Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2003 Jul 1;94(4):287–291. doi: 10.1007/BF03403607

Factors Associated with Maintenance of Regular Condom Use Among Single Heterosexual Adults

A Longitudinal Study

Gaston Godin 112,, Hélène Gagnon 112, Léo-Daniel Lambert 112
PMCID: PMC6979863  PMID: 12873088

Abstract

Objective

The aims of this study were to describe behavioural and psychosocial characteristics of single heterosexuals towards regular condom use, and to identify factors associated with the maintenance of this behaviour over time.

Method

A cohort of 179 single heterosexual adults (83 men and 96 women, mean age: 32 years) was followed over a period of 2 years. The data were collected, by phone interviews, at baseline and 1 and 2 years later. The phone numbers were generated using a random digit strategy.

Results

The following changes were observed: over time fewer people were sexually active, but those who were, reported more often having had more than one sexual partner. No significant change was observed regarding condom use. The psychosocial variables remained stable during the study period. To have a favourable intention was the main factor associated with maintenance of condom use. Having had a STD, personal normative beliefs and positive attitude were also associated with regular condom use.

Discussion

Promotion strategies should highlight the importance of acting as a responsible person, reinforce the advantages of using condoms, and select strategies that favour the implementation of intention of using condoms.

Footnotes

Research funded by a grant from the Medical Research Council of Canada (MT-14485)

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. The World Health Report 1997. 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Health Canada. The Canadian Strategy on HIV/AIDS. Moving Forward Together. 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.MSSS. Stratégie québécoise de lutte contre les MTS. Orientations 2000–2002. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Health Canada. Canadian STD Guidelines. 1998 Edition. Ottawa: Division of STD Prevention and Control, Health Protection Branch; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Health Canada. HIV/AIDS Epi Update. Ottawa: Bureau of HIV/AIDS, STD and TB Update Series, Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Parent R, Alary M. Analyse des cas de chlamy-diose, de gonorrhée, d’infection par le virus de l’hépatite B et de syphilis déclarés au Québec par année civile (1994-1998) Québec: Centre québécois de coordination sur le sida. MSSS, Gouvernement du Québec; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Richardson H, Franco E, Pintos J. Determinants of low-risk and high-risk cervical human papillo-ma virus infections in Montreal University students. Sex Transm Dis. 2000;27(2):79–86. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200002000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Siegel D, Golden E, Washington A. Prevalence and correlates of herpes simplex infections: The population-based AMEN study. JAMA. 1992;286:1702–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.1992.03490130090036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Catania JA, Binson D, Dolcini MM, Stall R, Choi K, Pollack LM, et al. Risk factors for HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases and prevention practices among US heterosexual adults: Changes from 1990 to 1992. Am J Public Health. 1995;85(11):1492–99. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.85.11.1492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Carey RF, Herman WA, Retta SM, Rinaldi JE, German BA, Athey TW. Effectiveness of latex condoms as a barrier to human immunodeficiency virus-sized particles under conditions of simulated use. Sex Transm Dis. 1992;19(4):230–34. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199207000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sheeran P, Abraham C, Orbel S. Psychosocial correlates of heterosexual condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 1999;125(1):90–132. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Choi KH, Catania JA. Changes in multiple sexual partnerships, HIV testing and condom use among US heterosexuals 18 to 49 years of age, 1990 and 1992. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:554–56. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.86.4.554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kusseling FS, Shapiro MF, Greenberg JM, Wenger NS. Understanding why heterosexual adults do not practice safer sex: A comparison of two samples. AIDS Educ Prev. 1996;8(3):247–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Guiguet M, Lepont F, Retel O, Valleron AJ. Changes in HIV behavior among french heterosexuals: Patterns of sexual monogamy and condom use between 1988 and 1991. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1994;7(12):1290–91. doi: 10.1097/00126334-199412000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Otis J. Santé sexuelle et prévention des MTS et de l’infection au VIH: bilan d’une décennie de recherche au Québec auprès des adolescents et adolescentes et des jeunes adultes. Québec: Direction générale de la planification et de l’évaluation. Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Health Canada. Sexual risk behaviour of Canadians. Ottawa: Bureau of HIV/AIDS, STD and TB Update Series, Centre for Prevention and Control; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chequer P, Marin BV, Paiva L, Hudes ES, Piazza T, Rodrigues L, et al. AIDS and condoms in Brasilia: A telephone survey. AIDS Educ Prev. 1997;9(5):472–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Maticka-Tyndale E, Godin G, LeMay G, Adrien A, Singer SM, Willms D, et al. Les communautés ethnoculturelles canadiennes face au sida: vue d’ensemble et résumé des résultats de la phase III de l’enquête. Rev can santé publique. 1996;87(suppl.1):S42–S48. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Conway B, Cameron W, Plummer FA, Ronald AR. Heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus infection-Strategies for prevention. Can J Infect Dis. 1991;2(1):30–36. doi: 10.1155/1991/160193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Org Behav and Hum Dec Proc. 1991;50:179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley; 1975. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. 1980. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Manstead A, Parker D. Evaluating and extending the theory of planned behavior. European Review of Social Psychology. 1995;6:69–95. doi: 10.1080/14792779443000012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Raats MM, Shepherd R, Sparks P. Including moral dimensions of choice within the structure of the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1995;25(6):484–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb01763.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Godin G, Maticka-Tyndale E, Adrien A, Mason-Singer S, Willms D, Cappon P, et al. Cross-cultural testing of three social cognitive theories: An application to condom use. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1996;26(17):1556–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb00086.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Triandis HC. Interpersonal Behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole; 1977. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Godin G, Kok G. The Theory of Planned Behavior: A review of its applications to health-related behaviors. Am J Health Prom. 1996;11(2):87–98. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-11.2.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Middlestadt SE, Bhattacharyya K, Rosenbaum J, Fishbein M, Shepherd M. The use of theory-based semistructured elicitation questionnaires: Formative research for CDC’s prevention marketing initiative. Public Health Rep. 1996;3(suppl.1):18–27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liang K, Zeger L. Longitudinal data analysis generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;78(1):13–22. doi: 10.1093/biomet/73.1.13. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Horton N, Bebchuk J, Jones C, Lipsitz S, Catalano P, Zahner G, et al. Goodness-of-fit for GEE: An example with mental health service utilization. Statistics in Medecine. 1999;18(2):213–22. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990130)18:2<213::AID-SIM999>3.0.CO;2-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gollwitzer PM. Implementation intentions, strong effects of simple plans. Am Psychol. 1999;54(7):493–503. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Santé-Québec. Enquête québécoise sur les facteurs de risque associés au sida et aux autres MTS: la population des 15–29 ans. Québec: Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux, Gouvernement du Québec, 1992.
  • 34.Morrill AC, Ickovics JR, Golubchikov VV, Beren SE, Rodin J. Safer sex: Social and psychological predictors of behavioral maintenance and change among heterosexual women. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996;64(4):819–28. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.64.4.819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Morrison DM, Gillmore MR, Baker SA. Determinants of condom use among high-risk heterosexual adults: A test of the Theory of Reasoned Action. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1995;25(8):651–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb01767.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Weinstock HS, Lindan C, Bolan G, Kegeles SM, Hearst N. Factors associated with condom use in a high-risk heterosexual population. Sex Transm Dis. 1993;20(1):14–20. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199301000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wulfert E, Wan CK. Safer sex intentions and condom use viewed from a health belief, reasoned action and social cognitive perspective. J Sex Res. 1995;32(4):299–311. doi: 10.1080/00224499509551803. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Catania JA, Gibson DR, Chitwood DD, Coates TJ. Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: Influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior. Psychol Bull. 1990;108:339–62. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES