Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2012 Jul 1;103(4):e293–e296. doi: 10.1007/BF03404238

Risk Assessment of Aircraft Noise on Sleep in Montreal

Louis-François Tétreault 113, Céline Plante 213, Stéphane Perron 213,313, Sophie Goudreau 213, Norman King 213, Audrey Smargiassi 113,413,513,
PMCID: PMC6973841  PMID: 23618644

Abstract

Objective

Estimate the number of awakenings additional to spontaneous awakenings, induced by the nighttime aircraft movements at an international airport in Montreal, in the population residing nearby in 2009.

Methods

Maximum sound levels (LAS,max) were derived from aircraft movements using the Integrated Noise Model 7.0b, on a 28 x 28 km grid centred on the airport and with a 0.1 x 0.1 km resolution. Outdoor LAS,max were converted to indoor LAS,max by reducing noise levels by 15 dB(A) or 21 dB(A). For all grid points, LAS,max were transformed into probabilities of additional awakening using a function developed by Basner et al. (2006). The probabilities of additional awakening were linked to estimated numbers of exposed residents for each grid location to assess the number of aircraft-noise-induced awakenings in Montreal.

Results

Using a 15 dB(A) sound attenuation, 590 persons would, on average, have one or more additional awakenings per night for the year 2009. In the scenario using a 21 dB(A) sound attenuation, on average, no one would be subjected to one or more additional awakenings per night due to aircraft noise.

Conclusion

Using the 2009 flight patterns, our data suggest that a small number of Montreal residents are exposed to noise levels that could induce one or more awakenings additional to spontaneous awakenings per night.

Key words: Noise; sleep; aircraft, risk assessment

Abbreviation

dB(A)

decibel with an A weighted sound level

INM

Integrated Noise Model

LAeq

A weighted equivalent sound levels

LAS,max

maximum A weighted sound level with 1-second time weighting

Lnight

LAeq for nighttime noise of an 8-h duration

Lday

LAeq for daytime noise of a 16-h duration

Footnotes

Acknowledgements: We thank the Direction de la santé publique de Montréal de l’Agence de la santé et des services sociaux du Québec for their financial and logistical support; and Dr. Louis Drouin for his leadership in ensuring that this project was possible.

Conflict of Interest: None to declare.

References

  • 1.Jarup L, Dudley ML, Babisch W, Houthuijs D, Swart W, Pershagen G, et al. Hypertension and Exposure to Noise near Airports (HYENA): Study design and noise exposure assessment. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(11):1473–78. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Huss A, Spoerri A, Egger M, Roosli M. Aircraft noise, air pollution, and mortality from myocardial infarction. Epidemiol. 2010;21(6):829–36. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181f4e634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Babisch W. Transportation noise and cardiovascular risk: Updated review and synthesis of epidemiological studies indicate that the evidence has increased. Noise Health. 2006;8(30):1–29. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.32464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organization. Burden of disease from environmental noise. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stansfeld SA, Berglund B, Clark C, Lopez-Barrio I, Fischer P, Öhrström E, et al. Aircraft and road traffic noise and children’s cognition and health: A cross-national study. Lancet. 2005;365(9475):1942–49. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66660-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Basner M, Samel A, Isermann U. Aircraft noise effects on sleep: Application of the results of a large polysomnographic field study. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006;119(5):2772–84. doi: 10.1121/1.2184247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.World Health Organization. Night Noise Guidelines for Europe. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ministère des transports du Canada TC. TP 1247 — Aviation — Utilisation des terrains au voisinage des aéroports. Ottawa: Gouvernement du Canada; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Leipzig/Halle Airport. Current Noise Pollution Protection Programme. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Basner M, Buess H, Elmenhorst D, Gerlich A, Luks N, MaaB H, et al. Effects of Nocturnal Aircraft Noise. Cologne, Germany: German Aerospace Center; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Federal Aviation Administration. Integrated Noise Model (INM) Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.ATAC. Integrated Noise Model; Global Standard Modeling Tool for Aircraft Noise Impacts. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bradley JS. IBANA-Calc Validation Studies, Institute for Research in Construction. Ottawa: Government of Canada; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.American National Standard Institute. Quantities and Procedures for Description and Measurement of Environmental Sound, Methods for Estimation of Awakenings Associated with Outdoor Noise Events Heard in Homes. New York, NY: Acoustical Society of America; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Perron S, Tetreault LF, King N, Plante C, Smargiassi A. Review of the effect of aircraft noise on sleep disturbance in adults. Noise Health. 2012;14:58–67. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.95133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Statistics Canada. Structural Type of Dwelling and Household Size for Occupied Private Dwellings of Canada, 2006 Census. Ottawa: Government of Canada; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dorval Municipality. City profile. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Institut de la statistique du Québec. Profil de la région. Quebec: Government of Quebec; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stadt Leipzig. Leipzig International. Leipzig: City of Leipzig; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Aéroport de Montréal. Climat sonore. 2011. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES