Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2005 Jan 1;96(1):65–68. doi: 10.1007/BF03404021

The Influence of Motor Vehicle Legislation on Injury Claim Incidence

Mark Lemstra 1, W P Olszynski 1,
PMCID: PMC6976259  PMID: 15682700

Abstract

Background

Although there have been numerous strategies to prevent motor vehicle collisions and their subsequent injuries, few have been effective in preventing motor vehicle injury claims. In this paper, we examine the role of legislation and compensation system in altering injury claim incidence.

Methods

The population base for our natural experiment was all Saskatchewan, Manitoba, British Columbia and Quebec residents who submitted personal injury claims to their respective motor vehicle insurance provider from 1990 to 1999. The provinces of Saskatchewan and Manitoba switched from Tort to pure No-Fault insurance on January 1, 1995 and on March 1, 1994 respectively. British Columbia maintained tort insurance and Quebec maintained pure no-fault insurance throughout the entire 10-year period.

Results

The conversion from tort insurance to pure no-fault motor vehicle insurance resulted in a five-year 31% (RR=0.69; 95% CI 0.68-0.70) reduction in total injury claims per 100,000 residents in Saskatchewan and a five-year 43% (RR=0.57; 95% CI 0.56–0.58) reduction in Manitoba. At the same time, the province of British Columbia retained tort insurance and had a five-year 5% reduction (RR=0.95; 95% CI 0.94–0.99). Quebec, which retained pure no-fault throughout the entire 10-year period, had less than one third of the injury claims per 100,000 residents than the tort province of British Columbia.

Interpretation

The conversion from tort to pure no-fault legislation has a large influence in reducing motor vehicle injury claim incidence in Canada. Legislative system and injury compensation scheme have an observable impact on injury claim incidence and can therefore have significant impact on the health care system.

MeSH terms: Automobiles, traffic accidents, insurance benefits

References

  • 1.Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Coté P, Lemstra M, Berglund A, Nygren A. Effect of eliminating compensation for pain and suffering on the outcome of insurance claims for whiplash injury. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1179–86. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200004203421606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, Cassidy JD, Duranceau J, Suissa S, et al. Scientific Monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-associated Disorders. Spine. 1995;20:1–58. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199501000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bellamy R. Compensation neurosis: Financial reward for illness as nocebo. Clin Orthop. 1997;336:94–106. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199703000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Carroll SJ, Abrahamse A, Vaiana M. RAND. 1995. The costs of excess medical claims for automobile personal injuries; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Carroll SJ, Kakalik JS. RAND. 1991. No-fault automobile insurance. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Carroll S, Abrahamse A. RAND. 1995. The effects of a proposed no-fault plan on the costs of auto insurance in California; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kakalik JS, Pace NM. RAND. 1986. Costs and compensation paid in tort litigation; pp. 1–157. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Insurance Research Council. Auto Injuries: Claiming Behaviour and Its Impact on Insurance Costs. Oak Brook, IL: Insurance Research Council; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Insurance Research Council. Trends in Auto Injury Claims. Wheaton, IL: Insurance Research Council; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.U.S. Government Printing Office. Compensating auto accident victims: 1984 follow-up report on no-fault auto insurance experiences. 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.U.S. Government Printing Office. Economic consequences of automobile accident injuries. Washington: U.S. Department of Transportation; 1970. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kochanowski PS, Young MV. Deterrent aspects of no-fault automobile insurance: Some empirical findings. J Risk Ins. 1985;52:269–83. doi: 10.2307/252515. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Statistics Canada. Estimates of population by age and sex for Canada, the provinces and the territories. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Robson LS, Shannon HS, Goldenhar LM, Hale AR. Guide to evaluating the effectiveness of strategies for preventing injuries. Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2001;1:1–122. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1998. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES