Skip to main content
PMC home page
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2001 Mar 1;92(2):155–159. doi: 10.1007/BF03404951

Hospitalization for Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Conditions: A Method for Comparative Access and Quality Studies Using Routinely Collected Statistics

Adalsteinn D Brown 118,✉, Michael J Goldacre 118,218, Nicholas Hicks 118, James T Rourke 318, Robert Y McMurtry 418, John D Brown 518, Geoffrey M Anderson 618,718
PMCID: PMC6979584  PMID: 11338156

Abstract

Background: Appropriate and timely provision of ambulatory care is an important factor in maintaining population health and in avoiding unnecessary hospital use. This article describes conditions for which hospitalization rates have a strong and inverse relationship to access to high-quality ambulatory care.

Methods: Three panels of Canadian physicians following different consensus techniques selected conditions for which the relative risk of hospitalization is inversely related to ambulatory care access.

Principal Findings: All panels identified asthma, angina pectoris, congestive heart failure, otitis media, gastric ulcer, pelvic inflammatory disease, malignant hypertension, and immunizationpreventable infections as ambulatory caresensitive admissions. These conditions strongly overlap with lists developed for similar purposes in the U.S. and England.

Interpretation: Ambulatory care-sensitive conditions represent an intermediate health outcome. They are distinct from inappropriate hospitalizations. They may be useful for measuring the impact of health care policy, and for performance measurement or audit.

References

  • 1.Government of Canada, Canada Health Act. Ottawa: Government of Canada, 1984;c:C-6.
  • 2.Weissman JS, Gatsonis C, Epstein AM. Rates of avoidable hospitalization by insurance status in Massachusetts and Maryland. JAMA. 1992;268:2388–94. doi: 10.1001/jama.1992.03490170060026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Billings J, et al. Impact of socioeconomic status on hospital use in New York City. Health Aff (Millwood) 1993;12:162–73. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.12.1.162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dixon J, Sanderson C, Hunter D. Identifying Conditions for Which an Admission to Hospital is Potentially Avoidable by Effective Ambulatory Care. 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Parchman ML, Culler S. Primary care physicians and avoidable hospitalizations. J Fam Pract. 1994;39:123–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bindman AB, et al. Preventable hospitalizations and access to health care. JAMA. 1995;274:305–11. doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03530040033037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wennberg JE, McPherson K, Caper P. Will payment based on diagnosis-related groups control hospital costs? N Engl J Med. 1984;311(5):295–300. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198408023110505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Roos NP, Wennberg JE, McPherson K. Using diagnosis-related groups for studying variations in hospital admissions. Health Care Financing Review. 1988;9:53–62. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gloor JE, Kisson N, Joubert GJ. Appropriateness of hospitalization in a Canadian pediatric hospital. Pediatrics. 1993;91:70–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sackman H. Delphi Assessment: Expert Opinion, Forecasting, and Group Process. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation; 1974. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brook RH, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of coronary disease: Comparison of doctors’ attitudes in the USA and, UK. Lancet. 1988;i:750–53. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(88)91550-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fraser GM, et al. Effect of panel composition on appropriateness ratings. Int J Qual Health Care. 1994;6:251–55. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/6.3.251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Casanova C, Starfield B. Hospitalizations of children and access to primary care: A cross-national comparison. Int J Health Serv. 1995;25:283–94. doi: 10.2190/PCF7-ALX9-6CN3-7X9G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Casanova C, Colomer C, Starfield B. Pediatric hospitalizations due to ambulatory care-sensitive conditions in Valencia (Spain) Int J Qual Health Care. 1996;8:51–59. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/8.1.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Billings J, Anderson GM, Newman LS. Recent findings on preventable hospitalizations. Health Aff (Millwood) 1996;15:239–49. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.15.3.239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bild D, et al. Sentinel health events surveillance in diabetes - deaths among persons under age 45 with diabetes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41:999–1006. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90039-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Carter Center of Emory University. Closing the gap: The problem of diabetes mellitus in the United States. Diabetes Care. 1985;8:391–406. doi: 10.2337/diacare.8.4.391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Connell FA. Epidemiologic approach to the identification of problems in diabetes care. Diabetes Care. 1985;8:82–86. doi: 10.2337/diacare.8.1.S82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.National Commission on Diabetes to the Congress of the United States. Report of the National Commission on Diabetes to the Congress of the United States, Assessment of Program Effectiveness at Grady Memorial Hospital. DHEW #77-1031, Part 5, Vol III. Washington, D.C.: US Govt Printing Office, 1975.
  • 20.Williams DRR. Outcome indicators for diabetes services - what do we have and what do we need? Community Medicine. 1989;11(1):57–64. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Carr W, et al. Sentinel health events as indicators of unmet needs. Soc Sci Med. 1989;29:705–14. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90149-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Carr W, Zeitel L, Weiss K. Variations in asthma hospitalizations and deaths in New York City. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:59–65. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.82.1.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gonnella JS, Louis DZ, McCord JJ. The staging concept - an approach to the assessment of outcome of ambulatory care. Med Care. 1976;14:13–21. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197601000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wissow LS, et al. Poverty, race, and hospitalization for childhood asthma. Am J Public Health. 1988;78:777–82. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.78.7.777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Weissman JS, et al. Delayed access to health care: Risk factors, reasons, and consequences. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:325–31. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-4-325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Starfield B, et al. Costs vs quality in different types of primary care settings. JAMA. 1994;272:1903–908. doi: 10.1001/jama.1994.03520240031037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Connell FA, Day RW, LoGerfo J. Hospitalisation of Medicaid children: Analysis of small area variations in admission rates. Am J Public Health. 1981;71:606–13. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.71.6.606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stoddard JJ, St Peter RF, Newacheck PW. Health insurance status and ambulatory care for children [see comments] N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1421–25. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199405193302006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wennberg JE, et al. Changes in tonsillectomy rates associated with feedback and review. Pediatrics. 1977;59:821–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gonnella JS, et al. The problem of late hospitalization: A quality and cost issue. Acad Med. 1990;65:314–19. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199005000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES