Skip to main content
Cancer Medicine logoLink to Cancer Medicine
. 2019 Dec 2;9(2):562–574. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2730

Age comorbidity scores as risk factors for 90‐day mortality in patients with a pancreatic head adenocarcinoma receiving a pancreaticoduodenectomy: A National Population‐Based Study

Ben‐Chang Shia 1,2,3, Lei Qin 4, Kuan‐Chou Lin 5,6, Chih‐Yuan Fang 5,6, Lo‐Lin Tsai 5,6, Yi‐Wei Kao 7, Szu‐Yuan Wu 8,9,10,11,12,
PMCID: PMC6970054  PMID: 31789464

Abstract

Background

To estimate easily assessed preoperative factors for predicting 90‐day mortality in patients with a pancreatic head adenocarcinoma (PHA) receiving a pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Methods

We analyzed data from the Taiwan Cancer Registry Database of patients with a PHA who received a pancreaticoduodenectomy. Basic demographic characteristics, including gender and age, were categorized. The selection of preoperative comorbidities was based on the preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists score and Charlson comorbidity index.

Results

We enrolled 8490 patients with a PHA who received a pancreaticoduodenectomy without distant metastasis. Currently, a pancreaticoduodenectomy for a PHA achieves an overall 90‐day mortality rate of 8.39%. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that an older age (65‐74 and ≥75 years) and specific comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, dementia, and sepsis) were significant independent prognostic factors for predicting 90‐day mortality after a pancreaticoduodenectomy. After adjustment, the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) of subjects with middle and high comorbidity scores for 90‐day mortality in 65 to 74‐year‐old patients were 1.36 (1.05‐1.75) and 2.25 (1.03‐4.90), respectively, compared to subjects with low comorbidity scores. The aHRs (95% CIs) of subjects with middle and high comorbidity scores for 90‐day mortality in ≥75‐year‐old patients were 1.35 (1.07‐1.78) and 2.07 (1.19‐3.62), respectively, compared to those with low comorbidity scores.

Conclusions

Elderly patients with a PHA and moderate or high comorbidity scores have an increased risk of 90‐day mortality after a pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Keywords: 90‐day mortality, comorbidity, older age, pancreatic head adenocarcinoma, pancreaticoduodenectomy


This is the first study to utilize the largest cohort of patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma and to develop an easily implementable tool using preoperative characteristics such as age‐comorbidity predictive scores for 90‐day mortality in patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma receiving pancreaticoduodenectomy.

graphic file with name CAM4-9-562-g005.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic adenocarcinomas (PAs) are a highly lethal malignancy.1, 2 They are the fourth leading cause of cancer‐related deaths in the United States and second only to colorectal cancer as a cause of digestive cancer‐related deaths.2 In Taiwan, PAs are the fifth leading cause of cancer‐related deaths in women and the eighth leading cause of cancer‐related deaths in men.3, 4, 5 Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for PA.6 The most common anatomic location of a PA is the head (approximately 70%).7 The standard operation for a pancreatic head adenocarcinoma (PHA) is a pancreaticoduodenectomy.8, 9

A pancreaticoduodenectomy is a complex operation, and its early mortality rate is high.10, 11, 12 One of the most important reasons for improvements in pancreaticoduodenectomies is the considerable experience of a limited number of surgeons who perform the operation on a regular basis in high‐volume hepatobiliary centers.13, 14, 15 However, the definitions of experience and learning curves differ depending on individual surgeons’ learning ability and continuing medical education.16, 17, 18 Cutoff values in high‐volume hospitals are vague and different13, 19, 20 and vary with different surgical procedures.18, 19, 21 Easily assessed tools for predicting early perioperative mortality with a pancreaticoduodenectomy are needed as a reference for pancreaticoduodenectomies or other alternative treatments for patients with a PHA.

All events recorded within 90 days of resection are considered postoperative complications.22 Instead of 30‐day mortality, 90‐day postoperative mortality is a valid measure of hepatopancreatobiliary surgical quality.23 Moreover, 30‐day mortality usually underestimates the risk of early death after major resections for malignancies.10, 24, 25 Therefore, in this study, we attempted to estimate easily assessed preoperative factors for predicting 90‐day mortality in patients with a PHA who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy. These novel easily assessed preoperative factors may represent an easy and useful tool for evaluating 90‐day mortality to prevent underestimating perioperative mortality if using the 30‐day mortality rate after a pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with a PHA.

2. PATIENTS AND METHODS

2.1. Data source

The Taiwan Cancer Registry Database (TCRD) from the Collaboration Center of Health Information application contains detailed cancer‐related information,5, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 and the quality and precision of codes in Taiwan were verified and proven by previous studies.35, 36

2.2. Study cohort

We established a cohort from the TCRD. We enrolled patients who had received a diagnosis of resectable PHA and then undergone a pancreaticoduodenectomy between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2015. The index date was the date of surgery. The follow‐up duration was from the index date to December 31, 2016. Our protocols were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Taipei Medical University. The diagnoses of enrolled patients were confirmed according to their pathological data, and patients who received a new diagnosis of resectable PHA and underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy surgery exhibited no other cancer or distant metastasis. The inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of resectable PHA with the indication for a pancreaticoduodenectomy, being aged ≥20 years, having an adenocarcinoma, and being at clinical cancer stage I to III without metastasis as per the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual, Seventh Edition. Induction chemotherapy was used in our study. The exclusion criteria were a history of cancer before the pancreatic head cancer diagnosis, missing gender data, unclear staging, neoadjuvant radiotherapy before the index date, and non‐adenocarcinoma histology.

2.3. Study covariates

Basic demographic characteristics, including gender and age, were categorized. Patient age was determined according to the index date; patients were accordingly divided into five age groups: <45, 45‐54, 55‐64, 65‐74, and ≥75 years. The variables of interest included demographic characteristics, AJCC clinical stage, comorbidities, hospital volume,19, 37 and income level.38 Comorbidities were derived on the basis of previous studies and the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (TCRD).39, 40, 41 The selection of comorbidities was based on the preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists score and Charlson comorbidity index. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hepatitis B, hepatitis C, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease (CVD), heart valve dysfunction, sepsis, chronic kidney disease (CKD), heart failure, aortic aneurysm, peripheral vascular disease, peptic ulcer disease, dementia, chronic pulmonary disease, connective tissue disease, mild liver disease, hemiplegia, moderate or severe renal disease, and moderate or severe liver disease were examined. To ensure relevance, comorbidities reported >1 year before the index date were not included. Based on the main International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM) diagnostic codes, comorbidities were identified with a positive diagnosis in a single admission or a positive diagnosis in two or more visits to outpatient departments within 1 year before the index date.

2.4. Endpoint

The endpoint was the 90‐day mortality rate among patients who received a pancreaticoduodenectomy.

2.5. Statistical analysis

A Chi‐squared test was used to compare demographic characteristics between surviving patients and the 90‐day mortality rate between those with and without a specific comorbidity (Table 1). Independent predictors were adjusted for and stratified in the analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were constructed. Significant independent predictors—such as old age and specific significant comorbidities—were analyzed using multivariate Cox regression models, which were also used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs). After adjusting for confounders, Cox proportional hazards were used to model the time from the index date to 90‐day mortality for enrolled patients. In the multivariate analysis, HRs were adjusted for age, gender, the aforementioned comorbidities, clinical AJCC stage, hospital volume, and income level (Table 1). Table 3 presents stratified analyses performed to evaluate the 90‐day mortality risk associated with different independent significant comorbidities mentioned in Table 2; the analyses were stratified by low, middle, and high comorbidity scores (0, 1 or 2, and 3 or 4) and different age groups (<45, 45‐64, 65‐74, and ≥75 years). All analyses were performed using SAS (vers. 9.3; SAS). Two‐tailed P < .05 was considered statistically significant. The 90‐day survival rate was estimated using the Kaplan‐Meier method. Differences among patients with low, middle, and high comorbidity scores were determined using the log‐rank test.

Table 1.

90‐day survival rates stratified by the characteristics of patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma receiving pancreaticoduodenectomy

  No. of patients Survival rate, n (%)   P value
8490 7778 91.61%
Age (years)       <.001
<45 817 786 96.21%  
45‐54 1410 1343 95.25%  
55‐64 2203 2077 94.28%  
65‐74 2521 2274 90.20%  
≥75 1539 1298 84.34%  
Gender       .107
Female 3491 3219 92.21%  
Male 4999 4559 91.20%  
Comorbidities
Diabetes mellitus 3086 2775 89.92% <.001*
Hypertension 4543 4072 89.63% <.001*
Pneumonia 2879 2601 90.34% .003*
COPD 2116 1863 88.04% <.001*
Hepatitis B 684 641 93.71% .046*
Hepatitis C 333 297 89.19% .127*
Myocardial infarction 130 110 84.62% .006*
CAD 2386 2132 89.35% <.001*
CVD 1335 1169 87.57% <.001*
Heart valve dysfunction 576 510 88.54% .007*
Sepsis 775 677 87.35% <.001*
CKD 1250 1095 87.60% <.001*
Heart failure 898 780 86.86% <.001*
Aortic aneurysm 36 31 86.11% .372*
Peripheral vascular disease 652 570 87.42% <.001*
Peptic ulcer disease 4888 4448 91.00% .019*
Dementia 276 229 82.97% <.001*
Chronic pulmonary disease 2585 2316 89.59% <.001*
Connective tissue disease 550 498 90.55% .393*
Mild liver disease 4716 4365 92.56% .001*
Hemiplegia 1113 974 87.51% <.001*
Moderate or severe renal disease 514 455 88.52% .011*
Moderate or severe liver disease 1481 1357 91.63% <.001*
Clinical AJCC stage       <.001
I 2918 2705 92.70%  
IIA 3141 2878 91.63%  
IIB 2103 1903 90.50%  
III 328 292 89.02%  
Hospital‐volume levels       <.001
Very high 3202 2966 92.63%  
High 3104 2866 92.33%  
Moderate 1525 1353 88.72%  
Low 313 282 90.10%  
Very low 346 311 89.88%  
Income level       <.001
Low 2268 2055 90.61%  
Middle 3907 3543 90.68%  
High 2315 2180 94.17%  

Abbreviations: AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; CAD, coronary artery disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CVD, cerebrovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension.

*

A Chi‐square test was used to compare 90‐day mortality rates between surviving patients with and those without a specific comorbidity.

Table 3.

Age‐stratified Cox proportional hazards model for the 90‐days mortality risk associated with specific comorbidities in patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma receiving pancreaticoduodenectomy

Age (years) n Survival Death Death rate (%) Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR 95% CI P value aHRa 95% CI P value
<45
Low comorbidity score (0) (Ref.) 636 618 18 2.80            
Middle comorbidity score (1 or 2) 180 168 12 6.67 2.31 1.15‐4.94 .020 1.23 1.06‐4.32 .025
High comorbidity score (3 or 4) 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
45‐64
Low comorbidity score (0) (Ref.) 2513 2398 115 4.60            
Middle comorbidity score (1 or 2) 1075 1000 75 6.98 1.55 1.16‐2.07 .003 1.51 1.13‐2.02 .005
High comorbidity score (3 or 4) 25 22 3 12.00 2.69 0.86‐8.46 .091 2.12 1.03‐7.31 .011
65‐74
Low comorbidity score (0) (Ref.) 1309 1199 110 8.4            
Middle comorbidity score (1 or 2) 1175 1045 130 11.06 1.33 1.03‐1.72 .027 1.36 1.05‐1.75 .020
High comorbidity score (3 or 4) 37 30 7 18.92 2.40 1.12‐5.16 .024 2.25 1.03‐0.90 .042
≥75
Low comorbidity score (0) (Ref.) 620 540 80 12.90            
Middle comorbidity score (1 or 2) 859 713 146 17.00 1.35 1.03‐1.77 .032 1.35 1.03‐1.78 .033
High comorbidity score (3 or 4) 60 45 15 25.00 1.97 1.14‐3.43 .016 2.07 1.19‐3.62 .011

Abbreviations: aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

a

All of the variables in Table 1 were used in the multivariate analysis.

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses of clinical factors for 90‐day mortality in patients with a pancreatic head adenocarcinoma who received a pancreaticoduodenectomy

  Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR P value 95% CI aHRa P value 95% CI
Age (years)
<45 (ref.)
45‐54 1.25 .300 0.82 1.92 1.28 .265 0.83 1.96
55‐64 1.51 .039 1.02 2.24 1.40 .102 0.94 2.08
65‐74 2.65 <.001 1.82 3.84 2.12 <.001 1.44 3.13
≥75 4.36 <.001 3.00 6.34 3.13 <.001 2.11 4.66
Gender
Female (ref.)
Male 1.13 .110 0.97 1.32 1.15 .073 0.99 1.34
Comorbidities
No comorbidity (ref.)
Diabetes mellitus 1.37 <.001 1.19 1.59 1.13 .126 0.97 1.33
Hypertension 1.74 <.001 1.49 2.03 1.17 .094 0.97 1.40
Pneumonia 1.26 .003 1.08 1.46 1.04 .622 0.89 1.22
COPD 1.70 <.001 1.46 1.98 1.35 .014 1.06 1.71
Hepatitis B 1.73 .044 1.04 1.99 1.76 .124 1.05 1.98
Hepatitis C 1.32 .109 0.94 1.84 1.29 .183 0.89 1.86
Myocardial infarction 1.93 .004 1.24 3.01 1.37 .173 0.87 2.17
CAD 1.44 <.001 1.24 1.68 0.92 .365 0.77 1.10
CVD 1.67 <.001 1.41 1.99 1.05 .754 0.78 1.40
Heart valve dysfunction 1.42 .007 1.10 1.83 1.13 .361 0.87 1.48
Sepsis 1.62 <.001 1.31 2.01 1.40 .003 1.12 1.74
CKD 1.65 <.001 1.38 1.98 1.29 .012 1.06 1.57
Heart failure 1.72 <.001 1.41 2.10 1.10 .391 0.88 1.37
Aortic aneurysm 1.72 .225 0.72 4.16 1.15 .752 0.47 2.82
Peripheral vascular disease 1.60 <.001 1.27 2.02 1.11 .385 0.87 1.42
Peptic ulcer disease 1.20 .018 1.03 1.40 1.05 .564 0.89 1.23
Dementia 2.19 <.001 1.63 2.94 1.42 .027 1.04 1.93
Chronic pulmonary disease 1.40 <.001 1.21 1.63 0.86 .191 0.68 1.08
Connective tissue disease 1.15 .329 0.87 1.53 0.91 .517 0.68 1.21
Mild liver disease 1.77 .049 1.06 1.89 1.73 .487 0.62 1.85
Hemiplegia 1.65 <.001 1.37 1.99 1.02 .908 0.75 1.38
Moderate or severe renal disease 1.43 .009 1.09 1.86 1.03 .850 0.77 1.37
Moderate or severe liver disease 1.00 .990 0.82 1.21 1.13 .305 0.89 1.43
Clinical AJCC stage
I (ref.)
IIA 1.19 .670 0.54 2.62 2.12 .176 0.71 6.28
IIB 1.27 .586 0.54 2.99 2.01 .162 0.64 4.08
III 1.31 .950 0.27 3.01 2.32 .956 0.10 4.93
Hospital‐volume level
Very high (ref.)
High 1.04 .639 0.87 1.25 1.02 .848 0.85 1.22
Moderate 1.57 .229 0.79 1.91 1.29 .119 0.84 1.60
Low 1.37 .098 0.94 1.99 1.18 .400 0.81 1.72
Very low 1.40 .066 0.98 1.99 1.10 .610 0.76 1.60
Income level
Low (ref.)
Middle 1.00 .986 0.84 1.18 1.07 .480 0.89 1.29
High 0.61 .053 0.31 1.01 0.80 .050 0.64 1.00

Abbreviations: aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; CAD, coronary artery disease; CI, confidence interval; CKD, chronic kidney disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CVD, cerebrovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; HR, hazard ratio; HTN, hypertension.

a

All of the variables of Table 1 were used in the multivariate analysis.

3. RESULTS

We enrolled 8490 patients with a PHA who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy without distant metastasis (Table 1). Of the 8490 enrolled patients, 712 died before completing the 90‐day threshold, whereas 7778 survived; thus, a current pancreaticoduodenectomy for PHA achieved an overall 90‐day mortality rate of 8.39%. High 90‐day mortality rates were observed in patients that received a pancreaticoduodenectomy who were of an old age, had comorbidities, had advanced AJCC stage, had a low income level, or were operated on in a low‐volume hospital (Table 1).

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that old age (65‐74 and ≥75 years) and specific comorbidities (COPD, CKD, dementia, and sepsis) were crucial independent prognostic factors (Table 2). After the multivariate analysis, being aged 65‐74 and ≥75 years (adjusted HR [aHR]: 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.44‐3.13 and aHR: 3.13; 95% CI: 2.11‐4.66, respectively) were crucial independent prognostic factors for 90‐day mortality. Specific comorbidities such as COPD (aHR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.06‐1.71), CKD (aHR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.06‐1.57), dementia (aHR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.04‐1.93), and sepsis (aHR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.12‐1.74) were also significant independent prognostic factors for 90‐day mortality (Table 2). Age was determined to be a crucial independent prognostic factor. Furthermore, the aHR increased with an advancement in age from 65‐74 to ≥75 years (aHR: 2.12 and 3.13 for ages 65‐74 and ≥75, respectively; Table 2).

A stratified Cox proportional hazard model assessed the risk of 90‐day mortality and the associated specific comorbidity scores of patients with a resectable PHA who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy by considering different age groups (Table 3). We divided the cohort into four age subsets and developed three separate comorbidity scores (low, middle, and high) for patients. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze the 90‐day mortality risk associated with different comorbidity scores at different ages (Table 3). After adjustment, the aHR (95% CIs) of the middle comorbidity score for 90‐day mortality in younger patients (<45 years old) was 1.23 (1.06‐4.32) compared to those with a low comorbidity score. The aHRs (95% CI) of middle and high comorbidity scores for 90‐day mortality in patients aged 45‐64 years were 1.51 (1.13‐2.02) and 2.12 (1.03‐7.13), respectively, compared to those with a low comorbidity score. The aHRs (95% CIs) of middle and high comorbidity scores for 90‐day mortality in patients aged 65‐74 years were 1.36 (1.05‐1.75) and 2.25 (1.03‐4.90), respectively, compared to those with a low comorbidity score. The aHRs (95% CIs) of middle and high comorbidity scores for 90‐day mortality in patients aged ≥75 years were 1.35 (1.07‐1.78) and 2.07 (1.19‐3.62), respectively, compared to those with a low comorbidity score.

Figure 1 illustrates the Kaplan‐Meier curves of 90‐day survival after a pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients aged <45 year who had different comorbidity scores. The 90‐day survival rates were 93.33% and 97.20% in those with middle and low comorbidity scores, respectively. The 90‐day survival rate was 97.20% in those with low comorbidity scores, which was the highest (log‐rank test, P = .016). The 90‐day survival rate in patients aged 45‐64 years who had low (96.40%), middle (93.02%), and high (88.00%) comorbidity scores significantly differed (log‐rank test, P = .004, Figure 2). The 90‐day survival rates in elderly patients (65‐74 years old) with low, middle, and high comorbidity scores were 91.60%, 88.94%, and 81.08%, respectively (log‐rank test, P = .013, Figure 3). The 90‐day survival rates in elderly patients (≥75 years old) with low, middle, and high comorbidity scores were 87.10%, 83.00%, and 75.00%, respectively (log‐rank test, P = .018, Figure 4). Figures 1, 2, 3, 4 indicate that 90‐day survival rates of patients with low comorbidity scores were superior to rates of those with middle and high comorbidity scores across different age groups. For the same comorbidity scores, survival rates were higher in younger patients (Table 3, Figures 1, 2, 3, 4). Figures 1, 2, 3, 4 demonstrate that elderly patients with high comorbidity scores had higher 90‐day mortality rates than younger patients with low comorbidity scores.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Kaplan‐Meier curves for 90‐day survival after a pancreaticoduodenectomy in <45‐year‐old patients with different comorbidity scores

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Kaplan‐Meier curves for 90‐day survival after a pancreaticoduodenectomy in 45 to 64‐year‐old patients with different comorbidity scores

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Kaplan‐Meier curves for 90‐day survival after a pancreaticoduodenectomy in 65 to 74‐year‐old patients with different comorbidity scores

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Kaplan‐Meier curves for 90‐day survival after a pancreaticoduodenectomy in ≥75‐year‐old patients with different comorbidity scores

4. DISCUSSION

The prognosis of resection of an adenocarcinoma in the head of the pancreas remains poor even after undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy with surgically negative margins.8, 12, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46 Previous studies found high perioperative morbidity and mortality rates for a pancreaticoduodenectomy, and the 30‐day mortality rate of a pancreaticoduodenectomy in a previous series was approximately 4%.8, 12, 42, 43, 44, 45, 47 The 30‐day mortality rates observed in previous studies are similar to our observations (ie, 4.12%). However, 90‐day postoperative mortality is a more‐legitimate measure of hepatopancreatobiliary surgical quality than is 30‐day mortality.23 Moreover, 30‐day mortality usually underestimates the risk of early death after major resections for malignancies.10, 24, 25 Therefore, we estimated the risk factors for 90‐day, not 30‐day, mortality after a pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with PHA. The 90‐day mortality rate observed in our study was 8.39% and was double the 30‐day mortality after a pancreaticoduodenectomy for a PHA, which is compatible with results of Swanson et al10 In the modern era, a pancreaticoduodenectomy is also typically performed for head‐dominant chronic pancreatitis in patients who present with duodenal or biliary obstruction or an inflammatory mass in the head of the pancreas. In high‐volume centers, a pancreaticoduodenectomy results in pain relief in 70%‐89%, morbidity in 16%‐53%, and late mortality in <2% of patients with chronic pancreatitis.48, 49, 50 Compared to early mortality from a pancreaticoduodenectomy for a PHA, the early mortality rate is higher than late mortality from a pancreaticoduodenectomy for chronic pancreatitis. Therefore, a PHA may be considered per se a risk for greater morbidity. A pancreaticoduodenectomy for a PHA is also more complicated than other surgical procedures in the general surgery field due to a longer anesthesia time, more postoperative morbidities, and longer intensive care unit or hospital stay durations.8, 12, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46 Although we could not determine whether there were individuals who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy with venous resection in our cohort, we used AJCC clinical stages to adjust for the degree of difficulty in the pancreaticoduodenectomy. In addition, studies of easily assessed preoperative clinical factors for predicting 90‐day mortality after a pancreaticoduodenectomy for a PHA are scarce. There is no age‐comorbidity predicative scoring system for the high mortality rate of a pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients with a PHA (Table 3). In our study, we used easily assessed preoperative clinical characteristics of patients with a PHA who received a pancreaticoduodenectomy to evaluate age comorbidity scores for predicting the early mortality rate.

In Table 1, the crude analysis of differences in demographics of patients with a PHA who received a pancreaticoduodenectomy showed high 90‐day mortality rates in elderly patients with a comorbidity, advanced AJCC stage, low hospital volume, and low income level. Unadjusted and risk‐adjusted 90‐day mortality rates were higher in patients of a geriatric age, with a higher clinical AJCC stage, with a lower income, and those who were operated on in a low‐volume hospital, which are compatible with findings of previous studies, although the time points of mortality assessment differed in previous studies.10, 11, 19, 51, 52, 53 Taiwan is defined as a developed country. In a comparison with data from other developed countries compatible with Taiwan, socioeconomic status influenced the likelihood of undergoing surgical treatment for pancreatic cancer in other developed countries.54, 55 Moreover, sample sizes for comorbidities such as hepatitis C, aortic aneurysm, and connective tissue diseases were smaller than those for other comorbidities; hence, the crude analysis showed no statistical difference with or without the comorbidity.

Development of bile duct obstruction may contribute to poor outcomes, including cholangitis, delay in treatment including chemotherapy or curative surgery, a decreased quality of life, and higher mortality.56 A pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has a dismal 5‐year survival rate of only 6%, and biliary obstruction was correlated with decreased survival times.56 As many as 70% of patients have some degree of biliary obstruction at the time of their initial diagnosis with pancreatic cancer.57 Occurrences of bile duct obstruction were 69.94% and 69.99% in the death and surviving groups, respectively. Bile duct obstruction was defined as an individual who underwent preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP), stents, percutaneous drainage, endoscopic ultrasound‐guided biliary drainage, or surgical bypass combined with ICD‐9 codes of jaundice. Bile duct obstruction had no statistical significance for 90‐day mortality in our cohort. ERCP is regularly performed in Taiwanese facilities before a pancreaticoduodenectomy.

A standard pancreaticoduodenectomy for removing lesions from within the head or uncinate process of the pancreas is also called the “Whipple procedure.”58 A standard pancreaticoduodenectomy involves a distal gastrectomy with removal of the pancreatic head, duodenum, first 15 cm of the jejunum, common bile duct, and gallbladder.58 A modification of the standard procedure, a pylorus‐preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy, preserves the gastric antrum, pylorus, and the proximal 2‐3 cm of the duodenum, which is anastomosed to the jejunum to restore gastrointestinal continuity.59 A pylorus‐preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy may decrease the incidence of postoperative dumping, marginal ulceration, and bile reflux gastritis that occur in many patients undergoing a partial gastrectomy, which is employed as part of the standard pancreatectomy technique.59 A pylorus‐preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy is not appropriate if the tumor involves the proximal duodenum, pylorus, or gastric antrum.59 In this circumstance, a standard pancreaticoduodenectomy operation should be done. The available data suggest that for suitable cases, perioperative morbidity and mortality, and long‐term survival are not affected by the use of pylorus‐preserving techniques.60, 61 The impact of a pylorus‐preserving approach on gastrointestinal function remains an open question.60, 61 To the present, there is no study of 90‐day mortality between standard and pylorus‐preserving pancreaticoduodenectomies. We designed the endpoint of 90‐day mortality based on curative‐intent and radical removal of all pancreatic cancer whether using a standard or pylorus‐preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Therefore, patients undergoing either a standard or pylorus‐preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy were enrolled in our cohort.

After conducting the multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis of clinical factors for 90‐day mortality in patients with a PHA who received a pancreaticoduodenectomy, age subsets of 65‐74 and ≥75 years, COPD, sepsis, CKD, and dementia were determined as independent risk factors (Table 2). For patients with a PHA who received a pancreaticoduodenectomy, the aHR was higher for ≥75‐year‐old patients than for 65‐74‐year‐old patients. These findings are compatible with those of previous studies, which showed that old age is an independent risk factor for early mortality with a pancreaticoduodenectomy, but the cutoff points of age differed because time points of the mortality assessment which differed between our and previous studies.11, 51, 62

After adjustment, specific comorbidities such as CKD, sepsis, COPD, and dementia were determined to be independent risk factors for 90‐day mortality in patients with a PHA who received a pancreaticoduodenectomy (Table 2). Previous studies also indicated that COPD, CKD, and sepsis were independent risk factors for early mortality in patients who received a pancreaticoduodenectomy.12, 52, 62, 63 In our study, preoperative factors that were associated with 90‐day mortality in the multivariate analysis included an older age, COPD, sepsis, CKD, and dementia. The majority of these risk factors were associated with perioperative morbidity or mortality in previous studies on pancreatic resection results.12, 52, 62, 63 Overall morbidity after a pancreaticoduodenectomy associated with 90‐day mortality included preoperative factors that are considered risk factors for superficial and deep surgical site infection, pneumonia, unplanned intubation, renal insufficiency, and urinary tract infections.12, 52, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72 COPD is a crucial patient‐related risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications.64, 65, 66 Preoperative CKD is associated with an increased risk of complications and respiratory failure after pancreatic resection.63 Moreover, preoperative sepsis clearly alters innate and adaptive immune responses for a prolonged duration after clinical recovery, and such alterations include immune suppression, chronic inflammation, and bacterial persistence.67 Patients with a PHA and preoperative sepsis are susceptible to early mortality after a pancreaticoduodenectomy.12, 52 But sepsis might be related to cholangitis and directly associated with the pancreatic adenocarcinoma or a chronic preoperative comorbidity which could be difficult to clarify. We examined the covariate of sepsis, and outcomes showed preoperative sepsis to be a significant factor for 90‐day mortality after a pancreaticoduodenectomy as an easily assessed preoperative factor. Preoperative sepsis is an easily assessed preoperative factor; however, it might not be a chronic preoperative comorbidity. Similarly, previous studies also indicated that patients with preexisting dementia exhibit a high risk of early mortality after surgery, and their incidence of fatal complications was higher than that of surgical patients without dementia,68, 69, 70, 71 although surgery was not specifically a pancreaticoduodenectomy. Patients with preoperative dementia usually show low activity and poor self‐sufficiency, which increase postoperative complications, such as surgical site infection, urinary tract infections, and respiratory complications.72 Ours is the first study on patients with a PHA who received a pancreaticoduodenectomy, and the endpoint was 90‐day mortality after surgery. The results indicate that obvious and easily assessed independent risk factors for predicting 90‐day mortality in patients with a PHA receiving a pancreaticoduodenectomy are old age (≥65 years), COPD, CKD, sepsis, and dementia.

Other factors that were adjusted for in the multivariate analysis are listed in Table 2. These factors might be crucial, although they showed no statistical significance in the multivariate analysis. These factors might be bias‐selected by physicians’ initial decision on surgical‐intent for the patient with a PHA based on their experience, hospital volume level, and cancer clinical stage. The majority of patients with a PHA who received a pancreaticoduodenectomy were at clinical AJCC stages I (34.37%) and IIA (36.91%), while 24.77% and 3.86% of patients were at stages IIB and III (Table 1), respectively. Most surgeons consider stage III PHA to be an unresectable status without surgical‐intent treatment (Table 1). Surgeons at very‐low‐ and low‐volume hospitals might have selected AJCC clinical stage I PHA cases for a pancreaticoduodenectomy rather than advanced‐stage cases; hence, the clinical AJCC stage and hospital volume were statistically insignificant after adjustment (Table 2).

We used an age‐stratified Cox proportional hazard model to predict the 90‐day mortality risk associated with specific comorbidity scores in patients who received a pancreaticoduodenectomy (Table 3). In patients with the same comorbidity score (whether low, middle, or high) and a PHA who received a pancreaticoduodenectomy, elderly patients showed a higher 90‐day mortality rate than did younger patients (Tables 2 and 3, Figures 1, 2, 3, 4). Moreover, within the same age interval, patients with a PHA who received a pancreaticoduodenectomy with middle and high comorbidity scores showed higher 90‐day mortality rates than those with lower comorbidity scores (Tables 2 and 3, Figures 1, 2, 3, 4). These findings indicate that both age and specific comorbidity scores are independent risk factors for predicting 90‐day mortality in patients with a PHA who received a pancreaticoduodenectomy. A 90‐day mortality rate of 25% was observed in ≥75‐year‐old patients with high comorbidity scores (Table 3). Other alternative treatments, such as biliary or gastric bypass, endoscopic stents, targeted therapy, and chemotherapy or chemoradiation, might be considered, because the mean survival time of all of those treatments exceeded 90 days.5, 73, 74, 75 In Table 3, ≥75‐year‐old patients with a PHA and middle and high comorbidity scores showed extremely high 90‐day mortality rates. Whether the pancreaticoduodenectomy is effective in all patients with a PHA still remains unclear, especially for elderly patients with specific multiple comorbidities (Table 2). This aspect has been a challenge for physicians for a long time; hence, we attempted to establish predictive scores to enable further discussion between physicians and patients before a pancreaticoduodenectomy. The easily assessed preoperative predictive system described in our study could be a valuable and useful tool for both physicians and patients.

The strengths of our study are the inclusion of a very large cohort of patients with a PHA and the development of an easily assessed tool using preoperative characteristics such as age comorbidity scores to predict the 90‐day mortality for patients with a PHA who are to receive a pancreaticoduodenectomy (Table 3). In Tables 1 and 2, it is clear that surgeons selected patients with a PHA as affordable cases in their respective hospitals. However, although surgeons carefully selected patients, the 90‐day mortality was still high (8.39%) in Taiwan; a very high 90‐day mortality rate was noted in some patients with a PHA in this study, especially in elderly patients with a PHA and moderate or high comorbidity scores (Table 3). Our results obtained using age‐comorbidity predictive scores could be a valuable benchmark for selecting patients with a PHA who are to receive a pancreaticoduodenectomy with a high risk of 90‐day mortality. Further discussion about a pancreaticoduodenectomy between the physician and patient is worthwhile for PHA patients who are elderly with high comorbidities scores. This tool can be a reference for future clinical practice and was designed for selecting indicated patients in future trials.

This study has some limitations. First, as all of the patients with a PHA enrolled in this study were of Asian ethnicity, extrapolation of our findings to non‐Asian populations might not be entirely suitable. Moreover, as pancreatic cancer in Asians may be clinically similar to pancreatic cancer in Caucasians, the goals of future research on the disease might also be similar in these two ethnicities.76 The predictive scores still have clinical value as a pretreatment reference for a pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with a PHA, whether patients are of Caucasian or Asian ethnicity. Second, diagnoses of all comorbidities were based on ICD‐9‐CM codes. However, to verify the accuracy of the diagnoses, the Taiwan Cancer Registry administration randomly reviews charts and interviews patients and ensures that hospitals with outlier chargers or practices are audited and subsequently heavily penalized if malpractice or discrepancies are identified. Furthermore, the quality and precision of ICD‐9‐CM codes in Taiwan have been verified and proven in previous studies.35, 36 Therefore, the conclusions of the study can be accepted as valid. Nevertheless, to obtain accurate information on population specificity and disease occurrence, a large‐scale randomized trial that carefully compares selected elderly patients with multiple comorbidities who have received suitable treatments is required. Finally, although informative, the TCRD lacks information such as that on dietary habits and the body‐mass index, both of which may be risk factors for 90‐day mortality in the context of a pancreaticoduodenectomy.

5. CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients with a PHA and moderate or high comorbidity scores have a high risk of 90‐day mortality after a pancreaticoduodenectomy. Age‐comorbidity predictive scores for 90‐day mortality in patients with a PHA who receive a pancreaticoduodenectomy are easily assessed and are a valuable tool.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to declare. The datasets supporting the study conclusions are included in the manuscript.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conception and Design: Ben‐Chang Shia, PhD; Lei Qin, Ph.D; Szu‐Yuan Wu, MD, MPH, PhD Collection and Assembly of Data: Ben‐Chang Shia, PhD; Lei Qin, PhD; Kuan‐Chou Lin, DDS, MS; Chih‐Yuan, Fang, DDS; Lo‐Lin Tsai, DDS, PhD Data Analysis and Interpretation: Ben‐Chang Shia, PhD; Lei Qin, PhD; Kuan‐Chou Lin, DDS, MS; Chih‐Yuan, Fang, DDS; Lo‐Lin Tsai, DDS, PhD Administrative Support: Szu‐Yuan Wu*. Manuscript Writing: All authors. Final Approval of Manuscript: All authors.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT

Our protocols were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Taipei Medical University (TMU‐JIRB No. 201402018).

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIAL

The datasets supporting the study conclusions are included in this manuscript and its additional files.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Szu‐Yuan Wu is supported by Taipei Medical University Funding (TMU105‐AE1‐B26). Lei Qin’s work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (61603092), University of International Business and Economics Huiyuan outstanding young scholars research funding (17YQ15), “the Fundamental Research Funds for the central Universities” in UIBE (CXTD10‐10).

Shia B‐C, Qin L, Lin K‐C, et al. Age comorbidity scores as risk factors for 90‐day mortality in patients with a pancreatic head adenocarcinoma receiving a pancreaticoduodenectomy: A National Population‐Based Study. Cancer Med. 2020;9:562–574. 10.1002/cam4.2730

Ben‐Chang Shia and Lei Qin have contributed equally to this study (joint primary authors).

Funding information

Taipei Medical University (TMU105‐AE1‐B26) and Wan Fang Hospital.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Allen PJ, Kuk D, Castillo CF, et al. Multi‐institutional validation study of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th Edition) changes for T and N staging in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2017;265:185‐191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:7‐30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. National Health Insurance Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan, R.O.C. (2014). National Health Insurance Annual Report 2014‐2015, 2016.
  • 4. Hsieh MC, Chang WW, Yu HH, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy improve survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma receiving surgery: adjuvant chemotherapy alone is insufficient in the era of intensity modulation radiation therapy. Cancer Med. 2018;7:2328‐2338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Lin YK, Hsieh MC, Chang CL, et al. Intensity‐modulated radiotherapy with systemic chemotherapy improves survival in patients with nonmetastatic unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a propensity score‐matched, nationwide, population‐based cohort study. Radiother Oncol. 2018;129:326‐332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Ko CY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Talamonti MS. National failure to operate on early stage pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2007;246:173‐180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ryan DP, Hong TS, Bardeesy N. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1039‐1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg. 1990;226:248‐260; discussion 57–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas 201 patients. Ann Surg. 1995;221:721‐733; discussion 31–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Swanson RS, Pezzi CM, Mallin K, Loomis AM, Winchester DP. The 90‐day mortality after pancreatectomy for cancer is double the 30‐day mortality: more than 20,000 resections from the national cancer data base. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:4059‐4067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Haigh PI, Bilimoria KY, DiFronzo LA. Early postoperative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy in the elderly. Arch Surg. 2011;146:715‐723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kneuertz PJ, Pitt HA, Bilimoria KY, et al. Risk of morbidity and mortality following hepato‐pancreato‐biliary surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1727‐1735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Birkmeyer JD, Warshaw AL, Finlayson SR, Grove MR, Tosteson AN. Relationship between hospital volume and late survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery. 1999;126:178‐183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Bilimoria KY, Talamonti MS, Sener SF, et al. Effect of hospital volume on margin status after pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:510‐519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2117‐2127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Rogers DA, Elstein AS, Bordage G. Improving continuing medical education for surgical techniques: applying the lessons learned in the first decade of minimal access surgery. Ann Surg. 2001;233:159‐166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Huirne JAF, Kennedy R, Stolzenberg J. What is the impact of surgical expertise and how to get it? Gynecol Surg. 2008;5:265‐267. [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Schmidt CM, Turrini O, Parikh P, et al. Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single‐institution experience. Arch Surg. 2010;145:634‐640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1128‐1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ, et al. Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg. 2005;242:781‐790; discussion 88–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Urbach DR, Baxter NN. Does it matter what a hospital is "high volume" for? Specificity of hospital volume‐outcome associations for surgical procedures: analysis of administrative data. BMJ. 2004;328:737‐740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Pugalenthi A, Protic M, Gonen M, et al. Postoperative complications and overall survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113:188‐193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Mise Y, Vauthey JN, Zimmitti G, et al. Ninety‐day postoperative mortality is a legitimate measure of hepatopancreatobiliary surgical quality. Ann Surg. 2015;262:1071‐1078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. McMillan RR, Berger A, Sima CS, et al. Thirty‐day mortality underestimates the risk of early death after major resections for thoracic malignancies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:1769‐1775; discussion 74–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Bryant AS, Rudemiller K, Cerfolio RJ. The 30‐ versus 90‐day operative mortality after pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:1717‐1723; discussion 22–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Shao YJ, Chan TS, Tsai K, Wu SY. Association between proton pump inhibitors and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;48:460‐468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Lin WC, Ding YF, Hsu HL, et al. Value and application of trimodality therapy or definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2017;123:3904‐3915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Yen YC, Chang JH, Lin WC, et al. Effectiveness of esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy through intensity‐modulated radiation therapy techniques. Cancer. 2017;123:2043‐2053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Chang CL, Yuan KS, Wu SY. High‐dose or low‐dose cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer. Head Neck. 2017;39:1364‐1370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Chang CL, Tsai HC, Lin WC, et al. Dose escalation intensity‐modulated radiotherapy‐based concurrent chemoradiotherapy is effective for advanced‐stage thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2017;125:73‐79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Chang WW, Hsiao PK, Qin L, Chang CL, Chow JM, Wu SY. Treatment outcomes for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: nationwide, population‐based, cohort study based on propensity score matching with the Mahalanobis metric. Radiother Oncol. 2018;129:284‐292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Chen TM, Lin KC, Yuan KS, Chang CL, Chow JM, Wu SY. Treatment of advanced nasopharyngeal cancer using low‐ or high‐dose concurrent chemoradiotherapy with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy: a propensity score‐matched, nationwide, population‐based cohort study. Radiother Oncol. 2017;129:23‐29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Lin YK, Hsieh MC, Wang WW, et al. Outcomes of adjuvant treatments for resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Chemotherapy alone, sequential chemoradiotherapy, or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2018;128:575‐583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Yen YC, Hsu HL, Chang JH, et al. Efficacy of thoracic radiotherapy in patients with stage IIIB‐IV epidermal growth factor receptor‐mutant lung adenocarcinomas who received and responded to tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. Radiother Oncol. 2018;129:52‐60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Cheng CL, Lee CH, Chen PS, Li YH, Lin SJ, Yang YH. Validation of acute myocardial infarction cases in the national health insurance research database in Taiwan. J Epidemiol. 2014;24:500‐507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Hsing AW, Ioannidis JP. Nationwide population science: lessons from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:1527‐1529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Laks MP, Cohen T, Hack R. Volume of procedures at transplantation centers and mortality after liver transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1527; author reply 28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Ng‐Kamstra JS, Arya S, Greenberg SLM, et al. Perioperative mortality rates in low‐income and middle‐income countries: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3:e000810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Mellemgaard A, Luchtenborg M, Iachina M, et al. Role of comorbidity on survival after radiotherapy and chemotherapy for nonsurgically treated lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10:272‐279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Sogaard M, Thomsen RW, Bossen KS, Sorensen HT, Norgaard M. The impact of comorbidity on cancer survival: a review. Clin Epidemiol. 2013;5(Suppl 1):3‐29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Lee L, Cheung WY, Atkinson E, Krzyzanowska MK. Impact of comorbidity on chemotherapy use and outcomes in solid tumors: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:106‐117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Crist DW, Sitzmann JV, Cameron JL. Improved hospital morbidity, mortality, and survival after the Whipple procedure. Ann Surg. 1987;206:358‐365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Pellegrini CA, Heck CF, Raper S, Way LW. An analysis of the reduced morbidity and mortality rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Arch Surg. 1989;124:778‐781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Balcom JHT, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y,Fernandez‐del Castillo C . Ten‐year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg. 2001;136:391‐398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Kaufman HS, Coleman J. One hundred and forty‐five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg. 1993;217:430‐438; discussion 35–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. De Pietri L, Montalti R, Begliomini B. Anaesthetic perioperative management of patients with pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:2304‐2320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Trede M, Schwall G, Saeger HD. Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality. Ann Surg. 1990;211:447‐458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Vickers SM, Chan C, Heslin MJ, Bartolucci A, Aldrete JS. The role of pancreaticoduodenectomy in the treatment of severe chronic pancreatitis. Am Surg. 1999;65:1108‐1111; discussion 11–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Sakorafas GH, Farnell MB, Nagorney DM, Sarr MG, Rowland CM. Pancreatoduodenectomy for chronic pancreatitis: long‐term results in 105 patients. Arch Surg. 2000;135:517‐523; discussion 23–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Jimenez RE, Fernandez‐Del Castillo C, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL. Pylorus‐preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis. World J Surg. 2003;27:1211‐1216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Sukharamwala P, Thoens J, Szuchmacher M, Smith J, DeVito P. Advanced age is a risk factor for post‐operative complications and mortality after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta‐analysis and systematic review. HPB (Oxford). 2012;14:649‐657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Gleeson EM, Shaikh MF, Shewokis PA, et al. WHipple‐ABACUS, a simple, validated risk score for 30‐day mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy developed using the ACS‐NSQIP database. Surgery. 2016;160:1279‐1287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Newhook TE, LaPar DJ, Lindberg JM, Bauer TW, Adams RB, Zaydfudim VM. Morbidity and mortality of pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and premalignant pancreatic neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19:1072‐1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Bakens M, Lemmens V, de Hingh I. Socio‐economic status influences the likelihood of undergoing surgical treatment for pancreatic cancer in the Netherlands. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19:443‐448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. van Roest MH, van der Aa MA, van der Geest LGM, de Jong KP. The impact of socioeconomic status, surgical resection and type of hospital on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. A population‐based study in the Netherlands. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0166449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Boulay BR, Parepally M. Managing malignant biliary obstruction in pancreas cancer: choosing the appropriate strategy. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:9345‐9353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Kruse EJ. Palliation in pancreatic cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90:355‐364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg. 2006;244:10‐15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Diener MK, Fitzmaurice C, Schwarzer G, et al. Pylorus‐preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011:CD006053 https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006053.pub6/full [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Huttner FJ, Fitzmaurice C, Schwarzer G, et al. Pylorus‐preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2:CD006053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Diener MK, Knaebel HP, Heukaufer C, Antes G, Buchler MW, Seiler CM. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of pylorus‐preserving versus classical pancreaticoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007;245:187‐200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Greenblatt DY, Kelly KJ, Rajamanickam V, et al. Preoperative factors predict perioperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2126‐2135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Squires MH 3rd, Mehta VV, Fisher SB, et al. Effect of preoperative renal insufficiency on postoperative outcomes after pancreatic resection: a single institution experience of 1,061 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218:92‐101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Yakubek GA, Curtis GL, Khlopas A, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with short‐term complications following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:2623‐2626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Gupta H, Ramanan B, Gupta PK, et al. Impact of COPD on postoperative outcomes: results from a national database. Chest. 2013;143:1599‐1606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Kroenke K, Lawrence VA, Theroux JF, Tuley MR. Operative risk in patients with severe obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:967‐971. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Delano MJ, Ward PA. The immune system's role in sepsis progression, resolution, and long‐term outcome. Immunol Rev. 2016;274:330‐353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Seitz DP, Gill SS, Gruneir A, et al. Effects of dementia on postoperative outcomes of older adults with hip fractures: a Population‐Based Study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15:334‐341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Bernstein GM, Offenbartl SK. Adverse surgical outcomes among patients with cognitive impairments. Am Surg. 1991;57:682‐690. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Mehaffey JH, Hawkins RB, Tracci MC, et al. Preoperative dementia is associated with increased cost and complications after vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68:1203‐1208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Kassahun WT. The effects of pre‐existing dementia on surgical outcomes in emergent and nonemergent general surgical procedures: assessing differences in surgical risk with dementia. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18:153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Tsuda Y, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Ogawa S, Kawano H, Tanaka S. Association between dementia and postoperative complications after hip fracture surgery in the elderly: analysis of 87,654 patients using a national administrative database. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135:1511‐1517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. van Wagensveld BA, Coene PP, van Gulik TM, Rauws EA, Obertop H, Gouma DJ. Outcome of palliative biliary and gastric bypass surgery for pancreatic head carcinoma in 126 patients. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1402‐1406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Oh SY, Edwards A, Mandelson M, et al. Survival and clinical outcome after endoscopic duodenal stent placement for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: comparison of pancreatic cancer and nonpancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82:460‐468.e2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Amanam I, Chung V . Targeted therapies for pancreatic cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2018;10:36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Kongkam P, Benjasupattananun P, Taytawat P, et al. Pancreatic cancer in an Asian population. Endosc Ultrasound. 2015;4:56‐62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets supporting the study conclusions are included in this manuscript and its additional files.


Articles from Cancer Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES