Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2019 Dec 23;29:105044. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.105044

Dataset from PPG wireless sensor for activity monitoring

Giorgio Biagetti 1, Paolo Crippa 1,, Laura Falaschetti 1, Leonardo Saraceni 1, Andrea Tiranti 1, Claudio Turchetti 1
PMCID: PMC6971339  PMID: 31989005

Abstract

We introduce a dataset to provide insights about the photoplethysmography (PPG) signal captured from the wrist in presence of motion artifacts and the accelerometer signal, simultaneously acquired from the same wrist. The data presented were collected by the electronics research team of the Department of Information Engineering, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy. This article describes data recorded from 7 subjects and includes 105 PPG signals (15 for each subject) and the corresponding 105 tri-axial accelerometer signals measured with a sampling frequency of 400 Hz. These data can be reused for testing machine learning algorithms for human activity recognition.

Keywords: Photoplethysmography, Accelerometer, Machine learning, Activity recognition


Specifications Table

Subject Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Biomedical Engineering
Specific subject area Photoplethysmography (PPG)
Type of data Data matrix, table, image
How data were acquired PPG and accelerometer signals were acquired using the Maxim Integrated MAXREFDES100 device applied to a wrist band.
Data format Raw mat files.
Parameters for data collection Participants were familiarised with the experimental protocol by testing the equipment and software prior to recording.
Description of data collection Participants performed five acquisition sessions each of squat exercises, stepper exercises, and resting.
PPG and acceleration signals were concurrently recorded during the voluntary activity.
Data source location Institution: Università Politecnica delle Marche, Department of Information Engineering, via Brecce Bianche, 12
City/Town/Region: Ancona (AN)
Country: Italy
Latitude and longitude (and GPS coordinates) for collected samples/data:
43°35′12.9″N 13°31′00.5″E
Data accessibility With the article.
Value of the Data
  • The data provide a collection of photoplethysmography (PPG) signals synchronized with the accelerometer signals [[1], [2], [3], [4]].

  • The data are suitable for different pattern recognition and classification tasks to detect different activities (such as squat or stepper) from rest [5,6].

  • The dataset is suitable to signal processing analysis of the PPG signal, in order to investigate motion artifact reduction techniques [[7], [8], [9], [10], [11]].

1. Data

The dataset provided with this article supplies valuable information to investigate the PPG signal acquired from the wrist by using the Maxim Integrated MAXREFDES100 device.

The dataset consists in an archive file named “PPG_ACC_dataset.zip”, containing a folder for each subject (S1, …, S7) and 30 raw mat files for each folder, for a total of 210 raw mat files corresponding to each recording session of each subject. The mat files (named “<activity><N>_acc.mat” and “<activity><N>_ppg.mat”, where <activity> = “rest”, “squat”, “step”, and <N> = “1”, … , ”5”) contain one data matrix whose first column is the sampling time [s]. The other columns represent the measure of the PPG signal or the measure of the three axes accelerometer signal. The PPG signal values correspond to the ADC output of the photodetector with a pulse width of 118 μs, a resolution of 16 bits and a full-scale range of 8192 nA, lighted with the green LED. The three axes accelerometer signal values correspond to the MEMS output with a 10-bit resolution, left-justified, ± 2g scale.

The dataset contains 210 recording sessions for a total duration of 17201 s. Table 1 shows the details about the consistency of the dataset, in terms of duration.

Table 1.

Data consistency: Acquisition time for each subject.

Subject ID Squat Activity [s] Stepper Activity [s] Resting Activity [s]
1 311.5975 442.9900 3271.7
2 216.7975 397.6150 2962.8
3 231.4950 271.0400 1323.8
4 212.5750 269.6800 1361.9
5 246.2950 241.9750 1440.9
6 237.3700 325.9025 1402.0
7 266.8600 254.9300 1510.7

Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3 show the tri-axis accelerometer signals and the PPG signal for subject ID 1 during a session of squat, stepper and resting activities, respectively.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Data recorded from subject ID1 during squat activity.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Data recorded from subject ID 1 during stepper activity.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Data recorded from subject ID 1 during resting activity.

Fig. 4 reports the same PPG signals for subject ID 1 for a window of 10 s.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

PPG signals recorded from subject ID 1 during 10 s of (a) squat, (b) stepper, and (c) resting activities.

2. Experimental design, materials, and methods

The experimental protocol used to acquire the data, for every subject can be resumed as follows: seven adult subjects volunteered to perform exercises for data acquisition.

The material has been acquired by performing the following activities:

  • Five series of ten squat exercises each;

  • Five series of ten stepper exercises each;

  • Five series of resting for five minutes each.

2.1. Participants

A total of 7 subjects that includes 3 males and 4 females aged between 20 and 52 years were recruited for participation as reported in Table 2.

  • -

    Age = 31.5714 ± 13.6120 years old

  • -

    BMI = 23.5429 ± 2.5310 kg/m2.

Table 2.

Subjects.

Subject ID Height [m] Weight [kg] BMI [kg/m2] Age Sex
1 1.73 70 23.4 22 M
2 1.78 72 22.7 22 M
3 1.80 80 24.7 44 M
4 1.70 60 20.8 52 F
5 1.65 55 20.2 20 F
6 1.57 66 26.8 41 F
7 1.78 83 26.2 20 F

The subjects were selected from adult healthy people.

A detailed written consent was obtained from all participants.

2.2. Procedure

The PPG signals were recorded during the voluntary activity from the wrist by using the Maxim Integrated MAXREFDES100 device.

For applying the device directly on the wrist, a specific weight lifting cuff has been used (see Fig. 5 as a reference), adjustable by a tear-off closure, with excellent elastic properties that make it particularly suitable to guarantee a perfect adherence of the sensor device to the skin surface. The sensor was then initially fixed on the wrist of the subject, to then be fixed by adequately tightening the band, with the cable (used in the "tethered" mode) that comes out from the rear end of the band.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

PPG sensor placement.

Particular care has been devoted to all the phases of preparation of the measurement set-up: i) the correct positioning of the sensor inside the sports belt, ii) the correct wiring, checking that it is securely connected inside of the default socket, and that it is also well locked in the support, so as to ensure that it does not move when performing various types of activities. Loss of adherence to the skin-device interface would cause the addition of high-frequency noise in the acquired signals, making them unusable.

The signals were acquired with a sampling frequency of 400 Hz.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by Authors’ Institution.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.105044.

Contributor Information

Giorgio Biagetti, Email: g.biagetti@univpm.it.

Paolo Crippa, Email: p.crippa@univpm.it.

Laura Falaschetti, Email: l.falaschetti@univpm.it.

Leonardo Saraceni, Email: S1080114@studenti.univpm.it.

Andrea Tiranti, Email: S1079282@studenti.univpm.it.

Claudio Turchetti, Email: c.turchetti@univpm.it.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.zip (28.7MB, zip)

References

  • 1.Zhang Z., Pi Z., Liu B. TROIKA: a general framework for heart rate monitoring using wrist-type photoplethysmographic signals during intensive physical exercise. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2015;62(2):522–531. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2014.2359372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhang Z. Photoplethysmography-based heart rate monitoring in physical activities via joint sparse spectrum reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2015;62(8):1902–1910. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2406332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Islam Md S., Shifat-E-Rabbi Md, Dobaie A.M.A., Hasan MdK. PREHEAT: precision heart rate monitoring from intense motion artifact corrupted PPG signals using constrained RLS and wavelets. Biomed. Signal Process. Control. 2017;38:212–223. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhao D., Sun Y., Wan S., Wang F. SFST: a robust framework for heart rate monitoring from photoplethysmography signals during physical activities. Biomed. Signal Process. Control. 2016;33:316–324. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Biagetti G., Crippa P., Falaschetti L., Orcioni S., Turchetti C. Human activity recognition using accelerometer and photoplethysmographic signals. In: Czarnowski I., Howlett R., Jain L., editors. vol. 73. Springer; Cham: 2018. (Intelligent Decision Technologies 2017. IDT 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Boukhechba M., Cai L., Wu C., Barnes L.E. ActiPPG: using deep neural networks for activity recognition from wrist-worn photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors. Smart Health. 2019;14:100082. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ram M.R., Madhav K.V., Krishna E.H., Komalla N.R., Reddy K.A. A novel approach for motion artifact reduction in PPG signals based on AS-LMS adaptive filter. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2012;61(5):1445–1457. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dubey H., Kumaresan R., Mankodiya K. Harmonic sum-based method for heart rate estimation using PPG signals affected with motion artifacts. J. Amb. Intel. Hum. Comput. 2018;9(1):137–150. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bacà A., Biagetti G., Camilletti M., Crippa P., Falaschetti L., Orcioni S., Rossini L., Tonelli D., Turchetti C. 23rd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 2015), Nice, France. Sept. 2015. CARMA: a robust motion artifact reduction algorithm for heart rate monitoring from PPG signals; pp. 2696–2700. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Biagetti G., Crippa P., Falaschetti L., Orcioni S., Turchetti C. Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods (ICPRAM 2016), Rome, Italy. Feb. 2016. Motion artefact reduction in photoplethysmography using Bayesian classification for physical exercise identification; pp. 467–474. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Biagetti G., Crippa P., Falaschetti L., Orcioni S., Turchetti C. Reduced complexity algorithm for heart rate monitoring from PPG signals using automatic activity intensity classifier. Biomed. Signal Process. Control. 2019;52:293–301. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.zip (28.7MB, zip)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES