Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 1999 Sep 1;90(5):330–333. doi: 10.1007/BF03404522

Interactions Between Smokers and Non-Smokers in Public Places: A Qualitative Study

Blake D Poland 112,212,, Lisa Stockton 312, Mary Jane Ashley 112,212, Linda Pederson 412, Joanna Cohen 212, Roberta Ferrence 212,512, Shelley Bull 212,612
PMCID: PMC6979958  PMID: 10570578

Abstract

Few studies have employed a qualitative approach to better understand how both smokers and non-smokers experience and make sense of no-smoking restrictions in their daily lives. We describe qualitative research involving an examination of self-reported interpersonal interactions between smokers and non-smokers in public places regarding exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). Five focus group discussions and twenty individual in-depth interviews were conducted with smokers and non-smokers in the Metropolitan Toronto region as a complement to a quantitative survey of the adult population of Ontario. Strategies used by non-smokers in responding to ETS exposures included verbal confrontations, non-verbal cues, use of a third party, and moving away. The perceived consequences of such actions, as described by both smokers and non-smokers, are discussed, together with implications for tobacco control policy and practice.

References

  • 1.Elder J, Rosbrook B, Choi W, et al. Public objections to environmental tobacco smoke. Prev Med. 1992;21(6):701–9. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(92)90077-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gibson B. Smoker-nonsmoker conflict: Using a social psychological framework to understand current social controversy. J Social Issues. 1997;53(1):97–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1997.tb02433.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gibson B. Psychological aspects of smoker-non-smoker interaction: Implications for public policy. American Psychologist. 1994;49:1081–83. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.1081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Leedom C, Persaud D, Shovein J. The effect on smoking behavior of an assertive request to refrain from smoking. Int J Addict. 1986;21:1113–17. doi: 10.3109/10826088609077257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Davis RM, Boyd GM, Schoenborn CA. ‘Common courtesy’ and the elimination of passive smoking. Results of the 1987 National Health Interview Survey. JAMA. 1990;263(16):2208–10. doi: 10.1001/jama.1990.03440160070040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.de Willemsen MC, Vries H. Saying “no” to environmental tobacco smoke: Determinants of assertiveness among nonsmoking employees. Prev Med. 1996;25:575–82. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1996.0092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cardador T, Hazan AR, Glantz SA. Tobacco industry smokers’ rights publications: A content analysis. Am J Public Health. 1995;85(9):1212–17. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.85.9.1212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. The New York Times. 1985. The secondhand smokescreen (advertisement) [Google Scholar]
  • 9.The Economist. The Economist. 1998. Tobacco and tolerance: Blowing smoke. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Poland B. Smoking, stigma, and the purification of public space. In: Kearns R, Gesler W, editors. Putting Health into Place: Making Connections in Geographical Research. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press; 1998. pp. 208–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fischer B, Poland B. Exclusion, ‘risk’, and social control: Reflections on community policing and public health. GeoForum. 1998;29(2):187–97. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7185(98)00006-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Poland B. The ‘considerate’ smoker in public space: The micro-politics and political economy of ‘doing the right thing’, Health and Place forthcoming. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 13.Ashley MJ, Pederson L, Poland B, et al. Smoking, Smoking Cessation, Tobacco Control and Programming: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study. 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ashley MJ, Cohen J, Ferrence R, et al. Smoking in the home: Changing attitudes and current practices. Am J Public Health. 1998;88(5):797–800. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.88.5.797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Northrup DA, Rhyne D. Smoking, Smoking Cessation, Tobacco Control and Programming: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study. North York, ON: Insititute for Social Research; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Poland B, Stockton L. Qualitative Research on Lay Perceptions of Tobacco Control: The ‘Q&Q Study’ (Final Report) Toronto, ON: University of Toronto; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Goffman E. Behavior in Public Places. New York: Macmillan; 1963. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Poland B, Taylor SM, Eyles J, White NF. Qualitative evaluation of the Brantford COMMIT intervention trial: The smokers’ perspective. Health and Canadian Society. 1994;2(2):269–316. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ashley MJ, Cohen J, Bull S, et al. Knowledge about tobacco and attitudes toward tobacco control: How different are smokers and nonsmokers? Cancer Prevention & Control, in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Pederson L, Bull S, Ashley MJ, Lefcoe NM. A population survey on legislative measures to restrict smoking in Ontario: 2. Knowledge, attitudes, and predicted behaviour. Am J Prev Med. 1986;2(6):316–23. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(18)31302-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bull SB, Pederson LL, Ashley MJ. Restrictions on smoking: Growth in population support between 1983 and 1991 in Ontario, Canada. J Public Health Pol. 1994;15:310–28. doi: 10.2307/3342908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES