Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
editorial
. 2009 May 1;100(3):176–179. doi: 10.1007/BF03405535

Global Health and Local Poverty: Rich Countries’ Responses to Vulnerable Populations

Chris D Simms 1,, D David Persaud 1
PMCID: PMC6973823  PMID: 19507717

Abstract

Poverty is an important determinant of ill health, mortality and suffering across the globe. This commentary asks what we can learn about poverty by looking at the way rich countries respond to the needs of vulnerable populations both within their own societies and those of low-income countries. Taking advantage of recent efforts to redefine child poverty in a way that is consistent with the World Health Organization’s Commission on Social Determinants of Health, three sets of data are reviewed: levels of child well-being within 23 Organization of Economic Community Development countries; the amount of official development assistance these countries disburse to poor countries; and, government social transfers targeted at families as a percentage of GDP. Analysis shows that countries in Northern Europe tend to have lower levels of child poverty, and are the most generous with social transfers and providing development assistance to poor countries; in contrast, the non-European countries like Australia, Canada, Japan, and the United States, and generally, the G7 countries, are the least generous towards the vulnerable at home and abroad and tend to have the highest levels of child poverty. The findings suggest that nations’ responses tend to be ideologically based rather than evidence or needs based and that poverty is neither inevitable nor intractable.

Key words: Poverty, socioeconomic factors, child welfare, international cooperation, world health, Canada

References

  • 1.https://doi.org/www.who.int/whr/1995/media_centre/executive_summary1/en/ (Accessed June 9, 2008).
  • 2.Therien JP, Noel A. From domestic to international justice: The welfare state and foreign aid. International Organization. 1995;49(3):523–53. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300033373. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Materia E, Rossie L, Guasticchi G. Income inequality and nations’ altruism. Lancet. 2005;365:9469. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66410-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.UNICEF Child Poverty in Perspective . Report Card Number 7. Florence. Italy: Innocenti Research Center; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.OECD. Development aid from OECD countries decline in 2006. 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Archives of the World Bank. Available online at: https://doi.org/web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTABOUTUS/EXTARCHIVES/0,,contentMDK:20121526~pagePK:36726~piPK:36092~theSitePK:29506,00.html (Accessed June 9, 2008).
  • 7.UNICEF. Child poverty in rich countries. Florence: Innocenti Research Center; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Picciotto R. A Comment on ‘The White Man’s Burden’. London, UK: Overseas Development Institute; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.https://doi.org/www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2007/pr62/en/index.html (Accessed June 9, 2008).
  • 10.World Bank. Beating the odds: Sustaining inclusion in Mozambique’s growing economy. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Noor A, Amin A, Akhwale W, Snow R. Increasing coverage and decreasing inequity in insecticide-treated bed net use among rural Kenyan children. PLoS Med. 2007;4(8):e255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.WHO. Global Tuberculosis Control in 2007: Key findings. Geneva. Switzerland: WHO; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.UNAIDS. AIDS Epidemic Update. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.https://doi.org/www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/sdh-dss/bg-eng.php (Accessed November 14, 2008).

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES