Abstract
Background: A national project investigated seniors’ perceptions of the influences upon their quality of life. The seven participating cities were Montreal, Quebec City, Ottawa, Toronto, Regina, Vancouver and Whitehorse. The project focussed on policy decisions affecting the quality of life of seniors. It was a participatory study in which seniors controlled the direction and shape of the project in each city.
Methods: Focus groups and individual interviews with seniors and stakeholders. Data analysis used qualitative methods to see the world through the eyes of participants. Each project was committed to hearing the voices of seniors and their views on which issues were affecting the quality of their lives.
Results: Across the seven cities, seniors highlighted access to information, health care, housing, income security, safety and security, social contacts and networks, and transportation as key issues that affect the quality of life of seniors in Canada.
Conclusions: The findings affirm the value of participatory activities that involve seniors working with other sectors as a productive policy-informing approach. The Seniors’ Quality of Life projects demonstrate the conceptual power of the determinants of health perspective to understand seniors’ quality of life issues. While seniors considered health care to be a continuing concern, they also recognized socio-economic issues as significantly affecting the quality of their lives.
Résumé
Contexte: Un projet national s’est penché sur la perception par les aînés des facteurs qui influencent leur qualité de vie. Les sept villes participantes étaient Montréal, Québec, Ottawa, Toronto, Regina, Vancouver et Whitehorse. Le projet a porté sur les politiques qui ont un effet sur la qualité de vie des aînés. Il s’agissait d’une étude participative où des aînés ont contrôlé l’orientation et la forme du projet dans chaque ville.
Méthode: Nous avons organisé des discussions de groupe et des entretiens individuels avec des aînés et des professionnels. Pour l’analyse des données, nous avons adopté une méthode qualitative afin de voir le monde avec les yeux des participants. Chaque projet s’était engagé à écouter les aînés et leurs points de vue sur les enjeux qui ont un effet sur leur qualité de vie.
Résultats: Dans les sept villes, les aînés ont souligné l’accès à l’information, les soins de santé, le logement, la sécurité du revenu, la sécurité et la protection, les contacts et réseaux sociaux, ainsi que les transports comme étant les principaux enjeux touchant leur qualité de vie au Canada.
Conclusions: Ces constatations soulignent la valeur, en tant que démarche productive sous-tendant les politiques, des activités participatives où des aînés collaborent avec d’autres secteurs. Les projets „ Qualité de vie des aînés ” font la preuve de la puissance conceptuelle d’une perspective axée sur les déterminants de la santé pour comprendre les enjeux liés à la qualité de vie des aînés. Les soins de santé sont bien sûr une préoccupation constante pour les aînés, mais ces derniers reconnaissent aussi que les facteurs socio-économiques exercent une influence considérable sur leur qualité de vie.
Footnotes
Source of support in the form of grant: Population Health Fund, Health Canada
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Health Canada.
References
- 1.Health Canada. Dare to Age Well! Ottawa, Ontario: Division of Aging and Seniors; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lilley S. Policies for Aging Population: An International Perspective. Halifax, NS: Population and Public Health Branch, Atlantic Region, Health Canada; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 3.National Forum on Health. Building on the Legacy: Volume 2, Adults and Seniors. Ottawa, ON: National Forum on Health; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bryant T, Raphael D, Brown I, Wheeler J, Herman R, Houston J, et al. Opening up the public policy analysis process to the public: Participatory policy research and Canadian seniors’ quality of life. Can Rev Soc Pol. 2001;48:35–67. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lilley S, Campbell JM. Shifting Sands: The Changing Shape of Atlantic Canada. 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ulysse P-J, Lesemann F. Population aging: An overview of the past thirty years: Review of the literature. 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Quality of Life Research Unit Website. The Seniors Quality of Life Project. Toronto, ON: Centre for Health Promotion; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bryant T, Raphael D, Brown I, Cogan T, Dallaire C, Laforest S, et al. A Nation for All Ages? A Participatory Study of Canadian Seniors’ Quality of Life in Seven Municipalities. Toronto, ON: York University Centre for Health Studies; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Health Canada. The Population Health Template: Key Elements and Actions That Define a Population Health Approach. 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wilkinson R, Marmot M. Social Determinants of Health: The Solid Facts. 2nd edition 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Marmot M, Wilkinson R. Social Determinants of Health. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Minkler M, Wallerstein N, Hall B. Community Based Participatory Research for Health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lindstrom B. Quality of life: A model for evaluating health for all. Soz Praventivmed. 1992;37:301–6. doi: 10.1007/BF01299136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Raphael D, Brown I, Renwick R, Rootman I. Quality of life: What are the implications for health promotion? Am J Health Behav. 1997;21(2):118–28. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Canadian Policy Research Networks. Asking Citizens What Matters for Quality of Life in Canada: A Rural Lens. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Policy Research Networks; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Navarro V, Shi L. The political context of social inequalities and health. In: Navarro V, editor. The Political Economy of Social Inequalities: Consequences for Health and Quality of Life. Amityville, NY: Baywood; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Federation of Canadian Municipalities. Quality of Life Reporting System: Quality of Life in Canadian Communities: Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Michalski JH. Asking Citizens What Matters for Quality of Life in Canada: Results of CPRN’s Public Dialogue Process. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Policy Research Networks; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Health Canada. Taking Action on Population Health: A Position Paper for Health Promotion and Programs Branch Staff. Ottawa, ON: Health Canada; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1985. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Daniels N. Am I My Parents’ Keeper? An Essay on Justice Between the Young and the Old. New York: Oxford University Press; 1988. [Google Scholar]
- 22.McElroy K, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(4):351–77. doi: 10.1177/109019818801500401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Richard LD, Laforest S, Dufresne F, Sapinski JP. The quality of life of older adults living in an urban environment: Professional and lay perspectives. Article submitted for publication. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 24.Raphael D, Phillips S, Renwick R, Sehdev H. Government policies as a threat to health: Findings from two Toronto community quality of life studies. Can J Public Health. 2000;91(3):181–85. doi: 10.1007/BF03404267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Raphael D. When social policy is health policy: Why increasing poverty and low income threatens Canadians’ health and health care system. Can Rev Soc Pol. 2003;51:9–28. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bryant T. Role of knowledge in public health and health promotion policy change. Health Prom Int. 2002;17(1):89–98. doi: 10.1093/heapro/17.1.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Armstrong P, Amaratunga C, Bernier J, Grant K, Pederson A, Wilson K. Exposing Privatization: Women and Health Care Reform in Canada. Toronto, ON: Garamond; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bryant T. Policy Options. 2003. The current state of housing as a social determinant of health; pp. 52–56. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Raphael D, editor. Social Determinants of Health: Canadian Perspectives. Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars Press; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lessard R. Prevent, Cure, Care - Challenges of an Ageing Society. Montreal: Direction de la santé publique de Montréal-Centre; 1999. [Google Scholar]