Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2011 Jan 1;102(1):51–54. doi: 10.1007/BF03404877

Trends in Farm Fatalities, Saskatchewan, Canada: 1990–2004

Syed M Shah 110,210,, Louise Hagel 210, Hyun Lim 310, Niels Koehncke 210, James A Dosman 210
PMCID: PMC6974020  PMID: 21485967

Abstract

Objectives

This study was conducted to estimate farm fatality rates and to describe patterns of fatal agricultural injury on Saskatchewan farms from 1990 to 2004.

Methods

We used data available from the Canadian Agricultural Injury Surveillance Program (CAISP) for farm work-related fatalities in Saskatchewan, Canada from January 1990 to December 2004.

Results

There were 251 farm work-related fatalities recorded between 1990 and 2004 in Saskatchewan. The majority (92%) of work-related fatalities were in males. The overall fatality rate was 11.9 (95% CI, 2.0–30.1) per 100,000. The overall age-adjusted work-related fatality rate was 32.1 (95% CI, 19.6–44.6) per 100,000 among males and 3.2 (95% CI, 1.3–5.1) per 100,000 among females. Age-adjusted rate increased from 29.3 (95% CI, 6.9–59.3) per 100,000 in 1990–1994 to 37.1 per 100,000 in 2000–2004 in males. Trend analysis of the fatality rate of all cases showed an average annual increase of 3.8% and it was statistically significant (p<0.05). Bystander and runover injuries contributed to a high proportion of fatalities in children (32.1%) and the elderly population (26.7%).

Conclusion

The burden of injury mortality is substantial and there has been a statistically significant upward trend in injury rate over the 15-year study period. High vigilance is needed on the part of adults to prevent a high proportion of runover injuries in children and the elderly population.

Key words: Injury, surveillance, farm fatality, agriculture, Saskatchewan

Footnotes

Acknowledgements: This work was conducted in collaboration with the Canadian Agricultural Injury Surveillance Program. We recognize the support of the Canadian Agriculture Safety Program conducted by The Canadian Coalition for Agricultural Safety and Rural Health on behalf of Agriculture and Agri-food Canada; and the contribution of all the collaborators in the Canadian Agricultural Injury Surveillance Program. We acknowledge the Canadian Centre for Health and Safety in Agriculture (CCHSA) for a faculty time release grant through the Institute of Population and Public Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research to conduct this research.

Conflict of Interest: None to declare.

References

  • 1.Centers for Disease ControlPrevention: MorbidityMortality Weekly Report. Fatal Occupational Injuries–United States, 1980–1997. JAMA. 2001;285(19):2440–41. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.19.2440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.United States Department of Labor. Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries Summary. 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pickett W, Hartling L, Brison RJ, Guernsey JR. Fatal work-related farm injuries in Canada, 1991–1995. CMAJ. 1999;160(13):1843–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wigle D, Mao Y, Wong T, Lane R. Economic burden of illness in Canada, 1986. Chron Dis Can. 1989;1:1–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Peek-Asa C, Zwerling C, Stallones L. Acute traumatic injuries in rural populations. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(10):1689–93. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.94.10.1689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Voaklander DC, Hartling L, Pickett W, Dimich-Ward H, Brison RJ. Work-related mortality among older farmers in Canada. Can Fam Phys. 1999;45:2903–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Statistics Canada. Agricultural Profile of Canada. Ottawa, ON: Minister of Industry; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Statistics Canada. Portrait of the Canadian Population in 2006, by Age and Sex, 2006 Census. 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.The Conference Board of Canada. Healthy Provinces, Healthy Canadians: A Provincial Benchmarking Report. 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ahn YS, Bena JF, Bailer AJ. Comparison of unintentional fatal occupational injuries in the Republic of Korea and the United States. Inj Prev. 2004;10:199–205. doi: 10.1136/ip.2003.004895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Stout NA, Jenkins EL, Pizatella TJ. Occupational injury mortality rates in the United States: Change from 1980 to 1989. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:73–77. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.86.1.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Day LM. Farm work related fatalities among adults in Victoria, Australia: The human cost of agriculture. Accid Anal Prev. 1999;31(1-2):153–59. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(98)00057-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Richardson D, Loomis D, Bailer AJ, Bena J. The effect of rate denominator source on US fatal occupational injury rate estimates. Am J Ind Med. 2004;46(3):261–70. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Franklin RC, Mitchell RJ, Driscoll TR, Fragar LJ. Agricultural work-related fatalities in Australia, 1989–1992. J Agric Saf Health. 2001;7(4):213–27. doi: 10.13031/2013.6218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Meng R. How dangerous is work in Canada? Estimates of job-related fatalities in 482 occupations. J Occup Med. 1991;33(10):1084–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Workplace Safety and Health; Fatal Occupational Injury Cost Model. CDC DHHS (NIOSH) Pub. No. 2006-151.
  • 17.Boland M, Staines A, Fitzpatrick P, Scallan E. Urban-rural variation in mortality and hospital admission rates for unintentional injury in Ireland. Inj Prev. 2005;11(1):38–42. doi: 10.1136/ip.2004.005371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rissanen P, Taattola K. Fatal injuries in Finnish agriculture, 1988–2000. J Agric Saf Health. 2003;9(4):319–26. doi: 10.13031/2013.15460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Huston AF, Smith C. Farm accidents in Saskatchewan. CMAJ. 1969;100:764–69. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zentner J, Berg RL, Pickett W, Marlenga B. Do parents’ perceptions of risks protect children engaged in farm work? Prev Med. 2005;40(6):860–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Marlenga B, Berg RL, Linneman JG, Brison RJ, Pickett W. Changing the child labor laws for agriculture: Impact on injury. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(2):276–82. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.078923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.May JJ, Sorensen JA, Burdick PA, Earle-Richardson GB, Jenkins PL. Rollover protection on New York tractors and farmers’ readiness for change. J Agric Saf Health. 2006;12(3):199–213. doi: 10.13031/2013.21228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pana-Cryan R, Myers ML. Am J Ind Med. 2002. Cost-effectiveness of roll-over protective structures; pp. 68–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES