Abstract
Breast cancer has become the most popular malignant tumors in females. Breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) play an important role in metastasis and recurrence. Previous study showed close correlation between miR-200c and behavioral regulation of breast cancer stem cells. This study aimed to investigate differential expression of miR-200c in breast cancer stem cells, and its role in regulation tumor formation property. DNA microchip assay and qRT-PCR analyzed differential expression of microRNA between BCSCs and non-tumor formation NTG cells. Bioinformatics and luciferase reporter gene assay determined targeted site of miR-200c. MiR mimic and inhibitor were transfected to change miR-200c expression level, followed by Western Blot for detecting BMI1 gene expression. Cell clonal assay determined cell proliferation, whilst tumor xenograft was performed to analyze tumor formation potency. MiR-200c was down-regulated in BCSCs compared to NTG cells (P<0.05). Bioinformatics and luciferase reporter gene assay attributed BMI1 gene as targeting site of miR-200c. Transfection of miR-200c and inhibitor altered miR-200c expression. Results showed that miR-200c could suppress BMI1 expression, and suppressed proliferation and tumor formation rate (P<0.05). Compared to NTG cells, BCSCs has significantly down-regulated expression of miR-200c. BCSCs facilitate BMI1 gene expression via inhibiting miR-200c expression, further elevating BCSCs proliferation and tumor formation potency.
Keywords: Breast cancer stem cells, MicroRNA-200c, cell proliferation, tumor formation
Introduction
Statistics showed breast cancer as the most popular female specific malignant tumors, and occupies about 29% of all female cancers [1]. Surgery is still the major treatment strategy, in addition to chemotherapy and hormone replacement, with chemotherapy as the major approach [2]. Common chemotherapy reagents including docetaxel and adriamycin frequently lead to drug resistance, which severely compromises treatment efficacy and increases patient’s burden [3,4]. Therefore, the study of mechanism underlying drug resistance of breast cancer is of critical importance for improving treatment efficacy and decreasing patient burden.
Tumor stem cells are a certain sub-type of cells in solid tumors, with self-renewal potency causing heterogeneity of tumors [5]. Tumor stem cells have multiple features similar as those of normal stem cells. Studies shown the important role of tumor stem cells in multiple pathology and cellular behaviors of malignant tumors [6]. The self-renewal and rapid proliferation potency of tumor stem cells are critical for tumor maintenance and recurrence. Meanwhile, multiple mechanisms inside tumor stem cells are closely correlated with drug resistance after routine tumor treatment [7,8]. Therefore, the study of behavioral regulation of malignant tumor stem cells and related mechanism are of critical importance for identifying effective treatment against malignant tumors including breast cancer.
MiR-200c belongs to microRNA family. Previous study showed that microRNA could affect multiple cell behaviors via RNA interference mechanism [9]. By analyzing microRNA expressional profile of malignant tumor cells, it has been found to play an important role in regulating behaviors of malignant tumor cells [10]. Recently, study has shown important roles of microRNA in regulating malignant tumor cells, as miR-200c and miR-222 had abnormal expression level in breast cancer cell lines with drug resistance [11,12]. This study aimed to investigate differential expression of miR-200c in breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) and related mechanism.
Materials and methods
Materials
BCSCs and non-tumor formation breast cancer cell NTG, plus HEK293 cells were purchased from Chinese Medical Academy. DMEM culture medium, penicillin and streptomycin were purchased from Gibco (US). RNA extraction kit was purchased from Qiagen (US). Improved DMEM medium was purchased from Invitrogen (US). Model GCS3000 microchip scanner and miRNA4.0 test array were purchased from Affymetrix (US). MirVanat qRT-PCR miRNA test kits were purchased from Ambion (US). Real-time PCR was purchased from Bio-Rad (US).
Cell culture and miRNA expression profile analysis
BCSCs were cultured in improved DMEM culture medium containing 15% FBS. NTG and HEK293 cells were cultured in dual-resistant culture medium containing 10% FBS. Cells were cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2.
BCSCs and HEK283 cells were collected and cultured. RNA extraction kit was used to collect total RNA. FlashTagBiotinHSR test kit (Affymetrix) was used for adding tail tag and biotin label on miRNA of sample RNA. MiRNA4.0 microarray was used for reaction after washing and rinsing. Collected data were analyzed by ExpressionConsole software for obtaining mean values and standard deviation (SD).
qRT-PCR
qRT-PCR primers were firstly designed based on miR-200c sequence (GeneBank access number, NR_029779) as shown in Table 1. Using total RNA extracted from HEK293 cells as the control, qRT-PCR was used to test miR-200c expression level in HTB-106 cells. MirVanat qRT-PCR miRNA test kit was used for qRT-PCR assay. Built-in software of instrument (version 2.02) was used for analyzing expression level by 2-ΔΔCt method using U6 sequence as the internal control [13].
Table 1.
qRT-PCR primer sequences
| Name | Sequence |
|---|---|
| miR-200-F | 5’-GGTTCTTCCCTGGGCTTC-3’ |
| miR-200-R | 5’-GAGTAGGAGCTCCGGATGTG-3’ |
| U6-F | 5’CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA3’ |
| U6-R | 5’AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT3’ |
Functional prediction of miR-200c
TargetScan Release 5.1 (www.Targetscan.org) was used to predict functional targeted gene of miR-200c. Luciferase reporter gene assay was used to demonstrate possible targets of miR-200c. Based on 3’UTR sequences of BMI1 (Genebank access number, NM_005180), primers were synthesized as 5’-TATATC TAGAT TCTTG TTATT ACGCTG TTTTG-3’ and 5’-AGATT CTAGA ATGTCA TATACC AATATG GC-3’. 3-UTR sequence of BMI1 mRNA was obtained by PCR amplification, followed by the insertion into downstream site of luciferase gene coding region of pmiRGLO plasmid to construct pmirGLO-BMI1 and pmirGLO plasmid. Those cells with successful transfection were transfected with miR-200c mimic to elevate miR-200c level as described below. 48 h after transfection, cells were analyzed for fluorescent intensity. Dual luciferase reporter gene assay system (Promega) and MicroLumatPlus LB96V spectrometry (Berthold) were used for analyzing fluorescent intensity.
Transfection of miR-200c
MiR-200c mimic or inhibitor sequence was transfected into BCSCs to elevate or suppress miR-200c expression level. MiR-200c mimic and inhibitor sequence were purchased from Gimma (China). Liposome INTERFERinTM transfection kit (Polyplus transfection) was used for cell transfection. After culture, digestion, cells were counted and inoculated into 96-well plate for 24 h incubation. Transfection was performed according to manual instruction of test kit.
Western blot analysis
BCSCs with successful transfection were collected and lysed for extracting total proteins, which were tested for BMI1 expression in cells by Western Blot. Primary antibody (mouse anti-human BMI1 antibody at 1:1000 or anti-human β-actin at 1:1000) and secondary antibody (goat anti-mouse IgG at 1:200) were used. Western Blot results were analyzed by computer assisted gel imaging system to calculate SMI expression across different cell lines.
Cell clone formation assay
BCSCs cell line with successful transfection was cultured until log-growth phase. Cells were digested in trypsin and re-suspended into fresh culture medium. Cells were then inoculated into 10 mL fresh medium at 100 cells concentration in triplicates. Cells were incubated for 10 days. After that, culture medium was removed and cells were fixed in paraformaldehyde for staining in crystal violet. Staining buffer was removed, and clones were counted on the inverted culture dish with meshed film to calculate clonal formation rate = (clone number/100) ×100%.
Xenograft for human breast cancer cells
Breast cancer cell xenograft assay was performed to test the effect of miR-200c on tumor formation potency of BCSCs. Those cells with successful transfection were cultured at 37°C for 2 h, and were re-suspended for counting. Using NOD/SCID mice as research objects, 12 adult mice (6 weeks age, body weight at 32.6±2.5 g, 6 males and 6 females) were randomly assigned into three groups. Each mouse received 105 cells and was fed with normal diet. Animals were cultured at 25°C with 60±10%. Animal protocols followed guidelines of animal experimental stipulated by NIH.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). SPSS20.0 was used for student t-test. A statistical significance was defined when P<0.05, and an extreme significance was defined when P<0.01.
Results
Differential expression of miRNA in BCSCs
Total RNA was extracted from BCSCs and NTG cells. MiRNA expression was examined by gene chip assay in triplicates. Expression Console software was used for analysis using miRNA expression in NTG cells as baseline level, to analyze miRNA expression in BCSCs. As shown in Figure 1, in BCSCs, expression levels of miR-214, miR-127, miR-1555 and miR-34b were significantly elevated (P<0.05), whilst miR-429, miR-183, miR-200a and miR-200c were all down-regulated (P<0.05).
Figure 1.

MiRNA expression in BCSCs by gene chip assay.
qRT-PCR for miR-200c expression level
qRT-PCR was used to confirm results of gene chip assays. As shown in Figure 2, miR-200c expression level in BCSCs was significantly lowered (P<0.05 compared to NTG cells), as consistent with gene chip assay.
Figure 2.

RT-PCR assay for BCSCs cell relative expression. *, P<0.05 compared to NTG cells.
Relationship between miR-200c and BMI1 gene
TargetScan Release 5.1 was used to predict target genes of miR-200c. We found certain homology between miR-200c sequence and 3’UTR region of BMI1 (Figure 3A), thus predicting that BMI1 gene might be the target of miR-200c. We then constructed luciferase reporter gene expression system for confirmation. As shown in Figure 3B, we found significantly decreased fluorescent intensity after miR-200c mimic transfection (P<0.05), and elevated cellular fluorescent intensity after miR-200c inhibitor transfection (P<0.05), indicating that 3’UTR of BMI1 gene was functioning target of miR-200c.
Figure 3.

Correlation between miR-200c and BMI1 gene. A: Sequence homology between miR-200c and 3’UTR of BMI1 gene; B: Effects of miR-200c on BMI1 gene expression. *, P<0.05 compared to control group; #, P<0.05 compared to pmir-GLO vector.
Effects of miR-200c on BMI1 gene expression in BCSCs
By transfecting mimic or inhibitor, miR-200c expression was enhanced or suppressed in BCSCs. After transfection, cells were cultured until reaching log-growth phase. Total RNA was extracted from cell lines for RT-PCR assay measuring miR-200c relative expression level (Figure 4A), BMI protein expression level was shown in Figure 4B. Our results showed that miR-200c mimic and inhibitor could facilitate and inhibit miR-200c expression in BCSCs. Meanwhile, we also found significantly decreased BMI1 gene expression in BCSCs transfected with miR-200c mimic (P<0.05), whilst miR-200c inhibitor transfection remarkably facilitated BMI1 expression in BCSCs (P<0.05).
Figure 4.

Effects of miR-200c on BMI1 gene expression in BCSCs. A: miR-200c expression level in BCSCs after transfection by RT-PCR assay; B: Effects of miR-200c expression on BMI1 in BCSCs. *, P<0.05 compared to control group.
Proliferation potency of BCSCs
Cell clonal formation assay was performed to test effects of miR-200c mimic and inhibitor transfection on proliferation potency of BCSCs. As shown in Figure 5, after 21 days of cell culture, BCSCs with miR-200c mimic transfection had significantly decreased clonal formation potency (P<0.05 compared to control group). Whilst transfection of miR-200c inhibitor elevated clonal formation of BCSCs (P<0.05), indicating that miR-200c could inhibit proliferation activity of BCSCs.
Figure 5.

Cell clonal formation ability. *, P<0.05 compared to control group.
Tumor formation potency of BCSCs
Tumor cell xenograft assay was performed to test tumor formation ability of BCSCs after transfecting with miR-200c mimic or inhibitor. As shown in Figure 6, we found significantly lowered tumor formation potency of BCSCs in those transfected with miR-200c mimic (P<0.05 compared to control group). Whilst those transfected with miR-200c inhibitor had elevated tumor formation ability (P<0.05).
Figure 6.

Tumor formation ability of BCSCs. A: Results of breast cancer cell xenograft; B: Tumor size of mouse breast cancer cell xenograft. *, P<0.05 compared to negative control group.
Discussion
Various studies have suggested major difference of microRNA expressions including miR-21, miR-10b and miR-200c between breast cancer cells and normal tissues [14-16]. Cancer cells are proposed to regulate pathology and cell behaviors of malignant tumors via changing normal expression of microRNA [15]. MiR-200c also plays an important role in proliferation of breast cancer cells [14]. Some studies also suggested the close correlation between microRNA expression and drug resistance of breast cancer cells [10]. It is commonly believed that tumor stem cells are critical factor for proliferation, metastasis and drug resistance of malignant tumors. Therefore, it is speculated that miR-200c plays an important role in behavioral regulation of BCSCs [6]. This study firstly analyzed miRNA expressional spectrum in NTG cells and BCSCs, and found down-regulation of multiple miRNA including miR-200c. We further employed bioinformatics prediction and luciferase reporter gene assay to determine functioning site of miR-200c as BMI1. Cell clonal assay and breast cancer xenograft assay found that miR-200c could inhibit proliferation or tumor formation potency of BCSCs.
Currently lots of studies showed down-regulation of miRNA in BCSCs, but leaving the mechanism of how malignant tumor cells achieve differential expression of miRNA is still debatable [16,17]. Some studies treated tumor cells with demethylation reagent and found up-regulation of microRNA, thus proposing that methylation or other irreversible modification of transcription regulatory sequence caused different expression levels of microRNA in malignant tumor cells [17]. Moreover, some studies also showed that expression products of certain targeted genes of miRNA can also regulate miRNA expression, although more evidences are required as support [18].
As one important regulatory gene in animal cells, BMI1 gene participates in embryonic development of mammalian bones and nervous system [19]. BMI1 has close correlation with proliferation of normal stem cells. It is also one oncogene as it can facilitate self-renewal and proliferation of tumor stem cells [20]. BMI1 gene is found to be up-regulated in various human malignant tumor cells including breast cancer [21]. Previous findings showed that the binding between BMI1 and c-Myc can inhibit Ink4a/Arf gene loci to regulate p16Ink4a and p19Arf transcription, eventually inhibiting cell aging, facilitating cell proliferation and self-renewal of stem cells [22]. This study showed that miR-200c could suppress BMI1 gene expression. Meanwhile, miR-200c was found to be down-regulated in BCSCs. Therefore up-regulation of BMI1 gene expression eventually facilitates proliferation and tumor formation ability of BCSCs.
As the most common female specific malignant tumor, breast cancer severely threatens women health [1]. The recurrence, metastasis and drug resistance of breast cancer mainly depends on BCSCs. Therefore, the inhibition of BCSCs is of critical importance for treating breast cancer. This study found significantly suppressed miR-200c expression in BCSCs, which can up-regulate BMI1 gene expression via suppressing miR-200c expression, thus facilitating proliferation and tumor formation ability of BCSCs. This conclusion may provide novel insights for future treatment of breast cancer. By molecular biology approach, one can elevate miR-200c expression in BCSCs, thus inhibiting recurrence and metastasis of breast cancer.
Conclusion
MiR-200c is down-regulated in BCSCs, thus elevating target gene BMI1 expression level and enhancing proliferation and tumor formation potency of BCSCs.
Acknowledgements
Research supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (#81895576).
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Lyman GH, Temin S, Edge SB, Newman LA, Turner RR, Weaver DL, Benson AB 3rd, Bosserman LD, Burstein HJ, Cody H 3rd, Hayman J, Perkins CL, Podoloff DA, Giuliano AE American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014;32:1365–83. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.1177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Khatcheressian JL, Hurley P, Bantug E, Esserman LJ, Grunfeld E, Halberg F, Hantel A, Henry NL, Muss HB, Smith TJ, Vogel VG, Wolff AC, Somerfield MR, Davidson NE American Society of Clinical Oncology. Breast cancer followup and management after primary treatment: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013;31:961–5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.9859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Swain SM, Baselga J, Kim SB, Ro J, Semiglazov V, Campone M, Ciruelos E, Ferrero JM, Schneeweiss A, Heeson S, Clark E, Ross G, Benyunes MC, Cortes J CLEOPATRA Study Group. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:724–34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1413513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yang G, Wu D, Zhu J, Jiang O, Shi Q, Tian J, Weng Y. Upregulation of miR-195 increases the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to adriamycin treatment through inhibition of Raf-1. Oncol Rep. 2013;30:877–89. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Clevers H. The cancer stem cell: premises, promises and challenges. Nat Med. 2011;17:313–9. doi: 10.1038/nm.2304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kakarala M, Wicha MS. Implications of the cancer stem-cell hypothesis for breast cancer prevention and therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008;26:2813–20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Visvader JE, Lindeman GJ. Cancer stem cells in solid tumours: accumulating evidence and unresolved questions. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:755–68. doi: 10.1038/nrc2499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Moitra K, Lou H, Dean M. Multidrug efflux pumps and cancer stem cells: insights into multidrug resistance and therapeutic development. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;89:491–502. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nikitina EG, Urazova LN, Stegny VN. MicroRNAs and human cancer. Exp Oncol. 2012;34:2–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Robertson NM, Yigit MV. The role of microRNA in resistance to breast cancer therapy. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2014;5:823–33. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liu X, Xiao J, Zhu H, Wei X, Platt C, Damilano F, Xiao C, Bezzerides V, Bostrom P, Che L, Zhang C, Spiegelman BM, Rosenzweig A. miR-222 is necessary for exercise-induced cardiac growth and protects against pathological cardiac remodeling. Cell Metab. 2015;21:584–95. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lim YY, Wright JA, Attema JL, Gregory PA, Bert AG, Smith E, Thomas D, Lopez AF, Drew PA, Khew-Goodall Y, Goodall GJ. Epigenetic modulation of the miR-200 family is associated with transition to a breast cancer stem-celllike state. J Cell Sci. 2013;126:2256–66. doi: 10.1242/jcs.122275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yan J, Zhang N, Qi C, Liu X, Shangguan D. One-step real time RT-PCR for detection of microRNAs. Talanta. 2013;110:190–5. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.02.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yin H, Zhou Y, Zhang H, Meng X, Ai S. Electrochemical determination of microRNA-21 based on graphene, LNA integrated molecular beacon, AuNPs and biotin multifunctional bio bar codes and enzymatic assay system. Biosens Bioelectron. 2012;33:247–53. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ahmad A, Sethi S, Chen W, Ali-Fehmi R, Mittal S, Sarkar FH. Up-regulation of microRNA-10b is associated with the development of breast cancer brain metastasis. Am J Transl Res. 2014;6:384–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Li X, Roslan S, Johnstone CN, Wright JA, Bracken CP, Anderson M, Bert AG, Selth LA, Anderson RL, Goodall GJ, Gregory PA, Khew-Goodall Y. MiR-200 can repress breast cancer metastasis through ZEB1-independent but moesin-dependent pathways. Oncogene. 2014;33:4077–88. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chakrabarti M, Ray SK. Direct transfection of miR-137 mimics is more effective than DNA demethylation of miR-137 promoter to augment anti-tumor mechanisms of delphinidin in human glioblastoma U87MG and LN18 cells. Gene. 2015;573:141–52. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.07.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Li W, Guo F, Wang P, Hong S, Zhang C. miR-221/222 confers radioresistance in glioblastoma cells through activating Akt independent of PTEN status. Curr Mol Med. 2014;14:185–95. doi: 10.2174/1566524013666131203103147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fasano CA, Dimos JT, Ivanova NB, Lowry N, Lemischka IR, Temple S. shRNA knockdown of Bmi-1 reveals a critical role for p21-Rb pathway in NSC self-renewal during development. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1:87–99. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cao L, Bombard J, Cintron K, Sheedy J, Weetall ML, Davis TW. BMI1 as a novel target for drug discovery in cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2011;112:2729–41. doi: 10.1002/jcb.23234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Park IK, Qian D, Kiel M, Becker MW, Pihalja M, Weissman IL, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF. Bmi-1 is required for maintenance of adult selfrenewing haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2003;423:302–5. doi: 10.1038/nature01587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.LaPak KM, Burd CE. The molecular balancing act of p16(INK4a) in cancer and aging. Mol Cancer Res. 2014;12:167–83. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
