Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
editorial
. 2012 Sep 1;103(Suppl 1):S5–S7. doi: 10.1007/BF03404452

Public Health Interventions to Reduce Inequalities: What Do We Know Works?

John Frank 12,22,
PMCID: PMC6973693  PMID: 23618051

Abstract

This commentary focuses on the notion of “what works” to reduce health inequalities. It begins by noting the need for and presence of a wide range of methodologies and approaches internationally. It then argues that it is useful to map out these contributions and those in the present Supplement against a set of principles (Macintyre, 2007) to guide the selection and implementation of public health interventions explicitly aiming to reduce health inequalities. The chosen principles derive largely from efforts to reduce steep and persistent Scottish health inequalities by social class. The commentary summarizes Macintyre’s analysis of the main characteristics of public health interventions. It then notes that the present Supplement provides clear examples of population-health interventions and their health impacts that are inequality-reducing. The suggested approach and principles align with calls for the use of structural changes in the environment, early-life interventions, reductions in preventive-care barriers, and a harm-reduction philosophy. The commentary concludes that there remains much to learn and to do in order for public health intervention research to clearly demonstrate how to effectively reduce health inequalities in a lasting manner.

References

  • 1.Macintyre S. Inequalities in health in Scotland: What are they and what can we do about them? Glasgow, UK: MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Popham F, Boyle P. Assessing socio-economic inequalities in mortality and other health outcomes at the Scottish national level (incorporating a comparison between mortality in Scotland and England) 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Frank J, Haw S. Monitoring health inequalities by socio-economic status: Lessons from Scotland. Milbank Q. 2011;89(4):658–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00646.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hertzman C, Siddiqi A, Hertzman E, Irwin L, Vaghri Z, Houweling TAJ, et al. Tackling inequality: Get them while they’re young. BMJ. 2010;340(7742):346–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Frost H, Geddes R, Haw S, Jackson CA, Jepson R, Mooney JD, Frank JW. Experiences of knowledge brokering for evidence-informed public health policy and practice: Three years of the SCPHRP. Evidence & Policy. 2012;8:347–59. doi: 10.1332/174426412X654068. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Roos N, Roos LL, Brownell M, Fuller EL. Enhancing policymakers’ understanding of disparities: Relevant data from an information-rich environment. Milbank Q. 2010;88(3):382–403. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00604.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Craig P, Cooper C, Gunnell D, Haw S, Lawson K, Macintyre S, et al. Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: Guidance for producers and users of evidence (Prepared on behalf of the Medical Research Council) 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES