Abstract
Objective
To examine how social support, participation in intramurals, varsity and community sports are associated with physical activity among Ontario secondary school students, and explore gender differences in the prevalence of physical activity and participation in school- and community-based sports.
Methods
Data from 25,416 students (grades 9-12) attending 76 Ontario secondary schools were collected using the School Health Action, Planning, and Evaluation System (SHAPES). Logistic regression analyses examined how social support and school- and community-based sports participation were associated with physical activity.
Results
Males and females with low social support for physical activity were less likely to be active than their lower-risk peers (males: OR 0.61; females: OR 0.72). Males and females were more likely to be active if they participated in intramural activities (males: OR 1.92; females: OR 1.55), varsity sports (males: OR 1.93; females: OR 1.77), or community sports (males: OR 2.84; females: OR 2.90).
Conclusion
Since students with low social support for physical activity were less likely to be active, interventions to increase support and engagement in physical activity should be targeted to these students. In addition, considering that participation in school- and community-based sports increases the likelihood that students were active, practitioners should seek to enhance opportunities for participation in and access to these programs in order to increase the level of activity obtained by students.
Key words: Social support, physical activity, sedentary behaviour, youth, school sports, schools, gender
Résumé
Objectif
Examiner en quoi le soutien social et la participation aux sports intra-muros, universitaires et communautaires sont associés à l’activité physique chez les élèves du secondaire de l’Ontario et étudier les sexospécificités dans la prévalence de l’activité physique et la participation aux activités sportives en milieu scolaire et communautaire.
Méthode
Nous avons recueilli des données sur 25 416 élèves (9e à 12e année) fréquentant 76 écoles secondaires de l’Ontario à l’aide du Système d’intervention, de planification et d’évaluation de la santé dans les écoles (SIPÉSÉ). Au moyen d’analyses de régression logistique, nous avons examiné l’association entre le soutien social et la participation sportive en milieu scolaire et communautaire, d’une part, et l’activité physique d’autre part.
Résultats
Les garçons et les filles peu encouragés à faire de l’activité physique dans leur milieu social étaient moins susceptibles d’être actifs que leurs pairs moins à risque (garçons: rapport de cotes [RC] = 0,61; filles: RC = 0,72). Garçons et filles étaient plus susceptibles d’être actifs s’ils participaient à des sports intra-muros (garçons: RC = 1,92; filles: RC = 1,55), universitaires (garçons: RC = 1,93; filles: RC = 1,77) ou communautaires (garçons: RC = 2,84; filles: RC = 2,90).
Conclusion
Étant donné que les élèves recevant peu de soutien social à l’activité physique sont moins susceptibles d’être actifs, les interventions visant à accroître le soutien et le goût pour l’activité physique devraient cibler ces élèves. De plus, comme la participation aux sports scolaires et communautaires augmente la probabilité que les élèves soient actifs, les praticiens devraient chercher à améliorer les occasions de participation et l’accès à de tels programmes afin d’accroître le niveau d’activité des élèves.
Mots clés: soutien social, activité physique, comportement sédentaire, jeunes, sport scolaire; écoles, sexospécificités
Footnotes
Acknowledgements: The data used in this analysis were drawn from the SHAPES-Ontario project, funded by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care/Ministry of Health Promotion and by Cancer Care Ontario (grant awarded to S. Leatherdale and S. Manske). The project was conducted by the Population Health Research Group at the University of Waterloo, with in-kind contributions from participating Public Health units. The concept for the SHAPES data collection and feedback system was developed by the National Cancer Institute of Canada/Canadian Cancer Society’s Centre for Behavioural Research and Program Evaluation. Dr. Leatherdale is a Cancer Care Ontario Research Chair in Population Studies.
References
- 1.Sallis JF, Haskell WL, Wood PD, Fortmann SP, Vranizan KM. Vigorous physical activity and cardiovascular risk factors in young adults. J Chron Dis. 1986;39(2):115–20. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90067-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Boreham CA, Twisk J, Savange MJ, Cran GW, Strain JJ. Physical activity, sports participation, and risk factors in adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;29(6):788–93. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199706000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jebb SA, Moore MS. Contribution of a sedentary lifestyle and inactivity to the etiology of overweight and obesity: Current evidence and research issues. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31(11):S534–S541. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199911001-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sallis JF, Prochaska JJ, Taylor WC. A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(5):963–75. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200005000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.U.S. Department of HealthHuman Services. Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shields M. Overweight and obesity among children and youth. Health Rep. 2006;17:27–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ogden CL, Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in overweight among US children and adolescents, 1999–2000. JAMA. 2002;288:1728–32. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Centers for Disease ControlPrevention CDC. Participation in high school physical education—United States, 1991–2003. MMWR. 2004;53(36):844–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Craig CL, Cameron C, Russell SJ, Beaulieu A. Increasing physical activity: Supporting children’s participation. Ottawa: Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dwyer JJ, Allison KR, LeMoine KN, Adlaf EM, Goodman J, Faulkner GE, Lysy DC. A provincial study of opportunities for school-based physical activity in secondary schools. J Adolesc Health. 2006;39(1):80–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Faulkner GE, Goodman J, Adlaf E, Irving H, Allison KA, Dwyer JJ. Participation in high school physical education — Ontario, Canada, 1999–2005. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56(3):52–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Beets MW, Vogel R, Forlaw L, Pitetti KH, Cardinal BJ. Social support and youth physical activity: The role of provider and type. Am J Health Behav. 2006;30(3):278–89. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.30.3.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Anderssen N, Wold B. Parental and peer influences on leisure-time physical activity in young adolescents. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1992;63(4):341–48. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1992.10608754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Prochaska JJ, Rodgers MW, Sallis JF. Association of parent and peer support with adolescent physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2002;73(2):206–10. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2002.10609010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Raudsepp L. The relationship between socio-economic status, parental support and adolescent physical activity. Acta Paediatr. 2006;95(1):93–98. doi: 10.1080/08035250500323772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Leatherdale ST, Cameron R, Brown KS, Jolin MA, Kroaeker C. The influence of friends, family, and older peers on smoking among elementary school students: Low-risk students in high-risk schools. Prev Med. 2006;42(3):218–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cameron R, Manske S, Brown KS, Jolin MA, Murnaghan D, Lovato C. Integrating public health policy, practice, evaluation, surveillance, and research: The School Health Action Planning and Evaluation System. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(4):648–54. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.079665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wong S, Leatherdale ST, Manske S. Reliability and validity of a school-based physical activity questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(9):1593–600. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000227539.58916.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.McMurray RG, Ring KB, Treuth MS, Welk GJ, Pate RR, Schmitz KH, et al. Comparison of two approaches to structured physical activity surveys for adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(12):2135–43. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000147628.78551.3B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Centers for Disease ControlPrevention. BMI — Body Mass Index: About BMI for children and teens. 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Leatherdale ST, Brown KS, Cameron R, McDonald PW. Social modeling in the school environment, student characteristics, and smoking susceptibility: A multi-level analysis. J Adolesc Health. 2005;37(4):330–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.SAS Version 9.1 by SAS Institute Inc., 2002-2003; Cary, NC, USA.
- 23.Cameron R, Brown KS, Best JA, Pelkman CL, Madill CL, Manske SR, et al. Effectiveness of a social influences smoking prevention program as a function of provider type, training method, and school risk. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1827–31. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.89.12.1827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Biddle S, Gorely T, Marshall SJ, Murdey I, Cameron N. Physical activity and sedentary behaviours in youth: Issues and controversies. J R Soc Health. 2003;124:29–33. doi: 10.1177/146642400312400110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Koezuka N, Koo M, Allison KR, Adlaf EM, Dwyer JJ, Faulkner GE, Goodman J. The relationship between sedentary activities and physical inactivity among adolescents: Results from the Canadian Community Health Survey. J Adolesc Health. 2006;39(4):515–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Leatherdale ST, Wong SL. Modifiable characteristics associated with sedentary behaviours among youth. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2008;3:93–101. doi: 10.1080/17477160701830879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Trost SG, Sallis JF, Pate RR, Freedson PS, Taylor WC, Dowda M. Evaluating a model of parental influence on youth physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2003;25:277–82. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(03)00217-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Adams J. Trends in physical activity and inactivity amongst US 14–18 year olds by gender, school grade and race, 1993–2003: Evidence from the youth risk behavior survey. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:57–63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Powers HS, Conway TL, McKenzie TL, Sallis JF, Marshall SJ. Participation in extracurricular physical activity programs at middle schools. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2002;73(2):187–92. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2002.10609007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]