Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2015 Nov 1;106(Suppl 7):eS21–eS30. doi: 10.17269/CJPH.106.4833

Spatial Relationships between Neighbourhood Characteristics and Rates of Children from Ethnocultural Communities Reported to Child Protective Services

Relations spatiales entre les caractéristiques des territoires et les taux d’enfants de groupes ethnoculturels signalés à la protection de la jeunesse

Sarah Dufour 13,, Chantal Lavergne 23, Yuddy Ramos 33
PMCID: PMC6972225  PMID: 26978696

Abstract

Objectives

The objectives of this study were to 1) map the spatial distribution of rates of children reported to Montreal child protective services by ethnocultural group (Black, other visible minorities, not from visible minorities) and (2) estimate the relative contribution of different neighbourhood characteristics to the rates for those groups.

Method

The study covered the 505 Montreal-area census tracts for which complete data were available. The rates of children reported by group (dependent variables) and various territorial characteristics such as poverty (independent variables) were mapped and subjected to multiple linear regression and geographically weighted regression. The results of the geographically weighted regression were then mapped.

Results

The geographic distribution and rates of children reported varied greatly by group, with the Black children having the highest rates. Although neighbourhood characteristics explained 51% of variance for the children who were not members of visible minorities, they were clearly less effective in predicting rates in the case of Black children (18%) and other minorities (18%).

Conclusion

Already well-known neighbourhood risk factors are at work in Montreal, but their influence is not equally strong in all census tracts nor, especially, in all ethnocultural groups. Therefore, when only the distribution and prediction of reports for all children as a whole are examined, important differences are underestimated. Access to and appropriateness of services offered to vulnerable families, including those of visible minorities, could, however, be improved with a better understanding of local dynamics.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available for this article at 10.17269/CJPH.106.4833 and is accessible for authorized users.

Keywords: child abuse, domestic violence, geographic mapping, risk factors, epidemiology

Electronic supplementary material

41997_2015_10607021_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (822.6KB, pdf)

Supplementary material, approximately 842 KB.

Footnotes

Funding

This research was made possible in part thanks to support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). The translation was made possible in part by funding from the CJM-IU.

Conflict of Interests

None to declare.

References

  • 1.Kaspar V, Noh S. Discrimination and Identity: An Overview of Theoretical and Empirical Research. Halifax, NS: Department of Canadian Heritage for the Ethnocultural, Racial, Religious, and Linguistic Diversity and Identity Seminar; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chan A. Every child matters? A critical review of child welfare reforms in the context of minority ethnic children and families. Child Abuse Rev. 2008;17(1):6–22. doi: 10.1002/car.1001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Montréal en statistiques. Population et démographie: Populations des minorités visibles: des différences marquées entre l’île de Montréal et la couronne urbaine. Montréal (Québec): Ville de Montréal; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mitchell BA. Canada’s Growing Visible Minority Population: Generational Challenges, Opportunities and FederalPpolicy. Ottawa, ON: Serving Canada’s Multicultural Population for the Future; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Eid P, Turenne M, Magloire J. Profilage racial et discrimination systémique des jeunes racisés. Montre⪯al: Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Trocmé N, Fallon B, MacLaurin B, Daciuk J, Felstiner C, Black T e coll. Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect 2008. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.CJM-IU. Présents et engagés-Rapport annuel 2009–2010. Montréal: Centre jeunesse de Montréal-Institut universitaire; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Les centres de la jeunesse et de la famille Batshaw. Ensemble dans l’action, rapport annuel de gestion. Montréal: Les centres de la jeunesse et de la famille Batshaw; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dufour S, Mayer M, Carrière J, Gauvin L-M. Le projet « Cartes sur les risques, les abus et les besoins des enfants »: un outil diagnostic interactif des communautés. Intervention. 2006;125:68–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Loseke DR, Gelles RJ, Cavanaugh MM. Current Controversies on Family Violence. London: SAGE Publications; 2005. p. 376 p.. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Trocmé N, Fallon B, MacLaurin B, Daciuk J, Felstiner C, Black T e coll. Étude canadienne sur l’incidence des signalements de cas de violence et de négligence envers les enfants-2003. Ottawa: Ministère des Travaux publics et des Services gouvernementaux; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dessureault D, Éthier LS, Milot T, Dionne M. Taux de récurrence chez les enfants signalés à une direction de la protection de la jeunesse entre 1998 et 2002. Serv Soc Que. 2004;51(1):1–13. doi: 10.7202/012715ar. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lavergne C, Dufour S, Sarniento J, Descôteaux M-È. La réponse du système de protection de la jeunesse montréalais aux enfants issus des minorités visibles. Intervention. 2009;131:233–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lavergne C, Dufour S, Trocmé N, Larrivée M-C. Visible minority, aboriginal, and caucasian children investigated by Canadian protective services. Child Welfare. 2008;87(2):59–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Derezotes D, Testa M, Poertner J. Race Matters in Child Welfare: The Overrepresentation of African American Children in the System. Washington, DC: CWLA Press; 2005. p. 248 p.. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.CWLA. Children of Color in the Child Welfare System. 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Coulton CJ, Crampton DS, Irwin M, Spilsbury JC, Korbin JE. How neighborhoods influence child maltreatment: A review of the literature and alternative pathways. Child Abuse Negl. 2007;31(11–12):1117–42. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dettlaff AJ, Rycraft JR. Deconstructing disproportionality: Views from multiple community stakeholders. Child Welfare. 2008;87(2):37–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Merritt DH. Child abuse potential: Correlates with child maltreatment rates and structural measures of neighborhoods. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2009;31(8):927–34. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.04.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ards SD, Myers SL, Jr, Malkis A, Sugrue E, Zhou L. Racial disproportionality in reported and substantiated child abuse and neglect: An examination of systematic bias. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2003;25(5–6):375–92. doi: 10.1016/S0190-7409(03)00027-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Korbin JE, Coulton CJ, Chard S, Platt-Houston C, Su M. Impoverishment and child maltreatment in African American and European American neighborhoods. Dev Psychopathol. 1998;10(2):215–33. doi: 10.1017/S0954579498001588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fromm SJ. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering. 2004. The processes that moderate the effect of community structural factors on neighborhood child maltreatment rates. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gracia E, Herrero J. Perceived neighborhood social disorder and residents’ attitudes toward reporting child physical abuse. Child Abuse Negl. 2006;30(4):357–65. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Harris MS, Hackett W. Decision points in child welfare: An action research model to address disproportionality. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2008;30(2):199–215. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.09.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sedlak A, Woolverton M, Karla M. Fourth national incidence study of child abuse and neglect. 18th International congress on child abuse and neglect; Honolulu, Hawaïi. Washington: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Coulton CJ, Korbin JE, Su M, Chow J. Community level factors and child maltreatment rates. Child Dev. 1995;66(5):1262–76. doi: 10.2307/1131646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Coulton CJ, Korbin JE, Su M. Neighborhoods and child maltreatment: A multi-level study. Child Abuse Negl. 1999;23(11):1019–40. doi: 10.1016/S0145-2134(99)00076-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ernst JS. Community-level factors and child maltreatment in a suburban community. Soc Work Res. 2001;25(3):133–42. doi: 10.1093/swr/25.3.133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Freisthler B. A spatial analysis of social disorganization, alcohol access, and rates of child maltreatment in neighborhoods. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2004;26(9):803–19. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.02.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ben-Arieh A. Socioeconomic correlates of rates of child maltreatment in small communities. Am J Orthopsychiat. 2010;80(1):109–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01013.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Freisthler B, Bruce E, Needell B. Understanding the geospatial relationship of neighborhood characteristics and rates of maltreatment for Black, Hispanic, and White children. Soc Work. 2007;52(1):7–16. doi: 10.1093/sw/52.1.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Statistique Canada. Secteur . de recensement. Ottawa: Statistique Canada; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Brunsdon C, Fotheringham AS, Charlton ME. Geographically weighted regression: A method for exploring spatial nonstationarity. Geogr Anal. 1996;28(4):281–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1996.tb00936.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Apparicio P, Séguin A-M, Leloup X. Modélisation spatiale de la pauvreté à Montréal: apport méthodologique de la régression géographiquement pondérée. Can Geogr. 2007;51(4):412–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0064.2007.00189.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Harris P, Fotheringham AS, Juggins S. Robust geographically weighted regression: A technique for quantifying spatial relationships between freshwater acidification critical loads and catchment attributes. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 2010;100(2):286–306. doi: 10.1080/00045600903550378. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1980. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Klein S, Merritt DH. Neighborhood racial & ethnic diversity as a predictor of child welfare system involvement. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2014;41:95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Freisthler B, Gruenewald PJ, Remer LG, Lery B, Needell B. Exploring the spatial dynamics of alcohol outlets and child protective services referrals, substantiations, and foster care entries. Child Maltreat. 2007;12(2):114–24. doi: 10.1177/1077559507300107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ben-Arieh A, Haj-Yahia MM. The “geography” of child maltreatment in Israel: Findings from a national data set of cases reported to the social services. Child Abuse Negl. 2006;30(9):991–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Drake B, Pandey S. Understanding the relationship between neighborhood poverty and specific types of child maltreatment. Child Abuse Negl. 1996;20(11):1003–18. doi: 10.1016/0145-2134(96)00091-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wheeler D, Tiefelsdorf M. Multicollinearity and correlation among local regression coefficients in geographically weighted regression. J Geogr Syst. 2005;7(2):161–87. doi: 10.1007/s10109-005-0155-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

41997_2015_10607021_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (822.6KB, pdf)

Supplementary material, approximately 842 KB.


Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES