Abstract
Living rurally creates geographic and socio-economic challenges for women, which negatively affect their health and well-being. Gender ideologies, expectations and practices that assign domestic and familial unpaid care work as “women’s work” serve also to disadvantage women. How these ideological and material forces together affect health are difficult to assess with a health determinants model. Drawing from relational theories of place and gender, articulated in geographic and feminist literature, we offer a nuanced relational framework that builds on insights of health determinants explanations but situates women as recipients and providers of care within a “relations of care” context. We discuss how this framework can contribute to a better understanding of rural women’s health and well-being. We focus on the context of neo-liberalism and the subsequent restructuring of rural Canadian society but note how our framework is applicable to other high-income nations, such as Finland, Iceland and Norway. We argue that it is critical to consider how contemporary political and ideological changes interact with place and gender relations to affect conditions of dignity for women as recipients and providers of care in rural places. We conclude with suggestions for policy directions.
Key words: Rural health, feminism, geography, self-care, health care, health care reform
Résumé
La vie en milieu rural présente des défis de nature géographique et socioéconomique pour les femmes, ce qui nuit à leur santé et à leur bien-être. Les idéologies, les attentes et les pratiques sexospécifiques, qui considèrent la prestation bénévole de soins au sein du ménage et en milieu familial comme un « travail féminin », défavorisent également les femmes. Lorsqu’on utilise un modèle axé sur les déterminants de la santé, il est difficile de savoir comment ces forces idéologiques et matérielles se conjuguent pour nuire à la santé. À partir des théories relationnelles du lieu et du sexe présentées dans la documentation géographique et féministe, nous proposons un cadre relationnel nuancé qui fait fond sur les explications des déterminants de la santé, mais situent les femmes en tant que bénéficiaires et dispensatrices de soins dans un contexte de « relation de soin ». Nous indiquons comment un tel cadre peut contribuer à améliorer les connaissances sur la santé et le bien-être des femmes en milieu rural. Nous nous attachons au contexte du néolibéralisme et de la restructuration subséquente de la société rurale canadienne, mais notre cadre peut s’appliquer à d’autres pays à revenu élevé comme la Finlande, l’Islande et la Norvège. Selon nous, il est essentiel d’étudier comment l’interaction entre les changements politiques et idéologiques contemporains, le lieu et les relations entre les sexes influe sur les conditions essentielles à la dignité des femmes en tant que bénéficiaires et dispensatrices de soins en milieu rural. Nous concluons en proposant des orientations stratégiques.
Mots clés: santé rurale, féminisme, géographie, autosoins, soins de santé, réforme des soins de santé
References
- 1.Canadian Institute for Health Information. How Healthy Are Rural Canadians? An Assessment of Their Health Status and Health Determinants. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 2.DesMeules M, Manuel D, Cho R. Mortality: Life and health expectancy of Canadian women. In: DesMeules M, Stewart D, editors. Women’s Health Surveillance Report: A Multidimensional Look at the Health of Canadian Women. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2003. pp. 17–18. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Adelson N. The embodiment of inequity: Health disparities in Aboriginal Canada. Can J Public Health. 2005;96(Suppl.2):S45–S61. doi: 10.1007/BF03403702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Stout M, Kipling G, Stout R. Aboriginal Women’s Health Research: Synthesis Report. Ottawa: Centres of Excellence for Women’s Health, Women’s Health Bureau, Health Canada; 2001. p. 43. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Statistics Canada. Women in Canada: A Gender-Based Statistical Report. Ottawa: Minister of Industry, Statistics Canada; 2006. p. 311. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Leipert B. Rural women’s health issues in Canada: An overview and implications for policy and research. Can Woman Studies. 2005;24(4):109–16. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Matthews S, Hertzman C, Ostry A, Power C. Gender, work roles and psychosocial work characteristics as determinants of health. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46(11):1417–24. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)10141-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Huber M, Staniciole A, Bremner J, Wahlbeck K. Director General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, European Commission. 2008. Quality in and Equality of Access to Healthcare Services. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vilhjalmsson R. Failure to seek needed medical care: Results from a national health survey of Icelanders. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:1320–30. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Suominen-Taipale A, Martelin T, Koskinen S, Holmen J, Johnsen R. Gender differences in health care use among the elderly population in areas of Norway and Finland. A cross-sectional analysis based on the HUNT study and the FIN-RISK Senior Survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:110. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Federal/Provincial/Territorial Advisory Committee on Population Health. Towards a Healthy Future: Second Report on the Health of Canadians. Ottawa: Ministry of Public Works and Government Services Canada; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Haraway D. Modest Witness@Second Millennium. FemaleMan Meets OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York, London: Routledge; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ng R. Restructuring gender, race, and class relations: The case of garment workers and labour adjustment. In: Neysmith S, editor. Restructuring Caring Labour: Discourse, State, Practice, and Everyday Life. Toronto: Oxford University Press; 2000. pp. 226–45. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Thien D. Recasting the pattern: Critical relations in gender and rurality. In: Little J, Morris C, editors. Critical Studies in Rural Gender Issues. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing; 2005. pp. 75–89. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Butler J. Gender, Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Valentine G. Making space: Lesbian separatist communities. In: Cloke P, Little J, editors. Contested Countryside Cultures: Otherness, Marginalisation and Rurality. London: Routledge; 1997. pp. 109–22. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Parr H. Rural Madness: Culture, Society and Space in Rural Geographies of Mental Health. Los Angeles: Association of American Geographers; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Thien D. Intimate distances: Considering questions of ‘us’. In: Davidson J, Smith M, Bondi L, editors. Emotional Geographies. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing; 2005. pp. 191–204. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Massey D. Geographies of responsibility. Geografiska Annaler Series B. 2004;86:5–18. doi: 10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00150.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Little J, Austin P. Women and the rural idyll. J Rural Studies. 1996;12:101–12. doi: 10.1016/0743-0167(96)00004-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Valentine G. Theorizing and researching inter-sectionality: A challenge for feminist geography. Professional Geographer. 2006;59(1):10–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00587.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Harcourt E. Women and the Politics of Place. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Naples N. Contested needs: Shifting the standpoint on rural economic development. Feminist Econ. 1997;3(2):63–98. doi: 10.1080/135457097338708. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Philips P, Philips E. Women and Work: Inequality in the Canadian Labour Market. 3rd ed. Toronto: James Lorimer & Company Ltd.; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Neysmith S, Chen X. Understanding how globalization and restructuring affect women’s lives: Implications for comparative policy analysis. Int J Soc Welfare. 2002;11:243–53. doi: 10.1111/1468-2397.00221. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Leach B, Winson A. Bringing globalization down to earth: Restructuring and labour in rural communities. Can Rev Sociol Anthropol. 1995;32(3):342–64. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Neis B, Grzetic B, Pidgeon M. National Network on Environments and Women’s Health (NNEWH), Centres of Excellence for Women’s Health Program. 2001. From Fishplant to Nickel Smelter: Health Determinants and the Health of Newfoundland’s Women Fish and Shellfish Producers in an Environment of Restructuring. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dolan A, Taylor M, Neis B, Ommer R, Eyles J, Schneider D, et al. Restructuring and health in Canadian coastal communities. Ecohealth. 2005;2:1–15. doi: 10.1007/s10393-005-6333-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ommer R. Coasts Under Stress: Understanding Restructuring and the Social-Ecological Health of Coastal Communities. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s University Press; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hanlon N, Halseth G. The greying of resource communities in Northern British Columbia: Implications for health care delivery in already under-serviced communities. Can Geographer. 2005;49(1):1–24. doi: 10.1111/j.0008-3658.2005.00077.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Armstrong P, Amaratunga C, Bernier J, Grant K, Pederson A, Willson K. Exposing Privatization: Women and Health Care Reform in Canada. Aurora, ON: Garamond Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Coburn D. Health, health care and neo-liberal-ism. In: Armstrong H, Armstrong P, Coburn D, editors. Unhealthy Times: Political Economy Perspectives on Health and Care in Canada. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press; 2001. pp. 45–65. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Spitzer D. Engendering health disparities. Can J Public Health. 2005;96(Suppl.2):S78–S96. doi: 10.1007/BF03403704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fenwick T. What happens to the girls? Gender, work and learning in Canada’s ‘new economy’. Gender Educ. 2004;16(2):169–85. doi: 10.1080/09540250310001690564. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Winson A, Leach B. Contingent Work, Disrupted Lives: Labour and Community in the New Rural Economy. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Canadian Institute for Health Information. Supply and Distribution of Registered Nurses in Rural and Small Town Canada 2000. Ottawa: Report to the Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 37.MacLeod M, Kulig J, Stewart N, Pitblado R, Banks K, D’Arcy C, et al. The Nature of Nursing Practice in Rural and Remote Canada. Ottawa, ON: Report to the Canadian Health Services Foundation; 2004. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Statistics Canada. E-Book, 2003. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Little J. Gender relations and the rural labor process. In: Marsden T, Lowe P, Whatmore S, editors. Gender and Rurality. London: David Fulton; 1994. pp. 335–42. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Thien D. University of Edinburgh. 2005. Intimate Distances: Geographies of Gender and Emotion in Shetland. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Leach B. Transforming rural livelihoods gender work and restructuring in three Ontario communities. In: Neysmith S, editor. Restructuring Caring Labour: Discourse, State Practice, and Everyday Life. Toronto: Oxford University Press; 2000. pp. 209–25. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lee S, Colditz G, Berkman L, Kawachi I. Caregiving and risk of coronary heart disease in US women. A prospective study. Am J Prev Med. 2003;24(2):113–19. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00582-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Centres of Excellence for Women’s Health. Canada’s health system failing women in rural and remote regions. Network. 2004;7(2/3):3–5. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ng E, Wilkins R, Pole J, Adams O. How far to the nearest physician? Rural and Small Town Canada Analysis Bulletin. 1999;1(5):1–7. [Google Scholar]
- 45.McBain L, Morgan D. Telehealth, geography and jurisdiction: Issues of healthcare delivery in Northern Saskatchewan. Can Woman Studies. 2005;24(4):221–24. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Simpson P. Trials of transportation in the rapidly developing community of Georgina. Can Woman Studies. 2005;24(4):147–52. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Leipert B. Northern Voices: Health, Community and Economic Perspectives in Northern British Columbia. Prince George, BC: University of Northern British Columbia; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Skillen D, Heather B, Young J. National Network on Environments and Women’s Health (NNEWH) and the Centres of Excellence for Women’s Health Program. 2001. Reflections of Rural Alberta: Work, Health and Restructuring. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lochhead C. The Dynamics of Women’s Poverty in Canada. Ottawa: Status of Women Canada; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sutherns R, McPhedran M, Haworth-Brockman M. Rural, Remote and Northern Women’s Health: Policy and Research Directions Final Summary Report. Winnipeg, MB: Prairie Women’s Health Centre of Excellence; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Robinson F. Globalizing Care: Ethics, Feminist Theory, and International Relations. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Reed M. Learning about the place of women in forestry and land use debates on British Columbia’s west coast. Can Woman Studies. 2005;24(4):18–25. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tigges L, Ziebarth A, Farnham J. Social relationships in locality and livelihood: The embedded-ness of rural economic restructuring. J Rural Studies. 1998;14(2):203–19. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(97)00037-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Massey D. Space, Place and Gender. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 1994. [Google Scholar]
