Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2006 Jul 1;97(4):330–334. doi: 10.1007/BF03405615

What Do Women Know About the Risks of Delayed Childbearing?

Suzanne Tough 115,215,, Karen Benzies 315, Christine Newburn-Cook 415, Karen Tofflemire 115,215, Nonie Fraser-Lee 515, Alexandra Faber 215, Reg Sauve 115,215
PMCID: PMC6976071  PMID: 16967756

Abstract

Background: Women aged 35 and older account for an increasing proportion of births and are at increased risk of pregnancy complications and poor infant outcomes. The objectives of the study were: 1) to determine what women know about delayed childbearing, including pregnancy complications and outcomes associated with low birthweight (LBW, <2500 grams), preterm delivery (<37 weeks) and multiple birth, and 2) to assess the characteristics of women with limited knowledge of risks.

Methods: A computer-assisted telephone interview survey was conducted with 1,044 randomly selected women who delivered their first live-born infant, between July 2002 and September 2003, in two urban centres, Calgary and Edmonton, in Alberta, Canada.

Results: The proportion of women aware of specific childbearing risks associated with advanced maternal age were as follows: conception difficulties (85.3%), multiple birth (24.0%), caesarean section (18.8%), preterm delivery (21.8%), and LBW (11.2%). Knowledge of specific developmental and health-related risks of suboptimal infant outcomes ranged between 18.0% and 46.5%. Logistic regression revealed that limited knowledge of maternal age-related pregnancy risks were associated with unplanned pregnancy (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.03–2.14), smoking (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.29–2.60) and non-use of fertility treatment (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.44–3.19). Characteristics associated with limited knowledge of the risks associated with suboptimal birth outcomes were: age 35–39 years (OR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.35–6.58), less than post-graduate education (<high school OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.20–3.82), and not currently enrolled as a student (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.02–3.00).

Conclusions: Many women are generally unaware of the potential consequences of delayed childbearing. There are missed opportunities in preconception counselling and education, which should be addressed to allow for more informed decision-making about family planning.

MeSH terms: Pregnancy, reproductive behaviour, health knowledge

Footnotes

Source of funding: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research

References

  • 1.Alberta Health and Wellness. Alberta Reproductive Health: Pregnancies and Births. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Health and Wellness; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Park MM. Births: Final data for 2000. Nat Vital Stat Rep. 2002;50:1–101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Astolfi P, Zonta LA. Delayed maternity and risk at delivery. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2002;16:67–72. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2002.00375.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wu Z, MacNeil L. Education, work, and childbearing after age 30. J Comp Fam Stud. 2003;33:191–213. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dion KK. Delayed parenthood and women’s expectations about the transition to parenthood. Int J Behav Dev. 1995;18:315–33. doi: 10.1177/016502549501800208. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ziadeh SM. Maternal and perinatal outcome in nulliparous women aged 35 and older. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2002;54:6–10. doi: 10.1159/000064689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Barton JR, Bergauer NK, Jacques DI, Coleman SK, Stanziano GJ, Sibai BM. Does advanced maternal age affect pregnancy outcome in women with mild hypertension remote from term? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176:1236–40. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70340-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sibai BM, Ewell M, Levine RJ, Klebanoff MA, Esterlitz J, Catalano PM, et al. Risk factors associated with preeclampsia in healthy nulliparous women. The Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention (CPEP) Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:1003–10. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70004-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bobrowski RA, Bottoms SF. Underappreciated risks of the elderly multipara. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:1764–67. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91409-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dildy GA, Jackson GM, Fowers GK, Oshiro BT, Varner MW, Clark SL. Very advanced maternal age: Pregnancy after age 45. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:668–74. doi: 10.1053/ob.1996.v175.a74402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hollier LM, Leveno KJ, Kelly MA, McIntire DD, Cunningham FG. Maternal age and malformations in singleton births. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:701–6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01019-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Forrester MB, Merz RD. Maternal age-specific Down syndrome rates by maternal race/ethnicity, Hawaii, 1986–2000. Birth Defects Res. 2003;67:625–29. doi: 10.1002/bdra.10112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tough S, Svenson L, Schopflocher D. Maternal Risk Factors in Relationship to Birth Outcome (Rep. No. 0-7785-0207-4) Edmonton: Health Surveillance, Alberta Health; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Aldous MB, Edmonson MB. Maternal age at first childbirth and risk of low birth weight and preterm delivery in Washington State. JAMA. 1993;270:2574–77. doi: 10.1001/jama.1993.03510210060028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fretts RC. Maternal age and fetal loss. Older women have increased risk of unexplained fetal deaths. BMJ. 2001;322:430. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7283.430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Roberts CL, Algert CS, March LM. Delayed childbearing—are there any risks? Med J Aust. 1994;160:539–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Steegers-Theunissen RP, Zwertbroek WM, Huisjes AJ, Kanhai HH, Bruinse HW, Merkus HM. Multiple birth prevalence in The Netherlands. Impact of maternal age and assisted reproductive techniques. J Reprod Med. 1998;43:173–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Main DM, Main EK, Moore DH. The relationship between maternal age and uterine dysfunction: A continuous effect throughout reproductive life. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:1312–20. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.106249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kramer MS. Determinants of low birth weight: Methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 1987;65:663–737. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Berkowitz GS, Papiernik E. Epidemiology of preterm birth. Epidemiol Rev. 1993;15:414–43. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jonson HC. Report on the Health of Albertans. Edmonton: Health Surveillance, Alberta Health. 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Committee to Study the Prevention of Low Birth Weight Division of Health PromotionDisease Prevention, Institute of Medicine. Preventing Low Birth Weight. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.McCormick MC. The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:82–90. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198501103120204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Moutquin JM, Milot-Roy V, Irion O. Preterm birth prevention: Effectiveness of current strategies. Journal SOGC. 1996;18:571–88. doi: 10.1016/S0849-5831(16)30300-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Svenson L, Schopflocher D. Alberta Health and Wellness. 1997. Hospitalizations by Birth Weight. Results from the Alberta Children’s Health Study. Graph of the Week. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Svenson L, Schopflocher D. Alberta Health and Wellness. 1997. Birthweight and the Use of Physician Services. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tough S, Tofflemire K. Maternal Risk Factors in Relationship to Birth Outcome, Alberta 1997–2001. 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Health Canada. Canadian Perinatal Health Report 2003. Ottawa, ON: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Heffner LJ. Advanced maternal age - How old is too old? N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1927–29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tough SC, Newburn-Cook C, Johnston DW, Svenson LW, Rose S, Belik J. Delayed childbearing and its impact on population rate changes in lower birth weight, multiple birth, and preterm delivery. Pediatrics. 2002;109:399–403. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.3.399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Society of ObstetriciansGynaecologists of Canada. Healthy Beginnings: Guidelines for Care During Pregnancy and Childbirth. SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines. 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tough SC, Clarke M, Hicks M, Clarren S. Attitudes and approaches of Canadian providers to preconception counselling and the prevention of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. J FAS Int. 2005;3:e3. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gagnon L. Stats Can: 14% of Canadians have no family doctor. CMAJ. 2004;171:124. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1041036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.McLaren L. Globe & Mail. 2003. Baby love. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Peters D. Chatelaine. 2004. Your get-pregnant guide; pp. 83–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sharpe S. Apple. 2004. Middle-aged mom; pp. 16–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mackelm K. Macleans. 2004. Kids vs Career. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rothschild ML. Carrots, sticks, and promises: A conceptual framework for the management of public health and social issue behaviors. J Marketing. 1999;63:24–37. doi: 10.1177/002224299906300404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES