Skip to main content
Acta Clinica Croatica logoLink to Acta Clinica Croatica
. 2019 Sep;58(3):516–522. doi: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.03.16

DETERMINATION OF THE EFFECTS OF DAILY LIFE ACTIVITIES AND SELF-CARE CAPACITY ON DEPRESSION OF THE ELDERLY IN NORTHERN TURKEY

Zeliha Koç 1,, Zeynep Sağlam 1
PMCID: PMC6971796  PMID: 31969765

SUMMARY

This study aimed to determine the effects of daily living activities and self-care capacity on depression of the elderly in northern Turkey. The study was conducted with participation of 451 voluntary elderly individuals. Data were collected via a questionnaire, Geriatric Depression Scale, Exercise of Self-care Agency Scale, Daily Activities Index, and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Index. The mean Exercise of Self-care Agency Scale score and Geriatric Depression Scale score was 91.44±16.32 and 11.87±5.01, respectively. Negative and highly statistically significant correlations (p=0.000) were found between depression scores and self-care capacity scores (r=-0.470), daily activities scores (r=-0.351), and Instrumental Activity of Daily Life scores (r=-0.270). Study results showed that depression scores of the elderly increased as their daily life activities and self-care capacity scores decreased.

Key words: Activities of daily living, Depression, Aged, Nursing, Self care, Turkey

Introduction

In 2000, 600 million people were aged 60 and over, and by 2050, there will be 2 billion (1). As in the world (2), in Turkey, the aged population is gradually increasing. According to Turkish State Institute of Statistics census findings, the proportion of the population aged 65 and above was 4.3% in 1990, 4.7% in 1997, and 5.6% in 2000. This curve is anticipated to reach 7.7% in 2020 (3). Based on the State Institute of Statistics data, it is clear that Turkey will soon be one of the old countries in the world.

Elderly people need to possess sufficient self-care capacity. Self-care capacity involves the activities conducted by individuals to maintain their independence, lifestyle, and state of health and wellness. Changes in age, health, physical and psychological factors, environmental conditions, and socio-economic factors can influence the self-care capacity of individuals (4, 5). The literature suggests that physical health, functional limitations and disability are affected by many factors, one of which is depression (6-8).

Depression has been documented as one of the most prevalent mental health problems in the elderly (9, 10). The literature also indicates that depression increases disability (11, 12), morbidity, mortality, and healthcare utilization (11). Studies have determined that the following factors are related with the development of depression: being female; being single, divorced, or separated (10); having a low income or socio-economic level (10); and having many chronic diseases, insufficient social support, and unexpected negative life events (13). It has also been reported that depression is an important risk factor for dependency in the elderly (14-17). In spite of the availability of studies on the factors affecting daily life activities and self-care capacity of the elderly (5, 18-21), no comprehensive study determining the effect of daily life activities and self-care capacity levels on depression in the elderly was found.

Aims

This descriptive study aimed to determine the effect of daily life activities and self-care capacity levels on depression in the elderly. The questions posed in the study were the following:

  1. What is the mean level of depression among elderly individuals?

  2. In terms of activities of daily living, are elderly dependent on others?

  3. Do daily life activities and self-care capacity levels of the elderly affect depression levels?

Subjects and Methods

Study design

This study was conducted between July 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013. The authors aimed to recruit the entire population of those presenting to internal medicine and surgical outpatient clinics at Ondokuz Mayıs University due to various health problems. A total of 608 elderly individuals were admitted to outpatient clinics during the study period. However, elderly people who were not willing to participate in the study and who did not complete the questionnaire were excluded from the research (n=157). The study was carried out with voluntary participation of 451 elderly individuals. The response rate was 74.2%.

Instruments

Study data were collected via a questionnaire, Geriatric Depression Scale, Exercise of Self-Care Agency Scale, Daily Activities Index, and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Index. Both depression and dementia affect activities of daily living (ADLs) and self-care agency in the elderly. For these reasons, distinction between dementia and depression symptoms was made by questioning the year, season, month, day, country, and city orientations among the elderly.

The Geriatric Depression Scale is an assessment tool introduced by Yesavage et al. (22). Its validity and reliability for Turkish population has been verified by Ertan and Eker (23). The scale consists of 30 self-report questions aimed at enabling the elderly to respond easily with ‘yes’ or ‘no’. The minimal and maximal number of points that can be obtained on the scale is 1 and 30, respectively. The Geriatric Depression Scale Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient was determined to be 0.77.

The validity and reliability of the Exercise of Self-Care Agency Scale developed by Kearner and Fleischer (24) were tested in Turkey by Nahçivan (25). The scale employs self-evaluations of self-care activities. Each statement is rated from 0 to 4, and the ratings are based on a five-point Likert-type scale. A higher score obtained using the scale indicates greater self-care potential (25). The Exercise of Self-Care Agency Scale Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient was determined to be 0.81.

The Daily Activities Index was used to detect problems in performing ADLs. Clients receive a score of yes/no for independence in bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, continence, and feeding (26, 27). The Daily Activities Index Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient was determined to be 0.89.

The Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Index includes preparing meals, shopping, taking medicine, traveling out of walking distance, doing housework, performing repairs in the house, managing money, and using telephone. The activities of the participants are evaluated as independent, semi-independent or dependent. The Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Index Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficient was determined to be 0.91.

Data collection

Data were collected from the elderly over a period of six months by the researcher during face-to-face interviews. This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration (WMA Declaration of Helsinki, 2008) (28). The questionnaire was tested on a group of 10 elderly individuals in a pilot study. The response time was 20-25 min.

Data analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS for Windows (v. 15.0). Descriptive statistics and Student’s t-tests were used to summarize data. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine whether there was a difference between depression scores of the elderly regarding self-care capacity, daily life activity, and instrumental activities of daily living. The values of p<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

In this study, 35.9% of all participants were between 60 and 66 years of age, 44.8% were females and 55.2% were males (Table 1). According to the distribution of clinical characteristics, 65.0% of all participants suffered from chronic diseases. Moreover, daily life activities were affected by chronic diseases in 94.2% of the participants, 21.3% exercised, 10.4% smoked, and 28.4% attended social activities (Table 2). The mean participants’ Exercise of Self-Care Agency Scale score and Geriatric Depression Scale score was 91.44±16.32 and 11.87±5.01, respectively. Additionally, 25.5% of the participants were dependent in terms of Daily Life Activities and 8.0% in terms of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living.

Table 1. Distribution of elderly subjects according to socio-demographic characteristics (N=451).

Characteristic n %
Age group (yrs, mean±SD) 69.1±6.7
  60-66 162 35.9
  67-73 147 32.6
  74-80 95 21.1
  81-87 47 10.4
Gender
  Female 202 44.8
  Male 249 55.2
Marital status
  Married 395 87.6
  Single 56 12.4
Education level
  Literate 270 59.9
  Elementary school 143 31.7
  Intermediate school 19 4.2
  High school 9 2.0
  University 10 2.2
Socioeconomic status
  Income less than expenses 212 47.0
  Income equal to expenses 229 50.8
  Income greater than expenses 10 2.2
Social insurance
  Present 417 92.5
  Absent 34 7.5
Occupation
  Homemaker 185 41.0
  Worker 99 22.0
  Officer 9 2.0
  Retired 90 20.0
  Self-employed 68 15.0
Place of residence
  City 109 24.2
  Town 134 29.7
  Village 208 46.1
Family type
  Large 186 41.2
  Small, nuclear 265 58.8
Number of children
  1-3 162 35.9
  4-6 221 49.0
  7-9 64 14.2
  None 4 0.9
Lives with
  Spouse 166 36.8
  Family member(s) 280 62.1
  Alone 5 1.1

Table 2. Distribution of elderly subjects according to clinical characteristics and health behavior (N=451).

Characteristic n %
Perceived health
  Good 153 33.9
  Fair 250 55.4
  Poor 48 10.7
Satisfied with medical treatment
  Yes 393 87.1
  No 58 12.9
Satisfaction level related to medical treatment (n=393)
  Low 8 2.0
  Middle 281 71.5
  High 104 26.5
Chronic disease condition
  Yes 293 65.0
  No 158 35.0
aHas chronic illness (n=293)
  Coronary arterial disease 148 50.5
  Diabetes 116 39.6
  Hypertension 169 57.7
  Osteoporosis 14 4.8
  Asthma 10 3.4
  Renal failure 36 12.3
  Rheumatism 8 2.7
  Herniated disc 3 1.0
  Hepatitis 3 1.0
  Epilepsy 4 1.4
  Goiter 8 2.7
  Cataract 4 1.4
Daily activities affected by chronic illness (n=293)
  Yes 276 94.2
  No 17 5.8
Previous hospitalization
  Yes 389 86.3
  No 62 13.7
Frequency of hospitalization (n=389)
  At least once a month 68 17.5
  Once in three months 51 13.1
  Once in six months 50 12.9
  Once a year 111 28.5
  Other 109 28.0
Has an attendant while hospitalized (n=389)
  Yes 267 68.6
  No 122 31.4
Has regular health check-ups
  Yes 288 63.9
  No 163 36.1
Exercises
  Yes 96 21.3
  No 355 78.7
Smoking
  Yes 47 10.4
  No 404 89.6
Attending social activities
  Yes 128 28.4
  No 323 71.6

aMore than one answer was given.

The current study revealed that the mean self-care capacity scores were relatively higher in married (t=2.881, p=0.004), regular health check-up receiving (t=4.174, p=0.000) and exercising (t=6.088, p=0.000) elderly individuals. The mean depression scores were also higher in women (t=4.915, p=0.000), singles (t=5.123, p=0.000), chronic disease sufferers (t=4.849, p=0.000) and those that did not attend social activities (t=4.857, p=0.000). There was a significant negative relationship between the depression scale score and educational status (r=-0.176), perception of health (r=-0.423) and satisfaction with medical treatment received (r=-0.286), and a significant positive relationship between the state of having a chronic disease (r=0.095) and the depression scale score (p<0.000) for the elderly. In other words, the mean score of depression decreased with increase in the level of education, level of health perception and level of satisfaction with medical treatment. Nevertheless, having a chronic disease increased the depression score.

The present study also revealed a statistically significant correlation (p<0.000) between the participants’ mean scores on the Daily Life Activities and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Indexes and certain socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. The Daily Life Activities Index scores were higher in men (t=7.777, p=0.000), married individuals (t=3.425, p=0.001), individuals receiving regular health check-ups (t=3.488, p=0.001), individuals attending social activities (t=3.179, p=0.002) and individuals who exercised (t=5.857, p=0.000). Moreover, the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Index scores were higher in men (t=7.374, p=0.000), married individuals (t=2.432, p=0.015), individuals without a chronic disease (t=2.344, p=0.020), individuals attending social activities (t=2.143, p=0.033) and individuals who exercised (t=6.991, p=0.000).

In the regression analysis concerning the effect of the Daily Life Activities and Self-Care Agency and Instrumental Activity of Daily Life on depression (Table 3), a statistically highly significant negative relationship was found between depression scores and self-care capacity of the elderly (r=-0.470), daily life activities (r=-0.351), and Instrumental Activity of Daily Life scores (r=-0.270). Study results showed that depression scores of the elderly increased as their daily life activities and self-care capacity scores decreased.

Table 3. Multiple regression analysis of factors (self-care capacity, daily life activities and instrumental activities of daily living) affecting depression levels in the elderly.

Coefficientsa t Sig.
Unstandardized
coefficients
Standardized coefficients
B SE Beta
(Constant) 25.823 1.235 20.910 0.000
Self-care capacity -0.128 0.013 -0.417 -10.154 0.000
Daily life activities -0.708 0.143 -0.293 -4.943 0.000
Instrumental activities of daily living 0.039 0.055 0.042 0.701 0.484

aDependent variable: depression total points; SE = standard error; Sig. = significance

Discussion

While the extent of depression varies with the characteristics of the elderly group involved in the study, the location of the study, and the selected methods, it has been asserted in the literature that many different factors affect development of depression (10, 11, 29-33). This study revealed that the mean depression scores were higher in women, singles, chronic disease sufferers, and individuals who did not attend social activities. Additionally, according to some studies, it has been asserted that depression, in line with the current research findings, is more common among women (10, 21, 31, 32). However, according to other studies inconsistent with the current research findings, depression is more common among individuals with low education levels (10, 31, 32) and those living in city centers, having serious illnesses or physical disabilities, physically inactive individuals and smokers (31, 32).

The current study revealed that two-thirds of the elderly had chronic diseases and that depression scores of such individuals were higher. Consistent with the results obtained in this sample, findings of other studies (34, 35) conducted in Turkey on this issue have revealed that elderly individuals with chronic diseases have higher levels of depression. However, in other studies (36) that have yielded findings inconsistent with the present ones, it has been asserted that having a chronic disease does not have any effect on the level of depression.

The present study found that almost all daily activities in the elderly chronic-disease sufferers were affected by their conditions and one-third of the elderly were dependent on the others in terms of continuing their daily life activities. Relevant studies from other countries (37, 38) have shown that between 4.3% and 8.6% of the elderly depend on the others to maintain their activities of daily living. Performing activities of daily living and self-care as part of personal care without any assistance is quite important in the eyes of the elderly.

In this study, it was determined that Daily Life Activity Index scores were relatively lower (and, consequently, dependency levels were higher) in the following: women, singles, and individuals not receiving regular check-ups, not attending social activities, and not exercising. In some studies, it has been asserted that dependency in terms of activities of daily living, in line with the current research findings, is more common among women (20, 21, 39, 40). However, according to other studies presenting findings inconsistent with those of the current research, dependency in terms of activities of daily living is more common among the following: homemakers (20), advanced age groups (19-21), individuals with low education levels (19), individuals without any social security (20), individuals with low socio-economic status (20), chronic-disease sufferers (20, 21), individuals who constantly use medicine (20), and individuals who perceive their health status as poor (21). Jiang et al. report that some demographic subgroups appear to be at a higher risk of impaired ADLs (41). Almedia and Rodrigues found that women and 75-84 age group were more dependent (37). Also, Konno et al. report that the prevalence of ADL disability increases with aging (38).

The present study demonstrated that the mean self-care capacity scores of the elderly were relatively higher in married individuals and among those who received regular health check-ups and exercise. On the other hand, other studies carried out on this issue have asserted that self-care capacity decreases as age and disease duration increase in the elderly (20), and that decreased self-care capacity has an important effect on the mood state of elderly individuals (42).

We found negative correlation between Geriatric Depression Scale scores and self-care capacity and daily life activity scores. That is, as daily life activities and self-care capacity decreased, depression levels in the elderly increased. During the aging process, the elderly may find it difficult to carry out the daily activities they were able to perform previously, and they may become dependent on the others. This may affect the elderly at many levels and hence decrease their self-care capacity. According to the findings of this study, a decrease in both daily life activities and self-care capacity levels of the elderly had a negative effect on depression. Therefore, reduction of depression prevalence in the elderly is of utmost importance.

Conclusion

In this study, depression scores of the elderly increased as their daily life activities and self-care capacity scores decreased. Therefore, the following is proposed: support to the elderly people’s maintaining daily life activities and self-care capacity independently; carrying out routine depression screenings among the elderly; referring elderly people at risk to psychiatric services and monitor them; and strengthening psychological counseling and guidance services focused on the elderly.

References

  • 1.WHO. 10 facts on ageing and the life course 2012 [Internet]. Department of NCD Prevention & Health Promotion. World Health Organization. [cited 2012 May 19]. Available from: http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/ageing
  • 2.World Assembly on Ageing II. The ageing of the world’s population. May 2001[Internet]. [cited 2012 May 19]. Available from: http://www.globalaging.org/waa2/documents/theagingoftheworld.htm
  • 3.Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry State Institute of Statistics. 2000 [Internet]. [cited 2012 May 19]. Available from: http://www.tuik.gov.tr
  • 4.Fleming KC, Evans JM, Weber DC, Chutka DS. Practical functional assessment of elderly persons: a primary care approach. Mayo Clin Proc. 1995;70(9):890–910. 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)63949-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ozer M. To study self-care strength and life satisfaction of elderly persons who reside in rest home and family environment [dissertation]. Ege University Health Science Institution; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lawrence RH, Jette AM. Disentangling the disablement process. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1996;51(4):S173–82. 10.1093/geronb/51B.4.S173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Verbrugge LM, Jette AM. The disablement process. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(1):1–14. 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90294-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Martinac M, Pehar D, Karlovic D, Babic D, Marcinko D. Jakovljevic. Metabolic syndrome, activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and inflammatory mediators in depressive disorder. Acta Clin Croat. 2014;53:55–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sinanović O, Hudic J, Zukic S, Kapidzic A, Zonic L, Vidovic M. Depression and dementia in Parkinson’s disease. Acta Clin Croat. 2015;54:73–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Blazer D, Hughes DC, George LK. The epidemiology of depression in an elderly community. Gerontologist. 1987;27(3):281–7. 10.1093/geront/27.3.281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Alexopoulos GS, Katz IR, Reynolds CF, Carpenter D, Docherty JP, Ross RW. Pharmacotherapy of depression in older patients: a summary of the expert consensus guidelines. J Psychiatr Pract. 2001;7(6):361–76. 10.1097/00131746-200111000-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Armenian HK, Pratt LA, Gallo J, Eaton WW. Psychopathology as predictor of disability: a population-based follow-up study in Baltimore, Maryland. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148(3):269–75. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009635 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Altıntaş H, Atilla S, Sevencan F, Akçalar S, Sevim Y, Solak ÖS, et al. The screening of depression symptoms of the elderly living in a residential home in Ankara. TSK Koruyucu Hekim Bul. 2006;5(5):332–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Béland F, Zunzunegui MV. Predictors of functional status in older people living at home. Age Ageing. 1999;28(2):153–9. 10.1093/ageing/28.2.153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cho CY, Alessi CA, Cho M, Aronow HU, Stuck AE, Rubenstein LZ, et al. The association between chronic illness and functional change among participants in a comprehensive geriatric assessment program. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46(6):677–82. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb03800.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rantanen T, Penninx BW, Masaki K, Lintunen T, Foley D, Guralnik JM. Depressed mood and body mass index as predictors of muscle strength decline in old men. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(6):613–7. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04717.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Stuck AE, Walthert JM, Nikolaus T, Büla CJ, Hohmann C, Beck JC. Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living elderly people: a systematic literature review. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(4):445–69. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00370-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Akgün HS, Bakar C, Budakoğlu Iİ. Health and mental status and daily living activities of 65 years and over hospitalized patients at Başkent University Hospitals network. Turk Geriatri Derg. 2009;7(3):133–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Güneş G, Demircioğlu N, Karaoğlu L. Daily living activities, social and psychological function levels of older women living in central Malatya. Turk Geriatri Derg. 2005;8(2):78–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tel H, Tel H, Sabancıoğulları S. Status of maintenance of activities of daily living and experience of loneliness in elder than 60 years old living at home and in institutions. Turk Geriatri Derg. 2006;9(1):34–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ulusal B, Soyer A, Uçku R. Dependence in daily living activities among community dwelling elderly: prevalence and risk factors. Turk Geriatri Derg. 2004;7(4):199–205. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1983;17(1):37–49. 10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ertan T, Eker E. Reliability, validity and factor structure of the Geriatric Depression Scale in Turkish elderly: are there different factor structures for different cultures? Int Psychogeriatr. 2000;12(2):163–72. 10.1017/S1041610200006293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kearney BY, Fleischer BJ. Development of an instrument to measure exercise of self-care agency. Res Nurs Health. 1979;2(1):25–34. 10.1002/nur.4770020105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nahçıvan NO. A Turkish language equivalence of the exercise of self-care agency scale. West J Nurs Res. 2004;26(7):813–24. 10.1177/0193945904267599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shelkey M, Wallace M. Katz Index of independence in activities of daily living. J Gerontol Nurs. 1999;25(3):8–9. 10.3928/0098-9134-19990301-05 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wallace M. Shelkey M. [Internet]. Katz Index of independence in activities of daily living. Issue Number 2, Revised 2007. [cited 2012 May 19]. Available from: http://210.0.231.168/Files/AlwaysOnLearning/3530Day4_try_this_2_katz_adl.pdf
  • 28.World Medical Association. WMA Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [Internet]. Seoul, Korea: World Medical Association; 2008. [cited 2012 May 19]. Available from: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/
  • 29.Beekman AT, Deeg DJ, Braam AW, Smith JH, Van Tilburg W. Consequences of major and minor depression in later life: a study of disability, well-being and service utilization. Psychol Med. 1997;27(6):1397–409. 10.1017/S0033291797005734 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chen R, Wei L, Hu Z, Qin X, Copeland JRM, Hemingway H. Depression in older people in rural China. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(17):2019–25. 10.1001/archinte.165.17.2019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Penninx BWJH, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, Deeg DJH, Wallace RB. Depressive symptoms and physical decline in community-dwelling older persons. JAMA. 1998;279(21):1720–6. 10.1001/jama.279.21.1720 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Penninx BWJH, Geerlings SW, Deeg DJH, Van Eijk JTM, Van Tilburg W, Beekman ATF. Minor and major depression and the risk of death in older persons. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56(10):889–95. 10.1001/archpsyc.56.10.889 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.van Gool CH, Kempen GIJM, Penninx BWJH, Deeg DJH, Beekman ATF, Van Eijk JTM. Impact of depression on disablement in late middle aged and older persons: results from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(1):25–36. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.04.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dişçigil G, Gemalmaz A, Başak O, Gürel FS, Tekin N. Depression in geriatric age group in a primary care setting. Turk Geriatri Derg. 2005;8(3):129–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hacıhasanoğlu R, Yıldırım A. Depression among the elderly in Erzincan Nursing Home and influential factors. Turk Geriatri Derg. 2009;12(1):25–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yıldız A, Erol S, Ergün A. Pain and depression risk among elderly people living in a nursing home. Turk Geriatri Derg. 2009;12(3):156–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Almeida SAJ, Rodrigues PVMC. The quality of life of aged people living in homes for the aged. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2008;16(6):1025–31. 10.1590/S0104-11692008000600014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Konno K, Katsumata Y, Arai A, Tamashiro H. Functional status and active life expectancy among senior citizens in a small town in Japan. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2004;38(2):153–66. 10.1016/j.archger.2003.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Berberoğlu U, Gül H, Eskiocak M, Ekuklu G, Saltık A. Some socio-demographic specialties and daily activities of the elderly people according to the Katz Index who live in Edirne rest house. Turk Geriatri Derg. 2002;5(4):144–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Uçku R, Ergin S. Daily life activity in elderly. Toplum Hekimliği Bülteni. 1993;14(2):1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jiang J, Tang Z, Meng XJ, Futatsuka M. Demographic determinants for change in activities of daily living: a cohort study of the elderly people living in Beijing. J Epidemiol. 2002;12(3):280–6. 10.2188/jea.12.280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Borg C, Hallberg IR, Blomqvist K. Life satisfaction among older people (65+) with reduced self-care capacity: the relationship to social, health and financial aspects. J Clin Nurs. 2006;15:607–18. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01375.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Clinica Croatica are provided here courtesy of Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center

RESOURCES