Abstract
Cancer incidence data for the Ontario Public Health Units in 1980–91 were examined to investigate regional patterns and the existence of outlier values after adjustment for known risk factors. Candidate risk factors were derived from the Ontario Health Survey and the census. Weighted regressions were fit to the data, and the spatial pattern of the residuals was analyzed.
The number of outlier data points with significant elevations or reductions in risk was close to that expected by chance. They were dispersed geographically, and occurred in a variety of cancer types. We conclude that, in general, most of the geographic variation in cancer risk can be associated with variation in known risk factors, and that there appear to be no broad regional effects remaining after adjustment for these factors. A few cancer sites provide limited evidence of regional effects that may warrant further investigation.
Résumé
Nous avons revu les données statistiques des unités de santé publique de l’Ontario (1980‐91) concernant l’incidence du cancer dans le but d’identifier les déterminants potentiels des variations régionales des risques à travers la province. L’information relative aux facteurs de risque provenait de l’Enquête sur la santé de l’Ontario de 1990 et du recensement. Une régression des carrés minimisés a été effectuée, ainsi qu’une analyse des corrélations spatiales des erreurs.
Le nombre de points extrêmes résultant en une augmentation ou une réduction significative du risque se rapprochait de celui anticipé par l’effet du hazard. Géographiquement, ces extrêmes étaient distribués à travers la province et étaient observés dans plusieurs types de cancer. Ces données démontrent qu’il n’y a pas d’unités où l’on retrouve un risque de cancer anormalement élevé ou anormalement bas, comparativement à l’ensemble de la province, après ajustement pour les facteurs de risque connus. Les données concernant quelques sites suggèrent cependant la possibilité d’effets régionaux qui méritent d’être analysés davantage.
Footnotes
This work was supported in part by Health Canada (project 6606-5034-58). Dr. Walter holds a National Health Scientist award from Health Canada.
References
- 1.Walter SD, Birnie SE, Marrett LD, et al. The geographic variation of cancer incidence in Ontario. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:367–76. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.84.3.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ministry of Health, Ontario. Ontario Health Survey: User’s Guide Vol. 1. Documentation. 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1982. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tomatis L. Cancer: Causes, Occurrence and Control. Lyon: IARC Scientific Publication; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Walter SD, Marrett LD, Taylor SM, et al. An analysis of determinants of regional variation in cancer incidence: Ontario, Canada. In: Lawson A, et al., editors. Advanced Methods of Disease Mapping and Risk Assessment for Public Health Decision Making. 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Le ND, Marrett LD, Robson DL, et al. Canadian Cancer Incidence Atlas. 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pickle LW, Mungiole M, Jones GK, White AA. Atlas of United States Mortality. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics; 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Marrett LD, Nishri ED, Swift MB, et al. Geographic distribution of cancer in Ontario: Atlas of cancer incidence 1980–1991. Toronto: Ontario Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Walter SD, Birnie SE. Mapping mortality and morbidity patterns: An international comparison. Int J Epidemiol. 1991;20:678–89. doi: 10.1093/ije/20.3.678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Aase A, Bentham G. Gender, Geography and Socioeconomic Status in the Diffusion of Malignant Melanoma Risk. Soc Sci Med. 1996;42:1621–37. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00318-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Charlton J. Which Areas are Healthiest? Population Trends. 1996;83:17–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Howe HL, Keller JE, Lehnherr M. Relation between population density and cancer incidence, Illinois, 1986–1990. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;138:29–36. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jones ME, Shugg D, Dwyer T, et al. Interstate differences in incidence and mortality from melanoma. A re-examination of the latitudinal gradient. Med J Australia. 1992;157:373–78. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1992.tb137243.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kafadar K, Freedman LS, Goodall CR, Turkey JW. Urbanicity-related trends in lung cancer mortality in US counties: White females and white males, 1970–1987. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25:918–31. doi: 10.1093/ije/25.5.918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lazcano-Ponce EC, Rascon-Pacheco RA, Lozano-Ascencio R, Velasco-Mondragon HE. Mortality from cervical carcinoma in Mexico: Impact of screening, 1980–1990. Acta Cytologica. 1996;40:506–12. doi: 10.1159/000333907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nasca PC, Mahoney MC, Wolfgang PE. Population density and cancer incidence differentials in New York State, 1978–82. Cancer Causes and Control. 1992;3:7–15. doi: 10.1007/BF00051906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Roos NP, Roos LL. Surgical rate variations: Do they reflect the health or socioeconomic characteristics of the population? Medical Care. 1982;20:945–58. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198209000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sturgeon SR, Schairer C, Gail M, et al. Geographic variation in mortality from breast cancer among white women in the United States. J National Cancer Institute. 1995;87:1846–53. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.24.1846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Walter SD. The ecologic method in the study of environmental health. I. Overview of the method. Environ Health Perspect. 1991;94:61–65. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94-1567938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Walter SD. The analysis of regional patterns in health data. I. Distribution considerations. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;136:730–41. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Walter SD. The analysis of regional patterns in health data. II. The power to detect environmental effects. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;136:742–59. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Greenland S, Robins J. Ecologic studies — biases, misconceptions and counterexamples. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;139:747–60. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]