Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2000 Nov 1;91(6):449–453. doi: 10.1007/BF03404827

Concurrent Consultations with Physicians and Providers of Alternative Care: Results from a Population-based Study

Nazeem Muhajarine 111,, Cordell Neudorf 211, Kathleen Martin 311
PMCID: PMC6979621  PMID: 11200737

Abstract

Objective: We examined the factors related to consultations with both physicians and alternative practitioners, compared with visits to physicians only.

Methods: A telephone survey (random-digit dialling) collected information from 818 adults living in and around Saskatoon. Respondents reported consultations with alternative practitioners and physicians in the previous 12 months.

Results: Approximately one in five respondents had consulted both a physician and an alternative practitioner. Among respondents under 65 years of age, having one or more chronic medical conditions significantly increased the likelihood of concurrent use of care. Men, individuals suffering from back pain or migraines, those reporting an elevated level of distress, and those for whom spiritual values were important were also more likely to use both types of care.

Interpretation: Consultations with alternative care providers occur as an adjunct to, rather than a replacement of visits to physicians. Particular types of medical conditions as well as psychosocial and spiritual factors are determinants of concurrent use of physicians and alternative practitioners.

References

  • 1.Millar WJ. Use of alternative health care practitioners by Canadians. Can J Public Health. 1997;88:154–58. doi: 10.1007/BF03403879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Astin JA. Why patients use alternative medicine: Results of a national study. JAMA. 1998;279:1548–53. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.19.1548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.MacLennan AH, Wilson DH, Taylor AW. Prevalence and cost of alternative medicine in Australia. Lancet. 1996;347:569–73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)91271-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Thomas KJ, Carr J, Westlake L, Williams BT. Use of non-orthodox and conventional health care in Great Britain. BMJ. 1991;302:207–10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6770.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bernstein JH, Shuval JT. Nonconventional medicine in Israel: Consultation patterns of the Israeli population and attitudes of primary care physicians. Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:1341–48. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)84076-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Foster C, et al. Unconventional medicine in the United States. Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:246–52. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199301283280406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shenfield GM, Atkin PA, Kristoffersen SS. Alternative medicine: An expanding health industry. Med J Aust. 1997;166:516–17. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1997.tb123240.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Murray RH, Rubel AJ. Physicians as healers—unwitting partners in health care. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:61–64. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199201023260113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Blais R, Maiga A, Aboubacar A. How different are users and non-users of alternative medicine? Can J Public Health. 1997;88:159–62. doi: 10.1007/BF03403880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Elder NC, Gillcrist A, Minz R. Use of alternative health care by family practice patients. Arch Fam Med. 1997;6:181–84. doi: 10.1001/archfami.6.2.181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Drivdahl CE, Miser WF. The use of alternative health care by a family practice population. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1998;11:193–99. doi: 10.3122/15572625-11-3-193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Groves RM, Biemer PP, Lyberg LE, et al., editors. Telephone Survey Methodology. New York, NY: John Wiley; 1988. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lwanga SK, Lemeshow S. Sample Size Determination in Health Studies. A Practical Manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1991. p. 25. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wade TJ, Cairney J. Age and depression in a nationally representative sample of Canadians: A preliminary look at the National Population Health Survey. Can J Public Health. 1997;88:297–302. doi: 10.1007/BF03403892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1989. pp. 25–58. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Northcott HC, Bachynsky JA. Concurrent utilization of chiropractic, prescription medicines, nonprescription medicines and alternative health care. Soc Sci Med. 1993;37:431–35. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90273-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Furnham A, Forey J. The attitudes, behaviors and beliefs of patients of conventional, vs. complementary (alternative) medicine. J Clin Psychol. 1994;50:458–69. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199405)50:3<458::AID-JCLP2270500318>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cassileth BR, Lusk EJ, Strouse TB, Bodenheimer BJ. Contemporary unorthodox treatments in cancer medicine: A study of patients, treatments, and practitioners. Ann Intern Med. 1984;101:105–12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-101-1-105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Anderson WH, O’Connor BB, MacGregor RR, Schwartz JS. Patient use and assessment of conventional and alternative therapies for HIV infection and AIDS. AIDS. 1993;7:561–65. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199304000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fuller RC. Alternative Medicine and American Religious Life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES