Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2012 Jan 1;103(1):40–45. doi: 10.1007/BF03404067

Childhood Vision Screening in Canada: Public Health Evidence and Practice

Silvina C Mema 1,✉, Lynn McIntyre 1, Richard Musto 1
PMCID: PMC6974295  PMID: 22338327

Abstract

Objectives

Best practice guidelines recommend vision testing in children 3 to 5 years of age for the prevention of amblyopia; however, universal vision screening is controversial. In Canada, amblyopia screening can be the responsibility of physicians, optometrists, and/or Public Health. We review the evidence underlying preschool vision screening for amblyopia using an Evidence-based Public Health (EBPH) approach, and consider implications for the Public Health provision of universal screening programs for amblyopia in Canadian jurisdictions in light of present practices.

Methods

We searched the literature to address each major screening criterion (disease, test, treatment, program requirements) necessary to support preschool vision screening for amblyopia. We also reappraised papers cited in two systematic reviews related to the impact of vision screening. The Chief Medical Officer of Health of each province/territory was sent a short survey asking whether there currently was a Public Health preschool vision screening program in place and if so, for specifics about the program.

Results

An EBPH approach to the literature with respect to the criteria for screening and available intervention studies support amblyopia screening by Public Health. There is a public health divide in amblyopia screening practice in Canada; while some provinces maintain organized programs, others have chosen to delegate the task to other professionals, without a concurrent surveillance function to monitor disparities in uptake.

Conclusions

Amblyopia deserves attention from Public Health. Efforts should be made to maintain existing programs, and provinces without organized screening programs should reconsider their role in the prevention of inequities with regard to preventable blindness in Canadian children.

Keywords: Amblyopia, vision screening, children, public health, evidence, precautionary principle

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: None to declare.

References

  • 1.Raffle AE, Gray JAM. Screening: Evidence and Practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ederer F, Krueger D. Report on the National Eye Institute’s Visual Acuity Impairment Survey Pilot Study. Bethesda, MD: Office of Biometry and Epidemiology; 1984. pp. 81–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hillis A, Flynn JT, Hawkins BS. The evolving concept of amblyopia: A chal-lenge to epidemiologists. Am J Epidemiol. 1983;118(2):192–205. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Keech RV, Kutschke PJ. Upper age limit for the development of amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1995;32(2):89–93. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19950301-07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schmucker C, Grosselfinger R, Riemsma R, Antes G, Lange S, Lagreze W, et al. Effectiveness of screening preschool children for amblyopia: A systematic review. BMC Ophthalmol. 2009;9:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-9-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kvarnstrom G, Jakobsson P, Lennerstrand G. Screening for visual and ocular disorders in children, evaluation of the system in Sweden. Acta Paediatr. 1998;87(11):1173–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1998.tb00926.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ross E, Murray AL, Stead S. Prevalence of ambylopia in grade 1 schoolchildren in Saskatoon. Can J Public Health. 1977;68(6):491–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dunfield L, Keating T. Health Technology Report. 2007. Preschool Vision Screening. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bray LC, Clarke MP, Jarvis SN, Francis PM, Colver A. Preschool vision screen-ing: A prospective comparative evaluation. Eye (Lond) 1996;10(Pt6):714–18. doi: 10.1038/eye.1996.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Maylahn CM. Evidence-based public health: A fun-damental concept for public health practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:175–201. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Powell C, Hatt SR. Vision screening for amblyopia in childhood. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(3):CD005020. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 12.Wilson JM, Jungner YG. Principles and practice of mass screening for disease. Bol Oficina Sanit Panam. 1968;65(4):281–393. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Carlton J, Karnon J, Czoski-Murray C, Smith KJ, Marr J. The clinical effec-tiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening programmes for amblyopia and strabismus in children up to the age of 4–5 years: A systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2008;12(25):xi–194. doi: 10.3310/hta12250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.The Value of Screening for Amblyopia Revisited. 2010. Available at: https://doi.org/www.springerlink.com/content/pp4m7x7450617362/ (Accessed July 6, 2011).
  • 15.von Noorden GK. Amblyopia: A multidisciplinary approach. Proctor lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26(12):1704–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Donahue SP. Relationship between anisometropia, patient age, and the devel-opment of amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142(1):132–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.02.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wiesel TN, Hubel DH. Single-cell responses in striate cortex of kittens deprived of vision in one eye. J Neurophysiol. 1963;26:1003–17. doi: 10.1152/jn.1963.26.6.1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vision screening in infants, children and youth. 2010. Available at: https://doi.org/www.cps.ca/english/statements/cp/cp09-02.htm (Accessed August 10, 2010).
  • 19.A Joint Statement of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus and the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Vision Screening for Infants and Children, 2007.
  • 20.Rourke Baby Record. 2010. Available at: https://doi.org/www.rourkebabyrecord.ca/ (Accessed August 18, 2010).
  • 21.Reed MJ, Kraft SP. Vision health care providers’ attitudes and experiences with preschool vision screening in Ontario. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81(7):548–53. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200407000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Richter ED, Laster R. The Precautionary Principle, epidemiology and the ethics of delay. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2004;17(1):9–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Public Health: Ethical Issues. 2007.
  • 24.Marsh-Tootle WL, Wall TC, Tootle JS, Person SD, Kristofco RE. Quantitative pediatric vision screening in primary care settings in Alabama. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85(9):849–56. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318185282a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Muzychka M. Environmental Scan of Vision Health and Vision Loss in the Provinces and Territories of Canada. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.The Saskatchewan Association of Optometrists. Available at: https://doi.org/www.optometrists.sk.ca/childrens_vision.php (Accessed January 11, 2011).
  • 27.Wallace DK. Mandating comprehensive eye examinations for children: Where is the evidence? Ophthalmology. 2008;115(8):1271–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Webber AL, Wood J. Amblyopia: Prevalence, natural history, functional effects and treatment. Clin Exp Optom. 2005;88(6):365–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2005.tb05102.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Barry JC, Konig HH. Test characteristics of orthoptic screening examination in 3 year old kindergarten children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87(7):909–16. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.7.909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Preslan MW, Novak A. Baltimore Vision Screening Project. Phase 2. Ophthal-mology. 1998;105(1):150–53. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91813-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Drover JR, Kean PG, Courage ML, Adams RJ. Prevalence of amblyopia and other vision disorders in young Newfoundland and Labrador children. Can J Ophthalmol. 2008;43(1):89–94. doi: 10.3129/i07-187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Webber AL, Wood JM, Gole GA, Brown B. The effect of amblyopia on fine motor skills in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(2):594–603. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hrisos S, Clarke MP, Kelly T, Henderson J, Wright CM. Unilateral visual impairment and neurodevelopmental performance in preschool children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(7):836–38. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.090910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Stifter E, Burggasser G, Hirmann E, Thaler A, Radner W. Monocular and binoc-ular reading performance in children with microstrabismic amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89(10):1324–29. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.066688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chua B, Mitchell P. Consequences of amblyopia on education, occupation, and long term vision loss. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(9):1119–21. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.041863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Packwood EA, Cruz OA, Rychwalski PJ, Keech RV. The psychosocial effects of amblyopia study. J AAPOS. 1999;3(1):15–17. doi: 10.1016/S1091-8531(99)70089-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rahi J, Logan S, Timms C R-E I, Taylor D. Risk, causes, and out-comes of visual impairment after loss of vision in the non-amblyopic eye: A population-based study. Lancet. 2002;360(9333):597–602. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09782-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Thompson JR, Woodruff G, Hiscox FA, Strong N, Minshull C. The incidence and prevalence of amblyopia detected in childhood. Public Health. 1991;105(6):455–62. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3506(05)80616-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Attebo K, Mitchell P, Cumming R, Smith W, Jolly N, Sparkes R. Prevalence and causes of amblyopia in an adult population. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(1):154–59. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91862-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rantakallio P, Krause U, Krause K. The use of the ophthalmological services during the preschool age, ocular findings and family background. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1978;15(4):253–58. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19780701-16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Miller M, Israel J, Cuttone J. Fetal alcohol syndrome. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1981;18(4):6–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2014.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dubowy SM. Vision screening of young children: Taking a second look. JAAPA. 2005;18(8):41–43. doi: 10.1097/01720610-200508000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Schmucker C, Grosselfinger R, Riemsma R, Antes G, Lange S, Lagreze W, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of vision screening tests for the detection of amblyopia and its risk factors: A systematic review. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247(11):1441–54. doi: 10.1007/s00417-009-1150-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kvarnstrom G, Jakobsson P. Is vision screening in 3-year-old children feasible? Comparison between the Lea Symbol chart and the HVOT (LM) chart. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005;83(1):76–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00367.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Agence nationale d’accréditation et d’évaluation en santé (ANAES) (2002). Early vision screening in children to prevent amblyopia. 2002. Available at: https://doi.org/www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/ (Accessed September 15, 2010).
  • 46.Stewart CE, Fielder AR, Stephens DA, Moseley MJ. Treatment of unilateral amblyopia: Factors influencing visual outcome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(9):3152–60. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hussein MA, Coats DK, Muthialu A, Cohen E, Paysse EA. Risk factors for treatment failure of anisometropic amblyopia. J AAPOS. 2004;8(5):429–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2003.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Loudon SE, Fronius M, Looman CW, Awan M, Simonsz B, van der Maas PJ, et al. Predictors and a remedy for noncompliance with amblyopia therapy in children measured with the occlusion dose monitor. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(10):4393–400. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hudak DT, Magoon EH. Poverty predicts amblyopia treatment failure. J AAPOS. 1997;1(4):214–15. doi: 10.1016/S1091-8531(97)90040-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Loudon SE, Passchier J, Chaker L d, Vos S, Fronius M, Harrad RA, et al. Psy-chological causes of non-compliance with electronically monitored occlusion therapy for amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(11):1499–503. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.149815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Horwood J, Waylen A, Herrick D, Williams C, Wolke D. Common visual defects and peer victimization in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(4):1177–81. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Schmucker C, Kleijnen J, Grosselfinger R, Riemsma R, Antes G, Lange S, et al. Effectiveness of early in comparison to late(r) treatment in children with amblyopia or its risk factors: A systematic review. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2010;17(1):7–17. doi: 10.3109/09286580903312301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Neubauer AS, Neubauer S. Cost-effectiveness of screening for amblyopia. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2005;222(2):110–16. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Eibschitz-Tsimhoni M, Friedman T, Naor J, Eibschitz N, Friedman Z. Early screening for amblyogenic risk factors lowers the prevalence and severity of amblyopia. J AAPOS. 2000;4(4):194–99. doi: 10.1067/mpa.2000.105274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Williams C, Northstone K, Harrad RA, Sparrow JM, Harvey I. ALSPAC Study Team. Amblyopia treatment outcomes after screening before or at age 3 years: Follow up from randomised trial. BMJ. 2002;324(7353):1549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7353.1549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Williams C, Northstone K, Harrad RA, Sparrow JM, Harvey I. ALSPAC Study Team. Amblyopia treatment outcomes after preschool screening v school entry screening: Observational data from a prospective cohort study. Br J Oph-thalmol. 2003;87(8):988–93. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.8.988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rasmussen F, Thoren K, Caines E, Andersson J, Tynelius P. Suitability of the Lang II random dot stereotest for detecting manifest strabismus in 3-year-old children at child health centres in Sweden. Acta Paediatr. 2000;89(7):824–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2000.tb18256.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES