Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
editorial
. 2012 Mar 1;103(2):125–127. doi: 10.1007/BF03404216

Canada Moving Backwards on Illegal Drugs

Elaine Hyshka 110,210, Janet Butler-McPhee 310, Richard Elliott 310, Evan Wood 210,410, Thomas Kerr 210,410,
PMCID: PMC6973617  PMID: 22530535

Abstract

Internationally, illegal drug use remains a major public health problem. In response, many countries have begun to shift their illegal drug policies away from enforcement and towards public health objectives. Recently, both the Global Commission on Drug Policy and the Supreme Court of Canada have endorsed this change in direction, supporting empirically sound illegal drug policies that reduce criminalization and stigmatization of drug users and bolster treatment and harm reduction efforts. Until recently, Canada was a participant in this growing movement towards rational drug policy. Unfortunately, in recent years, policy changes have made Canada one of the few remaining advocates of a “war-on-drugs” approach. Indeed, the current government has implemented a number of new illegal drug policies that contradict well-established scientific evidence from public health, criminology and other fields. As such, their approach is expected to do little to reduce the harms associated with substance use in Canada. The authors call on the current government to heed the recommendations of the Global Commission’s report and learn from the many countries that are innovating in illegal drug policy by prioritizing evidence, human rights and public health.

Keywords: Illegal drug policy, harm reduction, human rights, substance use

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: None to declare.

References

  • 1.US Department of Justice: National Drug Intelligence Centre. The economic impact of illicit drug use on American society. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wood E, Tyndall MW, Spittal PM, Li K, Anis AH, Hogg RS, Montaner JSG, O’Shaughnessy MVO, Schechter MT. Impact of supply-side policies for control of illicit drugs in the face of the AIDS and overdose epidemics: Investigation of a massive heroin seizure. CMAJ. 2003;168(2):165–69. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Open Society Foundation. At What Cost: HIV and Human Rights Consequences of the War on Drugs. Open Society Foundations, March 2009. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Global Commission on Drug Policy. Report of the Global Commission on Drug Policy. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Makin K, Dhillon S, Peritz I. The Globe and Mail 2011 Sept 30. 2011. Supreme Court ruling opens doors to drug injection clinics across Canada. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Marshall B, Milloy M-J, Wood E, Montaner JSG, Kerr T. Reduction in overdose mortality after the opening of North America’s first medically supervised safer injecting facility: A retrospective population-based study. Lancet. 2011;377(9775):1429–37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62353-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nature. Science in retreat [Editorial] Nature. 2008;451(7181):866. doi: 10.1038/451866a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wood E, Kerr T, Tyndall M, Montaner JS. The Canadian government’s treatment of scientific process and evidence: Inside the evaluation of North America’s first supervised injecting facility. IJDP. 2008;19(3):220–25. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.DeBeck K, Wood E, Kerr T, Montaner JS. Canada’s new federal “National AntiDrug Strategy”: An informal audit of reported funding allocation. IJDP. 2009;20(2):188–91. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2008.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Giesbrecht N, Haydon E. Community-based interventions and alcohol, tobacco and other drugs: Foci, outcomes and implications. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2006;25(6):633–46. doi: 10.1080/09595230600944594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Barnett L, Dupuis T, Kirkby C, MacKay R, Nicol J, Bechard J. Legislative Summary of Bill C-10: An Act to enact the Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act and to amend the State Immunity Act, the Criminal Code, the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, the Corrections and Conditional Release Act, the Youth Criminal Justice Act, the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and other Acts. October 5, 2011. Library of Parliament. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gabor T, Crutcher N. Mandatory minimum penalties: Their effects on crime, sentencing disparities, and justice system expenditures. Ottawa, ON: Justice Canada, Research and Statistics Division; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shore R. Vancouver Sun. 2011. Doctors, scientists want proposed federal drug law scrapped. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McGregor J. CBC News. 2011. Senate in no rush to pass omnibus crime bill. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Clark C. The Globe and Mail. 2011. Canada pledges $5-million to fight drug crime in the Americas. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Health Canada. Canadian Drug and Alcohol Use Monitoring Survey: Summary of Results for 2009. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Statistics Canada. Police-reported crime statistics in Canada, 2009. 2011. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES