Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2012 Jan 1;103(1):14–18. doi: 10.1007/BF03404062

Online Sexual Health Services: Examining Youth’s Perspectives

Jean Shoveller 14,, Rod Knight 14, Wendy Davis 14, Mark Gilbert 24, Gina Ogilvie 24
PMCID: PMC6973649  PMID: 22338322

Abstract

Objectives

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are high and rising in British Columbia, Canada, and youth ages 15–24 account for a disproportionate amount of the infections. As a result, new public health interventions have increasingly turned towards media such as the internet to reach youth populations at risk for STIs/HIV. We describe youth’s perceptions about online sexual health services.

Methods

We used data from in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 38 men and 14 women between the ages of 15 and 24 who discussed: online STI/HIV testing services and online counselling and education services.

Results

In general, youth are familiar with, receptive to and have an affinity for online sexual health services. Youth in the current study suggested that online STI/HIV risk assessment and testing as well as online counselling and education could enhance opportunities for low-threshold service provision. Online services appealed to youth’s needs for convenience, privacy, as well as expedient access to testing and/or counselling; however, youth also appear to have relatively low tolerance for technologies that they perceive to be antiquated (e.g., printing lab requisition forms), revealing the challenges of designing online approaches that will not quickly become outdated.

Conclusion

Globally, pilot programs for Internet-based sexual health services such as online testing and partner notification have shown promising results. As Canadian interventions of this type emerge, research with youth populations can provide relevant insights to help program planners launch effective interventions.

Keywords: Youth sexual health, online sexual health services, STI/HIV

Footnotes

Acknowledgements: This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). We are thankful to the youth who took part in this study. Dr. Shoveller holds a CIHR/PHAC Applied Public Health Chair.

Conflict of Interest: None to declare.

References

  • 1.British Columbia Centre for Disease Control STI/HIV Prevention and Control. 2009 annual surveillance report: HIV and sexually transmitted infections. Vancouver, BC: BCCDC, 2009.
  • 2.Shoveller J, Johnson J, Rosenberg M, Greaves L, Patrick D, Oliffe J, et al. Youth’s experiences with STI testing in four communities in British Columbia, Canada. STI. 2009;85(5):397–401. doi: 10.1136/sti.2008.035568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shoveller JA, Knight R, Johnson J, Oliffe JL, Goldenberg S. ‘Not the swab!’ young men’s experiences with STI testing. Sociol Health Ill. 2010;32(1):57–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01222.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Goldenberg S, Shoveller J, Koehoorn M, Ostry A. Barriers to testing among youth in a Canadian oil and gas community. Health Place. 2008;14(4):718–29. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hardwick D, McKay A, Ashem M. Chlamydia screening of adolescent and young adult women by general practice physicians in Toronto, Canada: Baseline survey data from a physician education campaign. Can J Hum Sex. 2007;16:63–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Solorio MR, Milburn NG, Rotheram-Borus MJ, Higgins C, Gelberg L. Predictors of sexually transmitted infection testing among sexually active homeless youth. AIDS Behav. 2006;10(2):179–84. doi: 10.1007/s10461-005-9044-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mill JE, Jackson RC, Worthington CA, Archibald CP, Wong T, Myers T, et al. HIV testing and care in Canadian Aboriginal youth: A community based mixed methods study. BMC Infect Dis. 2008;8:132. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-8-132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chai SJ, Aumakhan B, Barnes M, Jett-Goheen M, Quinn N, Agreda P, et al. Internet-based screening for sexually transmitted infections to reach non-clinic populations in the community: Risk factors for infection in men. STD. 2010;37(12):756–63. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181e3d771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hightow-Weidman LB, Fowler B, Kibe J, McCoy R, Pike E, Calabria M, et al. HealthMpowerment.org: Development of a theory-based HIV/STI website for young black MSM. AIDS Educ Prev. 2011;23:1–12. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2011.23.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jenkins WD, Rabins C, Barnes M, Agreda P, Gaydos C. Use of the internet and self-collected samples as a sexually transmissible infection intervention in rural Illinois communities. Sex Health. 2011;8:79–85. doi: 10.1071/SH10012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ralph L, Berglas N, Schwartz S, Brindis C. Sexuality Res Soc Policy. 2011. Finding teens in TheirSpace: Using social networking sites to connect youth to sexual health services; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rietmeijer CA, Westergaard B, Mickiewicz TA, Richardson D, Ling S, Sapp T, et al. Evaluation of an online partner notification program. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38(5):359–64. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31820ef796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McFarlane M, Bull SS. Use of the Internet in STD/HIV prevention. In: Aral SO, Douglas JM, editors. Behavioral Interventions for Prevention and Control of Sexually Transmitted Diseases. New York: Springer Science+Business Media; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.van den Broek IVF, Hoebe CJPA, van Bergen JEAM, Brouwers EEHG, de Feijter EM, Fennema JSA, et al. Evaluation design of a systematic, selective, internet-based Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands, 2008–2010: Implications of first results for the analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Second Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Strauss A, Corbin J. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Glaser BG, Strauss A. Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Sociology Press; 1967. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Moore SM, Charvat J. Promoting health behavior change using appreciative inquiry: Moving from deficit models to affirmation models of care. Fam Com-munity Health. 2007;30(1Suppl):S64–S74. doi: 10.1097/00003727-200701001-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Carpenter KM, Stoner SA, Mikko AN, Dhanak LP, Parsons JT. Efficacy of a web-based intervention to reduce sexual risk in men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2009;23(1):107–15. doi: 10.1007/s10461-009-9578-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rich M. E-mail intervention decreases online health risk references among adolescents. J Pediatr. 2009;155(1):147. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.03.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Noar SM, Black HG, Pierce LB. Efficacy of computer technology-based HIV prevention interventions: A meta-analysis. AIDS. 2009;23(1):107–15. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32831c5500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Novak D. Utilizing the power of the internet to reach high-risk youth and MSM: The Massachusetts experience. Chicago, IL: National STD Prevention Conference; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Harvey K, Churchill D, Crawford P, Brown B, Mullany L, Macfarlane A, et al. Health communication and adolescents: What do their emails tell us? Fam Pract. 2008;25(4):304–11. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ho SS, McLeod DM. Social-psychological influences on opinion expression in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Communication Res. 2008;35(2):190–207. doi: 10.1177/0093650207313159. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Garcia AC, Standlee AI, Bechkoff J, Cui Y. Ethnographic approaches to the internet and computer-mediated communication. J Contemp Ethnogr. 2009;38(1):52–84. doi: 10.1177/0891241607310839. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jancin B. Web-based tool makes patient STD screening accessible. Ob Gyn News. 2009;44(13):26. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Harvey KJ, Brown B, Crawford P, Macfarlane A, McPherson A. ‘Am I normal?’ Teenagers, sexual health and the internet. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(4):771–81. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Balfe M, Brugha R, O’Donovan D, O’Connell E, Vaughan D. BMC Public Health. 2010. Young women’s decisions to accept chlamydia screening: Influences of stigma and doctor-patient interactions; p. 425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Carlisle J, Shickle D, Cork M, McDonagh A. Concerns over confidentiality may deter adolescents from consulting their doctors. A qualitative exploration. J Med Ethics. 2006;32:133–37. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.011262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES