Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2005 Jan 1;96(1):24–28. doi: 10.1007/BF03404009

Should People Be Physically Active Outdoors on Smog Alert Days?

Monica E Campbell 15,, Qian Li 15, Sarah E Gingrich 15, Ronald G Macfarlane 15, Shouquan Cheng 25
PMCID: PMC6975582  PMID: 15682689

Abstract

Background

Given the importance of physical activity to well-being, there is a need to encourage people to be physically active year-round. At the same time, many people are vulnerable to adverse health effects from air pollution, especially on smog alert days. This study was undertaken to determine when air pollution levels tend to be lowest so that the public can modify strenuous outdoor activity accordingly.

Methods

Existing hourly air pollution data for Toronto were analyzed to determine how pollutant levels varied from hour to hour throughout each 24-hour day, to identify the times when pollution levels are at their lowest on average.

Results

Pollutant levels vary throughout the day, with concentrations of some pollutants (such as ozone, particles and sulphur dioxide) being highest during mid-day, and others (such as carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide) being highest with morning rush hour. Overall, pollutant concentrations tend to be lowest before seven a.m. and after eight p.m.

Interpretation

The public should be encouraged to maintain regular physical activity outdoors while monitoring any air pollution-related symptoms. The intensity of outdoor activity should be reduced, or activities replaced with indoor exercise, at those Air Quality Index (AQI) levels that trigger individual symptoms and when AQI values exceed 50. Where possible, strenuous activity should be taken when and where air pollution levels tend to be lowest, namely early in the morning and in low-traffic areas. More research is required to guide development of health protective advice on exercising when air quality is poor.

Fr: Exercise, air pollution, smog, health promotion, motor activity

Footnotes

Acknowledgements: This research was supported in part by the Health Policy Research Program, Health Canada (Project Number: 6795-15-2001/4400011). The views expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Health Canada.

References

  • 1.Vedal S, Brauer M, White R, Petkau J. Air pollution and daily mortality in a city with low levels of pollution. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:45–51. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Burnett RT, Cakmak S, Brook JR. The effect of the urban ambient air pollution mix on daily mortality rates in 11 Canadian cities. Can J Public Health. 1998;89:152–56. doi: 10.1007/BF03404464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Burnett RT, Smith-Doiron M, Stieb D, Cakmak S, Brook JR. Effects of particulate and gaseous air pollution on cardiorespiratory hospitalization. Arch Environ Health. 1999;54:130–39. doi: 10.1080/00039899909602248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Steib DM, Judek S, Burnett RT. Meta-analysis of time-series studies of air pollution and mortality: Effects of gases and particles and the influence of cause of death, age and season. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 2002;52:470–84. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2002.10470794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.American Lung Association. Annotated bibliography of recent studies on the health effects of air pollution. New York: American Lung Association; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Toronto Public Health. Air pollution burden of illness in Toronto: 2004 summary. Toronto: City of Toronto; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Toronto Public Health. Toronto’s air: Let’s make it healthy. Toronto: City of Toronto; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Toronto Public Health. Physical activity and public health: A call to action. Toronto: City of Toronto; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.National Health Committee. Active for life: A call to action. The health benefits of physical activity. Wellington, New Zealand: National Health Committee; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Canadian Diabetes Association. About diabetes. 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hanley DA, Josse RG. Prevention and management of osteoporosis: Consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 1. Introduction. Can Med Assoc J. 1996;155:921–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Martin JC, Wade TJ. The relationship between physical exercise and distress in a national sample of Canadians. Can J Public Health. 2000;91:302–6. doi: 10.1007/BF03404294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Adams W. Ozone dose-response effects of varied equivalent minute ventilation rates. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2000;10:217–26. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Carlisle AJ, Sharp NCC. Exercise and outdoor ambient air pollution. Br J Sports Med. 2001;35:214–22. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.35.4.214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Korrick SA, Neas LM, Dockery DW, Gold DR, Allen GA, Hill LB, et al. Effects of ozone and other pollutants on the pulmonary function of adult hikers. Environ Health Perspect. 1998;106:93–99. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9810693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McKittrick T, Adams WC. Pulmonary function response to equivalent doses of ozone consequent to intermittent and continuous exercise. Arch Environ Health. 1995;50:153–58. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1995.9940892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Campbell ME, Benson BA, Muir MA. Urban air quality and human health: A Toronto perspective. Can J Public Health. 1995;86:351–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rijnders E, Janssen NAH, van Vliet PHN, Brunekreef B. Personal and outdoor nitrogen dioxide concentrations in relation to degree of urbanization and traffic density. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109:411–17. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109s3411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Colome SD, Kado NY, Jaques P, Kleinman M. Indoor-outdoor air pollution relations: Particulate matter less than 10 μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM10) in homes of asthmatics. Atmos Environ. 1992;26A:2173–78. doi: 10.1016/0960-1686(92)90405-A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kingham S, Briggs D, Elliott P, Fischer P, Lebret E. Spatial variations in the concentrations of traffic-related pollutants in indoor and outdoor air in Huddersfield, England. Atmos Environ. 2000;34:905–16. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00321-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jones AP. Asthma and the home environment. J Asthma. 2000;37:103–24. doi: 10.3109/02770900009055434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bell RW, Chapman RE, Kruschel BD, Spencer MJ. Windsor air quality study: Personal exposure survey results. Windsor: Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pengelly D, Szakolcai A, Birmingham B, Muller P, Cole D, Bailey S, et al. Human health risk for priority air pollutants. Hamilton: Hamilton-Wentworth Air Quality Initiative; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Toronto Department of Public Health. Indoor air quality: Issues and concerns. Toronto: City of Toronto; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kim YM, Harrad S, Harrison R. Concentrations and sources of volatile organic compounds in urban domestic and public microenvironments. Indoor and Built Environment. 2001;10:147–53. doi: 10.1177/1420326X0101000305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bell RW, Chapman RE, Kruschel BD, Spencer MJ, Smith KV, Lusis MA. The 1990 Toronto personal exposure pilot (PEP) study. 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ilgen E, Karfich N, Levsen K, Angerer J, Schneider P, Heinrich J, et al. Aromatic hydrocarbons in the atmospheric environment: Part I. Indoor versus outdoor sources, the influence of traffic. Atmos Environ. 2001;35:1235–52. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00388-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Leaderer BP, Naeher L, Jankun T, Balenger K, Holford TR, Toth C, et al. Indoor, outdoor, and regional summer and winter concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, SO4, H+, NH4+, NO3, NH3 and nitrous acid in homes with and without kerosene space heaters. Environ Health Perspect. 1999;107:223–31. doi: 10.1289/ehp.99107223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lee K, Vallarino J, Dumyahn T, Ozkaynak H, Spengler JD. Ozone decay rates in residences. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 1999;49:1238–44. doi: 10.1080/10473289.1999.10463913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zwiers FW, von Storch H. Taking serial correlation into account in tests of the mean. J Climate. 1995;8:336–51. doi: 10.1175/1520-0442(1995)008<0336:TSCIAI>2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES