Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology logoLink to International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology
. 2017 Nov 1;10(11):11037–11043.

Targeting of pertechnetate imaging of HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma through the transduction of the survivin promoter controls the sodium iodide symporter

Zhen Zhao 1, Rui Huang 1, Huawei Cai 1, Bin Liu 1, Yu Zeng 1, Anren Kuang 1
PMCID: PMC6965826  PMID: 31966449

Abstract

Currently, the intratumoral (i.t.) injection of adenovirus-mediated cancer gene therapy has been reported in numerous investigations. However, the intravenous (i.v.) injection of adenovirus is more suited for disseminated tumors and distant metastatic lesions. The survivin promoter, which has tumor-selective capability, was used to construct an adenoviral vector, and its feasibility to carry the sodium iodide symporter (NIS) gene for potential tumor-targeting transfection into carcinoma was evaluated in this study. An in vitro cellular assay using HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells exhibited iodide uptake after infection with Ad-Sur-NIS, and the uptake reached a maximum level at 30 min. The effective half-life of 125I efflux from Ad-Sur-NIS infected HepG2 cells was 16.67 ± 1.08 min. Moreover, in vivo transfection of Ad-Sur-NIS via i.v. injection induced more effective transfection and, accordingly, induced higher uptake of pertechnetate in HCC xenograft tumors than did the non-specific transfection of Ad-CMV-NIS (i.v.) (P<0.05), indicating possible selective NIS gene-transfecting image strategies by the survivin promoter.

Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma, sodium iodide symporter, survivin promoter, intravenous injection, pertechnetate imaging

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers in East Asians, and its incidence is also increasing in the Western world [1]. However, advanced HCC has a poor prognosis despite various therapeutic options [2]. Partial hepatectomy or liver transplantation, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or a combined modality approach is also only partially effective against advanced HCC [3,4].Therefore, the development of new therapeutic strategies is indispensable. Gene therapy, as a promising method, may be a potential future treatment strategy for HCC [5,6].

The sodium iodide symporter (NIS) is an intrinsic membrane glycoprotein that can transport iodide into thyroid follicular cells [7,8]. NIS is the molecular basis for the diagnosis and therapeutic management of thyroid diseases, including differentiated thyroid cancer [9,10]. Many investigations, including our own, have shown that the gene transfer of NIS into various non-thyroidal cancer cells confers increased radioiodine uptake [11-15]. Therefore, NIS is the potential gene for the molecular imaging and targeted therapy of non-thyroidal tumors.

In terms of ensuring tumor-specific radiation exposure, the application of tumor-specific promoters can drive NIS selective expression in tumor cells. Survivin, the smallest member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein family, is highly expressed in most human cancers but is undetectable in normal adult tissues [16,17]. Our previous work in lung cancer cells and prostate cancer cells also demonstrated the high efficacy of radioiodine therapy after tumor-selective Ad-Sur-NIS gene delivery via intratumoral (i.t.) injection [11,12]. Compared with the i.t. injection of Ad-Sur-NIS, the intravenous (i.v.) injection of Ad-Sur-NIS will be more suitable for disseminated tumors and distant metastatic lesions [15,18]. Therefore, the i.v. injection of Ad-Sur-NIS could be useful for expanding this strategy in clinical application.

In this study, we aimed to investigate the i.v. injection of a gene for in vivo biodistribution and scintigraphy experiments of mice bearing HepG2 cells by delivery of an adenovirus vector containing the NIS gene under the control of the survivin promoter.

Materials and methods

Cell lines

The human HCC cell line HepG2 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA). Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% calf serum (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 100 ng/ml streptomycin at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.

Construction of recombinant adenovirus

The recombinant adenovirus Ad-Sur-NIS, which uses the survivin promoter to drive NIS expression, was used as previously described [12]. The recombinant adenovirus Ad-CMV-NIS, which uses the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter to drive NIS expression, was used as a positive control [12]. The recombinant adenoviruses Ad-Sur-GFP and Ad-CMV-GFP were used as negative controls [11,12].

In vitro 125I uptake and efflux experiments

The HepG2 cells were plated in 6-well plates and were cultured with RPMI 1640 medium. When the cells reached confluence (approximately 1×106 cells per well), they were incubated at 100 multiplicity of infection (MOI) per well of Ad-Sur-NIS, Ad-CMV-NIS, Ad-Sur-GFP or Ad-CMV-GFP for at 37°C and 5% CO2. After 2 h, the media were replaced with fresh culture media, and virus-infected cells were further maintained. After 48 h, the cells were quickly washed with 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and were incubated with 3.7 kBq 125I in 1 ml of medium without serum. To evaluate the time course of the iodide uptake, the cells were incubated for 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 60 and 90 min in the 125I solution. The cells were then washed with 1 ml of ice-cold PBS, and the radioactivity of the detached cells was counted using a γ-counter (No. 262 Nuclear Instrument Factory, Xi’an, China).

To determine the 125I efflux, the cells were incubated with 3.7 kBq 125I in 1 ml of medium without serum for 30 min. The cells were washed twice with PBS, followed by the addition of medium without serum and further incubation. At specified time points (5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 min), the buffer was removed, and its radioactivity was measured. After the last time point, the cells were collected and immediately lysed to determine the residual radioactivity.

In vivo imaging acquisition

The experiments involving animals were performed with the approval of the Sichuan University Animal Care and Use Committee. Ten million (1×107) HepG2 cells were transplanted subcutaneously into the flank region of 6-week-old BALB/c nude mice. The nude mice weighed 18-20 g. The experiments started when tumors had reached 8-10 mm in diameter. Two days after the i.v. injection of 1×109 PFU Ad-Sur-NIS and Ad-CMV-NIS, the mice were anesthetized with 2% isoflurane and were injected with 18.5 MBq 99mTcO4 -. At 2 h post injection, the mice were scanned with a gamma camera equipped with a low-energy, high-resolution pinhole collimator (Philips Medical Systems, Milpitas, CA). Each image was acquired with a 256×256 matrix and was magnified two times.

Immunohistochemical staining of NIS protein expression

To detect the NIS expression, resected tumors from nude mice were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h. The samples were immunostained using a standard streptavidin-biotin labeling protocol as described previously [12].

Biodistribution of 125I in the tumor-bearing mice

At 2 days after adenovirus treatment, radioiodine uptake in organs were assessed. The dose of 370 kBq 125I was injected into mice, and the animals were sacrificed at 2 h post-injection, and the tumor, liver and muscle were dissected, weighed and counted for radioactivity. The results were expressed as the percentage of the injected dose per gram of tissue.

Statistical analysis

The data were expressed as mean ± standard derivation. In vitro cell and vivo biodistribution experiments, statistical significance was determined using Student’s t-test, and statistical significance was achieved when the P value was <0.05.

Results

125I uptake and efflux studies in vitro

To test the transduction conditions in Ad-Sur-NIS-, Ad-CMV-NIS-, Ad-Sur-GFP- and Ad-CMV-GFP-infected HepG2 cells, functional assays quantifying 125I uptake were performed. As shown in Figure 1A, the 125I uptake was rapidly increased and reached a maximum level at 30 min in HepG2 cells infected with Ad-Sur-NIS and Ad-CMV-NIS. HepG2 cells infected with Ad-Sur-NIS and Ad-CMV-NIS exhibited significant 125I uptake, with the values of 13584 ± 1197 c.p.m. and 19496 ± 1360 c.p.m. By contrast, merely 125I uptake above the background level was observed in HepG2 cells infected with Ad-Sur-GFP and Ad-CMV-GFP, with the values of 326 ± 49 c.p.m. and 447 ± 53 c.p.m. Ad-Sur-NIS- and Ad-CMV-NIS-infected HepG2 cells showed significant 125I uptake ability compared with Ad-Sur-GFP- and Ad-CMV-GFP-infected controls (P<0.001). The uptake experiment indicated that 125I uptake was essentially dependent of NIS expression. Figure 1B showed the amount of 125I present within the cells as a function of time. The effluxes of 125I from Ad-Sur-NIS- and Ad-CMV-NIS-infected HepG2 cells were similar, with effective half-life (T1/2) values of 16.67 ± 1.08 min and 18.34 ± 1.59 min, respectively (P>0.05). The efflux experiment indicated that the T1/2 of Ad-Sur-NIS- or Ad-CMV-NIS-infected HepG2 cells were similar.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

In vitro experiments. A. Ad-Sur-NIS- and Ad-CMV-NIS-infected HepG2 cells showed significant 125I uptake ability compared with Ad-Sur-GFP- and Ad-CMV-GFP-infected controls (P<0.001). Iodide uptake increased within 30 min due to the incubation of the Ad-Sur-NIS- and Ad-CMV-NIS-infected HepG2 cells at different times with 3.7 kBq of 125I. B. The 125I efflux rates were similar in HepG2 cells infected with Ad-Sur-NIS and Ad-CMV-NIS (T1/2 = 16.67 ± 1.08 min, and T1/2 = 18.34 ± 1.59 min, P>0.05).

Scintigraphic imaging of tumor-bearing mice in vivo

To evaluate the visualization effect via adenovirus infection in tumors, scintigraphy was performed on tumor-bearing mice with 99mTcO4 - pertechnetate. Normal physiological uptake values were observed in the thyroid, stomach and bladder. The tumors infected with i.v. injection of Ad-Sur-NIS were visible, and only background activity was observed in the normal liver tissue (Figure 2A). The tumors infected with Ad-CMV-NIS i.v. were not visible, but the normal liver tissue exhibited significant uptake of 99mTcO4 - (Figure 2B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

99mTcO4 - pertechnetate scintigraphic images and immunohistochemical staining results (×200). A. The tumors infected with the i.v. injection of Ad-Sur-NIS were visible, and only the background activity was observed in the normal liver tissue. B. The tumors infected with the i.v. injection of Ad-CMV-NIS were not visible, but the normal liver tissue exhibited a significant uptake of 99mTcO4 -. C. The tumors infected with the i.v. injection of Ad-Sur-NIS exhibited NIS-specific immunoreactivity. D. By contrast, the tumors infected with the i.v. injection of Ad-CMV-NIS did not exhibit NIS-specific immunoreactivity.

Immunohistochemical staining results of NIS expression in the HepG2 xenografts

The tumors infected with Ad-Sur-NIS i.v. exhibited NIS-specific immunoreactivity (Figure 2C). By contrast, the tumors infected with Ad-CMV-NIS i.v. did not exhibit NIS-specific immunoreactivity (Figure 2D).

125I biodistribution studies in tumor-bearing mice

The biodistribution values of 125I in mouse tissues are provided in Figure 3. The 125I accumulated in tumors via i.v. injection of Ad-Sur-NIS was higher than that via i.v. injection of Ad-CMV-NIS (4.66 ± 0.45 vs 1.21 ± 0.66, P<0.05). The 125I accumulated in the liver via the i.v. injection of Ad-Sur-NIS was lower than that via the i.v. injection of Ad-CMV-NIS (1.38 ± 0.45 vs 17.59 ± 5.48, respectively; P<0.05). The tumor specificity of Ad-Sur-NIS was confirmed via biodistribution, which exhibited selective uptake of 125I in tumors and a lack of 125I uptake in the liver.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Biodistribution of 125I in mice with Ad-Sur-NIS- and Ad-CMV-NIS-injected HepG2 xenografts. A. The 125I accumulated in tumors via the i.v. injection of Ad-Sur-NIS was higher than that via the i.v. injection of Ad-CMV-NIS (4.66 ± 0.45 vs 1.21 ± 0.66, P<0.05). B. The 125I accumulated in the liver via the i.v. injection of Ad-Sur-NIS was lower than that via the i.v. injection of Ad-CMV-NIS (1.38 ± 0.45 vs 17.59 ± 5.48, P<0.05).

Discussion

The cloning and characterization of the NIS gene have paved the way for radionuclide imaging and therapy in non-thyroidal cancer [19,20]. Tissue-specific promoters may serve as targeting mechanisms for gene expression and have been described to mediate tissue-specific expression. In the context of the NIS gene therapy of different types of cancer, the promoters could introduce cancer specificity for improved safety and efficacy [21-23]. In previous studies, we have reported successful NIS expression via the application of the survivin promoter in A549 non-small cell lung cancer cells and PC3 prostate cancer cells following i.t. injection [11,12]. Although our previous data indicated a potential strategy for the imaging and therapy of iodine-insensitive tumors by NIS gene transfection, there remains a barrier before clinical application in selectively transferring the NIS gene into tumors. The i.t. drug injection is acceptable in notably few cases, while the i.v. drug injection requires a comparably effective but more selective promoter to mediate targeted and efficient NIS gene transfer with the potential to reach tumor metastases.

This functional NIS protein expression after adenoviral NIS gene transfer into HepG2 cells was confirmed by measurement of the in vitro 125I uptake. Ad-Sur-NIS- and Ad-CMV-NIS-infected HepG2 cells showed significant 125I uptake ability compared with Ad-Sur-GFP- and Ad-CMV-GFP-infected controls (P<0.001). The uptake experiment indicated that 125I uptake was essentially dependent on NIS expression. The effluxes of 125I from Ad-Sur-NIS- and Ad-CMV-NIS-infected HepG2 cells were similar (P>0.05), although CMV was a strong promoter. The effluxes of time were rapid, possibly because of the lack of iodide organification and the lack of an increase in the retention time of accumulated radioiodine in NIS gene-infected HepG2 cells [24].

The radionuclide uptake of i.v. injection of Ad-Sur-NIS was higher than that of i.v. injection of Ad-CMV-NIS in tumors (P<0.05) but lower than that of i.v. injection of Ad-CMV-NIS in the liver (P<0.05). Therefore, the i.v. injection of Ad-Sur-NIS could enhance radionuclide accumulation in hepatoma xenografts based on the tumor specificity of the survivin promoter, which would be more suitable for disseminated tumors and distant metastatic lesions. The CMV promoter showed no tumor specificity, and the normal liver tissues exhibited significant iodide uptake via the i.v. injection of Ad-CMV-NIS, and the results were similar to other reports [19,25]. The livers of mice accumulated high levels of technetium after the i.v. injection of Ad-CMV-NIS as shown by γ-camera imaging, resulting in markedly reduced tumoral transduction as seen by almost no technetium uptake activity of HCC xenografts.

In conclusion, the i.v. injection of Ad-Sur-NIS could help to verify the applicability of targeted NIS gene imaging for hepatoma xenografts. The i.v. injection of Ad-Sur-NIS will be more suitable for disseminated tumors and distant metastatic lesions in clinical application.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81201118, 81471692 and 81301250).

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Venook AP, Papandreou C, Furuse J, de Guevara LL. The incidence and epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: a global and regional perspective. Oncologist. 2010;15:5–13. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-S4-05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Oh BK, Kim H, Park YN, Yoo JE, Choi J, Kim KS, Lee JJ, Park C. High telomerase activity and long telomeres in advanced hepatocellular carcinomas with poor prognosis. Lab Invest. 2008;88:144–52. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhang ZM, Guo JX, Zhang ZC, Jiang N, Zhang ZY, Pan LJ. Therapeutic options for intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:1685–9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i13.1685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vilarinho S, Taddei T. Therapeutic strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma: new advances and challenges. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2015;13:219–34. doi: 10.1007/s11938-015-0049-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ding B, Li T, Zhang J, Zhao L, Zhai G. Advances in liver-directed gene therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma by non-viral delivery systems. Curr Gene Ther. 2012;12:92–102. doi: 10.2174/156652312800099625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sangro B, Mazzolini G, Ruiz M, Ruiz J, Quiroga J, Herrero I, Qian C, Benito A, Larrache J, Olagüe C, Boan J, Peñuelas I, Sádaba B, Prieto J. A phase I clinical trial of thymidine kinasebased gene therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Gene Ther. 2010;17:837–43. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2010.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Smanik PA, Liu Q, Furminger TL, Ryu K, Xing S, Mazzaferri EL, Jhiang SM. Cloning of the human sodium lodide symporter. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996;226:339–45. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1996.1358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Darrouzet E, Lindenthal S, Marcellin D, Pellequer JL, Pourcher T. The sodium/iodide symporter: state of the art of its molecular characterization. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1838:244–53. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chung JK. Sodium iodide symporter: its role in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:1188–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ravera S, Reyna-Neyra A, Ferrandino G, Amzel LM, Carrasco N. The sodium/iodide symporter (NIS): molecular physiology and preclinical and clinical applications. Annu Rev Physiol. 2017;79:261–289. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhao Z, Huang R, Cai HW, Liu B, Zeng Y, Kuang AR. Sodium iodide symporter expression driven by the survivin promoter enables radionuclide imaging and therapy for A549 non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2017;10:5430–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Huang R, Zhao Z, Ma X, Li S, Gong R, Kuang A. Targeting of tumor radioiodine therapy by expression of the sodium iodide symporter under control of the survivin promoter. Cancer Gene Ther. 2011;18:144–52. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2010.66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ma XJ, Huang R, Kuang AR. AFP promoter enhancer increased specific expression of the human sodium iodide symporter (hNIS) for targeted radioiodine therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Invest. 2009;27:673–81. doi: 10.1080/07357900802620885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schmohl KA, Gupta A, Grünwald GK, Trajkovic-Arsic M, Klutz K, Braren R, Schwaiger M, Nelson PJ, Ogris M, Wagner E, Siveke JT, Spitzweg C. Imaging and targeted therapy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using the theranostic sodium iodide symporter (NIS) gene. Oncotarget. 2017;8:33393–404. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim KI, Lee YJ, Lee TS, Song I, Cheon GJ, Lim SM, Chung JK, Kang JH. In vitro radionuclide therapy and in vivo scintigraphic imaging of alpha-fetoprotein-producing hepatocellular carcinoma by targeted sodium iodide symporter gene expression. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;47:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s13139-012-0166-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen X, Duan N, Zhang C, Zhang W. Survivin and tumorigenesis: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. J Cancer. 2016;7:314–23. doi: 10.7150/jca.13332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Garg H, Suri P, Gupta JC, Talwar GP, Dubey S. Survivin: a unique target for tumor therapy. Cancer Cell Int. 2016;16:49. doi: 10.1186/s12935-016-0326-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Urnauer S, Klutz K, Grünwald GK, Morys S, Schwenk N, Zach C, Gildehaus FJ, Rödl W, Ogris M, Wagner E, Spitzweg C. Systemic tumor-targeted sodium iodide symporter (NIS) gene therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma mediated by B6 peptide polyplexes. J Gene Med. 2017;19:e2957. doi: 10.1002/jgm.2957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dwyer RM, Bergert ER, O’Connor MK, Gendler SJ, Morris JC. Adenovirus-mediated and targeted expression of the sodium-iodide symporter permits in vivo radioiodide imaging and therapy of pancreatic tumors. Hum Gene Ther. 2006;17:661–668. doi: 10.1089/hum.2006.17.661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dai G, Levy O, Carrasco N. Cloning and characterization of the thyroid iodide transporter. Nature. 1996;379:458–60. doi: 10.1038/379458a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li W, Tan J, Wang P, Li N, Li C. Glial fibrillary acidic protein promoters direct adenovirus early 1A gene and human telomerase reverse transcriptase promoters direct sodium iodide symporter expression for malignant glioma radioiodine therapy. Mol Cell Biochem. 2015;399:279–89. doi: 10.1007/s11010-014-2254-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gao XF, Zhou T, Chen GH, Xu CL, Ding YL, Sun YH. Radioiodine therapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer following prostate-specific membrane antigen promoter-mediated transfer of the human sodium iodide symporter. Asian J Androl. 2014;16:120–3. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.122354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Trujillo MA, Oneal MJ, Davydova J, Bergert E, Yamamoto M, Morris JC. Construction of an MUC-1 promoter driven, conditionally replicating adenovirus that expresses the sodium iodide symporter for gene therapy of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2009;11:R53. doi: 10.1186/bcr2342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Haberkorn U, Kinscherf R, Kissel M, Kübler W, Mahmut M, Sieger S, Eisenhut M, Peschke P, Altmann A. Enhanced iodide transport after transfer of the human sodium iodide symporter gene is associated with lack of retention and low absorbed dose. Gene Ther. 2003;10:774–80. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Grünwald GK, Vetter A, Klutz K, Willhauck MJ, Schwenk N, Senekowitsch-Schmidtke R, Schwaiger M, Zach C, Wagner E, Göke B, Holm PS, Ogris M, Spitzweg C. Systemic image-guided liver cancer radiovirotherapy using dendrimer-coated adenovirus encoding the sodium iodide symporter as theranostic gene. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:1450–7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.115493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES