREDICTED: probable peroxisomal acyl-coenzyme A oxidase 1 XP_013149571.1 Papilio polytes 992 0 75%
SinsACO8 279 243 No 0.00 probable peroxisomal acyl-coenzyme A oxidase 1 XP_021195539.1 Helicoverpa armigera 181 5E-52 90%
ACD
SinsACD1 1214 768 Yes 19.22 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase type-2 XP_026727946.1 Trichoplusia ni 464 1E-161 89%
SinsACD2 3886 1902 Yes 214.36 very long-chain-specific acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, mitochondrial isoform X1 XP_026737732.1 Trichoplusia ni 944 0 80%
SinsACD3 1056 774 Yes 3.34 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase type-2-like isoform X1 XP_026761478.1 Galleria mellonella 429 7E-149 79%
SinsACD4 1252 933 Yes 105.77 hydroxyacyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase, mitochondrial-like XP_022822785.1 Spodoptera litura 581 0 89%
SinsACD5 1547 1266 Yes 145.78 short/branched-chain-specific acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, mitochondrial XP_023946257.1 Bicyclus anynana 808 0 92%
SinsACD6 2320 1830 Yes 11.66 PREDICTED: acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family member 9, mitochondrial XP_013192619.1 Amyelois transitella 902 0 69%
SinsACD7 3306 1236 Yes 12.58 short-chain-specific acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, mitochondrial-like isoform X1 XP_028162581.1 Ostrinia furnacalis 697 0 81%
SinsACD8 2324 1275 Yes 210.50 probable medium-chain-specific acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, mitochondrial NP_001298861.1 Papilio xuthus 712 0 84%
SinsACD9 4692 1224 Yes 17.89 short-chain-specific acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, mitochondrial XP_026489065.1 Vanessa tameamea 709 0 89%
ECH
SinsECH1 1207 990 Yes 10.81 PREDICTED: probable enoyl-CoA hydratase XP_013137975.1 Papilio polytes 484 2E-168 82%
SinsECH2 1321 303 Yes 2.54 enoyl-CoA hydratase domain-containing protein 3, mitochondrial isoform X2 XP_022822616.1 Spodoptera litura 393 3E-85 82%
SinsECH3 1439 894 Yes 13.68 enoyl-CoA hydratase domain-containing protein 2, mitochondrial XP_028167557.1 Ostrinia furnacalis 445 1E-152 79%
HAD
SinsHAD1 1214 768 Yes 19.22 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase type-2 XP_026727946.1 Trichoplusia ni 464 1E-161 89%
SinsHAD2 1056 774 Yes 3.34 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase type-2-like isoform X1 XP_026761478.1 Galleria mellonella 429 7E-149 79%
SinsHAD3 1252 933 Yes 105.77 hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase AID66694.1 Agrotis segetum 575 0 87%
KAT
SinsKAT1 1395 1194 Yes 10.21 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase, mitochondrial-like XP_028176321.1 Ostrinia furnacalis 491 5E-169 63%
FAR
SinsFAR1 1805 1545 No 5.57 PREDICTED: fatty acyl-CoA reductase 1-like XP_013185409.1 Amyelois transitella 761 0 71%
SinsFAR2 1867 1692 No 1.62 fatty acyl reductase 5 ATJ44463.1 Helicoverpa armigera 816 0 73%
SinsFAR3 2335 1875 Yes 33.44 fatty acyl-CoA reductase 2 ADI82775.1 Ostrinia nubilalis 992 0 80%
SinsFAR4 457 354 No 0.85 fatty acyl reductase ARD71192.1 Spodoptera exigua 193 3E-56 77%
SinsFAR5 967 723 No 0.56 fatty acyl-CoA reductase 1 XP_021197389.1 Helicoverpa armigera 360 4E-118 57%
SinsFAR6 2395 1494 Yes 476.06 fatty acyl reductase AID66655.1 Agrotis segetum 441 1E-143 46%
SinsFAR7 2040 1575 Yes 15.48 putative fatty acyl-CoA reductase CG5065 XP_004925992.1 Bombyx mori 900 0 84%
SinsFAR8 2910 1578 Yes 0.60 putative fatty acyl-CoA reductase CG5065 XP_026483533.1 Vanessa tameamea 1019 0 92%
SinsFAR9 1820 1605 No 9.83 fatty acyl reductase ARD71186.1 Spodoptera exigua 726 0 73%
SinsFAR10 1807 1560 Yes 2.70 fatty acyl-CoA reductase 1 XP_021197389.1 Helicoverpa armigera 783 0 73%
SinsFAR11 1875 1500 Yes 65.72 putative fatty acyl-CoA reductase CG5065 XP_028038252.1 Bombyx mandarina 792 0 73%
SinsFAR12 2448 1590 Yes 35.68 putative fatty acyl-CoA reductase CG5065 XP_022835056.1 Spodoptera litura 635 0 64%
SinsFAR13 4732 1533 Yes 24.19 putative fatty acyl-CoA reductase CG8306 XP_004930778.1 Bombyx mori 855 0 79%
AD
SinsAD1 1221 975 Yes 28.73 alcohol dehydrogenase BAR64763.1 Ostrinia furnacalis 529 0 80%
SinsAD2 1746 813 Yes 13.93 alcohol dehydrogenase AD1 AII21999.1 Sesamia inferens 360 4E-118 66%
SinsAD3 2923 1131 Yes 35.49 alcohol dehydrogenase class-3 XP_021189392.1 Helicoverpa armigera 658 0 94%
SinsAD4 1395 1059 Yes 7.76 alcohol dehydrogenase BAR64764.1 Ostrinia furnacalis 579 0 80%
SinsAD5 1209 750 Yes 37.20 alcohol dehydrogenase AD2 AKQ06148.1 Cydia pomonella 327 7E-108 71%
AR
SinsAR1 853 807 No 6.56 aldo-keto reductase AKR2E4-like XP_028160456.1 Ostrinia furnacalis 377 2E-128 69%
SinsAR2 1125 1011 Yes 27.65 aldo-keto reductase AKR2E4-like XP_028177948.1 Ostrinia furnacalis 506 5E-177 71%
SinsAR3 1738 1092 Yes 25.10 aldo-keto reductase AKR2E4-like XP_022830935.1 Spodoptera litura 553 0 75%
SinsAR4 1252 1032 Yes 26.15 PREDICTED: aldo-keto reductase AKR2E4-like XP_013136681.1 Papilio polytes 498 8E-174 70%
SinsAR5 1242 987 Yes 125.24 aldehyde reductase 7 ATJ44502.1 Helicoverpa armigera 507 1E-177 71%
ATF
SinsATF1 1775 1269 Yes 23.49 acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase, mitochondrial XP_028157143.1 Ostrinia furnacalis 777 0 89%
SinsATF2 379 285 Yes 0.47 PREDICTED: acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase, mitochondrial isoform X2 XP_013192024.1 Amyelois transitella 177 7E-51 79%

Acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC)

The first step of saturated long-chain fatty acid biosynthesis is the ATP-dependent carboxylation of acetyl-CoA to malonyl-CoA catalyzed by ACC, a rate-limiting enzyme [1314]. In the S. insularis PG transcriptome, we identified two ACCs with lengths of 723 and 7616 bp (Table 2 and S1 Text), similar to the numbers reported previously for other moth species (two in A. ipsilon [59], one in P. xylostella [25], and one in A. segetum [58]). SinsACC1 with an ORF of 399 bp encodes for an ACC with 63% amino acid identity with the ACC of Amyelois transitella (XP_013185423.1), and SinsACC2 has an intact ORF of 7101 bp that shares high amino acid identity (90%) with the ACC of Papilio polytes (XP_013146614.1). The RT-qPCR results (Fig 5) showed that SinsACC1 was more strongly expressed in the antennae than in the other tissues, whereas SinsACC2 was mainly expressed in the PG. However, both were present in low abundance (3.6 and 28.33 FPKM) in the S. insularis PG transcriptome. It was reported that the plastid-specific ACC is inhibited by herbicides that target the eukaryotic form of the enzyme in monocotyledonous plants [6264]. Eliyahu et al. (2003) subsequently demonstrated that the herbicide diclofop inhibits PBAN-activated sex pheromone production in Helicoverpa zea, thereby implicating ACC plays a key regulatory role in fatty acid biosynthesis [65], which provides a basis for the development of a new pest control method based on disruption of sex pheromone production in females.

Fig 5. Expression profiles of putative ACCs and DESs in different S. insularis tissues.

Fig 5

A, antennae; L, legs; P, pheromone glands. Actin was used as an internal reference gene for normalizing target gene expression. Standard errors are represented by error bars, and different lowercase letters (a–c) above bars denote significant differences (p <0.05).

Fatty acid synthase (FAS)

FAS is the multifunctional protein that catalyzes acetyl-CoA, malonyl-CoA, and NADPH through-multienzyme complex that catalyzes the synthesis of long-chain fatty acids. Labeling studies demonstrated that palmitic acid (C16) and stearic acid (C18) are the FAS products in most moth PGs [15, 6667]. Herein, we identified five FASs with lengths ranging from 301 bp to 8170 bp in the S. insularis PG transcriptome (Table 2 and S1 Text), These results are similar to those reported for other insects, with six and three FASs in A. segetum [58] and Sesamia inferens [68], respectively. Among the five FASs, only SinsFAS2 has an intact ORF. BLASTX results showed that FASs share high sequence similarity with Lepidoptera FASs in the NCBI Nr protein database (>60%). The FPKM analysis showed that SinsFAS2 displayed the highest expression level (90.41 FPKM) in the S. insularis PG.

Desaturase (DES)

Double bonds are introduced into the fatty acid chain at specific positions by a variety of desaturases [69]. Three putative sex pheromone compounds of S. insularis were identified as Z3-14:OAc, E3-14:OAc, and Z5-12:OAc, which are unsaturated fatty acids with acetate esters as the functional group. It is therefore reasonable to assume that the saturated fatty acid precursor of S. insularis sex pheromones is palmitic acid (C16), which is desaturated by Δ5-desaturase and Δ9-desaturase to form the precursors Z/E5-16:acyl-CoA and Z9-16:acyl-CoA in the production of two major (Z3-14:OAc and E3-14:OAc) and one minor (Z5-12:OAc) sex pheromone component, respectively (Figs 6 and 7). From the S. insularis PG transcriptome, we identified 17 putative DESs with lengths ranging from 244 to 7148 bp (Table 2 and S1 Text). The number of DESs identified in S. insularis was more than that in A. ipsilon [59], P. xylostella [25], and A. segetum [58]. Of these DESs, the identity of the best BLASX match in the NCBI NR database ranged from 52% to 89%. Notably, SinsDES15 identified in the S. insularis transcriptome shared the highest identity (89%), comparable with DES1 in Bombyx mori (XP_004930794.1). Of the 17 DESs, nine DES sequences were either less than 1000 bp, or no common sites were found for computing distances; thus, we only used the remaining eight S. insularis DES sequences to construct our phylogenetic tree (Fig 8). In the tree, SinsDES13 and SinsDES16 are clustered in the ‘Δ11-desaturases’ clade. The SinsDES17 sequence shares high sequence homology with ‘Δ9-desaturases’, and it clusters with other enzymes also possessing the NPVE motif. The remaining DESs clustered into the ‘other desaturases’ ortholog clade. The qRT-PCR results (Fig 5) revealed that SinsDES6 and SinsDES8 were highly expressed in S. insularis PG compared with the other tissues, suggesting that they may play roles in S. insularis sex pheromone production. The other five DESs (SinsDES1, SinsDES3, SinsDES4, SinsDES6, and SinsDES7) were expressed at significantly higher levels in antennae than in other tissues. All DESs except SinsDES8 and SinsDES17 were present at low abundance (from 0.41 to 86.74 FPKM) in the S. insularis PG transcriptome. DESs play important roles in the generation of structural diversity in Lepidopteran sex pheromone biosynthesis, owing to the evolution of diverse enzymatic properties [22]. Based on the most likely sex pheromone biosynthetic pathways in S. insularis, both the Δ5- and Δ9-desaturase are likely involved, but it is not clear which of the 17 desaturase genes identified in our study encode these enzymes. Further biochemical analyses of these desaturases are required to determine which ones are involved in pheromone biosynthesis.

Fig 6. Putative biosynthesis pathway of the sex pheromone components Z3-14:OAc and E3-14:OAc in S. insularis.

Fig 6

The saturated fatty acid precursor palmitic acid (16:0) is desaturated by Δ5-desaturase to form the precursor Z/E5-16:acyl-CoA in the production of two major pheromone components (Z3-14:OAc and E3-14:OAc).

Fig 7. Putative biosynthesis pathway of the sex pheromone component Z5-12:OAc in S. insularis.

Fig 7

The saturated fatty acid precursor palmitic acid (16:0) is desaturated by Δ9-desaturase to form the precursor Z9-16:acyl-CoA in the production of the minor pheromone component Z5-12:OAc.

Fig 8. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of selected Lepidopteran DES enzymes.

Fig 8

The stability of nodes was assessed by bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates, and only bootstrap values ≥0.5 are shown at the corresponding nodes. The scale bar represents 2.0 substitutions per site. S. insularis sequences are colored red.

β-oxidation enzymes

After a specific Δ5 or Δ9 double bond is introduced into palmitic acid to form a fatty acyl CoA precursor, the chain of the precursors is then shortened sequentially via a β-oxidation catabolic process to generate different shorter chain pheromone precursors (14C and 12C). Each cycle of β-oxidation involves four reactions: (1) acyl-CoA oxidases (ACOs, in peroxisomes) and acyl-CoA dehydrogenases (ACDs, in mitochondria) act on acyl-CoA to form E2-enoyl-CoA; (2) E2-enoyl-CoA is reversibly hydrated by enoyl-CoA hydratase (ECH) to form L-3-hydroxyacyl-CoA; (3) L-3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase (HAD) catalyzes the reversible dehydrogenation of L-3-hydroxyacyl-CoA to 3-ketoacyl-CoA; and (4) 3-ketoacyl-CoA is cleaved by 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase (KAT) [37, 7072]. In the S. insularis PG transcriptome, we identified eight ACO genes, nine ACD genes, three ECH genes, three HAD genes, and one KAT gene (Table 2 and S1 Text). The derived protein sequences of these 24 transcripts share 63–92% amino acid identity with their homologs in other insects. All transcripts were present in low abundance (from 0 to 214.36 FPKM) in the S. insularis PG.

Fatty acyl-CoA reductase (FAR)

Chain-shortened fatty acyl CoA precursors are reduced to the corresponding alcohols by alcohol-generating FARs. Fatty alcohols can serve as sex pheromone components in many moths including Plutella xylostella [25]. Herein, we detected 13 transcripts homologous to putative FAR genes in the S. insularis PG transcriptome (Table 2 and S1 Text), similar to the number identified in other moth species (13 in A. ipsilon [59] and 10 in A. segetum [58]). Among them, SinsFAR6 was expressed at the highest level (476.06 FPKM). The FARs in S. insularis encode proteins shared 46–92% amino acid sequence identity with homologs in other Lepidoptera moths such as B. mori, Helicoverpa armigera, and Spodoptera exigua.

Alcohol dehydrogenase (AD)

Fatty alcohols can also be used as pheromone intermediates to produce corresponding aldehydes by ADs [73]. In the S. insularis PG, five homologous full-length AD genes were identified (Table 2 and S1 Text). The number of AD-encoding genes in S. insularis was in accordance with P. xylostella [25] and A. ipsilon [59]. Two ADs (SinsAD1 and SinsAD4) encode proteins that are homologous to ADs in Ostrinia furnacalis (BAR64763.1 and BAR64764.1) and share relatively high amino acid sequence identity (70%); SinsAD2 encodes a protein sharing 66% identity with Sesamia inferens AD1 (AII21999.1), SinsAD3 encodes a protein sharing 94% identity with the AD of Helicoverpa armigera (XP_021189392.1), and SinsAD5 encodes a protein sharing 71% identity with the AD of Cydia pomonella (AKQ06148.1). FPKM value analysis revealed low expression levels in the S. insularis PG for all five ADs (FPKM <50).

Aldehyde reductase (AR)

ARs are a group of the aldo-keto reductases that catalyze the reduction of fatty aldehydes to alcohols [74]. Whether ARs first produce aldehydes which are then converted to alcohols, or vice versa, is very difficult to distinguish in sex pheromone biosynthesis. Herein, we identified five AR genes in the S. insularis PG transcriptome, and four included intact ORFs (Table 2 and S1 Text). The number of ARs identified in S. insularis was less than that in A. ipsilon [59] and P. xylostella [25]. The deduced protein sequences of these five genes share high amino acid sequence identity (>60%) with their homologs in other Lepidoptera species, and all were expressed at low levels (from 6.56 to 125.24 FPKM) in the S. insularis PG.

Acetyltransferase (ATF)

ATF catalyzes the conversion of fatty alcohols to acetate esters, and this is the final enzyme in the pheromone biosynthetic pathway of the S. insularis. Previous studies showed that ATF is found almost exclusively in the PG, and is active during the photophase and all adult stages [7576]. ATF is microsomal and exhibits specificity for the Z isomer of 12-, 14-, and 16-carbon monounsaturated fatty alcohol substrates [2930, 7576]. However, the enzyme has not been identified at the gene level in any moth so far [58]. In the present study, we identified two transcripts predicted to encode ATFs in the S. insularis PG (Table 2 and S1 Text). The number of ATF-encoding genes in the S. insularis PG was in accordance with P. xylostella [25]. The BLASTX results revealed 89% and 79% amino acid sequence identity shared with putative ATFs of Ostrinia furnacalis and Amyelois transitella (XP_028157143.1 and XP_013192024.1), respectively. Both ATF transcripts were present at low abundance (23.49 and 0.47 FPKM) in the S. insularis PG.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Primers used for RT-qPCR analysis of ACCs and DESs in S. insularis.

(DOCX)

S1 Text. Nucleic acid sequences of all putative sex pheromone biosynthesis-related genes identified in the S. insularis pheromone gland transcriptome.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Lili Ren and Dr. Yongliang Zhang for their suggestions and encouragement.

Data Availability

All raw reads files are available from the NCBI SRA database (accession number SRP179142).

Funding Statement

This research was funded by Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2018ZY24) and Beijing’s Science and Technology Planning Project (Z171100001417005). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Ando T, Inomata S, Yamamoto M. Lepidopteran sex pheromones. Top Curr Chem. 2004; 239: 51–96. 10.1007/b95449 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Witzgall P, Kirsch P, Cork A. Sex pheromones and their impact on pest management. J Chem Ecol. 2010; 36: 80–100. 10.1007/s10886-009-9737-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McNeil JN. Behavioral ecology of pheromone-mediated communication in moths and its importance in the use of pheromone traps. Annu Rev Entomol. 1991; 36: 407–430. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tillman JA, Seybold SJ, Jurenka RA, Blomquist GJ. Insect pheromones—an overview of biosynthesis and endocrine regulation. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1999; 29: 481–514. 10.1016/s0965-1748(99)00016-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Löfstedt C, Wahlberg N, Millar JG. Evolutionary patterns of pheromone diversity in lepidoptera In: Allison JD, Cardé RT, editors. Pheromone communication in moths: evolution, behavior and application. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2016. pp. 43–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Löfstedt C, Hansson BS, Petersson E, Valeur P, Richards A. Pheromonal secretions from glands on the 5th abdominal sternite of hydropsychid and rhyacophilid caddisflies (Trichoptera). J Chem Ecol. 1994; 20:153–170. 10.1007/BF02065998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kozlov MV, Zhu JW, Philipp P, Francke W, Zvereva EL, Hansson BS, et al. Pheromone specificity in Eriocrania semipurpurella (Stephens) and E. sangii (Wood) (Lepidoptera: Eriocraniidae) based on chirality of semiochemicals. J Chem Ecol. 1996; 22: 431–454. 10.1007/BF02033647 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Raina AK, Wergin WP, Murphy CA, Erbe EF. Structural organization of the sex pheromone gland in Helicoverpa zea in relation to pheromone production and release. Arthropod Struct Dev. 2000; 29: 343–353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jurenka R. Insect pheromone biosynthesis. Top Curr Chem. 2004; 239: 97–132. 10.1007/b95450 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Matsumoto S. Molecular mechanisms underlying sex pheromone production in moths. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2010; 74: 223–231. 10.1271/bbb.90756 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Moto K, Suzuki MG, Hull JJ, Kurata R, Takahashi S, Yamamoto M, et al. Involvement of a bifunctional fatty-acyl desaturase in the biosynthesis of the silkmoth, Bombyx mori, sex pheromone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101: 8631–8636. 10.1073/pnas.0402056101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Park HY, Kim MS, Paek A, Jeong SE, Knipple DC. An abundant acyl-CoA (Δ9) desaturase transcript in pheromone glands of the cabbage moth, Mamestra brassicae, encodes a catalytically inactive protein. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2008; 38: 581–595. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2008.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Volpe JJ, Vagelos PR. Saturated fatty acid biosynthesis and its regulation. Annu Rev Biochem. 1973; 42: 21–60. 10.1146/annurev.bi.42.070173.000321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pape ME, Lopez-Casillas F, Kim KH. Physiological regulation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase gene expression: effects of diet, diabetes, and lactation on acetyl-CoA carboxylase mRNA. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1988; 267: 104–109. 10.1016/0003-9861(88)90013-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bjostad LB, Roelofs WL. Biosynthesis of sex pheromone components and glycerolipid precursors from sodium [1–14C] acetate in redbanded leafroller moth. J Chem Ecol. 1984; 10: 681–691. 10.1007/BF00994228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Foster SP, Roelofs WL. Sex pheromone biosynthesis in the tortricid moth, Ctenopseustis herana (Felder & Rogenhofer). Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 1996; 32: 135–147. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang HL, Liénard MA, Zhao CH, Wang CZ, Löfstedt C. Neofunctionalization in an ancestral insect desaturase lineage led to rare Δ6 pheromone signals in the Chinese tussah silkworm. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2010; 40: 742–751. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2010.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Löfstedt C, Bengtsson M. Sex pheromone biosynthesis of (E,E)-8,10-dodecadienol in codling moth Cydia pomonella involves E9 desaturation. J Chem Ecol. 1988; 14: 903–915. 10.1007/BF01018782 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Foster SP, Roelofs WL. Sex pheromone biosynthesis in the leafroller moth Planotortix excessana by Δ10 desaturation. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 1988; 8: 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bjostad LB, Roelofs WL. Sex pheromone biosynthesis from radiolabeled fatty acids in the redbanded leafroller moth. J Biol Chem. 1981; 256: 7936–7940. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhao CH, Löfstedt C, Wang XY. Sex pheromone biosynthesis in the Asian corn borer Ostrinia furnacalis (II): Biosynthesis of (E)-and (Z)-12-tetradecenyl acetate involves Δ14 desaturation. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 1990; 15: 57–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Knipple DC, Rosenfield CL, Nielsen R, You KM, Jeong SE. Evolution of the integral membrane desaturase gene family in moths and flies. Genetics. 2002; 162: 1737–1752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Houten SM, Wanders RJA. A general introduction to the biochemistry of mitochondrial fatty acid β-oxidation. J Inherited Metab Dis. 2010; 33: 469–477. 10.1007/s10545-010-9061-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Moto K, Yoshiga T, Yamamoto M, Takahashi S, Okano K, Ando T, et al. Pheromone gland-specific fatty-acyl reductase of the silkmoth, Bombyx mori. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003; 100: 9156–9161. 10.1073/pnas.1531993100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chen DS, Dai JQ, Han SC. Identification of the pheromone biosynthesis genes from the sex pheromone gland transcriptome of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 16255 10.1038/s41598-017-16518-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang YN, Zhang LW, Chen DS, Sun L, Li ZQ, Ye ZF, et al. Molecular identification of differential expression genes associated with sex pheromone biosynthesis in Spodoptera exigua. Mol Genet Genomics. 2017; 292: 795–809. 10.1007/s00438-017-1307-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Teal PEA, Tumlinson JH. Properties of cuticular oxidases used for sex pheromone biosynthesis by Heliothis zea. J Chem Ecol. 1988; 14: 2131–2145. 10.1007/BF01014254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fang N, Teal PEA, Tumlinson JH. Correlation between glycerolipids and pheromone aldehydes in the sex pheromone gland of female tobacco hornworm moths, Manduca sexta (L.). Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 1995; 30: 321–336. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bestmann HJ, Herrig M, Attygalle AB. Terminal acetylation in pheromone biosynthesis by Mamestra brassicae L. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Experientia. 1987; 43: 1033–1034. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Teal PEA, Tumlinson JH. The role of alcohols in pheromone biosynthesis by two noctuid moths that use acetate pheromone components. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 1987; 4: 261–269. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhu JW, Zhao CH, Lu F, Bengtsson M, Löfstedt C. Reductase specificity and the ratio regulation of E/Z isomers in the pheromone biosynthesis of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1996; 26: 171–176. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gao RT, Qin XX. Preliminary study on Holcocerus insularis. For Pest Dis. 1983: 1, 3–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Liu HX, Liu ZX, Zheng HX, Jin ZR, Zhang JT, Zhang PQ. Sensilla on the antennae and ovipositor of the carpenterworm, Streltzoviella insularis (Staudinger, 1892) (Lepidoptera, Cossidae). Oriental Insects. 2018; 52: 420–433. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Xu LL, Pei JH, Wang T, Ren LL, Zong SX. The larval sensilla on the antennae and mouthparts of five species of Cossidae (Lepidoptera). Can J Zool. 2017; 95: 611–622. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhang JT, Meng XZ. Electrophysiological responses of Holcocerus insularis Staudinger to the female sex pheromone extracts and standard compounds. Scientia Silvae Sinicae. 2000; 36: 123–126. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhang JT, Meng XZ. Synthesis and filed tests of sex attractant for Holcocerus insularis Staudinger (Lepidoptera: Cossidae). Scientia Silvae Sinicae. 2001; 37: 71–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vogel H, Heidel AJ, Heckel DG, Groot AT. Transcriptome analysis of the sex pheromone gland of the noctuid moth Heliothis virescens. BMC Genomics. 2010; 11: 29 10.1186/1471-2164-11-29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011; 29: 644–652. 10.1038/nbt.1883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Conesa A, Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M, Robles M. Blast2GO: A universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics. 2005; 21: 3674–3676. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti610 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science. 1997; 278: 631–637. 10.1126/science.278.5338.631 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Moriya Y, Itoh M, Okuda S, Yoshizawa AC, Kanehisa M. KAAS: An automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35: W182–W185. 10.1093/nar/gkm321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nature Biotechnol. 2010; 28: 511–515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011; 28: 2731–2739. 10.1093/molbev/msr121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987; 4: 406–425. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rambaut A. FigTree 1.4.2 software. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, Univ. Edinburgh. 2014; Available from: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/
  • 46.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001; 25: 402–408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Raina AK, Jaffe H, Kempe TG, Keim P, Blacher RW, Fales HM, et al. Identification of a neuropeptide hormone that regulates sex pheromone production in female moths. Science. 1989; 244: 796–798. 10.1126/science.244.4906.796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Rafaeli A, Bober R, Becker L, Choi MY, Fuerst EJ, Jurenka RA. Spatial distribution and differential expression of the PBAN receptor in tissues of adult Helicoverpa spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Insect Mol Biol. 2007; 16: 287–293. 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2007.00725.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Jurenka RA, Fabrias G, Roelofs WL. Hormonal control of female sex pheromone biosynthesis in the redbanded leafroller moth, Argyrotaenia velutinana. Insect Biochem. 1991; 21: 81–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Choi MY, Jurenka RA. Role of extracellular Ca2+ and calcium channel activated by a G protein-coupled receptor regulating pheromone production in Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2006; 99: 905–909. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Choi MY, Fuerst EJ, Rafaeli A, Jurenka RA. Identification of a G protein-coupled receptor for pheromone biosynthesis activating neuropeptide from pheromone glands of the moth Helicoverpa zea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003; 100: 9721–9726. 10.1073/pnas.1632485100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hull JJ, Ohnishi A, Moto K, Kawasaki Y, Kurata R, Suzuki MG, et al. Cloning and characterization of the pheromone biosynthesis activating neuropeptide receptor from the silkmoth, Bombyx mori—Significance of the carboxyl terminus in receptor internalization. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 51500–51507. 10.1074/jbc.M408142200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kim YJ, Nachman RJ, Aimanova K, Gill S, Adams ME. The pheromone biosynthesis activating neuropeptide (PBAN) receptor of Heliothis virescens: Identification, functional expression, and structure-activity relationships of ligand analogs. Peptides. 2008; 29: 268–275. 10.1016/j.peptides.2007.12.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lee JM, Hull JJ, Kawai T, Goto C, Kurihara M, Tanokura M, et al. Re-evaluation of the PBAN receptor molecule: characterization of PBANR variants expressed in the pheromone glands of moths. Front Endocrinol. 2012; 3: 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hull JJ, Ohnishi A, Matsumoto S. Regulatory mechanisms underlying pheromone biosynthesis activating neuropeptide (PBAN)-induced internalization of the Bombyx mori PBAN receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005; 334: 69–78. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.06.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Moore CA, Milano SK, Benovic JL. Regulation of receptor trafficking by GRKs and arrestins. Annu Rev Physiol. 2007; 69: 451–482. 10.1146/annurev.physiol.69.022405.154712 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Marchese A, Paing MM, Temple BR, Trejo J. G protein—coupled receptor sorting to endosomes and lysosomes. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008; 48: 601–629. 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.48.113006.094646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ding BJ, Löfstedt C. Analysis of the Agrotis segetum pheromone gland transcriptome in the light of sex pheromone biosynthesis. BMC Genomics. 2015; 16: 711 10.1186/s12864-015-1909-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gu SH, Wu KM, Guo YY, Pickett JA, Field LM, Zhou JJ, et al. Identification of genes expressed in the sex pheromone gland of the black cutworm Agrotis ipsilon with putative roles in sex pheromone biosynthesis and transport. BMC Genomics. 2013; 14: 636 10.1186/1471-2164-14-636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Nusawardani T, Kroemer JA, Choi MY, Jurenka RA. Identification and characterization of the pyrokinin/pheromone biosynthesis activating neuropeptide family of G protein-coupled receptors from Ostrinia nubilalis. Insect Mol Biol. 2013; 22: 331–340. 10.1111/imb.12025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fodor J, Hull JJ, Köblös G, Jacquin-Joly E, Szlanka T, Fónagy A. Identification and functional characterization of the pheromone biosynthesis activating neuropeptide receptor isoforms from Mamestra brassicae. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2018; 258: 60–69. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2017.05.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Golz A, Focke M, Lichtenthaler HK. Inhibitors of de novo fatty acid biosynthesis in higher plants. J Plant Physiol. 1994; 143: 426–433. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sasaki Y, Konishi T, Nagano Y. The compartmentation of acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase in plants. Plant Physiol. 1995; 108: 445–449. 10.1104/pp.108.2.445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Harwood JL. Fatty acid metabolism. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1988; 39: 101–138. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Eliyahu D, Applebaum S, Rafaeli A. Moth sex-pheromone biosynthesis is inhibited by the herbicide diclofop. Pestic Biochem Phys. 2003; 77: 75–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Tang JD, Charlton RE, Jurenka RA, Wolf WA, Phelan PL, Sreng L, et al. Regulation of pheromone biosynthesis by a brain hormone in two moth species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989; 86: 1806–1810. 10.1073/pnas.86.6.1806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Jurenka RA, Jacquin E, Roelofs WL. Stimulation of pheromone biosynthesis in the moth Helicoverpa zea: Action of a brain hormone on pheromone glands involves Ca2+ and cAMP as second messengers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991; 88: 8621–8625. 10.1073/pnas.88.19.8621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Zhang YN, Xia YH, Zhu JY, Li SY, Dong SL. Putative pathway of sex pheromone biosynthesis and degradation by expression patterns of genes identified from female pheromone gland and adult antenna of Sesamia inferens (Walker). J Chem Ecol. 2014; 40: 439–451. 10.1007/s10886-014-0433-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Hashimoto K, Yoshizawa AC, Okuda S, Kuma K, Goto S, Kanehisa M. The repertoire of desaturases and elongases reveals fatty acid variations in 56 eukaryotic genomes. J Lipid Res. 2008; 49: 183–191. 10.1194/jlr.M700377-JLR200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ikeda Y, Okamura-Ikeda K, Tanaka K. Purification and characterization of short-chain, medium-chain, and long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenases from rat liver mitochondria. Isolation of the holo- and apoenzymes and conversion of the apoenzyme to the holoenzyme. J Biol Chem. 1985; 260: 1311–1325. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kunau WH, Dommes V, Schulz H. β-Oxidation of fatty acids in mitochondria, peroxisomes, and bacteria: A century of continued progress. Prog Lipid Res. 1995; 34: 267–342. 10.1016/0163-7827(95)00011-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Uchida Y, Izai K, Orii T, Hashimoto T. Novel fatty acid β-oxidation enzymes in rat liver mitochondria. II. Purification and properties of enoyl-coenzyme A (CoA) hydratase/3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase/3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase trifunctional protein. J Biol Chem. 1992; 267: 1034–1041. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Sofer W, Martin PF. Analysis of alcohol dehydrogenase gene expression in Drosophila. Annu Rev Genet. 1987; 21: 203–227. 10.1146/annurev.ge.21.120187.001223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Bohren KM, Bullock B, Wermuth B, Gabbay KH. The aldo-keto reductase superfamily. cDNAs and deduced amino acid sequences of human aldehyde and aldose reductases. J Biol Chem. 1989; 264: 9547–9551. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Jurenka RA, Roelofs WL. Characterization of the acetyltransferase used in pheromone biosynthesis in moths: specificity for the Z isomer in Tortricidae. Insect Biochem. 1989; 19: 639–644. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Morse D, Meighen E. Biosynthesis of the acetate ester precursor of the spruce budworm sex pheromone by an acetyl CoA: fatty alcohol acetyltransferase. Insect Biochem. 1987; 17: 53–59. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. Primers used for RT-qPCR analysis of ACCs and DESs in S. insularis.

(DOCX)

S1 Text. Nucleic acid sequences of all putative sex pheromone biosynthesis-related genes identified in the S. insularis pheromone gland transcriptome.

(DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

All raw reads files are available from the NCBI SRA database (accession number SRP179142).


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES