Abstract
Objectives
Street-involved youth are at high risk for acquiring HIV and hepatitis C infection due to potential engagement in high-risk behaviours, including injection drug use. The Youth Injection Prevention (YIP) Project sought to identify factors that prevented street-involved youth from moving into injection drug use in Vancouver, BC. Our project used a participatory research orientation to study these factors. This paper describes the level of participation observed among the street-involved youth taking part in our project.
Methods
The YIP project employed street-involved youth as co-researchers. To assess the level of participation among the co-researchers, we applied Roger Hart’s “Ladder of Youth Participation”. Each advancing rung in the ladder represents a higher level of participation. We compared the youth’s involvement in the project to the rungs in Roger Hart’s tool.
Results
Throughout the duration of the project, the youth’s participation increased. Initially the youth had low levels of participation as they were hired based on their life experiences and initially consulted and informed. Over the course of the project, team- and skill-building activities took place. This helped the project environment evolve into a safe space where youth felt comfortable to engage at the highest levels of participation.
Conclusion
The YIP Project was successful in being a highly participatory research project. In a safe and open environment, the youth felt comfortable to question and take on initiatives that went beyond the academic researcher’s initial expectations. This project highlights the success of engaging street-involved youth in participatory research.
Key words: IDU, youth, participatory research
Résumé
Objectifs
Les jeunes de la rue courent un risque élevé d’attraper des infections à VIH et à l’hépatite C du fait qu’ils peuvent s’adonner à des comportements à haut risque, dont l’utilisation de drogues par injection. Le projet YIP (Youth Injection Prevention) cherche à cerner les facteurs qui empêchent les jeunes de la rue de se tourner vers les drogues par injection à Vancouver, en Colombie-Britannique. Nous utilisons une approche de recherche participative pour étudier ces facteurs. Nous décrivons ici le niveau de participation observé chez les jeunes de la rue ayant pris part au projet.
Méthode
Le projet YIP a employé des jeunes de la rue comme co-chercheurs. Pour évaluer le niveau de participation chez les co-chercheurs, nous avons appliqué «l’échelle de participation des jeunes» de Roger Hart. Chaque barreau de l’échelle représente un niveau de participation plus élevé. Nous avons comparé l’implication des jeunes dans le projet aux barreaux de l’échelle de Hart.
Résultats
Au fil du projet, la participation des jeunes a augmenté. Au départ, leurs niveaux de participation étaient faibles, car ils étaient embauchés en raison de leur vécu et simplement consultés et informés. Au cours du projet, des activités de développement de l’esprit d’équipe et de renforcement des compétences ont eu lieu. Elles ont contribué à faire de l’environnement du projet un espace sûr où les jeunes se sont sentis libres de s’engager aux plus hauts niveaux de participation.
Conclusion
Le projet YIP a atteint un niveau de participation très élevé pour un projet de recherche. Dans un environnement sûr et ouvert, les jeunes se sont sentis libres de poser des questions et d’accepter des initiatives dépassant de loin les attentes initiales de la chercheuse universitaire. Ce projet montre l’efficacité de recruter des jeunes de la rue pour faire de la recherche participative.
Mots clés: UDI, jeunes, recherche participative
Footnotes
Acknowledgements: The authors thank the youth co-researchers, the participants, partner organizations, Catharine Chambers, Larissa Coser, and Elizabeth Saewyc for their time and contribution to this work. Funding for this project was provided by the Vancouver Foundation. Further information about the process, successes, challenges, and lessons learned throughout the YIP project are available through a link on the BCCDC Harm Reduction website available at: http://www.bccdc.ca/prevention/HarmReduction/YIPProject/default.htm or through communication with the corresponding author, Jane Buxton (jane.buxton@bccdc.ca).
Conflict of Interest: None to declare.
References
- 1.DeMatteo D, Major C, Block B, Coates R, Fearon M, Goldberg E, et al. Toronto street youth and HIV/AIDS: Prevalence, demographics, and risks. J Adolesc Health. 1999;25:358–66. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(99)00059-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Smith A, Saewyc E, Albert M, MacKay L, Northcott M. The McCreary Centre Society. Against the odds: A profile of marginalized and street-involved youth in BC. Vancouver, BC: The McCreary Centre Society; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sexually transmitted infections in Canadian street youth. Ottawa, ON: Public Health Agency of Canada, 2006.
- 4.Boivin JF, Roy E, Haley N, Galbaud du Fort G. The health of street youth: A Canadian perspective. Can J Public Health. 2005;96:432–37. doi: 10.1007/BF03405183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Miller CL, Kerr T, Strathdee SA, Li K, Wood E. Factors associated with premature mortality among young injection drug users in Vancouver. Harm Reduct J. 2007;4:1. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-4-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kerr T, Marshall BDL, Miller C, Shannon K, Zhang R, Montaner JSG, Wood E. Injection drug use among street-involved youth in a Canadian setting. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(1):171. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chambers CT. Risk and resiliency factors associated with injection drug use among at-risk youth in Vancouver, British Columbia. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kidd SA, Kral MJ. Practicing participatory action research. J Counselling Psychology. 2005;52:187–95. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.187. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mitchell K, Nyakake M, Oling J. How effective are street youth peer educators? Health Educ. 2007;107(4):364–76. doi: 10.1108/09654280710759278. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Podschun GD. Teen Peer Outreach-Street Work Project: HIV prevention education for runaway and homeless youth. Public Health Rep. 1993;108(2):150–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Poland BD, Tupker E, Breland K. Involving street youth in peer harm reduction education. Can J Public Health. 2002;93(5):344–48. doi: 10.1007/BF03404566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Powers JL, Tiffany JS. J Public Health Management Practice. 2006. Engaging youth in participatory research and evaluation; pp. S79–S87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Soleimanpour S, Brindis C, Geierstanger S, Kandawalla S, Kurlaender T. Incorporating youth-led community participatory research into school health center programs and policies. Public Health Rep. 2008;123:709–16. doi: 10.1177/003335490812300607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tumiel Berhalter LM, Mclaughlin-Diaz V, Vena J, Crespo CJ. Building community research capacity: Process evaluation of community training and education in a community-based participatory research program serving a predominately Puerto Rican community; Progress in Community Health Partnerships. Research, Education, and Action. 2007;1(1):89–97. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Van Staa A, Jedeloo S, Latour JM, Trappenburg MJ. Exciting but exhausting: Experiences with participatory research with chronically ill adolescents. Health Expect. 2010;13(1):95–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00574.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rodriguez LF, Brown TM. From voice to agency: Guiding principles for participatory action research with youth. New Directions for Youth Development. 2009;123:19–34. doi: 10.1002/yd.312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Holden DJ, Crankshaw E, Nimsch C, Hinnant LW, Hund L. Quantifying the impact of participation in local tobacco control groups on the psychological empowerment of involved youth. Health Educ Behav. 2004;31(5):615–28. doi: 10.1177/1090198104268678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Peake K, Gaffney S, Surko M. J Public Health Management and Practice. 2006. Capacity-building for youth workers through community-based partnerships; pp. S65–S71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Racz J, Lacko Z. Peer helpers in Hungary: A qualitative analysis. Int J Adv Counselling. 2008;30:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s10447-007-9040-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Paterson BL, Panessa C. Engagement as an ethical imperative in harm reduction involving at-risk youth. Int J Drug Policy. 2008;19:24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hart R. Children’s Participation: From Tokenism to Citizenship. Florence, Italy: UNICEF, International Child Development; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hart RA. Children’s Participation: The Theory and Practice of Involving Young Citizens in Community Development and Environmental Care. London, UK: Earth-scan; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chen S, Poland B, Skinner HA. Youth voices: Evaluation of participatory action research. Can J Program Eval. 2007;22(1):125–50. [Google Scholar]
- 24.BC Centre for Disease Control, Harm Reduction. Youth Injection Prevention Project (YIP) 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kelman HC, Hovland CI. “Reinstatement” of the communicator in delayed measurement of opinion change. J Abnormal Soc Psychol. 1953;48:327–35. doi: 10.1037/h0061861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Durantini MR, Albarracin D, Mitchell AL, Earl AN, Gillette JC. Conceptualizing the influence of social agents of behaviour change: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of HIV-prevention interventionists for different groups. Psychol Bull. 2006;132(2):212–48. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kelly JA. Popular opinion leaders and HIV prevention peer education: Resolving discrepant findings, and implications for the development of effective community programs. AIDS CARE. 2004;16:139–50. doi: 10.1080/09540120410001640986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kirshner B, O’Donoghue J, McLaughlin M. Youth evaluating programs for youth: Stories of youth IMPACT. New Directions Youth Development. 2002;96:101–17. doi: 10.1002/yd.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sabo K. Youth participatory evaluation: A field in the making. New Directions Evaluation. 2003;98:1–10. doi: 10.1002/ev.80. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hughes JJ. Paying injection drug users to educate and recruit their peers: Why participant-driven interventions are an ethical public health model. Qual Management Health Care. 1999;7(4):4–12. doi: 10.1097/00019514-199907040-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]