Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2004 Jul 1;95(4):258–263. doi: 10.1007/BF03405127

What Factors Are Associated with Poor Developmental Attainment in Young Canadian Children?

Teresa To 15,25,35,45,55,65, Astrid Guttmann 15,35,45, Paul T Dick 15,35,45,55,65, Jay D Rosenfield 35,55,75,85, Patricia C Parkin 15,35,55,65, Hongmei Cao 15,25, Tatiana N Vydykhan 15, Marjan Tassoudji 15, Jennifer K Harris 15
PMCID: PMC6975605  PMID: 15362466

Abstract

Background: This study was undertaken to determine the association between poor developmental attainment (PDA) and biological, home environment and socio-demographic factors in a population-based sample of Canadian children.

Methods: Cross-sectional data from two cycles (1994/95 and 1996/97) of the National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth were used. Children aged 1–5 years were included. PDA was defined as ≤15th percentile for motor and social developmental skills (1–3 year olds) or Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (4–5 year olds). Multiple logistic regression was used.

Results: The proportion of children with PDA varies across Canada, between males and females, and by age. Among 1 year olds in Cycle I, having a low birthweight (OR=3.3; 95% CI: 2.1–5.2), being male (OR=1.6; 95% CI: 1.2–2.2) and having a mother who is an immigrant (OR=1.6; 95% CI: 1.1–2.2) increased the odds of PDA. Similar results were observed in Cycle II. Among children aged 4–5 years in Cycle II, having a mother who is an immigrant (OR=5.3; 95% CI: 4.1–6.9) and a mother with low educational attainment (OR=2.8; 95% CI: 2.1–3.9) increased the odds of PDA. Low income was a significant predictor of PDA across all age groups.

Interpretation: The strong and consistent associations with living in a low-income household, having a mother with low educational attainment or a mother who is an immigrant highlight the need for targeting developmental assessments and services to this population.

Footnotes

Disclaimer: This analysis was based on the Statistics Canada master file National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth which contains anonymized data collected in the 1994/95 and 1996/97 Special Survey. All computations were prepared by the Population Health Sciences Program, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. The responsibility for the use and interpretation of these data is entirely that of the authors. The opinions expressed do not represent the views of Statistics Canada.

Acknowledgements: Funding for this project was made available through the National Health Research and Development Program (NHRDP grant no. 6606-06-1999/2590112). The Paediatric Outcomes Research Team is funded by The Hospital for Sick Children Foundation. Dr. Teresa To is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care through an Investigator Award. Dr. Paul Dick is supported by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care through a Career Scientist Award (#05239). Dr. Astrid Guttmann is supported by a Senior Research Fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. The results and conclusions are those of the authors; no official endorsement by the Ministry of Health is intended or should be inferred.

References

  • 1.Laucht M, Esser G, Schmidt MH, Ihle W, Loffler W, Stohr RM, et al. “Risk children”: The importance of biological and psychological risk for child development in the first two years of life [abstract] Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 1992;41:274–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kochanek TT, Kabacoff RI, Lipsitt LP. Early identification of developmentally disabled and atrisk preschool children. Except Child. 1990;56:528–38. doi: 10.1177/001440299005600604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Health Canada, Human Resources Development Canada, and Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. Federal/Provincial/Territorial Early Childhood Development Agreement: Report on Government of Canada Activities and Expenditures 2000–2001: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2001.
  • 4.Human R D C Canada. National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth. User’s handbook and microdata guide. Ottawa: Minister of Industry; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Human R D C Canada. National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth. User guide. Ottawa: Minister of Industry; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Baker PC, Kech CK, Mott FL, Quinlan SV. NLSY child handbook - revised edition. A guide to the 1986–1990 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - Child data. Columbus, Ohio: Center for Human Resource Research; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mott FL, Baker PC, Ball DE, Keck CC, Lenhart SM. The NLSY children 1992: Description and evaluation - revised. Columbus, Ohio: Center for Human Resource Research, The Ohio State University; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Center f H R Research. NLSY79 1996, Child and young adult data users guide. Columbus, Ohio: Center for Human Resource Research, The Ohio State University; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dunn L, Dunn L. PPVT-Revised Manual. MN: American Guidance Service; 1981. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Peterson JL, Moore KA. Motor and social development in infancy: Some results from a national survey. Washington, DC: Child Trends; 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977;1:385–404. doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Landy S, Tam KK. Understanding the contribution of multiple risk factors on child development at various ages. Hull, Quebec: Applied Research Branch, Strategic Policy, Human Resources Development Canada; 1998. p. 30. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Statistics Canada. Low Income Cut-Offs. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ramey CT, Stedman DJ. Borders-Patterson A, Mengel W. Predicting school failure from information available at birth. Am J Ment Defic. 1978;82:525–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ramey CT, Ramey SL. Which children benefit the most from early intervention? Pediatrics. 1994;94:1064–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Andrews Howard, Goldberg Doris, Wellen Norman, Pittman Brian, Struening Elmer. Prediction of Special Education Placement from Birth Certificate Data. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1995;11(3):55–61. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(18)30408-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Caughy MO, DiPietro JA, Strobino DM. Day-care participation as a protective factor in the cognitive development of low-income children. Child Dev. 1994;65:457–71. doi: 10.2307/1131396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Holloman HA, Dobbins DR, Scott KG. The effect of biological and social risk factors on special education placement: Birth weight and maternal education as an example. Res Dev Disabil. 1998;19:281–94. doi: 10.1016/S0891-4222(98)00002-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lyytinen P, Laakso ML, Poikkeus AM, Rita N. The development and predictive relations of play and language across the second year. Scand J Psychol. 1999;40:177–86. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hedges LV, Nowell A. Sex Differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science. 1995;269:41–45. doi: 10.1126/science.7604277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Prior M, Smart D, Sanson A, Oberklaid F. Sex differences in psychological adjustment from infancy to 8 years. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1993;32:291–304. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199303000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mustard CA, Mayer T, Black C, Postl B. Continuity of pediatric ambulatory care in a universally insured population. Pediatrics. 1996;98:1028–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kozyrskyj A, Mustard C, Derksen S. Considering the Health Care Needs of Children Living in Households Receiving Income Assistance in Manitoba. Family Services and Manitoba Health Pilot Project. Winnipeg: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation, Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, 2000;113.
  • 24.Childcare R Unit. The Early Childhood Development Agreement: Provincial initiatives and spending allocations, 2001–2002. 2002. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES