Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2005 Jan 1;96(1):55–59. doi: 10.1007/BF03404019

Opportunities for Video Lottery Terminal Gambling in Montréal

An Environmental Analysis

Jason A Gilliland 115,, Nancy A Ross 115
PMCID: PMC6976282  PMID: 15682698

Abstract

Background

In the province of Québec, video lottery terminal (VLT) gambling has proliferated under government control since 1993. The aims of this study were to describe the spatial distribution of video lottery terminals (VLTs) in the municipalities of Montréal and Laval and to identify neighbourhood socio-economic conditions associated with their distribution.

Method

Locations of all establishments holding VLT licences in Montréal and Laval (n=834) were geocoded by their street address. Boroughs (n=49) were characterized by socio-economic indicators (unemployment, educational attainment, lone parenthood), a neighbourhood distress index, and measures of VLT prevalence, VLT adoption and VLT density.

Results

VLT prevalence, adoption and density were strongly correlated (p<0.01) with lower borough socio-economic conditions. Although liquor establishments were also more likely to be located in poorer neighbourhoods, the adoption rate of VLT licences by bars in poorer neighbourhoods was systematically higher than in more affluent ones.

Conclusions

The spatial distribution of VLTs in Montréal and Laval closely reflects local geographies of socio-economic disadvantage. Any public health effort to reduce the burden of gambling-related health and social problems must recognize the spatial distortion of gambling opportunities in the urban environment.

MeSH terms: gambling, geographic factors, social environment, geographic information systems

References

  • 1.Loto-Québec Canada. Gaming in Québec: A necessary reorganization, shifting the focus from a local to a tourist clientele. Action plan 2003–2006. Québec: The Institute; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Société des loteries vidéo du Québec, Quelques chiffres, n.d. Available on-line at: https://doi.org/www.loterievideo.qc.ca (Accessed 20 November 2003).
  • 3.Doiron JP, Mazer DB. Gambling with video lottery terminals. Qual Health Res. 2001;11:631–46. doi: 10.1177/104973201129119343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Korn DA. Gambling and related mental disorders: A public health analysis. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:171–212. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gupta R, Derevensky JL. Adolescent gambling behavior: A prevalence study and examination of the correlates associated with problem gambling. J Gambl Stud. 1998;14(4):319–45. doi: 10.1023/A:1023068925328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ladouceur R, Dubé D, Bujold A. Gambling among primary school students. J Gambl Stud. 1994;10:363–70. doi: 10.1007/BF02104902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chevalier S, Allard D. Jeux pathologiques et joueurs problématiques — Le jeu à Montréal. Montréal: Régie régionale de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal-Centre et Direction de la santé publique; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fisher S. The pull of the fruit machine: A sociological typology of young players. Sociological Rev. 1993;41:446–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1993.tb00073.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Marshall K, Wynne H. Fighting the odds. 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wynne H, Smith G, Jacobs D. Adolescent Gambling and Problem Gambling in Alberta. A report prepared for the Alberta Alcohol and Drug Abuse Commission. Edmonton: Wynne Resources; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Winters KC, Anderson N. Gambling involvement and drug use among adolescents. J Gambl Stud. 2000;16:175–98. doi: 10.1023/A:1009480930810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hardoon K, Derevensky JL, Gupta R. Empirical measures vs. perceived gambling severity among youth. Why adolescent problem gamblers fail to seek treatment. Addict Behav. 2003;28:933–46. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4603(01)00283-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ladouceur R, Mireault C. Gambling behaviours among high school students in the Québec area. J Gambl Behav. 1988;4(1):3–12. doi: 10.1007/BF01043524. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lesieur HR, Klein R. Pathological gambling among high school students. Addict Behav. 1987;12:129–35. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(87)90019-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Avis NE, McKinlay JB, Smith KW. Is cardiovascular risk factor knowledge sufficient to influence behavior? Am J Prev Med. 1990;6(3):137–44. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(18)31018-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Green LW, Raeburn J. Contemporary developments in health promotion: Definitions and challenges. In: Bracht N, editor. Health Promotion at the Community Level. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990. pp. 29–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ross NA, Taylor SM. Geographical variation in attitudes towards smoking: Findings from the COMMIT communities. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46:703–17. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00175-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.U.S. Department of HealthHuman Services USDHHS. Reducing the Health Consequences of Smoking: 25 Years of Progress. A report of the U.S. Surgeon General. 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sharpe L. A reformulated cognitive-behavioral model of problem gambling: A biopsychosocial perspective. Clin Psychol Rev. 2002;22:1–25. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7358(00)00087-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jacques C, Ladouceur R, Ferland F. Impact of availability on gambling: A longitudinal study. Can J Psychiatry. 2000;45:810–15. doi: 10.1177/070674370004500904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.National Opinion Research Center. Gambling Impact and Behavior Study: Final Report to the National Impact Study Commission. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Marshall DC, Baker RGV. The evolving market structures of gambling: Case studies modelling the socioeconomic assignment of gaming opportunities in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia. J Gambl Stud. 2002;18:273–91. doi: 10.1023/A:1016847305942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Marshall DC, Baker RGV. Clubs, spades, diamonds and disadvantage: The geography of electronic gaming machines in Melbourne. Aust Geogr Stud. 2001;39:17–33. doi: 10.1111/1467-8470.00127. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Breen H, Hing N, Weeks P. Machine gaming in Sydney clubs: Characteristics of the supporting resident populations. J Gambl Stud. 2002;18:293–312. doi: 10.1023/A:1016899322780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dougheny J. Socioeconomic banditry: Poker machines and income redistribution in Victoria. In: Eardley T, Bradbury B (Eds.), SPRC Report 1/02. Competing Visions: Refereed Proceedings of the National Social Policy Conference, 2001. Sydney, Australia: Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales, 2002;136–54.
  • 26.Ley D, Smith H. Relations between deprivation and immigrant groups in large Canadian cities. Urban Stud. 2000;37:376–62. doi: 10.1080/0042098002285. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gilliland J. Putting gambling in its place: A geographical study of VLT accessibility and play by Montreal youth. Youth Gambling Int. 2003;3:1–2. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES