Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Public Health logoLink to Iranian Journal of Public Health
. 2019 Dec;48(12):2124–2132.

Strong Evidences of the Ovarian Carcinoma Risk in Women after IVF Treatment: A Review Article

Dariush D FARHUD 1,2, Shaghayegh ZOKAEI 3,*, Mohammad KEYKHAEI 4, Marjan ZARIF YEGANEH 5
PMCID: PMC6974869  PMID: 31993380

Abstract

Background:

In-vitro fertilization (IVF) has been very popular since the birth of the first “test-tube” baby. This method is the last hope and the most serious solution for couples with infertility problems. Although childbearing is a concern of many couples, it must always be noted that any method can also have disadvantages. Thus, many studies have been done on the problems encountered by this method.

Methods:

We searched for relevant articles in Pub Med, Springer, Elsevier, and Google Scholar databases, and studied more than 70 papers. Keywords used included ovarian cancer, in vitro fertilization, gonadotropin hormone, clomiphene citrate, and infertility.

Results:

Due to the large number of studies, high doses of the ovulation-stimulating drugs and their repeated use in this method can increase the risk of the ovarian hyper stimulation syndrome (OHSS), and ovarian cysts, which can lead to ovarian cancer. Also, an increase in the risk of developing ovarian cancer can be due to the increased duration of treatment for up to 12 months and the high doses of medications that are followed by defecation and failure of this treatment.

Conclusion:

Due to the increase in the rates of infertility treatments and the incidence of gynecological cancers, especially ovarian cancer, this method need to be used with caution. IVF clients and candidates should be informed about potential future risks. People should be evaluated genetically for their history of ovarian cancer and be more aware of the importance of “Personalized medicine”.

Keywords: Ovarian cancer, In-vitro fertilization, Ovarian hyper stimulation, Clomiphene citrate, Gonadotropins, Infertility

Introduction

In-vitro fertilization has been carried out for nearly 40 years, and at the top of the list of countries with optimal performance is Israel, which provided unlimited cycles for this operation up to two children for every women citizen, followed by Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden, and other countries at the next levels (1). Since the birth of Louise Brown, the first ‘test-tube’ baby, in 1978, in vitro fertilization (IVF) has become a common and popular method of infertility treatment (2, 3) which has steadily risen (4), and maybe the last hope of couples in many countries over the last several decades. However, after discovering a very close relation between doing IVF and congenital malformation and multiple pregnancies, research on the destructive consequences of this method began.

One of the disadvantages of this method is the development of abnormalities which threatens children from IVF (3). But there are many concerns about the health risks for the mothers of offsprings conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART), of which one of the most serious is ovarian cancer (5). As it is known, there is a close relation between reducing in the risk of female genital cancer and breast cancer, which are hormone-dependent (6), and having at least one child and a history of breastfeeding. Therefore, in this paper, we are considering the risk of ovarian cancer in mothers under IVF who take fertility drugs. (Fig. 1) (7).

Fig. 1:

Fig. 1:

International optimal utilization of IVF (7)

Every year, around 239,000 new cases of women in the world are diagnosed with ovarian cancer, with only below 45% survival rates, and according to the death toll (8), it has become the 8th deadly(fatal) cause of cancer death among women (9). It is also diagnosed that serous ovarian tumors can be originated from the fallopian tube instead of the ovary itself (10).

Among all gynecological malignancies, ovarian cancer has the worst prognosis, which as a medical term includes several types of tumors with different phenotypes, molecular biology, tumor progression, etiology, and even different prognosis (11). There are many factors which can increase the annual incidence rate of developing ovarian cancer risk such as a family history of the patient or heredity, mutation status, age, number of pregnancies, breastfeeding, physical activity, alcohol consumption and, in general, life style (9) (Fig. 2) (12).

Fig. 2:

Fig. 2:

National Institutes of Health (NIH) - National Cancer Institute (12)

Overall, there is a well-established association with a high proportion of hereditary between ovarian cancer risk and mutations, furthermore, these mutations are also prevalent among patients with ovarian cancer who do not have a family history of ovarian cancer (13). According to the appearance of the epithelium, ovarian tumors are classified into these subtypes: serous, mucinous, clear cell, endometrioid, squamous, transitional, mixed and undifferentiated. These subtypes are also divided into two groups of high-grade and low-grade tumors, based on morphology and genetic alternation.

Low-grade ones, including serous carcinoma, mucinous, endometrioid, and clear cell carcinomas, likely to arise stepwise in an adenoma (borderline tumor) carcinoma sequence from typical to micropapillary borderline tumors to low-grade invasive serous carcinoma, with a lower rate of progression and be caused by mutation in different genes including KRAS, BRAF, PTEN, and beta-catenin, and KRAS or BRAF mutations lead to the effective activation of the MAPK signaling in low-grade serous carcinoma cells (14). Contrary to the previous type, the high-grade type consists of the high-grade serous carcinoma, malignant mixed mesodermal tumors (carcinosarcomas) and undifferentiated carcinomas, grows rapidly and aggressively, with a high level of genetic stability characterized by TP53 mutations and BRCA1 and BRCA2 dysfunction (15, 16) (Table 1) (14).

Table 1:

Mutations, Precursors, Chromosomal Instability of Type I and Type II Carcinomas (14)

Type I (Low-grade) Mutations Precursors
Low-grade endometrioid CA CTNNB1, PTEN Endometriosis
Low-grade serous CAb KRAS, BRAF Serous borderline tumor
Mucinous CA KRAS Mucinous borderline tumor
Most clear cell CAc PIK3CA Endometriosis
Type II (High-grade) Mutations Precursors
Carcinosarcoma, High-grade serous CA, endometrioid CA TP53 Not recognized
Clear cell CAc, Undifferentiated CA __

Although high-grade cancers arise without an easily identifiable precursor lesion, most low-grade cancers arise from cystadenomas or endometriosis (16). Most ovarian cysts or benign ovarian tumors will never develop ovarian cancer. But some of these cysts or benign tumors, produced by the low-grade pathway, have the potential for malignancy and can become cancerous, like mucinous and endometrioid tumors. So eliminating these benign cysts may reduce the mortality rate of ovarian cancer (1721).

Overall, the aim of our study was to evaluate the possible effects of ovulation stimulants, used in fertility processes, on the increased risk of developing cysts and benign tumors that could lead to ovarian cancer. Therefore, we briefly discuss the mechanism of these stimulant drugs. (Fig. 3) (10, 12), (Fig. 4) (14).

Fig. 3:

Fig. 3:

Low-grade (arose from a serous cystadenoma) and high-grade (arose from a serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma) serous carcinoma. Respectively, due to mutations in the KRAS / BRAF / ERRB2 or TP53, low-grade or high-grade carcinoma are developed (10, 12)

Fig. 4:

Fig. 4:

High-grade and low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma pathogenesis.

There are two different pathways of ovarian cancer. Low-grade carcinoma, which has a lower rate of progression than high-grade carcinoma, is caused by serous cystadenomas with mutations in KRAS and BRAF. High-grade carcinoma with TP53 mutation has a higher rate of progression and can also spread to the pelvic and peritoneal organs. The precursor lesions of this high-grade carcinoma is also not well known, but it can originate from the epithelial inclusion of the ovary or the distal of the fallopian tube (14)

Effect of Fertility Drugs and Medications

Infertile women are more at risk for the development of ovarian cancer (22), so that parous women compared to nulliparous women had an estimated 26% lower risk of ovarian cancer (23), but in some available studies, especially those with great sample size, have been referred to the effects of hormonal drugs used in infertility treatment on the development of ovarian cancer (24), as in a study of 255,786 women in UK, with an average of 8.8 years’ follow-up, 386 cases of ovarian cancer have been reported. Women who had no live births by the end of treatment, were at greatest increased risk of ovarian cancer due to the high doses of these medications at each stage of the IVF (25). In recent decades, increasing infertility has also increased the use of ovulation-stimulating drugs, gonadotropin, and repeated ovulation hormones (26, 27), and fertility medications, which has raised concerns about their possible long-term carcinogenic effects, especially on the ovary (28, 29), because of the promoting polyfollicular ovulation (30). Thus, there should be an association among drug type, dosage, duration, and waiting more than 1 year to conceive a baby (31).

Here is a theory for the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer caused by fertility drugs that repeated ovulations by overstimulation of the ovary disrupts the ovarian epithelium and leads to the malignant transformation of ovarian epithelial cells (32). For instance, there was an increase in the incidence of ovarian cancer in women treated with tamoxifen or clomiphene citrate (CC) (33), while some studies with small sample size were not statistically significant (34).

Clomiphene Citrate (CC)

CC, a nonsteroidal ovarian stimulant, used alone or in combination with intrauterine insemination (IUI) to induce a multifollicular response, and thus increase the risk of conceiving twins, and may increase the risk of ovarian cancer and obesity (35). Clomiphene compound consists of both cis and trans isomers, which the isomer designated by the manufacturers as the cis compound is more effective in stimulating ovulation (36, 37). CC function is to connect to hypothalamic nuclear estrogen receptors, which by negative feedback causes the secretion of GnRH, increases gonadotrophin secretion and ovarian follicular activity (3840). Although in another study conducted by Smith and her colleagues, they pointed out that clomiphene affects directly on the ovaries to stimulate biosynthesis of estrogen and raise estrogen levels, which consequently, stimulate gonadotrophin release by the pituitary (4144).

Treatment with CC increases the pulse amplitude (not the frequency), because in infertility due to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), the GnRH pulse frequency is abnormally high (45). In anovulatory cycles, serum LH, FSH, and Estradiol (E2) increased initially, then, unlike the ovulatory cycles, returns to baseline and remained unchanged for the ensuing 40 days.

But on contrary, ovulation induction due to the use of clomiphene citrate in women with PCOS is associated with increased secretion of LH and FSH with enhanced estrogen secretion. Also, it is evident that clomiphene can affect pituitary function (46). Therefore, increasing the LH pulse amplitude after CC, along with the reduction of the pituitary sensitivity to GnRH, indicates a hypothalamic effect (45), although studies show that the minimum effective dose of CC in inhibiting estradiol absorption by the anterior hypothalamus was 100 times higher than the anterior pituitary, which is more sensitive than the former to CC (46). CC remains attached to the nuclear ER for a longer period of time than estrogen, and by intervening in the normal process of ER replenishment, reduces the concentration of ER (47).

One of the side effects of using CC is ovarian cysts formation. With decreasing dosage or duration of treatment, the emergence of ovarian cysts has also declined (39). Thus, studies show an increased risk of ovarian cancer in both women with or without ovulatory abnormalities, who used CC for a long-term (48).

Tamoxifen

Tamoxifen is a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) which can bind to the receptors due to structural similarity to estrogen. Antiestrogens have had their greatest clinical usefulness as inducers of follicular maturation in women with fertility problems (amenorrheic or oligomenorrheic women), although initially were considered as antifertility agents (49, 50). This anti-estrogenic compound may be used as a substitute for clomiphene citrate with a similar function to induce ovulation in women with anovulatory infertility (51) due to Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS). The early follicular phase administration of tamoxifen increased the serum concentration of estradiol (E2) during the follicular phase, at the mid-cycle, and at the times of mid-luteal hormone peaks, and was accompanied by a significant increase in integrated luteal phase progesterone (P) concentration (38, 52, 53).

Gonadotropins

Gonadotropins are other agents for ovarian stimulation and ovulation induction in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) or women with anovulatory problems (38). Gonadotropins play an important role in the development of ovarian cancer, approximately, at a rate of 40% in epithelial ovarian cancer (54). During IVF, high doses of gonadotropin may be used as a result of several injections per day. The most effective form of treatment for subfertility is intrauterine insemination combined with ovarian hyperstimulation, and gonadotropins might be those effective agents (55), but with low dose protocols to reduce the risk of multiple pregnancies and risks of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (56). In the first step of IVF, hormonal drugs are used to stimulate the ovaries. Muscular injection of human menopausal gonadotropins (HMG), found in the urine of postmenopausal women, stimulates the ovaries to grow follicles (57). Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG), obtained from the urine of pregnant women, is also used for ovulation induction, which induces final follicular maturation and oocyte retrieval in anovulatory patients undergoing ART (58). It also initiates rupture of the preovulatory ovarian follicle according to its activities as an analog of LH (38). As already mentioned, one of the complications of using ovulation induction drugs is ovarian cysts that have been observed in the series of gonadotropin drugs, and approximately 20% of patients receiving GnRH during the follicular or luteal phase had developed ovarian cysts, so that the number of cysts in the follicular phase was higher than the luteal phase, and compared to the follicular phase cysts, the luteal phase cysts are more benign (59). (Table 2) (54, 6070).

Table 2:

Function, side effects and potential risks of clomiphene citrate, tamoxifen, HMG, and HCG

Drugs Function Side effect Potential risks Ref .Nr
Clomiphene citrate Non-steroidal ovulation stimulant, an estrogen agonist or antagonist, Abnormal vaginal/uterine bleeding, vaginal dryness, breast tenderness or discomfort, ovarian enlargement, vomiting, diarrhea, nausea, headache, blurred vision or other visual disturbances, stroke or chest pain, weight gain Twin or multiple pregnancy, ovarian hyper stimulation syndrome (OHSS), ovarian cysts, ovarian cancer (6063)
Tamoxifen An anti-estrogen in the mammary tissue, also a selective estrogen receptor modulators Abnormal vaginal bleeding, pain or pressure in the pelvis, leg swelling or tenderness, shortness of breath, weakness, tingling, vision problems, severe headache, blood clots, stroke, hot flashes, nausea, fatigue, mood swings, depression, hair thinning, dry skin, loss of libido Ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer (6466)
HMG (human menopausal gonadotropins) A mixture of FSH and LH, used to stimulate ovulation Ovarian enlargement and discomfort, stomach pain, mood swings, fever, headaches, breathing trouble, bloating, skin rash, allergic reactions Ovarian cancer, ovarian cysts, ovarian hyper stimulation syndrome, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy (6769)
HCG (Human Chorionic Gonadotropin) Used to induce final maturation of follicle and subsequent ovulation and luteal phase support Ovarian enlargement, rise in basal body temperature, abdominal bloating and discomfort, pelvic pain, lower abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting Ovarian cancer, ovarian cysts, ovarian Hyper stimulation Syndrome, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy (54, 70)

Conclusion

IVF, which has been highly regarded as a method of treatment for infertility, can carry risks like any other method. Studies in this field give us different results so that in some studies with small sample size, no significant results have been achieved. However, other studies with a large sample size in this field clearly show the risk of developing ovarian cysts and ovarian cancer. The drugs used in this method, like clomiphene citrate and gonadotropins, extremely hyper-stimulate the ovary, leading to twin or multiple pregnancies, increased ovarian cyst and risk of ovarian cancer. The failure of each cycle compels the couples to try subsequent cycles, in which the dose and duration of the drug intake are increased. Altogether, different aspects of IVF courses should be considered. Initially, the couple should be completely aware of the risks associated with this treatment. Each couple should enter these therapies with regard to their “personalized medicine” in order to avoid long-term infertility treatment in the event of inherited risk of ovarian cancer. Every patient, especially susceptible one, should be monitored closely by the doctor and appropriate tests.

Ethical considerations

Ethical issues (Including plagiarism, informed consent, misconduct, data fabrication and/or falsification, double publication and/or submission, redundancy, etc.) have been completely observed by the authors.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Farhud Foundation.

Footnotes

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Simonstein F. (2010). IVF policies with emphasis on Israeli practices. Health Policy, 97(2–3):202–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. (1978). Birth after reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet, 2(8085):366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sutcliffe AG, Ludwig M. (2007). Outcome of assisted reproduction. Lancet, 370(9584):351–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kroener L, Dumesic D, Al-Safi Z. (2017). Use of fertility medications and cancer risk: a review and update. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 29(4):195–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hunter P. (2017). The long-term health risks of ART: Epidemiological data and research on animals indicate that in vitro fertilization might create health problems later in life. EMBO Rep, 18(7):1061–1064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cancer CGoHFiB (2012). Menarche, menopause, and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis, including 118 964 women with breast cancer from 117 epidemiological studies. Lancet Oncol, 13(11):1141–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nachtigall RD. (2006). International disparities in access to infertility services. Fertil Steril, 85(4):871–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Reid BM, Permuth JB, Sellers TA. (2017). Epidemiology of ovarian cancer: a review. Cancer Biol Med, 14(1):9–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Webb PM, Jordan SJ. (2017). Epidemiology of epithelial ovarian cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 41:3–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kurman RJ, Shih I-M. (2010). The Origin and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer-a proposed unifying theory. Am J Surg Pathol, 34(3):433–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Meinhold-Heerlein I, Hauptmann S. (2014). The heterogeneity of ovarian cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 289(2):237–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Noone AM HN, Krapcho M, Miller D, et al. (2017). Ovarian Cancer Bethesda: National Cancer Institute. [Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/ovary.html
  • 13.Alsop K, Fereday S, Meldrum C, et al. (2012). BRCA mutation frequency and patterns of treatment response in BRCA mutation– positive women with ovarian cancer: a report from the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol, 30(21):2654–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cho KR, Shih I-M. (2009). Ovarian cancer. Annu Rev Pathol, 4:287–313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kurman RJ, Shih I-M. (2008). Pathogenesis of ovarian cancer. Lessons from morphology and molecular biology and their clinical implications. Int J Gynecol Pathol, 27(2):151–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bell DA. (2005). Origins and molecular pathology of ovarian cancer. Mod Pathol, 18(S2):S19–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Scully R. (1995). Early de novo ovarian cancer and cancer developing in benign ovarian lesions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 49:S9–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bell DA, Scully RE. (1994). Early de novo ovarian carcinoma. A study of fourteen cases. Cancer, 73(7):1859–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Puls LE, Powell DE, DePriest PD, et al. (1992). Transition from benign to malignant epithelium in mucinous and serous ovarian cystadenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol, 47(1):53–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bourne TH, Whitehead MI, Campbell S, et al. (1991). Ultrasound screening for familial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol, 43(2):92–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stenbäck F. (1981). Benign, borderline and malignant serous cystadenomas of the ovary: a transmission and scanning electron microscopical study. Pathol Res Pract, 172(1–2):58–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ali AT. (2018). Fertility Drugs and Ovarian Cancer. Curr Cancer Drug Targets, 18(6):567–576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gaitskell K, Green J, Pirie K, Barnes, et al. (2018). Histological subtypes of ovarian cancer associated with parity and breastfeeding in the prospective Million Women Study. Int J Cancer, 142(2):281–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Reigstad MM, Storeng R, Myklebust TÅ, et al. (2017). Cancer risk in women treated with fertility drugs according to parity status—a registry-based cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 26(6):953–962 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sutcliffe A, Williams C, Jones M, et al. (2015). Ovarian tumor risk in women after Assisted Reproductive Therapy (ART); 2.2 million person years of observation in Great Britain. Fertil Steril, 104(3):e37. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Casagrande J, Pike M, Ross R, et al. (1979). “Incessant ovulation” and ovarian cancer. Lancet, 2(8135):170–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gabriella Impicciatore G, Mario Tiboni G. (2011). Ovulation inducing agents and cancer risk: review of literature. Curr Drug Saf, 6(4):250–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ehrlich S. (2015). Effect of fertility and infertility on longevity. Fertil Steril, 103(5):1129–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Reigstad M, Larsen I, Myklebust T, et al. (2015). Cancer risk among parous women following assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod. 30(8):1952–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tung K-H, Wilkens LR, Wu AH, et al. (2005). Effect of anovulation factors on pre-and postmenopausal ovarian cancer risk: revisiting the incessant ovulation hypothesis. Am J Epidemiol, 161(4):321–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Calderon-Margalit R, Friedlander Y, et al. (2009). Cancer risk after exposure to treatments for ovulation induction. Am J Epidemiol, 169(3):365–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Melin A, Sparén P, Bergqvist A. (2007). The risk of cancer and the role of parity among women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod, 22:3021–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Trabert B LE, Scoccia B, Moghissi KS, et al. (2013). Ovulation-inducing drugs and ovarian cancer risk: results from an extended follow-up of a large United States infertility cohort. Fertil Steril, 100:1660–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Benshushan A PO, Brzezinski A, Tanos V, et al. (2001). Ovulation induction and risk of endometrial cancer: a pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 98(1):53–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.drugbank (updated August 15, 2018 09:46). Clomiphene citrate Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Available from: https://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB00882
  • 36.Charles D, Klein T, Lunn S, Loraine J. (1969). Clinical and endocrinological studies with the isomeric components of clomiphene citrate. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw, 76(12):1100–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Klopper A, Hall M. (1971). New synthetic agent for the induction of ovulation: preliminary trials in women. Br Med J, 1(5741):152–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Usadi RS, Merriam KS. (2015). On-label and off-label drug use in the treatment of female infertility. Fertil Steril, 103(3):583–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Roy S, Greenblatt RB, Mahesh VB, Jungck EC. (1963). Clomiphene citrate: Further observations on its use in induction of ovulation in the human and on its mode of action. Fertil Steril, 14(6):575–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Riley GM, Evans TN. (1964). Effects of clomiphene citrate* on anovulatory ovarian function. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 89(1):97–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kistner R, Smith OW. (1960). Observations on the use of a non-steroidal estrogen antagonist: MER-25. Surg Forum, 10:725–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.GREENBLATT RB. (1961). Chemical induction of ovulation. Fertil Steril, 12:402–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Smith OW, Day CF. (1963). Effect of clomiphene on aromatization of steroids by the human placenta in vitro. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh), 44(4):519–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Smith OW, Smith GV, Kistner RW. (1963). Action of MER-25 and of clomiphene on the human ovary. JAMA, 184(11):878–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kettel LM, Roseff SJ, Berga SL, Mortola JF, Yen SS. (1993). Hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian response to clomiphene citrate in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril, 59(3):532–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kato J, Kobayashi T, Villee CA. (1968). Effect of clomiphene on the uptake of estradiol by the anterior hypothalamus and hypophysis. Endocrinology, 82(5):1049–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Clark JH, Markaverich BM. (1981). The agonistic-antagonistic properties of clomiphene: a review. Pharmacol Ther, 15(3):467–519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Rossing MA, Daling JR, Weiss NS, Moore DE, Self SG. (1994). Ovarian tumors in a cohort of infertile women. N Engl J Med, 331(12):771–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sherman BM, Chapler FK, Crickard K, Wycoff D. (1979). Endocrine consequences of continuous antiestrogen therapy with tamoxifen in premenopausal women. J Clin Invest, 64(2):398–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lunan CB, Klopper A. (1975). Antioestrogens: a review. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf), 4(5):551–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Williamson J, Ellis J. (1973). The induction of ovulation by tamoxifen. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw, 80(9):844–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Tajima C. (1984). Luteotropic effects of tamoxifen in infertile women. Fertil Steril, 42(2):223–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Senior B, CAWOOD ML, Oakey R, McKiddie J, Siddle D. (1978). A comparison of the effects of clomiphene and tamoxifen treatment on the concentrations of oestradiol and progesterone in the peripheral plasma of infertile women. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf), 8(5):381–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kuroda H, Mandai M, Konishi I, et al. (1998). Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) inhibits cisplatin-induced apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells: Possible role of up-regulation of insulin-like growth factor-1 by hCG. Int J Cancer, 76(4):571–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hughes EG. (1997). The effectiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of persistent infertility: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod, 12(9):1865–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Cantineau AE, Cohlen BJ, Heineman MJ. (2007). Ovarian stimulation protocols (anti-oestrogens, gonadotrophins with and without GnRH agonists/antagonists) for intrauterine insemination (IUI) in women with subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (2): CD005356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Albano C, Felberbaum R, Smitz J, et al. (2000). Ovarian stimulation with HMG: results of a prospective randomized phase III European study comparing the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)-antagonist cetrorelix and the LHRH-agonist buserelin. Hum Reprod, 15(3):526–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Filicori M, Cognigni G, Tabarelli Ce, et al. (2002). Stimulation and growth of antral ovarian follicles by selective LH activity administration in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 87(3):1156–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ben-Rafael Z, Bider D, Menashe Y, et al. (1990). Follicular and luteal cysts after treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril, 53(6):1091–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Choi S-H, Shapiro H, Robinson GE, et al. (2005). Psychological side-effects of clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotrophin. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol, 26(2):93–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Siedentopf F, Horstkamp B, Stief G, Kentenich H. (1997). Clomiphene citrate as a possible cause of a psychotic reaction during infertility treatment. Hum Reprod, 12(4):706–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Derman SG, Adashi EY. (1994). Adverse effects of fertility drugs. Drug Saf, 11(6):408–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Adashi EY. (1986), editor Clomiphene citrate-initiated ovulation: a clinical update. Seminars in Reproductive Endocrinology; Copyright© 1986 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Varras M, Polyzos D, Akrivis C. (2003). Effects of tamoxifen on the human female genital tract: review of the literature. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 24(3–4):258–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Nazarali SA, Narod SA. (2014). Tamoxifen for women at high risk of breast cancer. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press), 17;6:29–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Smith DM, et al. (2010). Women’s decisions regarding tamoxifen for breast cancer prevention: responses to a tailored decision aid. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 119(3):613–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Navot D, Goldstein N, Mor-Josef S, et al. (1991). Multiple pregnancies: risk factors and prognostic variables during induction of ovulation with human menopausal gonadotrophins. Hum Reprod, 6(8):1152–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.ACOG technical bulletin (1994). Managing the anovulatory state:Medical induction of ovulation. Number 197 September 1994. Committee on Technical Bulletins of the American College ofObstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 47:305–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Burt VK HV. (1985). Drug information. American Society of Hospital Pharmacists, Bethesda, MD: American Hospital Formulary Service. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Neulen J, Yan Z, Raczek S, Weindel K, et al. (1995). Human chorionic gonadotropin-dependent expression of vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor in human granulosa cells: importance in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 80(6):1967–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES