Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
editorial
. 2016 Mar 1;107(2):e202–e204. doi: 10.17269/cjph.107.5261

The use of potential years of life lost for monitoring premature mortality from chronic diseases: Canadian perspectives

Katerina Maximova 112,, Shahriar Rozen 112,212, Jane Springett 112,212, Sylvie Stachenko 112,212
PMCID: PMC6972475  PMID: 27526219

Abstract

Given that chronic diseases account for 88% of all deaths in Canada, robust surveillance and monitoring systems are essential for supporting implementation of health promotion and chronic disease prevention policies. Canada has a long tradition of monitoring premature mortality expressed as potential years of life lost (PYLL), dating back to the seminal work by Romeder and McWhinnie in the late 1970s, who pioneered the use of PYLL as a tool in health planning and decision-making. The utility of PYLL for monitoring progress was expanded in the 1990s through the national comparable Health Indicators Initiative, following which PYLL has been monitored for several decades nationally, provincially, regionally and locally as part of health systems’ performance measurement. Yet the potential for using PYLL in health promotion and chronic disease prevention has not been maximized. Linking PYLL with public health programs and initiatives aimed at health promotion and chronic disease prevention, introduced starting in the 1990s, would inform whether these efforts are making progress in addressing the burden of premature mortality from chronic diseases. Promoting the use of PYLL due to chronic diseases would contribute toward providing a more complete picture of chronic diseases in Canada.

Key words: Potential years of life lost, chronic disease prevention, health promotion, Canada, burden of disease

Footnotes

Acknowledgements: KM holds a Career Development Award in Prevention Research funded by the Canadian Cancer Society (grant #702936). All interpretations and opinions in this commentary are those of the authors.

Conflict of Interest: None to declare.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013–2020. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World Health Organization. Noncommunicable Diseases Global Monitoring Framework. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.The Money Value of Man. 1930.
  • 4.Dempsey M. Decline in tuberculosis: The death rate fails to tell the entire story. Am Rev Tuberc. 1947;86:157. doi: 10.1164/art.1947.56.2.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dickinson FG, Welker EL. What is the leading cause of death? AMA Bulletin. 1948;64:1–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Romeder JM, McWhinnie JR. Potential years of life lost between ages 1 and 70: An indicator of premature mortality for health planning. Int J Epidemiol. 1977;6(2):143–51. doi: 10.1093/ije/6.2.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wigle DT, Mao Y, Semenciw R, McCann C, Davies JW. Premature deaths in Canada: Impact, trends and opportunities for prevention. Can J Public Health. 1990;81(5):376–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.World Health Organization. The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Epp J. Achieving Health for All: A Framework for Health Promotion. Ottawa, ON: Health and Welfare Canada; 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Canadian Institute of Health Information. The Health Indicators Project: The Next 5 Years. Ottawa, ON: CIHI; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shield KD, Taylor B, Kehoe T, Patra J, Rehm J. Mortality and potential years of life lost attributable to alcohol consumption in Canada in 2005. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:91. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tjepkema M, Wilkins R, Senécal S, Guimond E, Penney C. Potential years of life lost at ages 25 to 74 among Métis and non-Status Indians, 1991 to 2001. Health Rep. 2011;22(1):1–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Beaglehole R, Bonita R. Public Health at the Crossroads: Achievements and Prospects. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gouda HN, Powles JW. The science of epidemiology and the methods needed for public health assessments: A review of epidemiology textbooks. BMC PublicHealth. 2014;14:139. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stein C, Kuchenmuller T, Hendrickx S, Pruss-Ustun A, Wolfson L, Engels D, et al. The global burden of disease assessments–WHO is responsible? PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2007;1(3):e161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Devleesschauwer B, Havelaar AH, de Maertens Noordhout C, Haagsma JA, Praet N, Dorny P, et al. Calculating disability-adjusted life years to quantify burden of disease. Int J Public Health. 2014;59(3):565–69. doi: 10.1007/s00038-014-0552-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Voigt K, King NB. Disability weights in the global burden of disease 2010 study: Two steps forward, one step back? Bull World Health Organ. 2014;92(3):226–28. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.126227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Polinder S, Haagsma JA, Stein C, Havelaar AH. Systematic review of general burden of disease studies using disability-adjusted life years. Popul Health Metr. 2012;10(1):21. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-10-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES