Abstract
Broad health determinants are accepted as key contributors to health; however, little is known about the public’s understanding of these determinants. We describe the results of a survey of young parents (18–30 years) in Alberta regarding their understanding of determinants of health, and their actions (planned or undertaken) in promoting wellbeing and health for themselves, their families, and their communities. A telephone survey of young parents (N=652) was conducted, using both open-ended and fixed response questions. In the open-ended responses, social support networks (46%) and personal health practices (40%) were most often cited as contributors to family well-being and health and as current actions (62% and 54% respectively). Health services were rarely mentioned as a contributor. Most frequently mentioned barriers to well-being and health related to income (36%) and coping skills (34%). Sub-sample differences by gender, age, income, and residence were detected. Fixed response questions indicated that parents rated a broad range of health determinants as “very important.”
Résumé
On considère les déterminants généraux de la santé comme des facteurs de santé clés; cependant, on en sait peu sur la compréhension de ces déterminants par le public. Voici les résultats d’un sondage auprès de jeunes parents albertains (18 à 30 ans) portant sur leur compréhension des déterminants de la santé et sur les mesures qu’ils prennent ou comptent prendre pour promouvoir leur bien-être et leur santé et ceux de leur famille et de leur communauté. Nous avons administré à de jeunes parents (n=652) un sondage téléphonique comportant des questions ouvertes et fermées. Dans les réponses aux questions ouvertes, les réseaux de soutien social (46 %) et les habitudes de santé personnelles (40 %) sont le plus souvent ressortis comme contribuant au bien-être et à la santé familiale et comme mesures déjà employées (62 % et 54 % respectivement). Les services de santé ont rarement été mentionnés à ce titre. Les obstacles au bien-être et à la santé les plus fréquemment mentionnés avaient trait au revenu (36 %) et aux habiletés d’adaptation (34 %). Nous avons relevé des différences dans les sous-échantillons selon le sexe, l’âge, le revenu et le domicile. Dans leurs réponses aux questions fermées, les parents ont qualifié de «très importants» une vaste gamme de déterminants de la santé.
Footnotes
This project was funded by Alberta Health and Wellness. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Alberta Health and Wellness.
References
- 1.Federal, ProvincialTerritorial Advisory Committee on Population Health. Health Canada, Publications. Toward a Healthy Future: Second Report on the Health of Canadians. 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Federal, ProvincialTerritorial Advisory Committee on Population Health. Health Canada, Publications. Statistical Report on the Health of Canadians. 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Public perceptions of the determinants of health survey. Canada’s Health Monitor 1996 Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
- 4.Reutter L, Neufeld A, Harrison M. Public perceptions of the relationship between poverty and health. Can J Public Health. 1999;90(1):13–18. doi: 10.1007/BF03404091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Potvin L, Richard L, Edwards AC. Knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors among the Canadian population: Relationships with indicators of socioeconomic status. CMAJ. 2000;162(9suppl):S5–S11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lomas J, Contandriopoulos A. Regulating limits to medicine: Towards harmony in public- and self-regulation. In: Evans B, Barer M, Marmor T, editors. Why are Some People Healthy and Others Not? New York: Aldine DeGruyter; 1994. pp. 253–83. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Millar J. A consensus on the causal role of social factors in population health: Implications for action. In: Hayes M, Foster L, Foster H, editors. The Determinants of Population Health: A Critical Assessment. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria; 1994. pp. 201–6. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Federal, ProvincialTerritorial Advisory Committee on Population Health. Strategies for Population Health: Investing in the Health of Canadians. 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Canadian Public Health Association. Perspectives on health promotion: Towards national consensus. Ottawa: Author; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jensen L, Allen M. Wellness: The dialectic of illness. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 1993;25:220–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1993.tb00785.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Orem D. Nursing: Concepts of Practice. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Health Canada. Population Health Approach. What is the Population Health Approach? 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pender N. Health Promotion in Nursing Practice. Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange; 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Labonte R. Health Promotion and Empowerment: Practice Frameworks. Issues in Health Promotion Series #3. Toronto: Centre for Health Promotion, University of Toronto & Particip Action; 1993. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Statistics Canada. National Population Health Survey 1994–95. Ottawa: Author; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Alberta HealthWellness. “You’re Amazing” Baseline Evaluation Technical Report and Baseline Evaluation Summary Report. Edmonton, Alberta: Population Research Laboratory, University of Alberta; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Alberta HealthWellness. “You’re Amazing” Evaluation Interim Report. Edmonton, Alberta: Population Research Laboratory, University of Alberta; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Blaxter M. Whose fault is it? People’s own conceptions of the reasons for health inequalities. Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:747–56. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00192-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]