Skip to main content
Journal of Pediatric Genetics logoLink to Journal of Pediatric Genetics
. 2019 Aug 12;9(1):32–39. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1694703

De Novo Subtelomeric 6p25.3 Deletion with Duplication of 6q23.3-q27: Genotype–Phenotype Correlation

Emine Ikbal Atli 1,, Hakan Gurkan 1, Engin Atli 1, Ulfet Vatansever 2, Betul Acunas 2, Cisem Mail 1
PMCID: PMC6976321  PMID: 31976141

Abstract

Duplications of 6q and deletions of 6p have been reported in more than 30 cases of live born infants and given rise to widespread abnormalities recognizable as a specific clinical syndrome. Different phenotypes have been described with variable clinical signs. Most cases involve the coexistence of unbalanced translocations affecting one or the other of the chromosomes. However, duplication of both chromosome 6q and deletion of 6p regions have been reported in only a few cases. Here, we report the first duplication of chromosome band 6q23.3–q27 with deletion of 6p25.3. This is the first case in the literature involving changes to these specific chromosomal regions; a medium size duplication of the distal long arm and smaller deletion of the terminal short arm of chromosome 6. In the literature, there are no other cases where these two specific chromosomal aberrations are observed together. Conventional chromosome analysis was performed to investigate the patient. Chromosome structure was identified using fluorescence in situ hybridization for subtelomeric regions of chromosome 6 and array comparative genomic hybridization analysis (array-CGH).

Keywords: cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization, chromosome 6, array-CGH

Introduction

Duplication (partial trisomy) of the distal long arm of chromosome 6 has several clinical characteristics. Similarly, deletion of the 6pter results in many clinical abnormalities. These two aberrations have been reported to occur in more than 30 cases of live born infants. 1

A variety of different phenotypes have been described with varying clinical signs for each of these chromosomal aberrations. In the case of duplication of 6q21–27, intellectual disability, pre- and postnatal growth restriction, microcephaly, prominent forehead, downward slanting palpebral fissures, clinodactyly, syndactyly, talipes equinovarus, cardiac anomalies, hypertelorism, flat/broad nasal bridge, “carp” mouth, small mandible, low set/posteriorly rotated ears, short/webbed neck, joint contractures, cerebral anomalies, abnormal palmar creases, cleft palate, eye abnormalities, and genital abnormalities have been observed. 2 Terminal deletions of 6p are rarer but also present a variety of clinical features. 3

Partial duplication has been described for all chromosomes and many cases show maternal inheritance. 4 Most cases represent the coexistence of unbalanced translocations. However, duplication of chromosome band 6q23.3–q27 is reported only in a few cases and they have well-defined phenotypes. Partial duplication of 6q is also reported only in a few cases 5 6 and these reports generally have duplication of 6q accompanied by other chromosomal abnormalities, e.g., chr16p and others, with duplications found more often than deletions. The size of duplication is directly related to the severity of the clinical phenotypes.

Sheth et al reported a medium size duplication of the distal long arm of chromosome 6 and small size deletion of terminal short arm. 7

The case reported here is the first in the literature involving the duplication of 6q23.3–q27 and deletion of the 6p25.3 chromosomal region.

Case Presentation

Our case is of an 8-month-old girl, the third child of a nonconsanguineous Turkish couple. Her mother and father are 28 and 31 years old, respectively. The proposita was delivered by Cesarean section at 38 5/7 weeks of gestation because of polyhydramnios. The pregnancy was uncomplicated. Birth weight was 2,670 g (10th centile) with a length of 48 cm (25th centile) and a head circumference of 33 cm (≥3rd and <97th). At the age of 2 months, the infant was noted to have bilateral exophthalmos, large fontanelle, bilateral overlapping toes ( Fig. 1 ), nail clubbing of the hand, retroperitoneal anus, and dysplastic ears.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Case image after physical examination.

At the age of 5 months, the main physical findings were head circumference 37.0 cm (<3rd centile), could not sit unsupported, cleft soft palate, blue sclerae, large prefrontal cortex (8 cm × 6 cm), and was fed with baby food. Stenosis of the patent foramen ovale and peripheral pulmonary artery was demonstrated by echocardiographic examination.

At age of 8 months, the infant had a head circumference of 39 cm with anterior fontanelles and open sutures. She was able to make good eye contact, was unable to sit unaided but could hold up her head. Abdominal ultrasonographic imaging was performed and a full abdominal examination was noted as normal (spleen, kidneys, liver, gall bladder, urinary bladder, pancreas, and bilateral adrenal gland). Right and left kidney sizes were 35 and 40 mm, respectively. The sizes of the liver and spleen were 41 and 39 mm. Society for Fetal Urology grade I dilation was detected in the bilateral pelvicalyceal system. The now 9-month-old patient underwent the Denver II Developmental Screening Test and was evaluated as abnormal.

Materials and Methods

Conventional chromosome analysis was performed on 72 h lymphocyte cultures according to standard techniques. 8 Preparations were performed using Leishmann-pancreatin banding. At a 400- to 500-band level of resolution, the extra chromosomal material was seen clearly a direct duplication. Subtelomeric 6p/6q probe (Chromoprobe Multiprobe-T device Panel, Aquarius Subtelomere Specific Probes Cat. No. PMP 803) was applied by for confirmation of the karyotype result. Genomic DNA was isolated from patient lymphocytes using the Qiagen DNA extraction kit (Santa Clara, CA). The investigation of copy number changes was performed by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) using the Whole Human Genome Comparative Genomic Hybridization Microarray 60K (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, United States) as recommended by the manufacturer. Scanned images of the arrays were processed by the Feature Extraction software (Agilent Technologies).

Written informed consent form was signed by the legal guardian of the baby. The research was reviewed and approved by an institutional review board.

Results

The patient was found to have a chromosomal aberration on chromosome 6 that contained a medium size duplication of the long arm. Her karyotype was 46,XX,der(6)(qter- > q23::p25.3- > qter; Fig. 2 ). Her parents have normal karyotypes. Subtelomeric fluorescence in situ hybridization showed three red signals for 6qter (indicating three copies of 6q) and a green signal for 6pter on normal chromosome 6 ( Fig. 3 ). Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis showed that the extra material on the patient's abnormal chromosome 6 was derived from chromosome 6. A deletion was observed on the 6p25.3-pter, approximately 329 kb in size that contained 20 probes. The deletion region was located between 206.749 bp and 588.213 bp. This region contains three genes (arr[GRCh37] 6p25.3[206749–588213]x1).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Case karyotype.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Case FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) image.

Array comparative genomic hybridization results generated expansion test/reference ratios for the 6q23.3q–27 region, supporting duplication (arr [GRCh37] 6q23.3-q27[138,180,512–170,906,796]x3). The gain in size was 32,726 kb and was detected by 525 probes/174 genes ( Fig. 4 , Table 1 ). The duplication region was located between 138.180.512 bp and 170.906.796 bp. Her array result is 46,XX,[GRCh38]6p25.3(206749–588213)x1 dn, 6q23.3-q27(138,180,512–170,906,796)x3 dn.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Array-CGH (comparative genomic hybridization) results.

Table 1. Gene list in duplication region 6q23.3q27.

TNFAIP3 PERP KIAA1244 PBOV1 HEBP2 NHSL1 MIR3145
FLJ46906 CCDC28A ECT2L REPS1 C6orf115 HECA TXLNB
CITED2 LOC645434 MIR3668 NMBR VTA1 GPR126 LOC153910
HIVEP2 AIG1 ADAT2 PEX3 FUCA2 LOC285740 PHACTR2
LTV1 C6orf94 PLAGL1 HYMA SF3B5 STX11 UTRN
EPM2A FBXO30 SHPRH GRM1 RAB32 C6orf103 LOC729176
LOC729178 STXBP5 SAMD5 SASH1 UST TAB2 SUMO4
ZC3H12D PPIL4 C6orf72 KATNA1 LATS1 NUP43 PCMT1
LRP11 RAET1E RAET1G ULBP2 ULBP1 RAET1K RAET1L
ULBP3 PPP1R14C IYD PLEKHG1 MTHFD1L AKAP12 ZBTB2
RMND1 C6orf211 C6orf97 ESR1 SYNE1 MYCT1 VIP
FBXO5 MTRF1L RGS17 OPRM1 IPCEF1 CNKSR3 SCAF8
TIAM2 TFB1M CLDN20 NOX3 ARID1B C6orf35 ZDHHC14
MIR3692 SNX9 SYNJ2 SERAC1 GTF2H5 TULP4 TMEM181
DYNLT1 SYTL3 MIR3918 EZR OSTCL C6orf99 RSPH3
TAGAP FNDC1 SOD2 WTAP LOC100129518 ACAT2
TCP1 SNORA20 SNORA29 MRPL18 PNLDC1 MAS1 IGF2R
LOC729603 SLC22A1 SLC22A2 SLC22A3 LPAL2 LPA PLG
MAP3K4 AGPAT4 NCRNA00241 PARK2 PACRG LOC285796
DKFZp451B082 LOC100526820 QKI C6orf118 PDE10A
C6orf176 LOC441177 PRR18 SFT2D1 BRP44L RPS6KA2
MIR1913 RNASET2 MIR3939 FGFR1OP CCR6 GPR31
TCP10L2 UNC93A TTLL2 TCP10 C6orf123 C6orf124
MLLT4 HGC6.3 KIF25 FRMD1 DACT2 SMOC2
THBS2 WDR27 C6orf120 PHF10 TCTE3 C6orf70
NCRNA00242 C6orf208 DLL1 PDCD2 LOC154449
FAM120B PSMB1 TBP

Discussion

Partial trisomy of chromosome 6q causes a wide range of effects in patients. Most fetuses with these anomalies abort during pregnancy. The condition of live born infants is dependent on the severity of clinical manifestations and generally these children need special care and specific therapies. Partial trisomy of 6q is a variable syndrome, which needs further evaluation. An increased number of studies can help to identify chromosomal aberration cause and clinical effect more clearly. Duplicated regions of the long arm of chromosome 6 display many widespread anomalies but define a clinically specific syndrome ( Fig. 5 ; Table 2 ). 2 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Hence, the observed variations in the syndrome characteristics between proximal 9 and distal duplication of chromosome 6q 10 might be because of the infrequent, potentially destructive genes mapped in the euchromatic band q21 and, in contrast, the clustering of genes related to brain differentiation, neuromuscular synapses, acetylcholine receptor expression, actin, and trace amine-associated receptor 4 in the telomeric region of the 6q23-qter. 11 Five papers have been published, related to 6q23q26 duplication and our case showed the same breakpoints. 2 9 12 13 14 Some people are mildly affected by a duplication of 6q but others show more marked effects. Children with terminal duplications of the long arm of chromosome 6 (between band 6q23 and the end) need a moderate amount of support with their learning, but some will need more, especially when they have a particularly large duplication. Some part of the duplication that we detected in our patient corresponds to this range. Therefore, the patient may be expected to have the same clinical findings at later ages. Children/adults with a duplication of 6q have small hands and short fingers but different features can be seen, which include an extra finger and toe; and hands that are twisted outwards and toward the little finger. 15 16 Our patient had similar clinical signs of the toes except for the hand fingers. She has bilateral overlapping toes ( Fig. 1 ), nail clubbing of the hand. Children and adults with 6q duplication have a very small head (microcephaly) and cryptorchidism, hypospadias, and shawl scrotum have also been reported in the literature. In our case, microcephaly is similar to these findings. At age 8 months, the infant had a head circumference of 39 cm with anterior fontanelles and open sutures. Patients with 6q duplication were generally born with normal kidneys and well-functioning urine collection systems; however, slow growth (in some cases starting in the womb) has been observed. Feeding and eating problems occur in some but certainly not all babies and children. Abdominal ultrasonographic imaging was performed and a full abdominal examination was noted as normal (spleen, kidneys, liver, gall bladder, urinary bladder, pancreas, and bilateral adrenal gland). Right and left kidney sizes were 35 and 40 mm, respectively. The sizes of the liver and spleen were 41 and 39 mm. Society for Fetal Urology grade I dilation was detected in the bilateral pelvicalyceal system in our patient's findings.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Diagram of normal and abnormal chromosome 6 of patient. Most likely features in literature.

Table 2. Comparison of physical findings of a duplication of chromosome 6q, deletion 6p, and the findings in our patient 2 9 22 23 24 25 .

Key findings Duplication 6q (the findings reported in the literature) Subtelomeric deletion 6p (the findings reported in the literature) Patient
Short webbed neck +
Microcephaly + + +
Prominent forehead + + +
Down-slanting palpebral fissures + +
Acrocephaly + +
Abnormal palmar creases + ±
Transient neonatal diabetes mellitus +
Joint contractures +
Foot anomaly + + +
Growth retardation + + +
High/cleft palate + + +
Low birth weight + +
Flat facies + + +
Hypertelorism + + +
Carp shaped mouth + +
Micrognathia + +
Hand/finger anomaly + + +
Kyphoscoliosis(kyphosis) +
Severe psychomotor retardation + +
Low set ears + +
Cardiac: murmur/anomaly + +
Genitourinary anomaly + +
Cerebral anomaly +
Flat/broad nose + +
Nail clubbing in hand +
Bilateral overlapping toes +
Bilateral exophthalmos +
Large fontanelle +
Retroperitoneal anus +
Patent foramen ovale +
Peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis +
Short/smooth/flat philtrum +
Long philtrum +
Blue sclerae + +
Intellectual disability +
Language impairment +
Hypotonia +
Hearing loss +
Heart defect +
Structural eye abnormality +
Dandy–Walker +
Hydrocephalus/abnormal skull shape +
White matter abnormalities +
Slender long bones and tall foreshortened vertebral bodies +
Epiphyseal dysplasia +
Hip dysplasia +
Hernia (umbilical or inguinal) +
Dental abnormalities +

Babies with duplications of other bands of 6q have been born with clubfoot or fixed contractures of the ankles. 17 The 6q duplication interval contains at least ten OMIM listed genes, of which four have OMIM morbid entries ( SMOC2, THBS2, ERMARD , and TBP ). Burnside et al report extensive CNS developmental abnormalities in a 2-month-old infant with duplication of THBS2 . This gene encodes thrombospondin 2, an astrocyte-secreted protein essential for synaptogenesis and neurite growth. The clinical features described in our proband are largely common to other case reports of duplication of 6q. 2 13 14 15 16 17 No such findings were observed in our patient at the time of admission to the clinic. However, she will be followed for further developmental periods.

Over 25 cases with variable deletions of 6p25-pter have been reported. Submicroscopic deletions of 6p, especially at 6p25 to 6pter, lead to develop hearing impairment, ocular dysgenesis, brain abnormalities, and dysmorphic features including hypertelorism, downslanting palpebral fissures, small nose, low nasal bridge, tented mouth, and a short neck. Other features include skeletal, renal, and cardiac malformations. 18 All previous reports of 6p25 cytogenetic abnormalities are consistent with the concept that altered doses of a gene or genes in the duplicated ( Table 1 ) or deleted regions give rise to the clinical symptoms ( Table 2 ). She has main physical findings: head circumference, 37.0 cm (less than third centile); could not sit unsupported; cleft soft palate; blue sclerae; large prefrontal cortex (8 cm × 6 cm); and was fed with baby food. Stenosis of the patent foramen ovale and peripheral pulmonary artery was demonstrated by echocardiographic examination. The clinical findings in our patient were more similar to the 6p deletion findings than the effects of the duplication of the sixth chromosome. As already known in classical knowledge, the phenotypic effects of chromosomal deletions compared with duplications produce more severe and more serious clinical effects. 19 Interferon regulatory factor-4(IRF4), dual specificity phosphatase 22 (DUSP22) , exocyst complex component 2(EXOC2) coding genes are normally present in the deleted region found in our patient at 6p25.3; however, such deletions in the literature usually also include the FOXC1 gene and because of this the clinical prognoses of patients are poor. 18 20 21 22 The deletion region in our patient did not include this gene.

IRF4 is located on chromosome 6 at the telomeric extremity of the short arm and occurs in the region between the DUSP22 and EXOC2 genes. 20 21 22 The loss of these genes ( IRF4, DUSP22 , and EXOC2 ) in the 6p25.3 region is reported as benign at ISCA. 23 24 The number of genes in the duplicated region is larger than the deleted region.

Conclusion

Here we report the first recognized case of duplication of chromosome 6q23.3-q27, a medium size duplication of the distal long arm, with deletion of 6p25.3, a small size deletion of the terminal short arm of chromosome 6. The patient described will be followed up clinically and correlation of developmental parameters with the cytogenetic findings will be performed. We hope to be a guide in the clinical evaluation of prospective patients and phenotypic and chromosomal findings will add to the exiting literature.

Acknowledgments

We kindly thank the all clinicians for their participation in this study.

Funding Statement

Funding None.

Conflict of Interest None declared.

Consent for Publication

Written informed consent has been obtained from the parents of the infant to have the case details and accompanying images published.

Ethics Approval

The study was approved by Trakya University, Faculty of Medicine, Scientific Research Ethics Committee.

Availability of Data and Supporting Materials

All data used in this study are available from the author.

Authors' Contributions

E.A. performed the molecular cytogenetic studies; H.G. conceived of the study; U.V. made the examination of the patient; B.A. made the examination of the patient and family; C.M. performed the cytogenetic studies; and E.I.A. conceived of the study, participated in its design, and drafted the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Breuning M H, Bijlsma J B, de France H F. Partial trisomy 6p due to familial translocation t(6;20)(p21;p13). A new syndrome? Hum Genet. 1977;38(01):7–13. doi: 10.1007/BF00295802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Henegariu O, Heerema N A, Vance G H. Mild “duplication 6q syndrome”: a case with partial trisomy (6)(q23.3q25.3) Am J Med Genet. 1997;68(04):450–454. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19970211)68:4<450::aid-ajmg15>3.0.co;2-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Le Caignec C, De Mas P, Vincent M-C et al. Subtelomeric 6p deletion: clinical, FISH, and array CGH characterization of two cases. Am J Med Genet A. 2005;132A(02):175–180. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kotzot D, Martinez M J, Bagci G et al. Parental origin and mechanisms of formation of cytogenetically recognisable de novo direct and inverted duplications. J Med Genet. 2000;37(04):281–286. doi: 10.1136/jmg.37.4.281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pazooki M, Lebbar A, Roubergues A, Baverel F, Letessier D, Dupont J M. Pure familial 6q21q22.1 duplication in two generations. Eur J Med Genet. 2007;50(01):60–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2006.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Goh D L, Tan A S, Chen J Y, Van Den Berghe J A. Dysmorphic sibs trisomic for the region 6q22.1-->6q23.3. J Med Genet. 2000;37(11):889–892. doi: 10.1136/jmg.37.11.889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sheth F, Trivedi S, Andrieux J, Blouin J L, Sheth J. Pure interstitial dup(6)(q22.31q22.31) - a case report. Ital J Pediatr. 2015;41:5. doi: 10.1186/s13052-015-0113-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Verma R S, Babu A. New York: Perga-monPress; 1998. Human Chromosomes – Manual of Basic Technologies. 4th ed; pp. 6–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cappon S L, Duncan A MV, Khalifa M M. Interstitial 6q duplication in an adult male without growth delay or severe mental retardation. Med Sci Monit. 2000;6(03):581–585. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cavani S, Perfumo C, Faravelli F et al. Cryptic 1p36.3/6q25.2 translocation in three generations ascertained through a foetus with IUGR and cerebral malformations. Prenat Diagn. 2003;23(10):819–823. doi: 10.1002/pd.678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Valerio D, Di Domenico A, Felicetti M et al. Prenatal diagnosis of a partial 6q trisomy: a case report. Prenat Diagn. 2006;26(10):917–919. doi: 10.1002/pd.1526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ohta T, Tohma T, Soejima H et al. The origin of cytologically unidentifiable chromosome abnormalities: six cases ascertained by targeted chromosome-band painting. Hum Genet. 1993;92(01):1–5. doi: 10.1007/BF00216136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Grati F R, Lalatta F, Turolla L et al. Three cases with de novo 6q imbalance and variable prenatal phenotype. Am J Med Genet A. 2005;136(03):254–258. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pace N P, Maggouta F, Twigden M, Borg I. Molecular cytogenetic characterisation of a novel de novo ring chromosome 6 involving a terminal 6p deletion and terminal 6q duplication in the different arms of the same chromosome . Mol Cytogenet. 2017;10:9. doi: 10.1186/s13039-017-0311-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Smith A, Jauch A, Slater H, Robson L, Sandanam T. Syndromal obesity due to paternal duplication 6(q24.3-q27) Am J Med Genet. 1999;84(02):125–131. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19990521)84:2<125::aid-ajmg8>3.0.co;2-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zweier C, Trautmann U, Ekici A, Rauch A. A 15Mb duplication of 6q24.1-q25.3 associated with typical but milder features of the duplication 6q syndrome. Eur J Med Genet. 2008;51(04):358–361. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2008.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Burnside M N, Pyatt R E, Hughes A, Baker P B, Pierson C R. Complex brain malformations associated with chromosome 6q27 gain that includes THBS2, which encodes thrombospondin 2, an astrocyte-derived protein of the extracellular matrix. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2015;18(01):59–65. doi: 10.2350/14-06-1516-CR.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.van der Knaap M S, Kriek M, Overweg-Plandsoen W CG et al. Cerebral white matter abnormalities in 6p25 deletion syndrome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27(03):586–588. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Devriendt K, Vermeesch J R. Chromosomal phenotypes and submicroscopic abnormalities. Hum Genomics. 2004;1(02):126–133. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-1-2-126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kee Y, Yoo J S, Hazuka C D, Peterson K E, Hsu S C, Scheller R H. Subunit structure of the mammalian exocyst complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94(26):14438–14443. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Freire G, Russell L, Oskoui M. Terminal 6p deletion syndrome mimicking CHARGE syndrome: a case report. J Pediatr Genet. 2013;2(02):103–107. doi: 10.3233/PGE-13055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Linhares N D, Svartman M, Rodrigues T C, Rosenberg C, Valadares E R. Subtelomeric 6p25 deletion/duplication: Report of a patient with new clinical findings and genotype-phenotype correlations. Eur J Med Genet. 2015;58(05):310–318. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2015.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Smigiel R, Misiak B, Golebiowski W et al. Esophageal atresia and anal atresia in a newborn with heterotaxia combined with other congenital defects. J Pediatr Genet. 2012;1(01):55–58. doi: 10.3233/PGE-2012-010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.ISCA Database Search. Available at:http://dbsearch.clinicalgenome.org/searchAccessed July 16, 2019
  • 25.Mazur L, Lodinger N, Wilsford L, Soletsky S A.21 year-old patient with a non-lethal 6q duplication syndromeSOP Transactions on Inheritance and Genetic Engineering. In press

Articles from Journal of Pediatric Genetics are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES