Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
editorial
. 2014 May 1;105(3):e214–e217. doi: 10.17269/cjph.105.4266

Exposed! Or not? The diminishing record of workplace exposure in Canada

Amy L Hall 111,, Cheryl E Peters 111, Paul A Demers 211, Hugh W Davies 111
PMCID: PMC6972319  PMID: 25165842

Abstract

The Canadian Workplace Exposure Database (CWED) is the first of its kind in Canada. It was originally developed in 2008 by the Canadian Carcinogen Exposure project (CAREX Canada) to assist in estimating worker exposures to carcinogens across the country.

Following the CWED’s establishment, all Canadian federal and provincial agencies responsible for administering occupational health and safety regulation were surveyed to obtain a clearer picture of the quantity and quality of regulatory exposure data available. This revealed troubling reductions in exposure measurement collection, retention, and centralization by these agencies in recent years.

Such trends will limit access to workplace exposure measurements for federal and provincial regulatory agencies as well as health researchers. Workplace exposure databases are used around the world for a variety of important purposes, such as identifying hazardous workplaces and workers at risk, assessing temporal–spatial trends, setting priorities for prevention, and informing epidemiological research.

Efforts are underway to preserve historical data and promote prospective collection, however future success of the CWED will require collaboration and long-term vision on the part of those responsible for collecting workplace exposure measurements in Canada.

Key Words: Occupational exposure, exposure database, hazard control, workplace surveillance

Footnotes

Acknowledgements of support: The CAREX Canada project is funded by the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer. The Canadian Workplace Exposure Database (CWED) has been developed through funding from the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, WorkSafeBC’s Innovation at Work program, and the Workers Compensation Board of Manitoba.

Conflict of Interest: None to declare.

References

  • 1.Vincent R, Jeandel B. COLCHIC-occupational exposure to chemical agents database: Current content and development perspectives. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2001;16(2):115–21. doi: 10.1080/104732201460190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stamm R. MEGA-database: One million data since 1972. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2001;16(2):159–63. doi: 10.1080/104732201460262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Burns D, Beaumon P. The HSE National Exposure Database—(NEDB) Ann Occup Hyg. 1989;33(1):1–14. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/33.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lavoue J, Friesen MC, Burstyn I. Workplace measurements by the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration since 1979: Descriptive analysis and potential uses for exposure assessment. Ann Occup Hyg. 2013;57(1):77–97. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Boiano JM, Hull RD. Development of a National Occupational Exposure Survey and Database associated with NIOSH hazard surveillance initiatives. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2001;16(2):128–34. doi: 10.1080/104732201460217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Peters CE, Ge CB, Hall AL, Davies HW, Demers PA. Occup Environ Med. 2014. CAREX Canada: An enhanced model for assessing occupational carcinogen exposure. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Occupational Cancer Research Centre. The human and economic burden of occupational cancer in Canada (research project summary). Available at: http://occupationalcancer.ca/2011/the-human-and-economic-burden-ofoccupational-cancer-in-ontario/ (Accessed June 2, 2014).
  • 8.Lofgren DJ, Reeb-Whitaker CK, Adams D. Surveillance of Washington OSHA exposure data to identify uncharacterized or emerging occupational health hazards. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2010;7(7):375–88. doi: 10.1080/15459621003781207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Teschke K, Olshan AF, Daniels JL, De Roos AJ, Parks CG, Schulz M, Vaughan TL. Occupational exposure assessment in case-control studies: Opportunities for improvement. Occup Environ Med. 2002;59(9):575–94. doi: 10.1136/oem.59.9.575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zalk DM, Nelson DI. History and evolution of control banding: A review. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2008;5(5):330–46. doi: 10.1080/15459620801997916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.CAREX Canada. The Canadian Workplace Exposure Database. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cherrie JW, Sewell C, Ritchie P, McIntosh C, Tickner J, Llewellyn D. Retrospective collection of exposure data from industry: Results from a feasibility study in the United Kingdom. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2001;16(2):144–48. doi: 10.1080/104732201460235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Caldwell DJ, Armstrong TW, Barone NJ, Suder JA, Evans MJ. Lessons learned while compiling a quantitative exposure database from the published literature. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2001;16(2):174–77. doi: 10.1080/104732201460299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES