Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2010 May 1;101(3):193–195. [Article in French] doi: 10.1007/BF03404372

Les médicaments onéreux et la justice intergénérationnelle

David Hughes 13,
PMCID: PMC6973836  PMID: 20737807

Abstract

Among all categories of health expenditure in Canada, spending on drugs is the fastest growing. The factors at play in the increase in expenditure on drugs are essentially those related to the volume of use and the arrival of new drugs on the market. Some of these new drugs are very expensive. In fact, the costs of certain drugs threaten the continued existence of the Québec Prescription Drug Insurance Plan. In Québec, the Conseil du médicament (Drug Board) is responsible for recommending drugs to the Ministry of Health and Social Services to be put on the formulary of drugs covered by the public plan. In spite of pressure by various stakeholders, we believe that the rationing of drugs that are too expensive can achieve political legitimacy if it is based on a transparent justification that includes not only evidence-based criteria, but also ethical principles and values. For egalitarians, fairness in the supply of health care should be accomplished as a function of health care needs. But this concept of justice should also be extended to future generations. The balance of current and future needs should be achieved by determining what would be “reasonable access” through public consultations among experts and citizens.

Key words: Drugs, Conseil du médicament, public prescription drug plans, rationing, ethics, resource allocation, intergenerational justice

Footnotes

Conflit d’intérêt: Aucun à déclarer.

Références

  • 1.Institut canadien d’information sur la santé. Dépenses en médicaments au Canada, de 1985 à 2008. Ottawa, ON: ICIS; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Régie de l’Assurance Maladie du Québec. Tableaux AM.07 — Nombre de participants et d’ordonnances, nombre d’ordonnances par participant, coût brut des ordonnances et par participant, coût RAMQ des ordonnances et par participant selon la classe de médicaments et la catégorie de personnes assurées. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gouvernement du Québec. La politique du médicament. Québec: Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Doucet H. Politiques publiques et critères d’inscription des médicaments dans le régime public québécois d’assurance médicaments. Éthique publique. 2001;8:113–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gouvernement du Québec. Loi sur l’assurance médicaments. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Johri M, Lehoux P. The great escape? Prospects for regulating access to technology through health technology assessment. Int J Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2003;19:179–93. doi: 10.1017/S0266462303000175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lehoux P. The Problem of Health Technology: Policy Implications for Modern Health Care Systems. New York, NY: Routledge; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lehoux P, Tailliez S, Denis J-L, Hivon M. Redefining health technology assessment in Canada: Diversification of products and contextualization of findings. Int J Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2004;20:325–36. doi: 10.1017/S026646230400114X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lehoux P, Williams-Jones B. Mapping the integration of social and ethical issues in health technology assessment. Int J Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2007;23:1–8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462307051513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lehoux P, Blume S. Technology assessment and the sociopolitics of health technologies. J Health Politics, Policy and Law. 2000;25:1083–120. doi: 10.1215/03616878-25-6-1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rawls J. La justice comme équité: une reformulation de théorie de la justice. Paris: La Découverte; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Daniels N. Equity and population health: Toward a broader bioethics agenda. Hasting Center Report. 2006;36:22–35. doi: 10.1353/hcr.2006.0058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Conseil du médicament. Le choix des médicaments assurés au Québec: une démarche responsable et transparente. Québec: Conseil du médicament; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Massé R. Éthique et santé publique. Québec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval; 2003. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES