Abstract
Background
Reproductive capacity can be altered by challenges experienced during critical periods of development, including fetal development and early neonatal life. Gossypol is a polyphenolic compound, commonly found in cotton seeds, that impairs male reproduction. Here, we investigated whether the exposure to gossypol in utero and during lactation alters male reproductive function in sheep. From conception until 60 days postpartum, ewes were randomly assigned to a control diet or a gossypol-rich diet based on cottonseed. Lamb testicles were removed at 60 days of age and subjected to RNA-sequencing.
Results
Lambs derived from the maternal cottonseed diet showed significantly lower growth and lower testis weight as a proportion of the total body weight, and reduced testosterone levels. In addition, the testis transcriptome was significantly altered by the maternal cottonseed diet. Most of the altered genes are directly implicated in testis development and sperm biology, cell communication, iron ion metabolism, calcium homeostasis and signaling, among other functions. Interestingly, network analysis revealed that exposure to gossypol significantly disturbed coexpression patterns among spermatogenesis-related genes, suggesting a disruption in coregulation mechanisms.
Conclusions
Our findings provide evidence that maternal exposure to gossypol alters male reproductive function in the offspring, with potential lasting or lifelong negative consequences.
Keywords: Cottonseed, Fetal programming, Male reproduction, Maternal nutrition
Background
The use of cotton by-products in animal nutrition is limited by the presence of gossypol, a toxic molecule. Gossypol, a phenolic compound (C30H30O8), is found in the roots and foliage of the cotton plant, but its greatest concentration is in the seeds. In general, this secondary plant compound has negative effects on mammalian cell metabolism [1]. Gossypol toxicity is related to its ability to bind macromolecules before and after absorption. Two gossypol forms have been identified, free (toxic) and bound. The bound form is synthesized via covalent bonds between free gossypol and the free epsilon-amino groups from lysine and arginine [2]. This reaction reduces the availability of these amino acids, particularly lysine. In addition, free gossypol also binds minerals, specially iron which inhibits the absorption of this metal, affecting the erythropoiesis [1].
Gossypol affects both female and male gametogenesis and also embryo development. Female exposure to gossypol has been associated with irregular and longer estrous cycles, lower levels of estradiol, reduced number of ovarian follicles, and decreased pregnancy rate [3–5]. The negative effect of gossypol on male reproduction has been reported in several studies, including degeneration of spermatocytes in hamsters [6], decreased sperm count and motility, increased abnormal sperms, and reduced testosterone concentration in rats [7–9], and reduced sperm production, reduced sperm motility, and increased sperm abnormalities in bulls [10, 11]. Interestingly, the effect of gossypol on male fertility is both dose- and time-dependent: in effective doses, gossypol causes infertility by affecting sperm motility and damaging the germinal epithelium; however the adverse effects are reversible when gossypol in no longer ingested [11, 12].
There is growing evidence that intrauterine stimulus or insults can affect offspring sexual development. Maternal nutrition is considered a major intrauterine environmental factor in fetal development. Indeed, it is now recognized that maternal nutrition plays a key role in programming offspring reproductive capacity [13]. For instance, in utero protein restriction reduces Sertoli cells, alters sperm motility and counts, and increases abnormal sperm morphology in adult male rats [14]. In addition, maternal protein restriction during lactation reduces testicular weight and decreases testicular aromatase expression in male rat offspring, indicating potential harm for future germ cell development and reproductive function [15]. Little is known, however, about the potential effects of gestational and lactational exposure to gossypol on the offspring sexual development. As such, the main objective of this study was to investigate the effect of maternal cottonseed supplementation from conception to weaning on the development of male reproductive function in sheep. Specifically, we hypothesized that a maternal diet rich in gossypol during gestation and throughout lactation would alter both testis development and testis gene expression in the offspring.
Results
Body measurements
Maternal diets did not affect lamb birth weights (Table 1). After birth, however, lambs exposed to gossypol showed lower milk intake, lower body weight gain and lower gonadosomatic index when compared to lambs exposed to a control diet (P-value ≤0.05, Table 1). These findings suggest that gestational and lactation exposure to gossypol impacts the development of the offspring, which in turn may have long-term consequences.
Table 1.
Variables | Maternal Diets | SEM | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control | Cottonseed | |||
Birth Weight | 4.39 | 3.62 | 1.14 | 0.99 |
Final Weight | 15.7 | 11.0 | 0.81 | 0.004 |
Milk Intake | 989 | 764 | 215 | 0.042 |
GSI | 0.049 | 0.032 | 0.006 | 0.019 |
Hemogram analysis
The hemogram analysis revealed that lambs exposed to gossypol in utero and through lactation showed significantly lower red blood cell count, lower hematocrit, and also lower hemoglobin compared to lambs derived from the maternal control diet (P-value ≤0.05, Table 2).
Table 2.
Variables | Maternal Diets | SEM | P-value | Referencea | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | Cottonseed | ||||
Red blood cell (× 106/μL) | 9.85 | 9.47 | 0.19 | 0.049 | 9–15 |
Hematocrit (%) | 39.28 | 37.27 | 0.85 | 0.020 | 27–45 |
Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 11.49 | 10.97 | 0.25 | 0.039 | 9–15 |
White blood cell (×103/mL) | 8.17 | 8.06 | 0.47 | 0.81 | 4–8 |
aReference values in sheep according to Byers and Kramer [16]
Hormone analysis
The levels of testosterone increased while the levels of both T3 and T4 decreased across time, from birth to weaning (P-value ≤0.05, Fig. 1). Interestingly, the levels of testosterone were systematically lower in lambs derived from the gossypol-rich maternal diet. Although these differences were not statistically significant, they hold biological importance as testosterone plays key roles in male sexual development.
RNA-sequencing
The RNA-sequencing of the testis transcriptome yielded approximately 24 million sequencing reads per sample. Roughly 81% of the reads were mapped to the Oar_v3.1 sheep genome assembly using the software Tophat (Additional file 1). A total of 18,326 genes were tested for differential expression. Controlling false discovery rate (FDR) at 1%, a total of 84 genes showed differential expression between maternal diets (P-value ≤4.6e-05, Fig. 2). Additional file 2 shows the full list of significant genes, including Ensembl gene ID, log2-fold-change, log2-counts-per-million, P-value and q-value. Most of the significant genes (62 out of 84) were down-regulated in lambs derived from the maternal gossypol-rich diet. Interestingly, many of these down-regulated genes are directly implicated in testis development, spermatogenesis, and sperm physiology, such as cystatin-9-like (CST9L), NK3 homeobox 1 (NKX3.1), a disintegrin and metallopeptidase domain 11 (ADAM11), V-set and immunoglobulin domain containing 1 (VSIG1), MAGE family member B18 (MAGEB18), leucine rich repeat containing 8 VRAC subunit B (LRRC8B), acrosomal protein KIAA1210 (KIAA1210), mitogen-activated protein kinase 15 (MAP3 K15), solute carrier family 4 member 5 (SLC4A5), fetal and adult testis expressed 1 (FATE1), and prion like protein doppel (PRND), among others. On the other hand, 22 out of 84 differentially expressed genes were up-regulated due to gossypol exposure. Many of these significant genes are directly implicated in xenobiotic metabolism, such as solute carrier family 47 member 1 (SLC47A1) or intracellular calcium homeostasis and signaling, such as SPARC related modular calcium binding 2 (SMOC2), erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 3 (ERBB3), calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit gamma 4 (CACNG4), cadherin related 23 (CDH23), and otoconin 90 (OC90).
Gene expression validation
The expression of five genes directly implicated in male reproduction, namely KIAA1210, MAP3 K15, SLC4A5, FATE1 and PRND, was validated using qRT-PCR. The RNA-Seq analysis revealed that these genes were down-regulated in the maternal cottonseed diet. In the same way, results from qRT-PCR clearly indicated that the expression of these five genes was significantly decreased due to gossypol exposure (P-value ≤0.05, Additional file 3).
Gene-set enrichment analysis
An enrichment analysis, also known as overrepresentation analysis, was performed in order to gain additional insight into the biological processes that could be impacted by gossypol in the lamb testicles. Figure 3 displays a set of Gene Ontology terms that were significantly enriched with differentially expressed genes. Some of these functional terms are closely related to testis function, such as spermatogenesis (GO:0007283). In addition, some terms are directly implicated in ion iron metabolism, such as ion iron binding (GO:0005506) and heme binding (GO:0020037), and also calcium homeostasis, such as and voltage-gated calcium channel complex (GO:0005891). Interestingly, many significant terms are associated with epithelial tissue integrity and homeostasis, such as cell communication (GO:0007154), gap junction (GO:0005921), and morphogenesis of an epithelium (GO:0002009), suggesting that gossypol exposure might impair the highly specialized epithelial tissue found in the testicles. Finally, some terms were closely related to the immune function, such as defense response to bacterium (GO:0042742) and innate immune response (GO:0045087). Additional file 4 shows the full list of significant GO terms, including GO ID, GO name, number of genes, number of differentially expressed genes, and Fisher’s P-value.
Gene coexpression network analysis
The potential impact of gossypol on spermatogenesis was further investigated using gene coexpression network analysis. The goal was to investigate the preservation of the coexpression network between maternal diets using the expression of 145 spermatogenesis-related genes. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the node connectivity and node cluster coefficient, two classical network preservation statistics, in each maternal diet. Interestingly, the exposure to gossypol in utero and throughout lactation caused noticeable changes in the coexpression patterns of genes directly implicated in spermatogenesis. Indeed, the maternal gossypol-rich diet altered the spermatogenesis network decreasing both gene connectivity and gene clustering, suggesting a clear disruption in gene coexpression patterns.
Discussion
Nutritional programming describes the effects that nutritional changes during key moments of development have on future animal performance. The present study was specially designed to evaluate the effects of maternal cottonseed supplementation, a feed rich in gossypol, on male reproductive function. Our results showed that exposure to gossypol in utero and throughout lactation led to significant changes in testis development and gene expression. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that reports programming of sexual development and male reproductive function due to maternal cottonseed nutrition.
The exposure to gossypol in utero and throughout lactation negatively impacts growth and testis development. Lambs derived from the maternal cottonseed diet had not only lower body weight at weaning but also significantly lower gonadosomatic index, indicating smaller testicles in relation to the total body mass. This is a clear indication that the gestational and lactational exposure to gossypol impairs normal development of the testicles, which in turn could have lasting or lifelong consequences on male reproductive function. Several studies in male rats have reported that exposure to gossypol caused degeneration of seminiferous tubules and reduced testosterone concentration [7–9]. Interestingly, we found that, although not statistically significant, testosterone levels were consistently lower in lambs from dams supplemented with cottonseed. Given that testosterone is produced by the Leydig cells, interstitial cells found adjacent to the seminiferous tubules, lower testosterone levels can be explained either by the reduced testicle mass and/or a direct impact of gossypol on the physiology of the Leydig cells [17, 18].
Maternal exposure to gossypol directly impacted the testis transcriptome of the offspring. Most significantly altered genes were found down-regulated in the maternal gossypol-rich diet. Notably, many of these down-regulated genes, such as CST9L, FATE1, NKX3.1, ADAM11, VSIG1, KIAA1210, CYP4F21, SLC4A5, and PRND, are closely related to male fertility and sperm biology. For instance, gene CST9L is a testis-specific protein, member of the superfamily of cysteine peptidase inhibitors, that has a relevant role in tissue reorganization during early testis development [19]. Gene FATE1 is a X-linked gene predominantly expressed in fetal and adult testis implicated in both testicular development and germ cell differentiation [20]. Gene NKX3.1 is a homeobox transcription factor which exhibits prostate and testis specific expression, and is essential for normal testis function given that its loss of expression is highly associated with testicular germ cell tumorigenesis [21]. Gene ADAM11 encodes a member of the disintegrin and metalloprotease protein family, membrane-anchored proteins that have been implicated in a variety of biological processes involving cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, including gametogenesis and fertilization [22, 23]. Gene VSIG1 is a member of the junctional adhesion molecule family, is primarily expressed in the stomach and testis, and plays important roles during spermatogenesis [24]. Gene KIAA1210 is predominantly expressed in testis and plays an active role in the acrosome reaction, a crucial process during sperm-oocyte fusion [25]. Gene CYP4F21 encodes a cytochrome P450 enzyme which is involved in the biosynthesis of 20-hydroxy-PGE1 and 20-hydroxy-PGE2, two specific and presumably physiologically important compounds excreted by the male vesicular glands [26]. Gene SLC4A5 encodes a member of the sodium bicarbonate cotransporter family, is highly expressed in the testis and plays a key role in regulating sodium and bicarbonate transport, influencing testis intracellular, extracellular, and interstitial pH [27]. Gene PRND encodes a membrane glycoprotein that is found predominantly in testis and has a crucial function during the late steps of spermatogenesis [28]. Overall, these results indicate that prenatal and lactational exposure to gossypol alters the expression of many genes involved in testicular function.
Although several studies have shown the toxicity of gossypol in male reproduction, the precise mechanisms of gossypol action in the testicles have not yet been fully elucidated. Of special interest, spermatogenesis (GO:0007283) was identified as one of the most impacted functional gene-sets by the maternal cottonseed diet (Fig. 3, Fisher’s P-value ≤0.01). Indeed, a total of 13 genes directly implicated in the spermatogenesis process showed differential expression between maternal diets. Notably, the gene coexpression network analysis revealed that the maternal exposure to gossypol significantly altered the coexpression patterns of spermatogenesis-related genes, suggesting that gossypol might disrupt gene coregulation mechanisms. Recently, Lim et al. proposed that gossypol induces negative effects on mice testis function by reducing cell viability, mitochondrial membrane potential, and the expression of many genes related to development and maturation of sperm cells [29]. Spermatogenesis is a multi-step process that involves multiple cellular events including cell-cell interactions, cell migration, apoptosis and differentiation. Interestingly, we found that functional gene-set terms such as cell communication (GO:0007154), cell adhesion (GO:0007155), gap junction (GO:0005921), cell migration (GO:0016477), and negative regulation of apoptotic signaling pathway (GO:2001234) were significantly impacted by gossypol exposure.
It is well-documented that free gossypol is a highly reactive compound that readily binds to iron, forming a gossypol-iron complex, which limits iron bioavailability and inhibits iron absorption. Here, lambs derived from the maternal gossypol-rich diet showed significantly lower red blood cells, hematocrit, and hemoglobin, compared to lambs from maternal control diet. Note that gossypol-mediated iron deficiency impairs heme synthesis, which in turn limits hemoglobin synthesis. Interestingly, the negative effect of gossypol on iron homeostasis was also revealed by the gene expression data. Indeed, some of the most significant gene-sets in the pathway analysis were closely related to iron metabolism, such as iron ion binding (GO:0005506), heme binding (GO:0020037), and iron ion homeostasis (GO:0055072). The vast majority of the genes in these functional terms were down-regulated in lambs from the maternal cottonseed treatment, providing further evidence that maternal exposure to gossypol negatively altered iron ion transport, signaling, and metabolism in the offspring.
There is growing evidence that gossypol also alters intracellular calcium homeostasis and signaling. Indeed, several studies have shown that gossypol causes a rapid increase in cytoplasmic calcium as a consequence of release of calcium from endoplasmic reticulum stores, and subsequent calcium influx through calcium release-activated channels [30–32]. Interestingly, we found that many genes up-regulated in lambs derived from the maternal gossypol-rich diet, such as CDH23 and CACNG4, are directly implicated in calcium homeostasis. For instance, gene CDH23 encodes a member of the cadherin superfamily, which comprises calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion glycoproteins involved in diverse biological processes including calcium ion transport and regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentration [33]. Similarly, gene CACNG4 encodes a transmembrane protein that plays an active role in the regulation of calcium ion transmembrane transport [34]. Furthermore, the gene-set enrichment analysis identified functional terms, such as transmembrane transport (GO:0055085), positive regulation of release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosol (GO:0051281), and voltage-gated calcium channel complex (GO:0005891), that are directly implicated in calcium ion homeostasis. Overall, our findings provide additional evidence that gossypol alters calcium metabolism, which in turn can mediate some of its detrimental effects.
Conclusions
Our findings provide evidence that maternal cottonseed supplementation during the gestational and lactational period alters male reproductive function in the offspring. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study showing that gossypol exposure during fetal development and early neonatal life can severely impact sexual development. The observed changes in testis development and testis gene expression suggest that exposure to gossypol in utero and during lactation can have lasting or lifelong consequences on male fertility.
Methods
Ethics statement
All the animal procedures used in this study were approved by the Committee on Animal Research and Ethics (008/2015) of the Center of Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Brazil. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Animals, experimental design, and maternal diets
Santa Inês ewes (Ovis aries) from the Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture at the University of São Paulo, Brazil, were used in a completely randomized design in order to evaluate the effect of gestational and lactational exposure to cottonseed-derived gossypol on testis development and testis gene expression in lambs. From conception until 60 days postpartum, ewes were individually supplemented with a control diet based on corn and soybean or a gossypol-rich diet based on cottonseed [35]. Ewes had ad libitum access to hay and forage (pastures of Panicum maximum cv. Aruana). The diets were elaborated to meet the requirements of protein and metabolizable energy for gestation and lactation.
Lamb measurements and blood collection
A total of 18 male lambs, 9 from control and 9 from gossypol-rich maternal diets, were used in this study. Lambs were kept in collective pens with ad libitum access to water, tifton hay, mineral salt, and concentrate (70% corn and 30% soybean meal) provided in creep feeding. Milk intake was estimated according to the method proposed by Robinson et al. [36]. Blood samples were collected on days 0, 3, 7, 15, 30, 45 and 60 after birth by puncture of the jugular vein, using vacuum tubes either with or without anticoagulant (EDTA). A hematological analyzer (Davol® poch-100 iV, São Paulo, Brazil) was used to determine red blood cell count (RBC), white blood cell count (WBC), hemoglobin concentration (Hg), hematocrit (Ht), and platelet count (Plc). Blood samples without EDTA were centrifuged for 10 min at 1310 g and 4 °C for serum separation and stored at − 20 °C for further analysis of testosterone (T), thyroxine (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3) on days 15, 30 and 60. Hormone levels were analyzed by radioimmunoassay (RIA) following the instructions of iodine 125I RIA kits Beckman coulter® (T/IM1087, T3/IM1699 and T4/IM1447), Praha, Czech Republic. The entire right and left testicles were removed at 60 days of age. Lambs were sedated with a 0.1 mg/kg dose intramuscular xylazine hydrochloride, followed by local anesthesia containing 2 mL of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride with epinephrine. The gonadosomatic index (GSI) for each lamb was calculated as the weight of both testicles divided by total body weight. The left testicle was frozen in nitrogen liquid and stored in − 80 °C for subsequent RNA-sequencing.
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis of the body weight, milk intake, GSI, blood parameters, and hormone data was performed using SAS® 9.2 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary NC, USA/2014). For the response variables measured only once, namely milk intake and GSI, the effect of the maternal diets was assessed using PROC Anova. On the other hand, body weight records, hemogram parameters, and hormone levels were evaluated several times, and hence the effect of maternal nutritional treatments was evaluated using the procedure of repeated measures in PROC Mixed.
RNA extraction, library preparation and sequencing
Total RNA was extracted from 18 testicles derived from 18 lambs, 9 from maternal control diet and 9 from maternal gossypol-rich diet. RNA extraction was performed using Trizol® reagent, and quality of the obtained RNA was determined using a nanodrop spectrophotometer (OD260/OD280) to determine purity, as well as an agarose gel electrophoresis to observe potential RNA degradation and contamination. The RNA integrity was assessed using an Agilent Bioanalyzer, with RNA integrity number (RIN) values between 8 and 10. All the RNA-sequencing procedures were performed by Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Sequencing libraries were prepared using a Poly-A tail capture method and sequenced with Illumina’s HiSeq 3000. Whole-genome transcriptome sequencing data can be accessed by GEO with the accession number GSE133811.
RNA-seq data analysis
RNA-sequencing reads were tested for quality before and after trimming using the software FastQC (version 0.11.7, Babraham Bioinformatics, UK). Trimming was conducted with the software Trim Galore (version 0.4.4, Babraham Bioinformatics, UK) using the following parameters: --quality 20, −-clip_R1 10, −-three_prime_clip_R1 20, and --length 50. Note that reads that became shorter than 50 bp were discarded. A first round of single-end alignment was performed on the Oar_v3.1 sheep genome assembly using the software Tophat2 (version 2.1.1) with the option --coverage-search to enable search of novel junctions [37]. Resulting junction files were then merged together and used for a second round of mapping as a way to fully maximize the identification of novel transcripts. A maximum of 2 mismatches were allowed and reads that mapped to more than 40 genomic locations were discarded. The resulting alignments were provided to software Cufflinks (version 2.2.1) in order to construct transcript models. Sample assemblies were merged together with the Oar_v3.1 sheep genome assembly annotation file using Cuffmerge (Cufflinks, version 2.2.1) in order to combine novel transcripts with known annotated transcripts; this strategy maximizes the overall quality of the final assembly. Read counting was performed with htseq (version 0.6.1p1) using the final transcriptome assembly with the option intersection-nonempty [38]. Differentially expressed genes between maternal diets were detected using the R package edgeR (version 3.20.9) with default parameters [39].
Validation of differentially expressed genes
Five differentially expressed genes were chosen for validation of RNA-Seq results: KIAA1210, MAP3 K15, MAGEA10, FATE1 and PRND. The same RNA samples used for RNA-Seq were used here for gene expression validation using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Total RNA was quantified through spectrometry using Nanodrop 2000c (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1000 ng of total RNA were treated with 1 U of DNase I (Thermo Scientific) in a 10 μL reaction containing 1 μL + DNase-RNase-Free water at 37 °C for 10 min. The cDNA was prepared using the Maxima First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA). Reactions were run using StepOnePlus system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Gene GAPDH was chosen as internal control because of its stable expression across all RNA-Seq samples. The association between normalized gene expression values (ΔCt) and maternal diets was tested using a likelihood ratio test [40]. The relative gene expression values were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method [41].
Gene-set enrichment analysis
The significant enrichment of Gene Ontology (GO) terms with differently expressed genes between maternal nutritional treatments was analyzed using Fisher’s exact test, a test of proportions based on the cumulative hypergeometric distribution. Differentially expressed genes that showed FDR ≤ 0.05 and had ENSEMBL annotations were tested against the background set of all expressed genes with ENSEMBL annotations. The assignment of genes to GO terms was performed using the function getBM from the R package biomaRt (v 2.36.1). The Fisher’s exact test was implemented using the function fisher.test in the R software.
Gene coexpression network analysis
Network modeling analysis was performed to further characterize the process of spermatogenesis that could be directly impacted by maternal gossypol exposure. A total of 145 genes that showed expression in the RNA-Seq analysis and belong to GO spermatogenesis (GO:0007283) were considered in this analysis. For each maternal nutritional treatment, a correlation matrix R = (rij) with dimensions 145 × 145 was constructed using Pearson correlation coefficients. Each correlation matrix was then translated into an adjacency matrix A = (aij), an 145 × 145 matrix with entries either 0 or 1. Here, if |rij| ≥ 0.5 and P-value ≤0.05, then aij = 1, otherwise aij= 0. Finally, for each maternal diet, an unweighted network was constructed based on adjacency matrix where two genes i and j were either connected (aij = 1) or disconnected (aij = 0). The structure and topology of each network was evaluated using node connectivity and node cluster coefficient [42]. The connectivity ki of gene i, defined as , measures the connection strength of gene i with all the other genes. The cluster coefficient ci of gene i, defined as,
represents the local density of a network with 0 ≤ ci ≤ 1. All these analyses were performed using the R package Weighted Correlation Network Analysis (WGCNA, version 1.66) [43].
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
Computational resources were kindly provided by the Florida Agricultural Experiment Station and the Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida.
Abbreviations
- FDR
False discovery rate
- GO
Gene ontology
- RNA-Seq
RNA sequencing
Authors’ contributions
HL, SMT and CMM conceived and designed the study. EHI and CRJ performed the animal trial, sample collection and hemogram analysis. PSC carried out the radioimmunoassay and RNA extraction. RA, LL and FP performed all the RNA-Seq bioinformatic analyses, including overall gene expression, gene-set enrichment analysis and network modeling. HL, RA and FP wrote the manuscript. All authors read, edited and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP 2016/09660–1, 2018/06191–6 and 2018/07947–7). P. S. Corrêa and E. H. Ieda received scholarships from Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, Brazil (CAPES). H. Louvandini, S. M. Tsai and C. M. McManus were supported by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). The funding bodies did not contribute to the design of the study or collection, analysis and interpretation of data and writing the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
Sequencing data can be accessed through NCBI GEO with accession number GSE133811.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All the animal procedures were approved by the Committee on Animal Research and Ethics (008/2015) of the Center of Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The corresponding author, Francisco Peñagaricano, is a member of the editorial board for the BMC Genomics journal.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Helder Louvandini, Email: louvandini@cena.usp.br.
Patricia S. Corrêa, Email: patricia.louvandini@gmail.com
Rocío Amorín, Email: ramorin@ufl.edu.
Lihe Liu, Email: lihe.liu@ufl.edu.
Egon H. Ieda, Email: egon_hion@hotmail.com
Carolina R. Jimenez, Email: zoocaro@hotmail.com
Siu M. Tsai, Email: tsai@cena.usp.br
Concepta M. McManus, Email: concepta@unb.br
Francisco Peñagaricano, Email: fpenagaricano@ufl.edu.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s12864-020-6487-2.
References
- 1.Gadelha IC, Fonseca NB, Oloris SC, Melo MM, Soto-Blanco B. Gossypol toxicity from cottonseed products. Sci World J. 2014;2014:231635. doi: 10.1155/2014/231635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fernandez SR, Zhang Y, Parsons CM. Dietary formulation with cottonseed meal on a total amino acid versus a digestible amino acid basis. Poult Sci. 1995;74(7):1168–1179. doi: 10.3382/ps.0741168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lin YC, Fukaya T, Rikihisa Y, Walton A. Gossypol in female fertility control: ovum implantation and early pregnancy inhibited in rats. Life Sci. 1985;37(1):39–47. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(85)90623-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lagerlöf RK, Tone JN. The effect of gossypol acetic acid on female reproduction. Drug Chem Toxicol. 1985;8(6):469–482. doi: 10.3109/01480548509041070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Randel R, Willard S, Wyse S, French L. Effects of diets containing free gossypol on follicular development, embryo recovery and corpus luteum function in Brangus heifers treated with bFSH. Theriogenology. 1996;45(5):911–922. doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(96)00021-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hahn D, Rusticus C, Probst A, Homm R, Johnson A. Antifertility and endocrine activities of gossypol in rodents. Contraception. 1981;24(1):97–105. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(81)90072-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Heywood R, Lloyd G, Majeed S, Gopinath C. The toxicity of gossypol to the male rat. Toxicology. 1986;40(3):279–284. doi: 10.1016/0300-483X(86)90060-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gåfvels M, Wang J, Bergh A, Damber J-E, Selstam G. Toxic effects of the antifertility agent gossypol in male rats. Toxicology. 1984;32(4):325–333. doi: 10.1016/0300-483X(84)90084-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.El-Sharaky A, Newairy A, Elguindy N, Elwafa A. Spermatotoxicity, biochemical changes and histological alteration induced by gossypol in testicular and hepatic tissues of male rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010;48(12):3354–3361. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chenoweth P, Risco C, Larsen R, Velez J, Tran T, Chase C., Jr Effects of dietary gossypol on aspects of semen quality, sperm morphology and sperm production in young Brahman bulls. Theriogenology. 1994;42(1):1–13. doi: 10.1016/0093-691X(94)90657-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hassan ME, Smith GW, Ott RS, Faulkner DB, Firkins LD, Ehrhart E, Schaeffer DJ. Reversibility of the reproductive toxicity of gossypol in peripubertal bulls. Theriogenology. 2004;61(6):1171–1179. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Randel R, Chase C, Jr, Wyse S. Effects of gossypol and cottonseed products on reproduction of mammals. J Anim Sci. 1992;70(5):1628–1638. doi: 10.2527/1992.7051628x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zambrano E, Guzman C, Rodriguez-Gonzalez GL, Durand-Carbajal M, Nathanielsz PW. Fetal programming of sexual development and reproductive function. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2014;382(1):538–549. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2013.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Toledo FC, Perobelli JE, Pedrosa FP, Anselmo-Franci JA, Kempinas WD. In utero protein restriction causes growth delay and alters sperm parameters in adult male rats. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011;9:94. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Teixeira CV, Silandre D, de Souza Santos AM, Delalande C, Sampaio FJ, Carreau S, da Fonte RC. Effects of maternal undernutrition during lactation on aromatase, estrogen, and androgen receptors expression in rat testis at weaning. J Endocrinol. 2007;192(2):301–311. doi: 10.1677/joe.1.06712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Byers SR, Kramer JW. Normal hematology of sheep and goats. In: Weiss DJ, Wardrop KJ, editors. Schalm’s Veterinary Hematology. Ames: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 837. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Donaldson A, Sufi S, Jeffcoate S. Inhibition by gossypol of testosterone production by mouse Leydig cells in vitro. Contraception. 1985;31(2):165–171. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(85)90030-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pearce S, Sufi S, O'Shaughnessy P, Donaldson A, Jeffcoate S. Site of gossypol inhibition of steroidogenesis in purified mouse Leydig cells. J Steroid Biochem. 1986;25(5):683–687. doi: 10.1016/0022-4731(86)90011-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Eriksson A, Töhönen V, Wedell A, Nordqvist K. Isolation of the human testatin gene and analysis in patients with abnormal gonadal development. Mol Hum Reprod. 2002;8(1):8–15. doi: 10.1093/molehr/8.1.8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Olesen C, Larsen NJ, Byskov AG, Harboe TL, Tommerup N. Human FATE is a novel X-linked gene expressed in fetal and adult testis. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001;184(1):25–32. doi: 10.1016/S0303-7207(01)00666-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Skotheim RI, Korkmaz KS, Klokk TI, Abeler VM, Korkmaz CG, Nesland JM, Fossa SD, Lothe RA, Saatcioglu F. NKX3.1 expression is lost in testicular germ cell tumors. Am J Pathol. 2003;163(6):2149–2154. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63571-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wolfsberg TG, Straight PD, Gerena RL, Huovila A-PJ, Primakoff P, Myles DG, White JM. ADAM, a widely distributed and developmentally regulated gene family encoding membrane proteins with a disintegrin and metalloprotease domain. Dev Biol. 1995;169(1):378–383. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1995.1152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wolfsberg TG, Primakoff P, Myles DG, White JM. ADAM, a novel family of membrane proteins containing a Disintegrin and Metalloprotease domain: multipotential functions in cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. J Cell Biol. 1995;131(2):275–278. doi: 10.1083/jcb.131.2.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kim E, Lee Y, Kim JS, Song BS, Kim SU, Huh JW, Lee SR, Kim SH, Hong Y, Chang KT. Extracellular domain of V-set and immunoglobulin domain containing 1 (VSIG1) interacts with sertoli cell membrane protein, while its PDZ-binding motif forms a complex with ZO-1. Mol Cell. 2010;30(5):443–448. doi: 10.1007/s10059-010-0138-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Iwamori T, Iwamori N, Matsumoto M, Ono E, Matzuk MM. Identification of KIAA1210 as a novel X-chromosome-linked protein that localizes to the acrosome and associates with the ectoplasmic specialization in testes. Biol Reprod. 2017;96(2):469–477. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.116.145458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bylund J, Oliw EH. Cloning and characterization of CYP4F21: a prostaglandin E2 20-hydroxylase of ram seminal vesicles. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2001;389(1):123–129. doi: 10.1006/abbi.2001.2322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Parker MD, Boron WF. The divergence, actions, roles, and relatives of sodium-coupled bicarbonate transporters. Physiol Rev. 2013;93(2):803–959. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00023.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Allais-Bonnet A, Pailhoux E. Role of the prion protein family in the gonads. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2014;2:56. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2014.00056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lim W, Ham J, Park S, Bae H, You S, Song G. Gossypol induces disruption of spermatogenesis and Steroidogenesis in male mice. J Agric Food Chem. 2019;67(7):2075. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b06946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jan C-R, Lin M-C, Chou K-J, Huang J-K. Novel effects of gossypol, a chemical contraceptive in man: mobilization of internal Ca2+ and activation of external Ca2+ entry in intact cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Mol Cell Res. 2000;1496(2–3):270–276. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4889(00)00033-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cheng J-S, Liu C-P, Lo Y-K, Chou K-J, Lin M-C, Su W, Law Y-P, Wang J-L, Chen W-C, Jan C-R. Gossypol, a component in cottonseed, induced increases in cytosolic Ca2+ levels in Chang liver cells. Toxicon. 2002;40(7):851–856. doi: 10.1016/S0041-0101(01)00194-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cheng J-S, Lo Y-K, Yeh J-H, Cheng H-H, Liu C-P, Chen W-C, Jan C-R. Effect of gossypol on intracellular Ca2+ regulation in human hepatoma cells. Chin J Phys. 2003;46:117–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sotomayor M, Gaudet R, Corey DP. Sorting out a promiscuous superfamily: towards cadherin connectomics. Trends Cell Biol. 2014;24(9):524–536. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sager C, Tapken D, Kott S, Hollmann M. Functional modulation of AMPA receptors by transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory proteins. Neuroscience. 2009;158(1):45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.12.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Moretti DB, Jimenez CR, Trinca HM, Machado-Neto R, Louvandini H. Effect of maternal cottonseed feed on the immune and antioxidant status of Santa Ines lambs. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;62:58–63. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2018.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Robinson JJ, Foster WH, Forbes TJ. The estimation of the milk yield of a ewe from body weight data on the suckling lamb. J Agric Sci. 1969;72(1):103–107. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600020451. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg S. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013;14(4):R36. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq-a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(2):166–169. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(1):139–140. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhang B, Peñagaricano F, Driver A, Chen H, Khatib H. Differential expression of heat shock protein genes and their splice variants in bovine preimplantation embryos. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94(8):4174–4182. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-4137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-DDCT method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Langfelder P, Luo R, Oldham MC, Horvath S. Is my network module preserved and reproducible? PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7(1):e1001057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9(1):559. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Sequencing data can be accessed through NCBI GEO with accession number GSE133811.