Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2020 Jan 23;9(4):e01448-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01448-19

Genome Sequences of Brevundimonas naejangsanensis Strain FS1091 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Strain FS1092, Isolated from a Fresh-Cut-Produce-Processing Plant

Ganyu Gu a, Narjol Gonzalez-Escalona b, Jie Zheng b, Samantha Bolten a, Yaguang Luo a, Abdullah I Mafiz b, Maria Sanchez Leon b, Xiangwu Nou a,✉
Editor: Steven R Gillc
PMCID: PMC6979307  PMID: 31974158

The complete genome sequences of Brevundimonas naejangsanensis strain FS1091 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain FS1092, which were isolated from a commercial fresh-cut-produce-processing facility, were determined. Both FS1091 and FS1092 have one circular chromosome of approximately 3.15 and 4.24 Mb, respectively.

ABSTRACT

The complete genome sequences of Brevundimonas naejangsanensis strain FS1091 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain FS1092, which were isolated from a commercial fresh-cut-produce-processing facility, were determined. Both FS1091 and FS1092 have one circular chromosome of approximately 3.15 and 4.24 Mb, respectively.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Brevundimonas naejangsanensis is a Gram-negative, motile, and rod-shaped bacterium that was first classified in 2009 (1). Su et al. (2) reported that B. naejangsanensis strain B1 could degrade several antibiotics, gaining advantages in competition in microbial communities and escaping antagonistic effects caused by different antimicrobial products. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens is a Gram-positive bacterium producing a natural antibiotic protein (barnase) with RNase activity (3). It has been applied in agriculture, aquaculture, and hydroponics to mitigate the threat of plant pathogens such as Ralstonia solanacearum, Pythium spp., Rhizoctonia solani, Alternaria tenuissima, and Fusarium spp. and to improve root tolerance to salt stress (4–10).

B. naejangsanensis strain FS1091 and B. amyloliquefaciens strain FS1092 were isolated from environmental surfaces in a fresh-cut-produce-processing facility in the mid-Atlantic region for their strong biofilm formation (11). Strain identification was carried out by sequencing the 16S rRNA genes using the universal bacterial primers 27F and 1492R (12).

Whole-genome shotgun DNA sequencing of B. naejangsanensis FS1091 and B. amyloliquefaciens FS1092 was performed using both Illumina MiSeq and Oxford Nanopore MinION platforms. Bacterial genomic DNA was extracted using the MagAttract high-molecular-weight DNA kit (Qiagen) for MiSeq sequencing and the Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega) for MinION sequencing, following the manufacturers’ instructions. MiSeq sequencing was performed using the MiSeq reagent kit version 2 with paired-end chemistry (2 × 250 bp), after library preparation using the Nextera DNA Flex kit (Illumina). Sequence reads generated by the MiSeq system were quality trimmed to remove adapter sequences and low-quality ends, using CLC Genomics Workbench version 12.0 (Qiagen). The total numbers of MiSeq reads were 1,019,621 for FS1091 and 1,015,953 for FS1092. The average length of MiSeq sequence reads was 230 bp. The MinION library was prepared from 600 ng of DNA with the rapid barcoding sequencing kit (product number SQK-RBK004) and sequenced using a flow cell with R9.4.1 chemistry following the manufacturer’s instructions (Oxford Nanopore). The MinION run was base called live using default settings (MinKNOW version 18.12 and Guppy version 2.1.3), with output as fastq files. The sequences were demultiplexed and barcodes were removed using Guppy version 2.1.3. About 1.58 million sequence reads were generated by MinION sequencing, with an average length of 5,675 bases. Complete genome sequences for each strain were obtained by de novo assembly using SPAdes version 3.12.0 (13) hybrid assembly (with default settings) based on both MiSeq and MinION data generated for each strain. The synteny and correctness of the assembly for each strain genome were confirmed by comparing the hybrid assembly with de novo assembly of the genomes using Nanopore MinION data alone, performed with Canu software version 1.7 (14), as described previously (15). Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise noted.

The genome of B. naejangsanensis strain FS1091 (single replicon, 3,150,039 bp, GC content of 67.3%) contains 2,967 protein-coding sequences, 49 tRNAs, and 2 copies of the rRNA coding genes. The B. amyloliquefaciens strain FS1092 genome (single replicon, 4,240,930 bp, GC content of 45.9%) contains 4,057 protein-coding sequences, 87 tRNAs, and 9 copies of the rRNA coding genes.

These are the first complete genome sequences of B. naejangsanensis and B. amyloliquefaciens strains isolated from a fresh-produce-processing facility. Further analysis of these genomes will provide insights regarding environmental bacteria interacting with foodborne pathogens and affecting their colonization and persistence in produce-processing environments.

Data availability.

The genome sequences of these two strains have been deposited in GenBank. Illumina MiSeq raw reads, Nanopore MinION raw reads, and the assembled sequences for B. naejangsanensis strain FS1091 can be accessed under accession numbers SRR8697623, SRR8697008, and CP038027, respectively. The corresponding accession numbers for B. amyloliquefaciens strain FS1092 are SRR8697624, SRR8697007, and CP038028, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was partially supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture Specialty Crop Research Initiative (award 2016-51181-25403) and by appointments to the Agricultural Research Service Research Participation Program, administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). ORISE is managed by Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) under DOE contract DE-SC0014664.

All opinions expressed in this paper are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the policies and views of the USDA, DOE, or ORAU/ORISE. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA or the FDA.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Kang SJ, Choi NS, Choi JH, Lee JS, Yoon JH, Song JJ. 2009. Brevundimonas naejangsanensis sp. nov., a proteolytic bacterium isolated from soil, and reclassification of Mycoplana bullata into the genus Brevundimonas as Brevundimonas bullata comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:3155–3160. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.011700-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Su H, Zhang T, Bao M, Jiang Y, Wang Y, Tan T. 2014. Genome sequence of a promising hydrogen-producing facultative anaerobic bacterium, Brevundimonas naejangsanensis strain B1. Genome Announc 2:e00542-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00542-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Paddon CJ, Hartley RW. 1985. Cloning, sequencing and transcription of an inactivated copy of Bacillus-amyloliquefaciens extracellular ribonuclease (barnase). Gene 40:231–239. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(85)90045-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Alvarez F, Castro M, Principe A, Borioli G, Fischer S, Mori G, Jofre E. 2012. The plant-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strains MEP218 and ARP23 capable of producing the cyclic lipopeptides iturin or surfactin and fengycin are effective in biocontrol of sclerotinia stem rot disease. J Appl Microbiol 112:159–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05182.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yuan J, Yu L, Ling N, Raza W, Shen QR, Huang QW. 2015. Plant-growth-promoting traits and antifungal potential of the Bacillus amyloliquefaciens YL-25. Biocontrol Sci Technol 25:276–290. doi: 10.1080/09583157.2014.971711. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gowtham HG, Murali M, Singh SB, Lakshmeesha TR, Murthy KN, Amruthesh KN, Niranjana SR. 2018. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: Bacillus amyloliquefaciens improves plant growth and induces resistance in chilli against anthracnose disease. Biol Control 126:209–217. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.05.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shahzad R, Khan AL, Bilal S, Asaf S, Lee IJ. 2017. Plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria versus pathogenic infections: an example of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens RWL-1 and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici in tomato. PeerJ 5:e3107. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chowdhury SP, Hartmann A, Gao XW, Borriss R. 2015. Biocontrol mechanism by root-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42: a review. Front Microbiol 6:780. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chowdhury SP, Uhl J, Grosch R, Alqueres S, Pittroff S, Dietel K, Schmitt-Kopplin P, Borriss R, Hartmann A. 2015. Cyclic lipopeptides of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum colonizing the lettuce rhizosphere enhance plant defense responses toward the bottom rot pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 28:984–995. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-03-15-0066-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chowdhury SP, Dietel K, Randler M, Schmid M, Junge H, Borriss R, Hartmann A, Grosch R. 2013. Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 on lettuce growth and health under pathogen pressure and its impact on the rhizosphere bacterial community. PLoS One 8:e68818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gu G, Ottesen A, Bolten S, Wang L, Luo Y, Rideout S, Lyu S, Nou X. 2019. Impact of routine sanitation on the microbiomes in a fresh produce processing facility. Int J Food Microbiol 294:31–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Frank JA, Reich CI, Sharma S, Weisbaum JS, Wilson BA, Olsen GJ. 2008. Critical evaluation of two primers commonly used for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:2461–2470. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02272-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. 2017. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res 27:722–736. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gonzalez-Escalona N, Yao K, Hoffmann M. 2018. Closed genome sequence of Salmonella enterica serovar Richmond strain CFSAN000191, obtained with Nanopore sequencing. Microbiol Resour Announc 7:e01472-18. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01472-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequences of these two strains have been deposited in GenBank. Illumina MiSeq raw reads, Nanopore MinION raw reads, and the assembled sequences for B. naejangsanensis strain FS1091 can be accessed under accession numbers SRR8697623, SRR8697008, and CP038027, respectively. The corresponding accession numbers for B. amyloliquefaciens strain FS1092 are SRR8697624, SRR8697007, and CP038028, respectively.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES