Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Gastroschisis is a serious birth defect of the abdominal wall that is associated with mortality and significant morbidity. Our understanding of the factors causing this defect is limited. The objective of this paper is to describe the geographic variation in incidence of gastroschisis and characterize the spatial pattern of all gastroschisis cases in Canada between 2006 and 2011. Specifically, we aimed to ascertain the differences in spatial patterns between geographic regions and identify significant clusters and their location.
METHODS: The study population included 641 gastroschisis cases from the Canadian Pediatric Surgery Network (CAPSNet) database, a population-based dataset of all gastroschisis cases in Canada. Cases were geocoded based on maternal residence. Using Statistics Canada live-birth data as a denominator, the total prevalence of gastroschisis was calculated at the provincial/territorial levels. Random effects logistic models were used to estimate the rates of gastroschisis in each census division. These rates were then mapped using ArcGIS. Cluster detection was performed using Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA).
RESULTS: There is significant spatial heterogeneity of the rate of gastroschisis across Canada at both the provincial/territorial and census-division level. The Yukon, Northwest Territories and Prince Edward Island have higher overall rates of gastroschisis relative to other provinces/territories. Several census divisions in Alberta, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Ontario, Northwest Territories and British Columbia demonstrated case “clusters”, i.e., focally higher rates in discrete areas relative to surrounding areas.
CONCLUSIONS: There is clear evidence of spatial variation in the rates of gastroschisis across Canada. Future research should explore the role of area-based variables in these patterns to improve our understanding of the etiology of gastroschisis.
Key Words: Spatial analysis, gastroschisis, cluster analysis, Canada
Résumé
OBJECTIFS: Le laparoschisis est une anomalie congénitale grave de la paroi abdominale associée à la mortalité et à une importante morbidité. Nos connaissances des facteurs à l’origine de cette malformation sont limitées. Nous avons cherché à décrire la variation spatiale de l’incidence du laparoschisis et à caractériser la structure spatiale de tous les cas de laparoschisis survenus au Canada entre 2006 et 2011. Plus précisément, nous avons voulu vérifier les différentes structures spatiales des régions géographiques et repérer les grappes significatives et leur emplacement.
MÉTHODE: La population étudiée comptait 641 cas de laparoschisis trouvés dans la base de données du Réseau canadien de chirurgie pédiatrique (CAPSNet), un fichier de données populationnelles de tous les cas de laparoschisis au Canada. Les cas ont été géocodés d’après le lieu de résidence de la mère. En utilisant les données de Statistique Canada sur les naissances vivantes comme dénominateur, nous avons calculé la prévalence totale du laparoschisis par province ou territoire et par secteur du recensement. Ces taux ont ensuite été cartographiés à l’aide d’ArcGIS. La détection des concentrations de cas a été effectuée à l’aide d’indicateurs locaux d’associations spatiales.
RÉSULTATS: Il existe une hétérogénéité spatiale importante des taux de laparoschisis au Canada, tant à l’échelle provinciale et territoriale qu’à celle des secteurs du recensement. Le Yukon, les Territoires du Nord-Ouest et l’Île-du-Prince-Édouard ont des taux globaux de laparoschisis plus élevés que les autres provinces et territoires. Plusieurs secteurs du recensement en Alberta, au Manitoba, en Saskatchewan, en Ontario, dans les Territoires du Nord-Ouest et en Colombie-Britannique présentent des grappes de laparoschisis, contrairement à leurs contreparties.
CONCLUSIONS: Il existe des preuves manifestes de variation spatiale des taux de laparoschisis au Canada. Les recherches futures devraient explorer le rôle des variables régionales dans cette configuration, afin d’améliorer nos connaissances de l’étiologie du laparoschisis.
Mots Clés: analyse spatiale, laparoschisis, analyse en grappes, Canada
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: None to declare.
References
- 1.Kilby MD. The incidence of gastroschisis. BMJ. 2006;332:250–51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7536.250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wilson RD, Johnson MP. Congenital abdominal wall defects: An update. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2004;19:385–98. doi: 10.1159/000078990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Skarsgard ED, Claydon J, Bouchard S, Kim P, Lee SK, Laberge JM, et al. Canadian Pediatric Surgical Network: A population-based pediatric surgery network and database for analyzing surgical birth defects. The first 100 cases of gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43:30–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wada M, Kato T, Hayashi Y, Selvaggi G, Mittal N, Thompson J, et al. Intestinal transplantation for short bowel syndrome secondary to gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:1841–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Public Health Agency of Canada. Congenital Anomalies in Canada 2013: A Perinatal Health Surveillance Report. 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Laughon M, Meyer R, Bose C, Wall A, Otero E, Heerens A, et al. Rising birth prevalence of gastroschisis. J Perinatol. 2003;23:291–93. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Loane M, Dolk H, Bradbury I. Increasing prevalence of gastroschisis in Europe 1980–2002: A phenomenon restricted to younger mothers? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21:363–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00820.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rasmussen SA, Frias JL. Non-genetic risk factors for gastroschisis. Am J Med Genet Part C Semin Med Genet. 2008;148C:199–212. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Reefhuis J, Honein MA. Maternal age and non-chromosomal birth defects, Atlanta 1968–2000: Teenager or thirty-something, who is at risk? Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2004;70:572–79. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kazaura MR, Lie RT, Irgens LM, Didreiksen A, Kapstad M, Egenaes J, et al. Increasing risk of gastroschisis in Norway: An age-period-cohort analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:358–63. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Torfs CP, Velie EM, Oechsli FW, Bateson TF, Curry CJ. A population-based study of gastroschisis: Demographic, pregnancy, and lifestyle risk factors. Teratology. 1994;50:44–53. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420500107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Neasham D, Dolk H, Vrijheid M, Jensen T, Best N. Stillbirth and neonatal mortality due to congenital anomalies: Temporal trends and variation by small area deprivation scores in England and Wales, 1986–96. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15:364–73. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2001.0379a.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Haddow JE, Palomaki GE, Holman MS. Young maternal age and smoking during pregnancy as risk factors for gastroschisis. Teratology. 1993;47:225–28. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420470306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Draper ES, Rankin J, Tonks AM, Abrams KR, Field DJ, Clarke M, et al. Recreational drug use: A major risk factor for gastroschisis? Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167:485–91. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Werler MM, Sheehan JE, Mitchell AA. Maternal medication use and risks of gastroschisis and small intestinal atresia. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:26–31. doi: 10.1093/aje/155.1.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Feldkamp ML, Reefhuis J, Kucik J, Krikov S, Wilson A, Moore CA, et al. Case-control study of self reported genitourinary infections and risk of gastroschisis: Findings from the national birth defects prevention study, 1997–2003. BMJ. 2008;336:1420–23. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39567.509074.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Waller SA, Paul K, Peterson SE, Hitti JE. Agricultural-related chemical exposures, season of conception, and risk of gastroschisis in Washington State. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:241. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Castilla EE, Mastroiacovo P, Orioli IM. Gastroschisis: International epidemiology and public health perspectives. Am J Med Gen. 2008;148:162–79. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stone DH, Rimaz S, Gilmour WH. Prevalence of congenital anterior abdominal wall defects in the United Kingdom: Comparison of regional registers. BMJ. 1998;317:1118–19. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7166.1118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Root ED, Meyer RE, Emch ME. Evidence of localized clustering of gastroschisis births in North Carolina, 1999–2004. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(8):1361–67. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fielder HM, Poon-King CM, Palmer SR, Moss N, Coleman G. Assessment of impact on health of residents living near the Nant-y-Gwyddon landfill site: Retrospective analysis. BMJ. 2000;320(7226):19–22. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 3rd. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Keys C, Drewett M, Burge DM. Gastroschisis: The cost of an epidemic. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43(4):654–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Root ED, Meyer RE, Emch M. Socioeconomic context and gastroschisis: Exploring associations at various geographic scales. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(4):625–33. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lupo PJ, Langlois PH, Reefhuis J, Lawson CC, Symanski E, Desrosiers T, et al. Maternal occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Effects on gastroschisis among offspring in the national birth defects prevention study. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:910–15. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]