Abstract
Objectives
The development, implementation, and evaluation of policies may play an important role in promoting health behaviours such as physical activity. The Ontario Ministry of Education (OME) recently mandated Memorandum No. 138 requiring daily physical activity (DPA) for Ontario elementary students in grades one through eight. The purpose of this paper is to examine implementation strategies.
Methods
Hogwood and Gunn’s 10 preconditions for “perfect implementation” are used to examine publicly available Ministry DPA policy documents to assess whether these implementation strategies have been considered in the policy documents.
Results
Several preconditions (e.g., allocation of resources, task specification) appear to have been considered, however a number of preconditions (e.g., the sustainability of resources, extent to which the policy is valued, and evaluation plans) thought to be important require additional attention to ensure optimal DPA implementation.
Conclusions
Additional reflection upon Hogwood and Gunn’s implementation preconditions would, in our opinion, assist in facilitating optimal DPA implementation as per Memorandum No. 138.
Key words: School, exercise, physical activity, public policy
Résumé
Objectifs
Le développement, la mise en application et l’évaluation des politiques peuvent jouer un rôle important dans la promotion des comportements favorisant la santé, telle l’activité physique. En réponse aux niveaux d’inactivité constatés chez les jeunes, le Ministère de l’Éducation de l’Ontario a récemment rendu obligatoire une politique d’activité physique quotidienne (APQ), Mémorandum no. 138, visant les élèves de la première à la huitième année du cours primaire en Ontario. L’objectif de cette étude est d’examiner les stratégies de mise en application proposées.
Méthodes
L’examen des documents publics disponibles se rapportant à la politique APQ du Ministère se fera à la lumière des dix conditions préalables à une «mise en application parfaite» selon Hogwood et Gunn, afin d’évaluer si ces stratégies ont été prises en considération dans les documents se rapportant à la politique.
Résultats
Plusieurs conditions préalables (ex., l’allocation de ressources) semblent avoir été prises en considération. Cependant, la viabilité des ressources, le degré d’importance accordé à la politique et les plans pour l’évaluation sont des points auxquels une attention plus particulière devra être accordée si l’on veut que la politique APQ soit maintenue en application.
Conclusions
Bien que la prise en considération de plusieurs des conditions préalables puisse favoriser la mise en application du Mémorandum no. 138, nous concluons que l’examen de conditions préalables additionnelles ainsi qu’une évaluation de la politique peuvent être justifiés comme moyens d’améliorer davantage la mise en application de la politique et d’en déterminer les résultats.
Mots clés: école, exercice, activité physique, politique publique
Footnotes
Acknowledgements: This paper was drafted while Jennifer Robertson-Wilson was a doctoral student in the School of Kinesiology and Health Studies at Queen’s University and under a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada doctoral fellowship (# 752-2003-1338). The authors also acknowledge the helpful comments of Robert Wilson, Jessica Fraser-Thomas, Charles Ungerleider, and Kim Bergeron, and two anonymous reviewers on an earlier draft.
References
- 1.Sheilds M. Measured obesity: Overweight Canadian children and adolescents. Nutrition: Findings from the Canadian Community Health Survey; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tremblay MS, Katzmarzyk PT, Willms JD. Temporal trends in overweight and obesity in Canada. Int J Obes. 2002;26:538–43. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Boyce WF, King MA, Pickett W. Overweight and obesity in Canadian adolescents and their association with dietary habits and physical activity patterns. J Adoles Health. 2004;35:360–67. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(04)00058-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Boyce WF, Vereecken C, Mulvihill C, Currie RC, Pickett W. HBSC Obesity Working Group. Comparison of overweight and obesity prevalence in school-aged youth from 34 countries and their relationships with physical activity and dietary patterns. Obes Rev. 2005;6:123–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2005.00176.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tremblay MS, Willms JD. Is the Canadian childhood obesity epidemic related to physical inactivity? Int J Obes. 2003;27:1100–5. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Strong WB, Malina RM, Blimkie CJ, Daniels SR, Dishman RK, Gutin B, et al. Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. J Pediatr. 2005;146:732–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.01.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cameron C, Wolfe R, Craig CL. Physical activity and sport: Encouraging children to be active. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Canadian Public Health Association. Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 9.McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(4):351–77. doi: 10.1177/109019818801500401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sallis JF, Owen N. Ecological models. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, editors. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 3rd. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002. pp. 462–84. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Richard L, Potvin L, Kishchuk N, Prlic H, Green LW. Assessment of the integration of the ecological approach in health promotion programs. Am J Health Promot. 1996;10(4):318–28. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.4.318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Brownson RC, Kelly CM, Eyler AA, Carnoske C, Grost L, Handy SL, et al. J Phys Act Health. 2008. Environmental and policy approaches for promoting physical activity in the United States: A research agenda. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schmid TL, Pratt M, Witmer L. A framework for physical activity policy research. J Phys Act Health. 2006;3(Suppl1):S20–S29. doi: 10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ministry of Health Public Health Branch. Mandatory Health Programs and Service Guidelines. 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ontario Ministry of HealthLong-Term Care. Ontario Public Health Standards. 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ontario Ministry of Education. Policy/program Memorandum No. 138. 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hogwood BW, Gunn LA. Policy Analysis for the Real World. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1984. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Heck RH. Studying Educational and Social Policy: Theoretical Concepts and Research Methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gerston LN. Public Policy Making: Process and Principles. 2nd. New York: M.E. Sharpe; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 20.McGraw SA, Sellers D, Stone E, Resnicow KA, Kuester S, Fridinger F, et al. Measuring implementation of school programs and policies to promote healthy eating and physical activity among youth. Prev Med. 2000;31Suppl:S86–S97. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0648. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pal LA. Public Policy Analysis: An introduction. 2nd. Scarborough, ON: Nelson Canada; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hill M, Hupe P. Implementing Public Policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002. pp. 50–51. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Levin B. Deputy Minister of Education: Memorandum to Directors of Education re: daily physical activity in elementary schools grades 1–8 - Policy/Program Memorandum 138. 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Levin B. Deputy Minister of Education: Memorandum to Principals of elementary schools re: daily physical activity in elementary schools grades 1–8 - Policy/Program Memorandum 138. 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ontario Ministry of Education. Healthy schools condition healthy minds. 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ontario Ministry of Education. Daily physical activity in schools: Grades 1–3 Resource Guide. 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ontario Ministry of Education. Daily physical activity in schools: Grades 4–6 Resource Guide. 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ontario Ministry of Education. Daily physical activity in schools: Grades 7–8 Resource Guide. 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ontario Ministry of Education. Daily physical activity in schools: Guide for school boards. 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ontario Ministry of Education. Daily physical activity in schools: Guide for principals. 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 31.E-Learning module - Daily physical activity: Active today. Active for life! 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ontario PhysicalHealth Education Association. Daily physical activity update - May 1, 2006. Toronto: OPHEA; 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ontario PhysicalHealth Education Association. Daily physical activity update - February 21, 2007. 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Barroso CS, McCullum-Gomez C, Hoelscher DM, Kelder SH, Murray NG. Selfreported barriers to quality physical education by physical education specialists in Texas. J Sch Health. 2005;75:313–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.tb07348.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Deacon BW. Physical Education Curriculum Review Report. Victoria, BC: Ministry of Education Curriculum Division; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hansen H. Barriers to QDPE and how to overcome them. CAHPERD Journal. 1990;56:1621. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Humbert ML, Chad KE. Determining barriers to implementing quality daily physical education. ICHPERSD. 1998;42:13–17. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hardman K, Marshall J. The state and status of physical education in schools in international context. Euro Phys Educ Rev. 2000;6:203–29. doi: 10.1177/1356336X000063001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.People for Education. The annual report on Ontario’s schools. 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Active Healthy Kids Canada. Canada’s report card on physical activity for children & youth 2008. 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Janssen I. Physical activity guidelines for children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007;32:S109–S121. doi: 10.1139/H07-109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Public Health Agency of CanadaCanadian Society for Exercise Physiology. Canada’s Physical Activity Guide for Youth. 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Public Health Agency of CanadaCanadian Society for Exercise Physiology. Canada’s Physical Activity Guide for Children. 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mueller L. Gutted programs and children’s guts. CMAJ. 2008;178:665–67. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Canadian Association of Health, Physical Education, Recreation,Dance. Quality daily physical education: About QDPE. 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ramanathan S, Allison KR, Faulkner G, Dwyer JJM. Challenges in assessing the implementation and effectiveness of physical activity and nutrition policy interventions as natural experiments. Health Promot Int. 2008;23:290–97. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dan022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Alberta Education. Daily physical activity initiative. 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Education Quality and Accountability Office. Available online at: https://doi.org/www.eqao.com/categories/home.aspx?Lang=E (Accessed July 26, 2008).
