Abstract
There is long-standing interest by the public health community in the potential implications of trade and investment agreements for public health. Our commentary highlights the main pathways by which the Trans-Pacific Partnerships (TPP), a comprehensive trade and investment agreement currently under negotiation, might undermine population health (based on analysis of and commentary about leaked chapters of the TPP), and calls for a more transparent and health-sensitive TPP negotiation process. We argue that use of comprehensive health impact assessments could be helpful in identifying how the potentially serious health consequences of the TPP and similar future international trade and investment agreements can be avoided, minimized or mitigated.
Key words: Public health, trade, socio-economic factors, social determinants of health
Résumé
Le milieu de la santé publique s’intéresse depuis longtemps aux répercussions possibles des accords commerciaux et d’investissement sur la santé publique. Notre commentaire souligne les principales voies par lesquelles le Partenariat transpacifique (PTP), un accord commercial et d’investissement complet en voie de négociation, pourrait miner la santé de la population (selon l’analyse et les commentaires sur les chapitres divulgués du PTP) et exige un processus de négociation plus transparent et sensible sur le plan de la santé. Nous affirmons que le recours à une évaluation complète des répercussions sur la santé pourrait être utile pour cerner comment les conséquences sur la santé, peut-être graves, du PTP et de tout accord commercial et d’investissement semblable à venir pourraient être évitées, minimisées ou atténuées.
Mots Clés: santé publique, commerce, facteurs socioéconomiques, déterminants sociaux de la santé
Footnotes
Funding: The research leading to this commentary was made possible through financial support provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Operating Grant Nr. 133483).
Conflict of Interest: None to declare.
References
- 1.Barfield C. The TPP: A Model for 2ht Century Trade Agreements? 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lee K, Ingram A, Lock K, McInnes C. Bridging health and foreign policy: The role of health impact assessments. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85(3):207–11. doi: 10.2471/BLT.06.037077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hilary J. The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and UK healthcare. BMJ. 2014;349:g6552. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.UNCTAD. Recent Developments in Investor-state Dispute Settlement (ISDS) 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 5.UNCTAD. Recent Developments in Investor-state Dispute Settlement (ISDS) 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Public Citizen. 2014 Table of Foreign Investor-state Cases and Claims under NAFTA and Other U.S. “Trade” Deals. Washington, DC: Public Citizen; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Thow Anne Marie, Snowdon Wendy, Labonté Ronald, Gleeson Deborah, Stuckler David, Hattersley Libby, Schram Ashley, Kay Adrian, Friel Sharon. Will the next generation of preferential trade and investment agreements undermine prevention of noncommunicable diseases? A prospective policy analysis of the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement. Health Policy. 2015;119(1):88–96. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hirono K, Gleeson D, Haigh F, Harris P. The Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement Negotiations and the Health of Australians: A Policy Brief. 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Labonté R. Health in all (foreign) policy: Challenges in achieving coherence. Health Promot Int. 2014;29(suppl.1):i48–58. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dau031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]