Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2009 Jul 1;100(4):285–290. [Article in French] doi: 10.1007/BF03403948

La consommation d’alcool à risque dans la main-d’œuvre canadienne: quelles sont les différences entre les professions et secteurs économiques?

Alain Marchand 112,✉, Martin Charbonneau 212
PMCID: PMC6973700  PMID: 19722342

Abstract

Objective: Examine the differences in weekly high-risk alcohol consumption among working people by economic sector and occupation.

Method: Secondary analysis of data from Cycle 2.1 of the Canadian Community Health Survey conducted by Statistics Canada. The sample comprised 76,136 subjects 15 years of age and older in 139 occupations and 96 economic sectors.

Results: The prevalence of weekly high-risk alcohol consumption is estimated to be 8 % among workers. Major disparities exist between men (11%) and women (6%). The results suggest a differential in weekly high-risk alcohol consumption by occupation and economic sector that is independent of working conditions, family status, and personal characteristics. Workers in five occupational groups have a greater likelihood of at-risk consumption (OR 1.88–2.94), whereas seven economic sectors stand out as having a lower risk (OR 0.25–0.59).

Discussion: Occupation appears to be of greater utility than economic sector for defining courses of action in public health. These research results make it possible to identify a set of occupations to target for preventive interventions in conjunction with other public health interventions.

Keywords: Alcohol drinking, occupations, workplace, industry

Références

  • 1.Adlaf EM, Begin P, Sawka E, editors. Enquête sur les toxicomanies au Canada (ETC): Une enquête nationale sur la consommation d’alcool et d’autres drogues par les Canadiens: La prévalence de l’usage et les méfaits: Rapport détaillé. Ottawa, ON: Centre canadien de lutte contre l’alcoolisme et les toxicomanies; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bondy SJ, Rehm J, Ashley MJ, Walsh G, Single E, Room R. Low-risk drinking guidelines: The scientific evidence. Can J Public Health. 1999;90:264–70. doi: 10.1007/BF03404129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Peele SB, Brodsky A. Exploring psychological benefits associated with moderate alcohol use: A necessary corrective to assessments of drinking outcomes? Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000;60:221–47. doi: 10.1016/S0376-8716(00)00112-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Marchand A, Demers A, Durand P, Simard M. Occupational variations in drinking and psychological distress: A multilevel analysis. Work. 2003;21:153–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rehm J, Baliunas D, Brochu S, Fisher B, Gnam W, Patra J, et al. Les coûts de l’abus de substance au Canada 2002. Ottawa: Centre canadien de lutte contre l’alcoolisme et les toxicomanies (CCLAT); 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Single E. Profil canadien. L’alcool, le tabac et les autres drogues. Ottawa: Centre canadien de lutte contre l’alcoolisme et les toxicomanies et Centre de toxicomanie et de santé mentale; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Single E. Substance Abuse and the Workplace in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gabriel P. Mental Health in the Workplace: Situation Analysis United States. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Alberta AlcoholDrug Abuse Commission AADAC. Substance use and gambling in the Alberta workplace, 2002: A replication study. Alberta: AADAC Research Services; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Statistique Canada. Classification type des professions 1991. Ottawa: Statistique Canada. Division des normes; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Statistique Canada. Système de classification des industries de l’Amérique du Nord: Canada 1997. Ottawa: Statistique Canada, Division des normes; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schwartz JE, Peiper CF, Karasek R. A procedure for linking psychosocial job characteristics data to health survey. Am J Public Health. 1988;78:904–9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.78.8.904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Karasek RA. Job content questionnaire and user’s guide. Lowell, MA: Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts; 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Frone MR. Prevalence and distribution of alcohol use and impairment in the workplace: A U.S. national survey. J Stud Alcohol. 2006;67:147–56. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mandell W, Eaton WW, Anthony JC, Garrison R. Alcoholism and occupations: A review and analysis of 104 occupations. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1992;16:734–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1992.tb00670.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Harford TC, Parker DA, Grant BF, Dawson DA. Alcohol use and dependence among employed men and women in the United States in 1988. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1992;16:146–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1992.tb01357.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hemmingsson T, Weitoft GR. Alcohol-related hospital utilization and mortality in different occupations in Sweden in 1991-1995. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2001;27:412–19. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Parker DA, Harford TC. The epidemiology of alcohol consumption and dependence across occupations in the United States. Alcohol Health Res World. 1992;16:97–106. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Substance Abuse Mental HealthServices SAMHSA. Drug Use Among U.S. Workers Prevalence and Trends by Occupation and Industry Categories. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA, DHHS Publication Number (SMA) 96-3089; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Roberts ER, Lee ES. Occupation and the prevalence of major depression, alcohol, and drug abuse in the United States. Environ Res. 1993;61:266–78. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1993.1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bacharach SB, Bamberger P, Sonnenstuhl WJ. Driven to drink: Managerial control, work related risk and employee drinking behavior. Acad Manage J. 2002;45:637–58. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Marchand A. Alcohol use and misuse: What are the contributions of occupation and work organization conditions? BMC Public Health. 2008;8:333. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Babor TF, Caetano R, Casswell S, Edwards G, Giesbrecht N, Graham K, et al. Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity — Research and Public Policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2003. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES