Skip to main content
Mycobiology logoLink to Mycobiology
. 2019 Oct 14;47(4):401–407. doi: 10.1080/12298093.2019.1672984

Two New Species of Placolecis (Lichenized Ascomycota) from China

An Cheng Yin a,b,, Xin Yu Wang a, Dong Liu c, Yan Yun Zhang a, Mei Xia Yang d,e, Li Juan Li a, Li Song Wang a
PMCID: PMC6968434  PMID: 32010461

Abstract

Two new species of the lichen genus Placolecis are discovered in China, namely P. kunmingensis An. C. Yin & Li S. Wang and P. sublaevis An. C. Yin & Li S. Wang. The new combination P. loekoesiana (S.Y. Kondr., Farkas, J.J. Woo & Hur) An. C. Yin is proposed. Placolecis kunmingensis is characterized by having simple, spherical or ellipsoid, hyaline spores, and pear-shaped pycnidia; while P. sublaevis can be distinguished by its thallus forming larger aggregations with slightly flattened lobes at the thallus margin, and urn-shaped pycnidia. Descriptions, a phylogenetic tree and a key are provided for all the known Placolecis species in China.

Keywords: Lichen, taxonomy, Catillariaceae, Yunnan Province

1. Introduction

The genus Placolecis Trevis. was established by Trevisan (1857) with two species: Placolecis balanina (Fr.) Trevis. and P. plumbea (Lightf.) Trevis [1]. Later on, Hafellner synonymized one more species Lecidea opaca Dufour into Placolecis, as P. opaca (Dufour) Hafellner, based on the morphological characters and secondary metabolites [2,3]. In recent studies, P. balanina was merged into P. opaca [4,5], and P. plumbea was treated as synonym of Pectenia plumbea (Lightf.) P. M. Jørg. [6]. After this study, four species (Placolecis kunmingensis, P. loekoesiana, P. opaca, and P. sublaevis) are recognized in this genus.

The genus Placolecis is mainly distributed in the Mediterranean region, and has been infrequently reported from Algeria, Russia, South Korea, and India, and so forth [7–14]. Species of this genus frequently occur on limestone in open and sunny habitats [9]. Placolecis opaca (≡Lecidea opaca var. crocea (B. de Lesd.) Zahlbr.) was first reported from China by Handel-Mazzetti based on collections from Sichuan Province, however, few studies were carried out [15,16]. Recently, during a field survey in Yunnan Province, some specimens of Placolecis were collected, and morphological, anatomical, chemical, and molecular phylogenetic analyses based on the internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS) were performed in order to determine species composition. A key to Placolecis species worldwide is provided.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials and morphological observation

The specimens in this study are deposited in the Lichen Herbarium, Kunming Institute of Botany (KUN), and Korean Lichen Research Institute (KoLRI). Anatomical descriptions are based on observations under a NIKON Eclipse 50i microscope, and photographs were taken using NIKON digital camera head DS-Fi2. Spot tests were conducted by K (a 10% aqueous solution of potassium hydroxide), C (a saturated solution of aqueous sodium hypochlorite), and P (a saturated solution of p-phenylenediamine in 95% ethyl alcohol). Secondary metabolites were detected by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) as described by Orange et al. [17] in solvent C (toluene: acetic acid =170:30).

2.2. DNA isolation, PCR and phylogenetic analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from dried materials using AxyPrep Multisource Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit50-prep (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. ITS was amplified via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the primers ITS1F [18] and ITS4 [19]. Amplifications were performed in a 25 µL volume comprising 12.5 µL of 2 × MasterMix, 0.5 µL of each primer, 10.5 µL distilled H2O, and 1 µL of DNA. PCR amplifications program were performed as following: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 4 min, 34 cycles each composed of 94 °C for 1 min, 62 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1.5 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were sequenced by TsingKe biological technology company (Kunming, China).

The ITS dataset consists of 6 newly generated sequences and 17 relevant ITS sequences from GenBank (Table 1). All raw sequences were assembled and edited using SeqMan 7.0 (DNAstar packages), then aligned with MAFFT version 7 [20] with the default parameters. Ambiguous regions were excluded using Gblocks [21] with default settings. Maximum likelihood (ML) was generated using the RAxML-HPC2 on XSEDE (8.2.10) in the CIPRES Science Gateway Platform (http://www.phylo.org/portal2/) using GTRGAMMA model, fast bootstrap analyses of 1000 pseudoreplicates were completed [22]. Phylogenetic trees were visualized using the program FigTree 1.4.0 [23]. The Bayesian analysis was conducted with MrBayes v.3.2.6 to evaluate Bayesian posterior probabilities by Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling (MCMC). Bayesian inference was conducted using four chains and run for one million generations. Lecidea tessellata Flörke, L. atrobrunnea (DC.) Schaer., Teloschistes flavicans (Sw.) Norman, T. exilis (Michx.) Vain. were used as outgroup [24].

Table 1.

Sequence information used in this study.

Species Collection No. GenBank No. Locality
Placolecis loekoesiana 041238 (KoLRI) MN052962 South Korea
Placolecis sublaevis 19-62675(KUN) MK995874 China, Yunnan
Placolecis kunmingensis 18-58078(KUN) MK995884 China, Yunnan
Placolecis kunmingensis 56795(KUN) MK995879 China, Yunnan
Placolecis opaca Inv.Nr.8763 MK995882 Spain
Placolecis opaca Inv.Nr.8764 MK995885 Spain
Solenopsora liparina Liparina-3-CZ (Herb. SAV) KF689879 Czech Republic
Solenopsora cesatii Cesatii-19-FR (Herb.J. Malíček, Sedlčany 5338) KF689850 France
Solenopsora vulturiensis Vulturiensis-4-FR (Herb. SAV) KF689897 France
Solenopsora grisea Grisea-9-AL (Herb. BP) KF689875 Albania
Solenopsora olivacea Olivacea-3-ME (Herb. O 11378) KF689889 Montenegro
Solenopsora marina Marina-4-FR (Herb. SAV) KF689883 France
Austrolecia sp1   JX036089 Antarctica
Austrolecia sp2   JX036083 Antarctica
Austrolecia sp3   JX036047 Antarctica
Austrolecia sp   JX036104 Antarctica
Austrolecia sp   JX036103 Antarctica
Catillaria scotinodes O: L 161161 MG925964 Norway
Catillaria corymbosa Hur ANT050798 DQ534457 Antarctica
Lecidea tessellata UR00138 KX120213 Argentina
Lecidea atrobrunnea UR00200 KX120206 Argentina
Teloschistes flavicans 03.22.03-13A (DUKE) JQ301685 Costa Rica
Teloschistes exilis D. Hillis 07-726 (DUKE) JQ301684 USA

Newly generated sequences were in bold.

3. Results and discussion

Topologies were established based on 23 ITS sequences including related species of family Catillariaceae and four species for outgroup (Table 1). The tree topology obtained from the maximum likelihood is used to represent phylogenetic relationships. A phylogenetic analysis using ITS sequences revealed 19 species, including P. kunmingensis, P. sublaevis new to science (Figure 1). Molecular phylogenetic analyses strongly supported the current taxonomic delimitation of species within the genus of Placolecis, which is in accordance with the taxonomic study based on morphological and chemical characters.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Phylogenetic relationships of the family Catillariaceae with the genus Placolecis inferred by Bayesian analysis of the ITS sequences. New species and the new combination are shown in bold. Bootstrap support values (MLBS) and posterior probabilities (PP) are shown above or below the branches.

Placolecis is characterized by saxicolous, crustose to effigurate, dark brown or yellowish brown or yellowish thallus, areolate in the center; Lobes contiguous, flat to convex, usually branched. Cortex paraplectenchymatous; medulla reddish orange in the upper portion and white in the lower portion. Apothecia lecideine, 0.3–1.3 mm across, black, sessile, with a flat to convex disc and a persistent proper margin. Hymenium colourless, I + blue; paraphyses capitate, the apical cells with an internal pigment cap. Asci 8-spored, narrowly clavate, Catillaria-type (with a prominent amyloid tholus, lacking any internal differentiation, I + blue). Ascospores simple, hyaline, ellipsoid, (7.5-)10-14 × (4-)5-7.5 µm. Pycnidia frequent, immersed or slightly protruding. Conidia hyaline, bacilliform, straight. Chemistry: medulla with anthraquinones [2,3,12,16].

Although these species have similar habit, colour reaction, thallus section, Catillaria-type ascus and simple hyaline ascospores, and so forth, they can be distinguished by the thallus morphology. The thallus of P. opaca usually dark brown or yellowish brown, areolate in the center, forming regular to irregular rosettes to 4 cm diameter; lobes are elongate, contiguous, flat to slightly convex, radiating from center toward to periphery, often with secondary lobes as branches of main lobules, in having yellow-ochre-orange medulla [1,2,7,25]. The new species P. kunmingensis has a crustose thallus with rather few lobes, areolate-squamulose in the center, forming irregular patches or clumps 10–50 mm wide; upper surface dark brown, uneven; rarely with radiating shorter lobules at the thallus margin, sometimes difficult to delimitate secondary lobules and main lobes. P. sublaevis is similar to P. kunmingensis in having the same crustose thallus in the center, differs in having larger aggregations of lobes at the thallus margin, in having distinct secondary lobules as branches of main lobes, slightly subflattened at the apex, in having pear-shaped pycnidia and elongated conidia. All four species contain unidentified anthraquinones by TLC and the same compounds: emodin, erythrin, fragilin, 7-chloro-emodin, 2-chloro-derivatives [26,27].

4. Taxonomy

4.1. New species

Placolecis kunmingensis An. C. Yin & Li S. Wang, sp. nov.

Holotype: CHINA: Yunnan Province, Baiyi village, 25°21′N, 102°50′E, 2130 m, on rock, April 12, 2018. Li S. Wang et al. 18-58078 (KUN-L).

MycoBank no. MB: 831234.

Description (Figure 2): Thallus saxicolous, crustose to effigurate, areolate-squamulose in the center, forming irregular patches or clumps 10–50 mm wide; rarely with radiating shorter lobules at the thallus margin; lobes to 0.5–1 mm long and 0.2–0.3 mm wide in the middle part and distinctly widened towards the tips, 0.35–0.5 mm wide, dark brown, swollen at the apex, equal dichotomous branching, sometimes difficult to delimitate secondary lobules and main lobes. Upper surface dark brownish, uneven. Upper cortex 25–30 µm thick, paraplectenchymatous. Algal layer uniform, 50–70 µm thick, photobiont cells Trebouxia-like, 7–12.5 µm diameter Medulla 180–250 µm thick, reddish orange in the upper portion and white in the lower portion. Lower cortex absent. Apothecia 0.3–1.2 mm diameter, sessile, lecideine, numerous, scattered to crowded, margin well developed, black. Exciple 40–60 µm thick at the sides, black. Epihymenium 7–15 µm thick, brown. Hymenium hyaline, 50–75 µm thick, I + blue. Hypothecium 75–120 µm thick, brown. Asci clavate to cylindrical, Catillaria-type with amyloid tholus, I + blue, 8-spored. Paraphyses simple or sparsely branched, with dark brown cap at the apex. Ascospores hyaline, simple, spherical or ellipsoid, 5–10 × 4–6 µm, with smooth 0.5–1 µm thick wall. Pycnidia numerous, is not totally immersed (ca. 2/3 immersed), 150–190 × 100–130 µm, pear-shaped, ostiole slightly black. Conidia bacilliform, 3–5 µm.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Placolecis kunmingensis, holotype. (A) Thallus and habit; (B) cross-section of thallus and a pycnidium; (C) ascus with ascospores; (D) I + blue of ascus; (E). conidia. Scale bars: A = 1 mm; B = 50 μm; C, D = 10 μm; E = 5 μm.

Chemistry: Medulla K + violet in the upper yellow portion, P−, C−; containing fragilin and anthraquinone (detected by TLC).

Ecology and distribution: This species occurs on limestone in sunny slopes, and is only found in Kunming and surrounding areas in the high mountains in Yunnan (SE China).

Notes: Placolecis kunmingensis is characterized by a thallus areolate-squamulose in the thallus center, forming irregular patches or clumps 10–50 mm wide and ellipsoid or globose ascospores with slightly thickened wall. This species is similar to P. opaca in having similarly dark brownish thallus, but the latter has a thallus forming regular or irregular rosettes, areolate in the center, with longer lobes radiating in the periphery of the thallus. It differs from P. loekoesiana in having areolate-squamulose thallus center, in having brown (vs. yellow) thallus colour, somewhat shorter thalline lobes at the thallus margin.

Etymology: The epithet “kunmingensis” refers to the type locality.

Further specimens: Yunnan Prov. Kunming City: Xiaohe village, Songhuaba, 25°11′54″N, 102°48′26″E, 2,000 m, on rock, 10 December. 2001. Li S. Wang 01-21029; Lunan Co., near Shilin and Stone Forest. 24°43′56″N, 103°20′33″E, 1,900 m, on limestone, October 27, 2002, A. Aptroot. 56795 (in KUN-L).

Placolecis sublaevis An. C. Yin & Li S. Wang, sp. nov.

Holotype: CHINA: Yunnan Province, Lijiang City, on the way from Lijiang to Ninglang, 26°58′54.38″N, 100°24′57.24″E, 1,902 m, on limestone, April 9, 2019. Li S. Wang et al. 19-62675 (KUN-L).

MycoBank no. MB: 831362.

Description (Figure 3): Thallus saxicolous, crustose to effigurate, areolate-squamulose in the center, forming irregular patches or clumps, pseudopycnidia numerous, immersed into thallus; lobes distinctly forming larger aggregations at the thallus margin: to 2–3 (–4) mm long and 0.1–0.3 mm wide in the middle part and slightly widened towards the tips to 0.15–0.4 mm wide, dark brown, slightly subflattened at the apex; often secondary lobules as branches of main lobes to 1–2 mm long observed. Upper surface dark brownish, uneven. Upper cortex 12.5–20 µm thick, paraplectenchymatous. Algal layer diffuse, 25–40 µm thick, photobiont cells Trebouxia-like, 6–12 µm diameter Medulla 60–140 µm thick, reddish orange in the upper portion and white in the lower portion. Lower cortex absent. Apothecia none. Pycnidia numerous, immersed into thallus, 75–95 × 40–60 µm, urceolate, ostiole black. Conidia bacilliform, 5–6 µm.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Placolecis sublaevis, holotype. (A) Thallus and habit; (B) cross-section of thallus and a pycnidium; (C) conidia. Scale bars: A = 1 mm; B = 25 μm; C = 5 μm.

Chemistry: Medulla K + violet in the upper yellow portion, P−, C−; fragilin, solorinic acid and anthraquinone substances detected by TLC.

Ecology and distribution: This species occurs on exposed steep slopes with limestone boulders near the stream, in the high mountain area in Yunnan and Sichuan (SE China).

Notes: The variety Lecidea opaca var. crocea (B. de Lesd.) Zahlbr. was described from France and reported later also from China [28,29]. According to Handel-Mazzetti's specimen information, L. opaca var. crocea was collected in Sichuan Yanyuan. We visited the original locality and collected samples from similar habitats, in order to compare with the European specimens (L-76218, L-203661, L-622068, L-622018, L-676136, L-685879) in UPS. According to the ITS phylogenetic tree, the morphological descriptions, and the WU online data query, we believe that the specimens Handel-Mazzetti collected in Sichuan in 1914 were misidentified as L. opaca var. crocea [15,16], they are in fact a new species in Placolecis, P. sublaevis. It differs from P. opaca in having areolate-squamulose in the thallus center, in having somewhat shorter and somewhat narrower thalline lobes, especially towards the tips (0.15–0.4 mm wide versus to 0.4–0.6 mm wide), medulla yellow in the upper portion and white in the lower portion (vs. yellow-brown), Trebouxia algae normally have smaller size cells (6–12 µm vs. 10–15 µm), in having elongated conidia (5–6 µm vs. 3–5 µm). The species P. sublaevis is similar to P. kunmingensis in having similar small crustaceous thallus center, but it is different in having larger aggregations of lobes at the thallus margin (2–3 (–4) mm vs. 0.5–1 mm), in having distinct secondary lobules as branches of main lobes (vs. equal dichotomous branching), in having thinner algal layer (diffuse, not uniform, 25–40 µm vs. uniform, 50–70 µm), in having pear-shaped pycnidia (vs. urn-shaped), elongated conidia (5–6 µm vs. 3–5 µm).

Etymology: The epithet sublaevis refers to the shape of lobes, slightiy subflattened at the apex.

4.2. New combination

Placolecis loekoesiana (S.Y. Kondr., Farkas, J.J. Woo & Hur) An. C. Yin, comb. nov.

Basionym: Astroplaca loekoesiana S.Y. Kondr., Farkas, J.J. Woo & Hur, in Kondratyuk et al., Acta Bot. Hung. 59(1/2): 139 (2017).

Type: Republic of Korea. Gangwon-do: Jeongseon-gun, Jeongseon-eup, Aesan-ri, limestone rocky wall along river, on calcareous rocks. Lat.: 37°22′18.66″N; Long.: 128°40′27.76″E; Alt.: 325 m a.s.l. Coll.: Kondratyuk, S. Y. and Lőkös, L. (163000), 16.09.2016 (KoLRI 041238 – holotype!).

MycoBank no. MB: 831252.

Notes: Baglietto established the genus Astroplaca based on Lecidea opaca Dufour in 1858, which was published later than Placolecis [1]. The genus Astroplaca is synonymized with Placolecis [1,2,4,30–34], our phylogenetic study supported this view, and this species A. loekoesiana is now synonymized as P. loekoesiana.

4.3. Key to the Placolecis species worldwide

1. Thallus center areolate-squamulose, rather few lobes; in high mountain 2

1. Thallus center areolate, elongated lobes; in lower elevations 3

2. Thallus dark brown, algal layer diffuse, not uniform, 25–40 µm; apothecia none, pycnidia urn-shaped, 75–95 × 40–60 µm, conidia 5–6 µm P. sublaevis

2. Thallus dark brown, algal layer uniform, 50–70 µm; apothecia numerous, ascospores spherical or ellipsoid, pycnidia pear-shaped, 150–190 × 100–130 µm, conidia 3–5 µm P. kunmingensis

3. Thallus yellow, thalline lobes shorter and narrower, medulla yellow; apothecia plane, rare, ascospores ellipsoid, 10–14 × 5–6 µm P. loekoesiana

3. Thallus dark brown or yellowish brown, thalline lobes elongated and contiguous, medulla ochre to reddish orange; apothecia convex, rather rare, ascospores ellipsoid, 9–11 × 4–5 µm P. opaca

Funding Statement

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Nos 31670028, 31750001, 31970022] and the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP) program [No. 2019QZKK0503].

Acknowledgments

The authors thank UPS, KoLRI, Prof. Christoph Scheidegger (Zurich, Switzerland) and Prof. Jae-Seoun Hur for (KoLRI) the loan of specimens and permission to extract DNA from the samples. They also appreciate Prof. Josef Hafellner (Graz, Austria) for providing literature, as well as support and advice during the study.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  • 1.Trevisan V. Nuovi studi sui licheni spettanti alle tribù delle Patellariee, Baeomycee e Lecideinee. Rev Period Lav Della Imper Reg Accad Padova. 1857;5:63–79. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hafellner J. Studien in Richtung einer natürlicheren Gliederung der Sammelfamilien Lecanoraceae und Lecideaceae. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia. 1984;(79):241–371. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nimis PL, Poelt J. The lichens and lichenicolous fungi of Sardinia (Italy). Stud Geobot. 1987;7:1–269. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kotlov YV. Preliminary checklist of lichen family Catillariaceae. Novitates Systemat Plant Vascul. 2004;37:234–252. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wijayawardene NN, Hyde KD, Lumbsch HT, et al. Outline of Ascomycota: 2017. Fungal Diver. 2018;88(1):167–263. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ekman S, Wedin M, Lindblom L, et al. Extended phylogeny and a revised generic classification of the Pannariaceae (Peltigerales, Ascomycota). Lichenologist. 2014;46(5):627–656. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Roux C. Phytogéographie des lichens saxicoles-calcicoles d’Europe méditerranéenne. Botan Chron. 1991;10:163–178. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Amrani S, Seaward MRD, Sipman HJM, et al. Lichenological exploration of Algeria II: checklist of lichenized, lichenicolous and allied fungi. Herzogia. 2018;31(2):817–892. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Czarnota P, Guttová A, Halda JP, et al. Lišajníky zaznamenané počas 13. jarného stretnutia Bryologicko-lichenologickej Sekcie ČBS na exkurzii v Tematínskych vrchoch (Považský Inovec, Slovensko). Bryonora. 2006;38:26–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bilovitz PO, Knežević B, Stešević D, et al. New or otherwise interesting lichenized and lichenicolous fungi from Montenegro. Fritschiana (Graz). 2008;62:1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Aptroot A, Moon KH. 114 new reports of microlichens from Korea, including the description of five new species, show that the microlichen flora is predominantly Eurasian. Herzogia. 2014;27(2):347–366. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nimis PL, Martellos S ITALIC-The Information System on Italian Lichens. Version 5.0. University of Trieste, Department of Biology. Internet version. [cited 2017 June 20]. Available form: http://dryades.units.it/italic.
  • 13.Gp S, Gupta P, Kar R, et al. A checklist of Lichens of Rajasthan, India. Curr Res Environ Appl Mycol. 2015;5(4):367–375. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Makryi TV. Placolecis opaca (Catillariaceae), a new to Russia lichen genus and species from Dauria (Chita region). Botanicheskiy Zhurnal. 2003;88:123–127. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Handel-Mazzetti H, Brotherus VF. Symbolae Sinicae: botanische Ergebnisse der Expedition der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wein nach Südwest-China, 1914–1918. Wien (Austria): J. Springer; 1929; p. 110. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hertel H. Gesteinsbewohnende Arten der Sammelgattung Lecidea (Lichenes) aus Zentral-, Ost- und Südasien: eine erste Übersicht. Khumbu Himal. 1977;6(3):145–378. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Orange A, James PW, White FJ. Microchemical methods for the identification of lichens. London (UK): British Lichen Society, Natural History Museum; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bruns TD, Gardes M. Molecular tools for the identification of ectomycorrhizal fungi-taxon‐specific oligonucleotide probes for suilloid fungi. Mol Ecol. 1993;2(4):233–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, et al. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protoc Guide Methods Appl. 1990;18(1):315–322. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Katoh K, Standley DM. A simple method to control over-alignment in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(13):1933–1942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Talavera G, Castresana J. Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst Biol. 2007;56(4):564–577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Westberg M, Millanes AM, Knudsen K, et al. Phylogeny of the Acarosporaceae (Lecanoromycetes, Ascomycota, Fungi) and the evolution of carbonized ascomata. Fungal Divers. 2015;73(1):145–158. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rambaut A FigTree: tree figure drawing tool, v.1.4.0. Institute of Evolutionary Biology. University of Edinburgh. Available from: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/. 2012.
  • 24.Bendiksby M, Timdal E. Molecular phylogenetics and taxonomy of Hypocenomyce sensu lato (Ascomycota: Lecanoromycetes): extreme polyphyly and morphological/ecological convergence. Taxon. 2013;62(5):940–956. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kondratyuk SY, Lőkös L, Halda JP, et al. New and noteworthy lichen-forming and lichenicolous fungi 6. Acta Botan Hungar. 2017;59(1/2):137–260. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schneider G. Flechtengattung Psora sensu Zahlbruckner. Bibl Lichenol. 1979;13:1–291. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Steiner M, Glombitza KW, Wagner A, et al. Anthraquinones of Astroplaca opaca. Phytochemistry. 1974;13(1):273–274. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zahlbruckner A. Lichenes in Handel-Mazzetti. Symbol Sin. 1930;3:1–254. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zahlbruckner A. Catalogus Lichenum Universalis. Bomtraeger, Leipzig. 1925;3:885. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fries E. Lichenographia Europaea reformata: praemittuntur lichenologiae fundamenta. Typis Berlingianis. 1831;107–108, 289. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nylander W. Essai d’une nouvelle classification des Lichens (second mémoire). Mémoires de la Societe imperiale des sciences naturelles de Cherbourg. 1855;3:161–391. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Baglietto F. Enumerazione dei Licheni di Liguria. Memorie della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di Torino. 1857;17:343–444. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Anzi M. Manipulus lichenum rariorum vel novorum Longobardiae et Etruriae. Commentario della Società Crittogamologica Italiana. 1862;1(3):130–166. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hue AM. Quelques lichens nouveaux. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France. 1897;44(5):425–431. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mycobiology are provided here courtesy of Korean Society of Mycology

RESOURCES