Abstract
One of the neuropathological hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is cerebral deposition of amyloid plaques composed of amyloid β (Aβ) peptides and the cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of those peptides are used as a biomarker for AD. Mature induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived cortical neurons secrete Aβ peptides in ratios comparable to those secreted to cerebrospinal fluid in human, however the protocol to achieve mature neurons is time consuming. In this study, we investigated if differentiation of neuroprogenitor cells (NPCs) in BrainPhys medium, previously reported to enhance synaptic function of neurons in culture, would accelerate neuronal maturation and, thus increase Aβ secretion as compared to the conventional neural maintenance medium. We found that NPCs cultured in BrainPhys displayed increased expression of markers for cortical deep-layer neurons, increased synaptic maturation and number of astroglial cells. This accelerated neuronal maturation was accompanied by increased APP processing, resulting in increased secretion of Aβ peptides and an increased Aβ38 to Aβ40 and Aβ42 ratio. However, during long-term culturing in BrainPhys, non-neuronal cells appeared and eventually took over the cultures. Taken together, BrainPhys culturing accelerated neuronal maturation and increased Aβ secretion from iPSC-derived cortical neurons, but changed the cellular composition of the cultures.
Subject terms: Neurochemistry, Stem-cell differentiation, Neural stem cells, Cellular neuroscience, Molecular neuroscience
Introduction
Amyloid plaques composed of aggregated amyloid beta (Aβ) peptides, predominantly species ending at amino acid 42 (Aβ42), are one of the major neuropathological hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease (AD)1. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42 concentration and the ratio of Aβ42 to Aβ40 in CSF are used as biomarkers for cerebral β-amyloidosis in AD2. Although some forms of these Aβ peptides are believed to be molecular triggers of AD, they are also produced and secreted by cells under normal physiological conditions3–5. Aβ peptides are generated by enzymatic cleavage of amyloid beta precursor protein (APP). Initially, APP is cleaved either by α-secretase, liberating soluble APPα (sAPPα), or by β-secretase, which releases sAPPβ. The remaining stub of APP in the latter processing pathway is then cleaved by γ-secretase to produce Aβ peptides of varying lengths6.
As an outcome of the discovery of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)7, functioning neurons of human origin can now be produced in vitro and these cells have also been shown by us and others to secrete measurable amounts of APP cleavage products into the cell media8–10. Moreover, ratios of short and long Aβ peptides (ranging in size from 14 to 42 amino acids) secreted into the cell media from these mature, human iPSC-derived neurons correspond to those measured in CSF2,11. There are many well-established, widely used protocols for cortical differentiation of human iPSCs. The one used in this study mirrors the human cortical development in vivo and gives rise to synaptically active neurons12. However, the protocol is time-consuming, as it takes up to 90 days to obtain mature neurons.
Neuronal maintenance medium (NMM), essentially a 1:1 mix of Neurobasal and DMEM/F12 media with supplements, is a commonly used medium to provide cortical differentiation and to maintain neuronal survival10,12–14. However, this conventional neuronal medium does not support neuronal functions and may even impair synaptic activity15. To address this, a medium formulated to improve the electrophysiological and synaptic properties of neurons was developed and named BrainPhys15. This medium contains factors, such as BDNF and GDNF, to increase the proportion of synaptically active neurons15. Meanwhile, increased synaptic activity has been shown to favor the differentiation of neuroprogenitor cells (NPCs) into functional neurons16. Similarly, synaptic activity-mediated increase in BDNF secretion from mature neurons has been shown to enhance the neuronal differentiation of precursor cells co-cultured with mature neurons17. Hence, regulating signaling pathways and neuronal activity could be a potential way to accelerate neuronal differentiation and maturation18.
BrainPhys has previously been investigated extensively for its ability to promote synaptic activity. However, to the best of our knowledge, the effects of BrainPhys on the secretion of APP cleavage products following cortical differentiation of human iPSC-derived NPCs has not yet been evaluated. To determine if culturing iPSC-derived NPCs in BrainPhys would accelerate the differentiation towards functional cortical neurons and if this consequently would affect the secretion of APP cleavage products, we performed a comparative study where human iPSC-derived NPCs were differentiated into neurons in BrainPhys in parallel with NMM. We found that neuronal differentiation of NPCs for less than 35 days in BrainPhys increased neurite branching, as well as the expression of markers for deep-layer cortical neurons, synaptic activity and glial cells in the cultures. Along with this, BrainPhys medium increased secretion of all soluble cleavage forms of APP that were measured, but with a significantly increased sAPPβ/sAPPα ratio indicating increased β-cleavage of APP, as well as shift towards increased γ-cleavage at Aβ amino acid 38. After more than 35 days in BrainPhys non-neuronal cell types appeared and rapidly took over the cultures however shorter differentiation time was sufficient to obtain cortical neurons secreting sAPP and long forms of Aβ. In conclusion, long-term BrainPhys culturing accelerates the differentiation of NPCs towards functional cortical neurons, but at the expense of neuronal purity. Future studies will reveal the consequences of the observed increased β-cleavage and secretion of Aβ38.
Results
BrainPhys accelerates neuronal differentiation
Human iPSCs were differentiated into NPCs according to a protocol by Shi et al.12 with minor changes10. This protocol robustly produces pure, cortical cultures in 90 days. Once the cells reached the NPC stage (after about 35 days of differentiation), final plating was performed and maturation was carried out in NMM or BrainPhys for another 20, 35 or 55 days (See Fig. 1A for experimental outline). During this process, cellular morphology was closely monitored and cortical identity and maturation were confirmed by analyzing mRNA and protein levels of markers of post-mitotic cortical neurons, synapses and astrocytes. At days 20 and 35 post final plating, a morphological examination revealed increased neurite networks in BrainPhys cultures as compared to NMM. After 35 days in BrainPhys, the cultures were morphologically similar to neurons cultured for 55 days in NMM (Fig. 1B). Beyond 35 days of culturing in BrainPhys, the presence of other non-neuronal cell types increased rapidly and hence subsequent analyses were performed on cells cultured in BrainPhys for a maximum of 35 days (a total differentiation time of 70 days). At this point, no statistically significant increase in the mRNA levels of PAX6 (Fig. 1CI), a marker of radial glial progenitor cells, was observed, although they showed a tendency to increase in BrainPhys, while levels of TBR1 mRNA (Fig. 1CII), a marker of cortical layer VI and post-mitotic projection neurons, increased significantly. The mRNA levels of CTIP2 (Fig. 1CIII), a marker of cortical layer V neurons, also showed a tendency to increase in BrainPhys, while the mRNA levels of markers for upper-layer neurons, SATB2, CUX1 and BRN2 (Fig. 1CIV–VI), were unaffected.
BrainPhys increases neurite branching and synaptic density
After ten days of culture in BrainPhys, we observed that the cells displayed more neurites as compared to NMM-cultured cells (Fig. 2AI). To examine if BrainPhys increased neurite branching, we used phase-contrast images from each population and quantified the number of neurite branch points per image related to growth area. The number of branch points in BrainPhys-cultured neurons was then related to the number of branch points in NMM-cultured neurons. BrainPhys-cultured cells displayed a significantly increase in branch points as compared to NMM-cultured cells (Fig. 2AII).
Next, we performed immunocytochemistry to examine the expression and localization of proteins specific to neurons in the two culture conditions. Cells differentiated in both media expressed all the investigated neuronal markers. Although both cell populations stained positive for the microtubule-associated proteins MAP2 and tau (Fig. 2BI), NMM-cultured cells (upper panels) displayed more punctuated tau-staining along the axons as compared to BrainPhys-cultured neurons (lower panels). The BrainPhys-cultured cells showed more neuron-specific Class III β-tubulin (TUJ1) positive axons and a higher density of vesicular glutamate transporter, vGLUT1, positive synapses (Fig. 2BII) as compared to the NMM-cultured cells. BrainPhys-cultured cells also displayed more staining of postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD95), a post-synaptic protein, and synaptic vesicle protein 2 (SV2), a pre-synaptic protein (Fig. 2BIII) as compared to the NMM-cultured cells.
BrainPhys increases synaptic activity and expression of synaptic markers
To investigate if BrainPhys culturing would accelerate synaptic development, we next performed analysis of proteins known for their involvement in long-term memory formation and synaptic maturation. mRNA levels of SNAP25, a pre-synaptic protein known to be involved in neurotransmitter release, synaptic transmission and maturation of synaptic density19,20, increased significantly in BrainPhys-cultured cells (Fig. 3AI), whereas protein levels of SNAP25 did not change (Fig. 3AII). CAMK2B is known to have a role in synaptic plasticity21 as well as maintaining the structure of dendritic spines22 and ARC is one of the neuronal activation immediate-early genes (reviewed in23), the transcription of which has been shown to increase by neuronal activity24. Hence, both ARC and CAMK2B mRNA are used to measure changes in synaptic activity25–27. mRNA levels of both CAMK2B (Fig. 3BI) and ARC (Fig. 3BII) increased significantly in BrainPhys-cultured cells as compared to NMM. Together, this suggests that BrainPhys media renders a neuronal population with more mature synapses, in line with the observed increase in neurite branching.
Next, we investigated a possible effect of BrainPhys culturing on spontaneous neuronal activity by using Multi-Electrode Array (MEA). Final plating was performed in 6-well MEA plates with NMM. Twenty to thirty days after the final-plating, NMM was replaced by BrainPhys in half of the wells, and neuronal activity was recorded from each condition every second day for ten days. Due to neuronal migration, we controlled that the cells were on the electrodes just before recordings were performed (Fig. 3CI). Number of spikes (action potentials) and population bursts were used to determine changes in overall neuronal activity and network activity, respectively. Six days of culturing in BrainPhys was enough to significantly increase the number of spikes as compared to NMM (Fig. 3CII). The spikes in BrainPhys-cultured cells seemed more organized in bursts, although not reaching statistical significance (Fig. 3CIII).
BrainPhys increases the number of glial cells
Since astrocytes are known to interact with neurons to regulate synaptic function (reviewed in28), we analyzed the astrocyte content in cultures using immunocytochemistry and qPCR. An increased staining of GFAP- and S100-positive astrocytes was observed in BrainPhys cultures compared with NMM (Fig. 3DI). Quantification of GFAP staining showed an increased GFAP area per cell (Fig. 3DII) in BrainPhys cultures, along with increased mRNA levels of GFAP (Fig. 3DIII). This indicates that BrainPhys increases the astrocytic population during differentiation.
BrainPhys increases expression and secretion of axonal proteins
To investigate if the increase in neuronal branching was reflected in increased expression of microtubule-organizing proteins, we analyzed expression and secretion of tau, a stabilizing protein in axonal microtubules29, and neurofilament-light (NfL), a modulator of axonal caliber30. Culturing the cells in BrainPhys significantly increased the mRNA levels of MAPT, the gene coding for tau (Fig. 4AI). We next performed a PCR analysis to investigate if we could detect the mature splice form of tau including exon 10 which is present in the cortex of children and adults, but not in the fetal cortex31. The exon 10 splice variant could not be detected in either condition at this neuronal differentiation stage (Fig. 4AII, the full image of the gel is shown in Supplementary Fig. 1F). Neurons cultured in NMM for 224 days and cDNA from whole brain, where the exon 10 splice variant is present, were included as positive controls. mRNA levels of NEFL, the gene coding for NfL, also increased significantly as compared to NMM (Fig. 4AIII). To investigate if the increased mRNA levels were reflected in secretion of the corresponding proteins, concentrations of tau and NfL were measured in the cell-conditioned media using ELISA. BrainPhys culturing significantly increased the concentration of tau (Fig. 4BI) and the concentration of NfL from undetectable to clearly detectable levels (Fig. 4BII) in the cell-conditioned media, as compared to NMM cultures. To exclude the possibility that increased secretion of tau and NfL was due to leakage from dying cells, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was measured in the cell-conditioned media from NMM and BrainPhys cultures as a marker of cell-membrane permeability due to necrosis32. Suspensions from cells lysed with Triton X-100 were used as positive control. The LDH concentrations were generally low (5% and 3% of the positive control for NMM and BrainPhys, respectively) and there was no difference in LDH release from BrainPhys-cultured cells compared with NMM (Fig. 4CI). In addition, the viability of cells cultured in NMM or BrainPhys was assessed using image cytometry. No differences were observed in viability between the two cell culture conditions (Fig. 4CII).
BrainPhys changes APP processing
We have previously shown that secretion of APP cleavage products changes with neuronal and synaptic maturation10. Therefore, we next investigated the effects of BrainPhys culturing on neuronal secretion of APP cleavage products. The concentrations of sAPPα and sAPPβ, as well as Aβ38, Aβ40 and Aβ42, in cell-conditioned media were measured using immunoassays with electrochemiluminescence detection and normalized to total RNA from the same well (Fig. 5). Culturing neurons in BrainPhys significantly increased the secretion of both sAPPα and sAPPβ as compared to NMM-cultured cells (Fig. 5AI–II). Furthermore, the ratio of sAPPβ to sAPPα in the cell media was significantly higher in BrainPhys compared with NMM-cultured cells (Fig. 5B), indicating an increased β-cleavage of APP. Consistently, the media concentrations of Aβ38, Aβ40 and Aβ42 were all significantly increased in BrainPhys compared with NMM-cultured cells (Fig. 5CI–III).
The Aβ region of APP can be cleaved by γ-secretase at different amino acids and more cleavage at amino acid 42 than at 38 and 40 is likely the most important amyloidogenic effect of presenilin [PSEN; the active site of γ-secretase] mutations that cause familial AD33. Hence, to investigate if culturing in BrainPhys would also modulate γ-secretase-mediated cleavage at the C-terminus of Aβ, we calculated the ratios of Aβ42/Aβ40, Aβ38/Aβ40 and Aβ38/Aβ42. The ratio of Aβ42/Aβ40 did not change by BrainPhys-culturing (Fig. 5DI), while the Aβ38/Aβ40 and Aβ38/Aβ42 ratios were significantly higher in BrainPhys-cultured cells as compared to NMM (Fig. 5DII–III). This indicates that BrainPhys has an increasing effect on γ-secretase cleavage at amino acid 38 of Aβ (i.e., a cleavage pattern that could protect from amyloidosis)33.
Blocking synaptic activity decreases Aβ secretion
Tetrodotoxin (TTX) has previously been shown to block synaptic activity and to decrease Aβ secretion with approximately 25% in vitro34. To investigate if the increased Aβ secretion seen in BrainPhys-cultured cells could be explained by increased synaptic activity, neurons cultured in BrainPhys for ten days were treated with 1 µM TTX for 24 hours and compared to vehicle control. MEA recordings performed immediately before collection of the conditioned media showed that the cells were still synaptically inactive after 24 hours of TTX treatment (Fig. 6AI,II). To exclude that this effect was due to cell death, LDH was measured in the cell-conditioned media. No significant differences in LDH activity were observed between control- and TTX-treated neurons, indicating that 1 µM TTX for 24 hours did not induce cell death (Fig. 6B). The TTX treatment decreased the secretion of Aβ peptides compared with control in all four experiments (the individual experiments are marked with separate colors) (Fig. 6CI–III). We next investigated if blocking synaptic activity with TTX treatment would affect the ratios of the secreted peptides, but no consistent changes in the ratios of Aβ42/Aβ40, Aβ38/Aβ40 and Aβ38/Aβ42 were observed (Fig. 6DI–II).
BrainPhys increases expression of APP and APP-cleaving secretases
To investigate if the increased secretion of APP cleavage products was linked to changed expression of APP or APP-cleaving enzymes, we measured mRNA and protein levels of APP, ADAM10 (α-secretase), BACE1 (β-secretase) and PSEN1 (γ-secretase) using qPCR and western blot, respectively. Culturing the cells in BrainPhys significantly increased APP mRNA levels (Fig. 7AI) whereas APP protein levels remained stable (Fig. 7AII). BrainPhys-cultured neurons displayed significantly increased mRNA levels of ADAM10 (Fig. 7BI), BACE1 (Fig. 7BIII) and PSEN1 (Fig. 7BV). When analyzing protein levels of the secretases, no significant change was observed for ADAM10 (Fig. 7BII) or BACE1 (Fig. 7BIV) whereas a significant increase in PSEN1 was detected (Fig. 7BVI). Full-lengths blots of all proteins are presented in Supplementary Fig. 1.
BrainPhys increases neuronal morphology and Aβ secretion in SH-SY5Y cells
The neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y is a commonly used neuronal cell model to study APP processing. The cell line is easy to culture and maintain, and can be differentiated with retinoic acid (RA) for one week to increase its neuron-like features35. However, Aβ secretion from these cells is low and close to the detection limit of most assays. To investigate if BrainPhys culturing could further increase the neuronal phenotype and secretion of APP cleavage products in this cell line, we cultured SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells in BrainPhys medium. SH-SY5Y cells were pre-differentiated with RA for seven days and thereafter seeded on poly-l-ornithine/laminin-coated wells and cultured in BrainPhys medium supplemented with RA for one or two weeks. Already after one week in BrainPhys, SH-SY5Y cells displayed a more definite neuronal morphology with more and longer neurites as compared to traditional culture conditions (Fig. 8A, left and middle panels). Increasing the BrainPhys culture time to two weeks (14 days) further increased this neuronal phenotype (Fig. 8A, right panel). Next, we investigated if the neuronal morphology would result in increased secretion of Aβ. Indeed, two weeks of BrainPhys culturing of SH-SY5Y cells resulted in more than 50% increase in secretion of Aβ40 and Aβ42 (Fig. 8BI–II), while Aβ38 was still under detection limit. To exclude that the increased secretion was due to increased cell number, cells were counted from phase contrast images of NMM and BrainPhys cultures. No significant difference in cell number was observed (Fig. 8C).
Discussion
The BrainPhys medium was developed to provide a physiologically enriched, optimal environment for neuronal survival and improved synaptic activity in vitro15, while the effects on neuronal maturation were less in focus. To investigate if culture conditions favouring neuronal network formation and synaptic maturation would speed up neuronal differentiation, and if this in turn would affect APP processing and secretion of APP cleavage products, we compared cortical differentiation of NPCs in BrainPhys medium with the ordinary protocol using NMM12. We found that BrainPhys medium increased synaptic activity and markers of deep- but not upper-layer neurons, which coincided with increased secretion of APP cleavage products. In addition, we found that BrainPhys cultures had an increased Aβ38/42 ratio, suggesting a more non-amyloidogenic APP processing in this condition. This indicates that BrainPhys leads to neuronal maturation in shorter time during in vitro differentiation and that neuronal and synaptic maturation affects APP processing. However, extended culture in BrainPhys also resulted in the appearance and growth of non-neuronal cells types and all analyses had therefore to be performed at a time point before the complete maturation of NMM cultures12.
After less than 35 days of differentiation in BrainPhys, gene expression of the cortical deep-layer markers TBR1 and CTIP2 increased as compared to the NMM cultures, while markers of upper-layer neurons SATB2, CUX1 and BRN2 did not change. This suggests that neuronal differentiation in BrainPhys changes the cellular composition of the cultures towards an increased proportion of deep- over upper-layer neurons. In line with earlier findings that human neuroprogenitor cells cultured and matured in BrainPhys displayed dense neuronal networks and synaptically active neurons in a few weeks15, we observed that culturing cells in BrainPhys significantly increased the branching of neurites as compared to NMM already ten days after final plating. TBR1 and CTIP2 have been shown to play important regulatory roles for fasciculation and extension of sub-cortical axons, as well as for the establishment of neuronal connections and the increased expression of these markers could, in theory, contribute to the increased branching in BrainPhys cultures36,37. We also observed that the BrainPhys-cultured neurons displayed stronger staining of the neuronal microtubule proteins MAP2, tau and TUJ1, supporting that the neurons developed extensive neurite networks at an earlier time during differentiation.
The BrainPhys medium was designed to improve neuronal function and activity over what could be obtained using other cell culture media15. Here, we observed that BrainPhys gave rise to a stronger staining to markers for both pre-synapses (vGlut1, SV2) and post-synapses (PSD-95). In addition, it also increased the expression of presynaptic protein SNAP25 in mRNA level although protein levels of the protein remained unchanged. Furthermore, BrainPhys increased mRNA levels of CAMK2B and ARC. CAMK2B is a Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein known for its importance in long-term potentiation and synaptic plasticity21,22. ARC gene expression is commonly used as a neuronal-activity marker23, since ARC mRNA is induced by neuronal activity24 and accumulates in activated dendrites38.
Next, we used a multi-electrode array (MEA) system to analyze the effects of BrainPhys culturing on spontaneous activity. Although the neurons cultured in BrainPhys medium detached from the electrodes in MEA plates during long-term culturing, as was previously observed39, switching to BrainPhys for six to ten days was enough to increase both the number of spikes and the number of population bursts in mature neurons differentiated according to Shi et al.12. Taken together, our findings are in line with earlier findings15 and support the observation of increased neuronal networks and synaptic activity.
In addition to the observed increase in deep-layer cortical neuronal markers, astroglial markers were also increased in BrainPhys-cultured cells as compared to NMM. Astrocytes are important for neurons to form healthy and functional synapses40 and are known to regulate synaptogenesis through contact-mediated signaling and to control the structural synapse formation by secreting synaptogenic signals28. In the NMM protocol, a smaller number of astrocytes appear as the culture matures, usually after 50 days post-final plating10. Interestingly, culturing cells in BrainPhys medium increased the number of GFAP-positive cells after less than 35 days and, in addition, astrocytes positive for both GFAP and S100 were observed. Hence, increased neuronal activity and dense neuronal network in the BrainPhys-cultured cells could be an effect of the increased number of astrocytes in the cultures, which highlights the importance of proper characterization of cell cultures.
After characterizing cortical- and synaptic maturation of cells cultured in BrainPhys versus NMM media, we subsequently investigated how these culture conditions affected mRNA- and secretion levels of tau and NfL, two proteins involved in axonal assembly and synaptic maturation41,42. Tau secretion is high in the developing brain43, which may reflect neuronal plasticity during differentiation. Both tau and NfL are secreted under physiological conditions and the secretion increases with increased synaptic activity44–46. NfL was also recently suggested to be involved in synaptic activity as a modulator of neurotransmitter release47,48. Here, we found significantly increased expression and secretion of both tau and NfL in BrainPhys cultures compared with NMM. In NMM, detectable levels of NfL in the neuron-conditioned media usually appear as the cells mature, typically more than 40 days after the final plating. Consistently, here NfL was under or close to the detection limit of the assay in NMM, while BrainPhys culturing increased the secretion of NfL to clearly measurable levels.
Tau and NfL are also well-known markers for neurodegeneration and CSF tau concentrations reflect an AD-type neurodegeneration, while CSF NfL concentrations are increased across most neurodegenerative diseases49,50. To ensure that the increased secretion was not due to neuronal death, we measured cell death and viability in both conditions, but observed no difference between the two. This suggests that the increased levels of tau and NfL in the BrainPhys cultures were rather due to an active secretion process, possibly due to increased neuronal- and synaptic maturation and increased number of neurites.
Tau can exist in six different isoforms51, due to alternative splicing at two different sites. One of them is exclusion or inclusion of exon 10, resulting in three or four microtubule binding repeats (3R and 4R, respectively). 3R tau binds less tightly to microtubule52, which is necessary during development. 4R tau, where exon 10 is included, is absent in the fetal brain but increases dramatically during the prenatal- to adult period31. To determine the neuronal maturation state, we investigated presence of tau exon 10 in both conditions. No clear expression of tau exon 10 was observed in either NMM or BrainPhys cultures at this stage of differentiation. However, more than 200 days of culture in NMM was needed for this splice variant to appear. It is possible that exon 10 would appear earlier in BrainPhys than NMM with extended culture time in BrainPhys, but the overgrowth of other non-neuronal cell types with long-term BrainPhys cultures made this unfeasible.
Accumulation of Aβ peptides in amyloid plaques in the brain is a key feature of AD, and APP and its cleavage forms have been extensively studied in this regard. Still, the physiological roles of the different peptides resulting from APP processing are not completely understood. In order to investigate the effects of increased neuronal maturity and activation on APP processing, we measured the secretion of soluble APP and Aβ peptides in neuron-conditioned media and found that BrainPhys increased secretion of all APP cleavage products measured. Aβ secretion has been shown to correlate with synaptic activity34,53–55 and we have previously reported that secretion of long Aβ (Aβ38, Aβ40 and Aβ42) peptides into cell-conditioned media coincides with neuronal and synaptic maturation10. Thus, one possible reason for the increased secretion of APP cleavage products observed here is the increased neuronal characteristics of the BrainPhys-cultured cells. Moreover, we found that culturing SH-SY5Y cells in BrainPhys gave rise to a more neuronal phenotype, which also resulted in increased Aβ secretion. This shows that the increased neuronal maturation observed in BrainPhys cultures can be used as a model to investigate the effects of a neuronal phenotype on APP processing, as long as the cultures are properly characterized, and presents SH-SY5Y cells cultured in BrainPhys as a refined cell model to study APP processing in vitro.
To further investigate if the increased secretion of Aβ could be due to increased synaptic activity in the BrainPhys cultures, we blocked neuronal activity using TTX and measured Aβ secretion. Although neuronal activity was efficiently blocked, only a 20–30% reduction in Aβ secretion was observed. This suggests that synaptic activity affects Aβ secretion, but only to a certain extent and that other factors contribute. This is in line with our earlier findings that neurons start to secrete Aβ peptides around ten days after final plating in NMM before measurable neuronal activity is seen and networks have formed10.
Increased spikes and bursts due to an artificially applied electrical stimulus to neurons was previously shown to decrease the ratio of Aβ42 to Aβ40 through conformational changes in the γ-secretase subunit PSEN156. We therefore investigated whether culturing neurons in BrainPhys would also affect the cleavage pattern of APP and the ratios of secreted Aβ peptides. Interestingly, we did not observe any change in the ratio of Aβ42 to Aβ40, but found the ratio of Aβ38 to both Aβ40 and Aβ42 to be significantly increased, indicating a relatively larger increase in secretion of Aβ38. Although it should be investigated in depth, BrainPhys-induced synaptic activity may cause conformational changes in PSEN1 favoring γ-cleavage of APP at Aβ amino acid 38 over 4257. This pattern is opposite to the one observed in familial AD patients carrying PSEN1 mutations58, and could thus potentially protect from Aβ42-induced amyloidosis. Blocking synaptic activity did not significantly alter the individual peptide ratios in these culture conditions, suggesting that the increase in Aβ38 was due to other factors. Although neurons are considered the main Aβ-secreting cell type, glial cells also contribute to the Aβ load8. It is not determined which cleavage forms of Aβ that are mainly produced in glial cells, but increased Aβ38 secretion could in theory also be due to the larger number of glial cells in the BrainPhys cultures.
Increased secretion of APP cleavage products could be the result both of increased APP expression and/or increased APP processing. We found that the mRNA levels of APP were significantly increased in BrainPhys-cultured cells, whereas no significant differences were observed on protein level, indicating that BrainPhys culturing increases both APP synthesis and APP processing, resulting in stable levels of full-length APP protein in the cells. The basal APP protein levels varied between differentiations, for unknown reasons. How APP expression is regulated is not fully elucidated, but the suggested roles of APP in neuronal maturation, neurite outgrowth and synaptic formation indicate that APP expression is tightly regulated during these events59. As we have previously shown10, the processing of APP is also regulated throughout neuronal development and the relatively large variation in APP protein levels between differentiations could possibly be explained by slight differences in the timing of differentiation steps between differentiations and iPSC lines.
Similarly, mRNA levels of the main APP-cleaving enzymes ADAM10 (α-secretase), BACE1 (β-secretase) and PSEN1 (γ-secretase) were all significantly increased in BrainPhys-cultured neurons, while only PSEN1 was significantly increased on protein level. Thus, the increase in PSEN1 protein could contribute to the increased Aβ secretion observed in BrainPhys cultures. Why the increased mRNA levels of ADAM10 and BACE1 were not reflected in protein levels remains to be investigated, but different post-transcriptional and -translational modifications along with protein degradation could contribute60. Synaptic activity also contributes to Aβ production through enhanced synaptic vesicle recycling, which causes more internalization of APP into endosomes. There, APP interacts with β- and γ-secretases resulting in increased production and secretion of sAPPβ and Aβ54. Similarly, active ADAM10 is enriched in synaptic vesicles61 and APP can be internalized in synaptic vesicles as a response to increased synaptic activity62. Thus, increased mRNA levels of α-, β- and γ-secretases in BrainPhys-cultured neurons could reflect an increased need for their activities due to enhanced internalization of APP in subcellular organelles and vesicles. The reason for increased sAPPα secretion (although less pronounced than the sAPPβ increase) could therefore be an enhanced interaction with APP in synaptic vesicles of BrainPhys-cultured cells.
In this study, we aimed at obtaining mature cortical neurons to study neural maturity and synaptic activity-dependent Aβ secretion in a shorter time period by using BrainPhys medium. We found that BrainPhys indeed did accelerate neuronal maturation and increase secretion of both sAPP and Aβ at an earlier time point in the differentiation protocol. However, with BrainPhys we also observed a shift in APP-processing favoring β-cleavage of APP in general and Aβ38 in particular.
In summary, BrainPhys culturing led to faster maturation of deep-layer cortical neurons, increased number of astrocytes and increased secretion of APP cleavage products, but with altered Aβ-peptide ratios. Further, long-term culturing in BrainPhys (more than 45 days) led to a substantial increase in non-neuronal cell types in the cultures. Thus, BrainPhys can be beneficial for in vitro studies focusing on the physiological role and turnover of APP, but proper characterization of the cellular composition of the cultures is crucial. Future studies will address potential links of increased number of deep-layer neurons and astrocytes, as well as the increased PSEN1 expression, to increased processing of APP in general and at Aβ amino acid 38 specifically.
Material and Methods
Cell culture
Three different human iPSC lines were used in this study, Ctrl163, ChiPSC22 (Takara Bio Europe) and WTSIi015-A (EBiSC/Sigma Aldrich). The iPSCs were differentiated towards NPCs according to Shi et al.12, as previously described10. Briefly, starting with fully confluent iPSCs, neural induction was initiated by addition of neural maintenance media (NMM) supplemented with mouse Noggin-CF chimera (R&D Systems) and SB431542 (Stemgent) for 10 days. When a neuroepithelial layer had formed, the cells were detached with dispase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and re-plated in NMM supplemented with FGF2 (Peprotech) on laminin-coated plates (Sigma Aldrich) for 4–5 days with medium changes every second day. To clean the cultures from unwanted cell types, the cell colonies were further passaged two to three times with dispase before day 25. On day 25, when neurogenesis occurred, the cells were dissociated with StemPro Accutase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to obtain single cells. The cells were further passaged with StemPro Accutase for expansion before the final plating around day 35. At this point, the cells were counted using a NucleoCounter® NC-200™ (Chemometec) and re-plated at a confluency of 50 000 cells/cm2 onto poly-L-ornithine (Sigma Aldrich) and laminin-coated plates in NMM (see Supporting Table 1). The day after final plating, the medium was replaced either with fresh NMM or BrainPhys Neuronal Medium (see Supporting Table 2) and maintained for up to 55 days. Every second day, NMM was fully changed whereas half of the BrainPhys was replaced with fresh BrainPhys, according to the respective protocols.
SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells were cultured in (DMEM/F12, (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% FBS (SigmaAldrich), 1% Glutamax and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin. Cells were pre-differentiated with 10 μM retinoic acid (RA) (SigmaAldrich) for 7 days prior to seeding onto poly-L-ornithine- and laminin-coated plates. Thereafter, the cells were cultured in this medium or BrainPhys medium supplemented with 10 μM RA for 7–14 days with bi-weekly media changes. Cell-conditioned medium was collected after 48 hours of culturing.
Immunocytochemistry (ICC)
Neurons on poly-L-ornithine and laminin-coated chamber slides (Ibidi) were fixed with cold 4% PFA (Histolab) for 10 min at room temperature and washed with TBS 3 × 5 min. For permeabilization, the samples were incubated with 0.3% Triton-X100 (Sigma Aldrich) in TBS for 15 min at room temperature and thereafter blocked in blocking buffer (5% donkey serum (SigmaAldrich), 0.3% Triton-X100 in TBS) for 1 hour at room temperature. Primary antibodies were diluted (see Supporting Table 3), in blocking buffer and the cells incubated over night at 4 °C or 1.5 hours in room temperature. Thereafter, the samples were washed with TBS and incubated with Alexa flour conjugated secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific), diluted in blocking buffer (see Supporting Table 3 for antibodies and dilutions), for 1.5 hours at room temperature. The samples were washed 3 × 5 min with TBS and incubated with DAPI (1 μM; Thermo Fisher Scientific) after the first wash for 5 min at room temperature. The samples were washed once with water and then mounted using Ibidi mounting media (Ibidi) and kept at 4 °C until analysis.
Confocal microscopy and image analysis
The samples were analyzed using an Eclipse Ti-E inverted confocal microscope with 60x objective and the NIS Element software (Nikon). Between Z-stacks 0.5 µm of distances were acquired. For large images, taken for GFAP and S100 staining, areas were randomly chosen and 5 images taken around those areas with 0.5 µm of distance between Z-stacks. From each sample, 10 images were randomly captured. Image analysis and number of cells and DAPI (nucleus) counting were performed using ImageJ within same setting for each figure64.
Western blot
The cells were lysed in RIPA buffer, as described previously10 and protein determination was performed using the Pierce BCA protein assay kit according to the manufacturers’ protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Equal amounts of protein for each sample was added into loading buffer and loaded into wells of a 4–12% Bis-Tris gel (NuPAGE™) and run with MES buffer (all from Thermo Fisher Scientific). Protein blot was performed onto a 0.2 µM nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare) using semi-dry technique. After blotting, the membrane was blocked in 5% non-fat dry milk (BioRad laboratories) for 1 hour and incubated over night at 4 °C with primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution (see Supplementary Table 1 for a list of the antibodies used). The membrane was then washed with TBS-Tween (SigmaAldrich) and incubated with HRP-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (1:2000, Cell Signaling Technologies) in blocking solution for 1 hour at room temperature. For protein detection, SuperSignal West Dura Extended Duration Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used and bands were visualized using ChemiDoc XRS+ (BioRad laboratories). To re-incubate with an HRP-conjugated glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) antibody (see Supplementary Table 1 for a list of the antibodies and concentrations used), the membranes were stripped using Restore stripping buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), blocked one hour with 5% non-fat dry milk and incubated with anti-GAPDH antibody in blocking solution for 1 hour at room temperature or with related primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. Band intensities were calculated using either Image Lab (BioRad laboratories) or Image Studio (LI-COR imaging systems) and correlated to GAPDH.
RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis
Cells were lysed directly in the well by addition of 360 or 600 µL Buffer RLT supplemented with 4 mM dithiothreitol (Sigma-Aldrich). Total RNA was extracted and purified manually or on a QiaCube robotic workstation (QIAGEN), using the RNeasy Mini protocol according to manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA concentrations were measured on a NanoDrop 2000/2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and diluted in RNase-free water to a final concentration of 25–50 ng/µL. cDNA was synthesized from 250–500 ng of total RNA using a High Capacity cDNA kit with RNase inhibitor (Applied Biosystems) in a total reaction volume of 20 µL and converted in a single-cycle reaction on a 2720 Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems); 25 °C for 10 min, 37 °C for 120 min and 85 °C for 5 min.
Quantitative PCR
Quantitative PCR was performed using inventoried TaqMan Gene Expression Assays with FAM reporter dye in TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix with UNG according to manufacturer’s instructions, in a total reaction volume of 25 µL. qPCR reactions were performed on Micro-Amp 96-well optical microtiter plates on a 7900HT Fast QPCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific), using standard settings for Standard Curve qPCR. TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (all from Thermo Fisher Scientific) are listed in Supplementary 2. 2.5 ng cDNA was used in the PCR and all samples were run in duplicates. PCR results were analyzed with the SDS 2.3 software (Applied Biosystems) and the relative quantity of gene expression was determined using the ∆∆CT method65, with BrainPhys-cultured cells as the calibrator and average CT:s of RPL27, RPL30 and HPRT1 as endogenous reference.
PCR of Tau exon-10 inclusion
Forward primer GTCCGTACTCCACCCAAGTC and reverse primer ATGAGCCACACTTGGAGGTC (ThermoFisher Scientific) were used with a HotStarTaq DNA Polymerase kit (SigmaAldrich) to amplify a region including exon 10 of the MAPT gene. The PCR was carried out in a 25-µL reaction consisting of 1x PCR buffer, 0.2 µM forward- and reverse primer, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 0.65 Units/µL HotStar Taq DNA polymerase and 0.8 ng/µL cDNA from NMM- or BrainPhys-cultured neurons. The template was denatured at 95 °C for 15 min followed by a 2-cycle step-down amplification in three steps with annealing temperatures of 64 °C, 62 °C and 60 degrees, respectively. Amplification was then carried out by 30 cycles at 94 °C for 30 sec/58 °C for 30 sec/72 °C for 30 sec, followed by elongation of the product at 72 °C for 10 min.
Multi-electrode array analysis of synaptic activity
Cells were differentiated towards cortical neurons according to Shi et al.12 for 35 days, then the cells were seeded on poly-L-ornithine (0.01%; Sigma Aldrich) and laminin-coated 60–6well MEAs plates (Multi Channel Systems MCS GmbH), in six independent culture chambers, with 9 electrodes in each chamber. NMM was replaced with BrainPhys medium ten days prior to analysis. MEA recordings were performed using a MEA2100-System (Multi Channels Systems MCS GmbH). Data acquisition and analysis were performed using the Multi-Channel Suite package (Multi Channels Systems MCS GmbH). The raw data was filtered at 200 Hz high pass (Butterworth, high pass filter) and further processed by a Spike Detector. The spike detection was performed using the Threshold (Falling edge) method, with the threshold set to 5x standard deviation. Spike counting was made from the electrodes which had 6 or more spikes. The pre-spike and post-spike durations were set to 1 ms and 2 ms, respectively. The burst detection was performed using the Maximum Interval Method with the minimal duration of a burst and minimal interval between bursts set to 50 ms and 100 ms, respectively. The maximum interval to start and end a burst was set to 50 ms and the minimum number of spikes in a burst was set to 5.
Immunochemical quantification of sAPPα, sAPPβ and Aβ peptides
Medium was collected after 48 hours of incubation with cells, centrifuged at 400 × g for 5 minutes to remove cell debris and then frozen in −80 °C until analysis. Concentrations of sAPPα and sAPPβ in cell-conditioned media were measured using the MSD sAPPα/sAPPβ Multiplex Assay (Meso Scale Discovery) according to manufacturer’s instruction. Media concentrations of Aβ38, Aβ40 and Aβ42 were measured using the MSD Human (6E10) Abeta Triplex Assay (Meso Scale Discovery) as described by the manufacturer. For both assays, the detection limit was set to the value of the lowest standard point.
Blocking of synaptic activity using tetrodotoxin
Tetrodotoxin (TTX, 6973.1 ROTH) was reconstituted in 0.1 M citrate buffer (sodium citrate dehydrate and citric acid) to a final concentration of 1 mM stock solution. Upon final plating in MEA plates, the cells were counted using a NucleoCounter® NC-200™ (Chemometec) and seeded at a confluency of 200 000 cells/cm2 to obtain equal cell numbers in all MEA wells. Ten days before treatment with vehicle or 1 µM TTX, the medium was switched from NMM to BrainPhys in all wells. After 24 hours of TTX/vehicle treatment, synaptic activity and Aβ secretion were assessed as described above.
Immunochemical quantification of tau and NfL
Medium was collected after 48 hours of incubation with cells, centrifuged at 400 × g for 5 minutes to remove cell debris and then frozen in −80 °C until analysis. Total tau concentration in cell media was measured using INNOTEST® hTAU Ag ELISA (Fujirebio) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The plate was mixed and the absorbance was quantified at 450 nm at a Multiskan FC (Thermo Scientific) within 15 min. NfL concentration in the cell media was measured using NF-light® (Neurofilament light) ELISA from UmanDiagnostics, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The absorbance was quantified at 450 nm with 620 nm reference wavelength at a Multiskan FC (Thermo Scientific).
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay
To compare the level of necrosis between cells cultured in NMM and BrainPhys, we performed an LDH activity assay, as described previously66. As a control for 0% viability, similarly aged cortical neurons were lysed with 1% Triton X-100 (Sigma Aldrich) (1% v/v to cell-conditioned media). The lysed cortical neurons (controls) were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min to release LDH. Then, the control and the samples were centrifuged at 360 × g for 5 min and the supernatants were collected. Freshly collected supernatants (350 μL) were analyzed at the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg using the LDH activity test kit as described by the manufacturer (Roche Diagnostics Scandinavia AB, 03004732122) on the Cobas e501 module (Roche, Germany).
Cell viability
To compare the viability between cells cultured in NMM and BrainPhys, we performed image cytometry on an Automated cell counter NucleoCounter® NC-200™ (Chemometec) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Using a Via1-Cassette™ (Chemometec), cells from 200 µl cell suspension were automatically stained with acridine orange and DAPI. The Via1-Cassette™ was inserted into the cell counter and the total and dead cell populations were determined with imaging cytometry.
Statistical analysis
Mean values from separate experiments (n) were compared using Student’s two-tailed t-test (in Fig. 6B, secretion data after TTX, p values were extracted from one-tailed t-test, given that a decreased secretion was expected on the basis of earlier results34) and two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test. Each n represents neurons differentiated from different iPSC lines or neurons differentiated from the same iPSC line on separate occasions. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad (Prism version 7.02 for Windows, GraphPad Software, La Jolla California USA, www.graphpad.com).
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The study was supported by grants from the European Research Council (#681712), the Swedish Research Council (#2018-02532), the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils, the ALF agreement (ALFGBG-720931 and ALFGBG-715981), the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the Torsten Söderberg Foundation, Frimurarestiftelsen and Hjärnfonden. SW is supported by an Alzheimer’s Research UK Senior Research Fellowship (ARUK-SRF2016B-2). We would like to thank Dr. Aida Muslimovic for assistance with LDH measurements and Dr. Laia Montolui Gaya for providing us with the ADAM10 antibody.
Author contributions
T.M.S., P.B. and L.A. designed and planned the study with support from H.Z. F.H.N. and T.M.S. performed neuronal differentiations, collected and analyzed samples. T.M.S. and E.H. performed SH-SY5Y differentiations, collected and analyzed samples. S.W. performed reprogramming and characterization of iPSCs. T.M.S., F.H.N., P.B., L.A. and D.V.H. collected and analyzed data. T.M.S. and P.B. wrote the manuscript with input from L.A. and H.Z. F.H.N., D.V.H., S.W. and K.B. took part in revision of manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version.
Competing interests
Kaj Blennow has served as a consultant or at advisory boards for Alector, Alzheon, CogRx, Biogen, Lilly, Novartis and Roche Diagnostics, and is a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB, a GU Ventures-based platform company at the University of Gothenburg, all unrelated to the work presented in this paper. Henrik Zetterberg has served at scientific advisory boards for Roche Diagnostics, Wave, Samumed and CogRx, has given lectures in symposia sponsored by Alzecure and Biogen, and is a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB, a GU Ventures-based platform company at the University of Gothenburg, all unrelated to the work presented in this paper. The other authors have no competing financial interest. The authors declare no non-financial competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Lotta Agholme and Petra Bergström.
Change history
2/28/2020
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-57516-7.
References
- 1.Blennow K, de Leon MJ, Zetterberg H. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet (London, England) 2006;368:387–403. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69113-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Janelidze S, et al. CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios: better diagnostic markers of Alzheimer disease. Annals of clinical and translational neurology. 2016;3:154–165. doi: 10.1002/acn3.274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Moghekar A, et al. Large quantities of Abeta peptide are constitutively released during amyloid precursor protein metabolism in vivo and in vitro. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2011;286:15989–15997. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.191262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Selkoe DJ. Physiological production of the β-amyloid protein and the mechanism of Alzheimer’s disease. Trends in Neurosciences. 1993;16:403–409. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(93)90008-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Haass C, et al. Amyloid beta-peptide is produced by cultured cells during normal metabolism. Nature. 1992;359:322–325. doi: 10.1038/359322a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Portelius E, et al. A novel pathway for amyloid precursor protein processing. Neurobiol Aging. 2011;32:1090–1098. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126:663–676. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liao MC, et al. Single-Cell Detection of Secreted Abeta and sAPPalpha from Human IPSC-Derived Neurons and Astrocytes. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2016;36:1730–1746. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.2735-15.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shi Y, et al. A human stem cell model of early Alzheimer’s disease pathology in Down syndrome. Science translational medicine. 2012;4:124ra129. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bergstrom P, et al. Amyloid precursor protein expression and processing are differentially regulated during cortical neuron differentiation. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29200. doi: 10.1038/srep29200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Arber, C. et al. Familial Alzheimer’s disease patient-derived neurons reveal distinct mutation-specific effects on amyloid beta. Molecular Psychiatry, 10.1038/s41380-019-0410-8 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 12.Shi Y, Kirwan P, Livesey FJ. Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells to cerebral cortex neurons and neural networks. Nature protocols. 2012;7:1836–1846. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lancaster Madeline A., Renner Magdalena, Martin Carol-Anne, Wenzel Daniel, Bicknell Louise S., Hurles Matthew E., Homfray Tessa, Penninger Josef M., Jackson Andrew P., Knoblich Juergen A. Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature. 2013;501(7467):373–379. doi: 10.1038/nature12517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Koch P, Opitz T, Steinbeck JA, Ladewig J, Brustle O. A rosette-type, self-renewing human ES cell-derived neural stem cell with potential for in vitro instruction and synaptic integration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:3225–3230. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808387106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bardy C, et al. Neuronal medium that supports basic synaptic functions and activity of human neurons in vitro. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015;112:E2725–E2734. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504393112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Deisseroth K, et al. Excitation-neurogenesis coupling in adult neural stem/progenitor cells. Neuron. 2004;42:535–552. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00266-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Babu H, Ramirez-Rodriguez G, Fabel K, Bischofberger J, Kempermann G. Synaptic Network Activity Induces Neuronal Differentiation of Adult Hippocampal Precursor Cells through BDNF Signaling. Frontiers in neuroscience. 2009;3:49–49. doi: 10.3389/neuro.22.001.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tao Y, Zhang S-C. Neural Subtype Specification from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;19:573–586. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Antonucci F, et al. SNAP-25, a Known Presynaptic Protein with Emerging Postsynaptic Functions. Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience. 2016;8:7–7. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2016.00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tomasoni, R. et al. SNAP-25 regulates spine formation through postsynaptic binding to p140Cap. NatureCommunications4, 2136, 10.1038/ncomms3136, https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms3136#supplementary-information (2013). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 21.Borgesius NZ, et al. betaCaMKII plays a nonenzymatic role in hippocampal synaptic plasticity and learning by targeting alphaCaMKII to synapses. J Neurosci. 2011;31:10141–10148. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5105-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Okamoto K-I, Narayanan R, Lee SH, Murata K, Hayashi Y. The role of CaMKII as an F-actin-bundling protein crucial for maintenance of dendritic spine structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104:6418–6423. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701656104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Minatohara K, Akiyoshi M, Okuno H. Role of Immediate-Early Genes in Synaptic Plasticity and Neuronal Ensembles Underlying the Memory Trace. Frontiers in molecular neuroscience. 2016;8:78–78. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2015.00078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Guzowski JF, Setlow B, Wagner EK, McGaugh JL. Experience-dependent gene expression in the rat hippocampus after spatial learning: a comparison of the immediate-early genes Arc, c-fos, and zif268. J Neurosci. 2001;21:5089–5098. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-14-05089.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kawashima T, et al. Synaptic activity-responsive element in the Arc/Arg3.1 promoter essential for synapse-to-nucleus signaling in activated neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:316–321. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806518106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Novak G, Seeman P, Tallerico T. Schizophrenia: elevated mRNA for calcium-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IIβ in frontal cortex. Molecular Brain Research. 2000;82:95–100. doi: 10.1016/S0169-328X(00)00188-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Li K, et al. betaCaMKII in lateral habenula mediates core symptoms of depression. Science. 2013;341:1016–1020. doi: 10.1126/science.1240729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Allen NJ, Eroglu C. Cell Biology of Astrocyte-Synapse Interactions. Neuron. 2017;96:697–708. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.09.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Guo T, Noble W, Hanger DP. Roles of tau protein in health and disease. Acta neuropathologica. 2017;133:665–704. doi: 10.1007/s00401-017-1707-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hoffman PN, Griffin JW, Price DL. Control of axonal caliber by neurofilament transport. The Journal of cell biology. 1984;99:705–714. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.2.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hefti MM, et al. High-resolution temporal and regional mapping of MAPT expression and splicing in human brain development. PLOS ONE. 2018;13:e0195771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kumar P, Nagarajan A, Uchil PD. Analysis of Cell Viability by the Lactate Dehydrogenase Assay. Cold Spring Harbor protocols. 2018;2018:pdb.prot095497. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot095497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Voytyuk I, De Strooper B, Chavez-Gutierrez L. Modulation of gamma- and beta-Secretases as Early Prevention Against Alzheimer’s Disease. Biological psychiatry. 2018;83:320–327. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li X, et al. Neuronal activity and secreted amyloid beta lead to altered amyloid beta precursor protein and presenilin 1 interactions. Neurobiology of disease. 2013;50:127–134. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2012.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Shipley, M. M., Mangold, C. A. & Szpara, M. L. Differentiation of the SH-SY5Y Human Neuroblastoma Cell Line. J Vis Exp, 53193–53193, 10.3791/53193 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 36.Hevner RF, et al. Tbr1 regulates differentiation of the preplate and layer 6. Neuron. 2001;29:353–366. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00211-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Arlotta P, et al. Neuronal subtype-specific genes that control corticospinal motor neuron development in vivo. Neuron. 2005;45:207–221. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Moga DE, et al. Activity-regulated cytoskeletal-associated protein is localized to recently activated excitatory synapses. Neuroscience. 2004;125:7–11. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ryynänen T, et al. Ion Beam Assisted E-Beam Deposited TiN Microelectrodes-Applied to Neuronal Cell Culture Medium. Evaluation. Frontiers in neuroscience. 2018;12:882–882. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Perea G, Navarrete M, Araque A. Tripartite synapses: astrocytes process and control synaptic information. Trends in Neurosciences. 2009;32:421–431. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2009.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lobsiger, C. S. & Cleveland, D. W. In Encyclopedia of Neuroscience (ed Larry R. Squire) 433–436 (Academic Press, 2009).
- 42.Pallas‐Bazarra N, et al. Novel function of Tau in regulating the effects of external stimuli on adult hippocampal neurogenesis. The EMBO journal. 2016;35:1417–1436. doi: 10.15252/embj.201593518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mattsson N, Savman K, Osterlundh G, Blennow K, Zetterberg H. Converging molecular pathways in human neural development and degeneration. Neuroscience research. 2010;66:330–332. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2009.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chai X, Dage JL, Citron M. Constitutive secretion of tau protein by an unconventional mechanism. Neurobiology of disease. 2012;48:356–366. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2012.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pooler AM, Phillips EC, Lau DHW, Noble W, Hanger DP. Physiological release of endogenous tau is stimulated by neuronal activity. EMBO reports. 2013;14:389–394. doi: 10.1038/embor.2013.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Jackson TC, Kotermanski SE, Jackson EK, Kochanek PM. BrainPhys® increases neurofilament levels in CNS cultures, and facilitates investigation of axonal damage after a mechanical stretch-injury in vitro. Experimental Neurology. 2018;300:232–246. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yuan A, Nixon RA. Specialized roles of neurofilament proteins in synapses: Relevance to neuropsychiatric disorders. Brain research bulletin. 2016;126:334–346. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2016.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yuan A, Sershen H, Veeranna, Basavarajappa B S, Kumar A, Hashim A, Berg M, Lee J-H, Sato Y, Rao M V, Mohan P S, Dyakin V, Julien J-P, Lee V M-Y, Nixon R A. Neurofilament subunits are integral components of synapses and modulate neurotransmission and behavior in vivo. Molecular Psychiatry. 2015;20(8):986–994. doi: 10.1038/mp.2015.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zetterberg H. Review: Tau in biofluids - relation to pathology, imaging and clinical features. Neuropathology and applied neurobiology. 2017;43:194–199. doi: 10.1111/nan.12378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Khalil M, et al. Neurofilaments as biomarkers in neurological disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14:577–589. doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0058-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Himmler A, Drechsel D, Kirschner MW, Martin DW., Jr. Tau consists of a set of proteins with repeated C-terminal microtubule-binding domains and variable N-terminal domains. Mol Cell Biol. 1989;9:1381–1388. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.4.1381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Levy SF, et al. Three- and four-repeat tau regulate the dynamic instability of two distinct microtubule subpopulations in qualitatively different manners. Implications for neurodegeneration. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:13520–13528. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413490200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Cirrito JR, et al. Synaptic activity regulates interstitial fluid amyloid-beta levels in vivo. Neuron. 2005;48:913–922. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Cirrito JR, et al. Endocytosis is required for synaptic activity-dependent release of amyloid-beta in vivo. Neuron. 2008;58:42–51. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kamenetz F, et al. APP processing and synaptic function. Neuron. 2003;37:925–937. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00124-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Dolev Iftach, Fogel Hilla, Milshtein Hila, Berdichevsky Yevgeny, Lipstein Noa, Brose Nils, Gazit Neta, Slutsky Inna. Spike bursts increase amyloid-β 40/42 ratio by inducing a presenilin-1 conformational change. Nature Neuroscience. 2013;16(5):587–595. doi: 10.1038/nn.3376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Chow VW, Mattson MP, Wong PC, Gleichmann M. An overview of APP processing enzymes and products. Neuromolecular medicine. 2010;12:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s12017-009-8104-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Arber, C. et al. Familial Alzheimer’s disease patient-derived neurons reveal distinct mutation-specific effects on amyloid beta. Mol Psychiatry, 10.1038/s41380-019-0410-8 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 59.Nicolas M, Hassan BA. Amyloid precursor protein and neural development. Development. 2014;141:2543–2548. doi: 10.1242/dev.108712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Vogel C, et al. Sequence signatures and mRNA concentration can explain two-thirds of protein abundance variation in a human cell line. Molecular systems biology. 2010;6:400. doi: 10.1038/msb.2010.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lundgren JL, et al. ADAM10 and BACE1 are localized to synaptic vesicles. J Neurochem. 2015;135:606–615. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Tampellini D, et al. Synaptic activity reduces intraneuronal Abeta, promotes APP transport to synapses, and protects against Abeta-related synaptic alterations. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2009;29:9704–9713. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.2292-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sposito T, et al. Developmental regulation of tau splicing is disrupted in stem cell-derived neurons from frontotemporal dementia patients with the 10 + 16 splice-site mutation in MAPT. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24:5260–5269. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods (San Diego, Calif.) 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Nazir FH, et al. Expression and secretion of synaptic proteins during stem cell differentiation to cortical neurons. Neurochem Int. 2018;121:38–49. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2018.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.