Abstract
In this article, the effects of physically active leisure on the relationships between stress and health are examined using structural equation modeling (SEM). The analyses are based on data from Canada’s 1994 National Population Health Survey (n = 17,626). Overall, physically active leisure was found to directly contribute to higher levels of physical health and wellbeing, and lower levels of mental ill-health among Canadians. When the respondents experienced higher levels of chronic stress, life event stress, and/or work stress, involvement in physically active leisure appeared to help them maintain good health and wellbeing. Also, higher levels of participation in physically active leisure helped paid workers suppress levels of work stress. Agencies involved in health promotion and lifestyle intervention should give greater consideration to physically active leisure. As a significant component of an active lifestyle, physically active leisure can contribute to better health, and provide a valuable resource for coping with stress.
Résumé
Nous avons analysé les effets de l’activité physique sur la relation entre le stress et la santé en nous servant d’un modèle d’équations structurelles. L’analyse repose sur des données recueillies dans le cadre de l’Enquête nationale sur la santé de la population de 1994 (n = 17 626). Sommairement, nous avons constaté que, chez les Canadiens, les loisirs actifs avaient une influence positive sur le bien-être et la santé physique et favorisaient une meilleure santé mentale. L’activité physique contribuait à maintenir la santé et le bien-être des répondants en période de hauts niveaux de stress chronique, de stress lié aux événements traumatisants de la vie, et/ou de stress professionnel. De plus, un niveau élevé d’activité physique aidait les hommes et femmes actifs à réduire les effets du stress professionnel. Les organismes de promotion de la santé et de modification des habitudes de vie devraient se pencher sur les bienfaits des loisirs actifs qui, s’ils font partie intégrante d’une vie active, peuvent améliorer la santé et deviennent un outil précieux pour combattre le stress.
Footnotes
This paper is based on a project funded by National Health Research Development Program (NHRDP) in Canada.
References
- 1.Robinson JP, Godbey G. Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zuzanek J, Smale BJA. More work—less leisure? Changing allocations of time in Canada, 1981 to 1992. Loisir et Société/Society and Leisure. 1997;20:73–106. doi: 10.1080/07053436.1997.10715538. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.McBride-King, Bachmann K. Is Work-life Balance Still an Issue for Canadians and Their Employers? You Bet It Is! Ottawa: Conference Board of Canada, 1999.
- 4.Avison WR, Gotlib IH. Stress and Mental Health: Contemporary Issues and Prospects for the Future. New York: Plenum Press; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Goldberger L, Breznitz S. Handbook of Stress: Theoretical and Clinical Aspects. 2nd. New York: The Free Press; 1993. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lazarus RS. Coping theory and research: Past, present, and future. Psychosomatic Medicine. 1993;55:234–47. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199305000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sachs BC. Coping with stress. Stress Medicine. 1991;7:61–63. doi: 10.1002/smi.2460070111. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Aldwin CM. Stress, Coping, and Development: An Integrative Perspective. New York: The Guilford Press; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gottlieb B Ed. Coping with Chronic Stress. New York: Plenum Press; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lazarus RS. From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks. Annual Review of Psychology. 1993;44:1–21. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.000245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zeidner M, Endler N Eds. Handbook of Coping: Theory, Research, Applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Caltabiano ML. Measuring the similarity among leisure activities based on a perceived stress-reduction benefit. Leisure Studies. 1994;13:17–31. doi: 10.1080/02614369400390021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Coleman D. Leisure based social support, leisure dispositions and health. J Leisure Research. 1993;25(4):350–61. doi: 10.1080/00222216.1993.11969933. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Coleman D, Iso-Ahola SE. Leisure and health: The role of social support and self-determination. J Leisure Research. 1993;25(2):111–28. doi: 10.1080/00222216.1993.11969913. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Driver BL, Brown PJ, Peterson G Eds. Benefits of Leisure. State College: Venture Publishing, Inc.; 1991. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hull RB, IV, Michael SE. Nature-based recreation, mood change, and stress restoration. Leisure Sciences. 1995;17:1–14. doi: 10.1080/01490409509513239. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Iso-Ahola SE, Park CJ. Leisure-related social support and self-determination as buffers of stress-illness relationship. J Leisure Research. 1996;28(3):169–87. doi: 10.1080/00222216.1996.11949769. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Iwasaki Y, Mannell RC. Hierarchical dimensions of leisure stress coping. Leisure Sciences. 2000;22:163–81. doi: 10.1080/01490409950121843. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Iwasaki Y, Mannell RC. The effects of leisure beliefs and coping strategies on stress-health relationships: A field study. Leisure/Loisir: The Journal of the Canadian Association for Leisure Studies. 2000;24:3–57. doi: 10.1080/14927713.1999.9651258. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Iwasaki Y, Smale BJA. Longitudinal analyses of the relationships among life transitions, chronic health problems, leisure, and psychological well-being. Leisure Sciences. 1998;20:25–52. doi: 10.1080/01490409809512263. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ouellet G, Iso-Ahola SE, Boisvert D Eds. Leisure, health and human function. Loisir et Société/Society and Leisure. 1995;18:15–181. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Patterson I, Carpenter G. Participation in leisure activities after the death of a spouse. Leisure Sciences. 1994;16:105–17. doi: 10.1080/01490409409513223. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zuzanek J, Robinson JP, Iwasaki Y. The relationships between stress, health, and physically active leisure as a function of life-cycle. Leisure Sciences. 1998;20:253–75. doi: 10.1080/01490409809512286. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Iso-Ahola SE. A psychological analysis of leisure and health. In: Haworth JT, editor. Work, Leisure and Well-being. London: Routledge; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Federal, ProvincialTerritorial Advisory Committee on Population Health. Toward a Healthy Future: Second Report on the Health of Canadians. Ottawa: Health Canada; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mannell RC, Kleiber DA. A Social Psychology of Leisure. State College: Venture Publishing; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Barrera M., Jr . Models of social support and life stress: Beyond the buffering hypothesis. In: Cohen LH, editor. Life Events and Psychological Functioning. Newsbury Park, CA: Sage; 1988. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ensel WM, Lin N. The life stress paradigm and psychological distress. J Health Soc Behav. 1991;32:321–41. doi: 10.2307/2137101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.House JS. Work Stress and Social Support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1981. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wheaton B. Models for the stress-buffering functions of coping resources. J Health Soc Behav. 1985;26:352–64. doi: 10.2307/2136658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Statistics Canada. NPHS Public Use Microdata Documentation. Ottawa: National Population Health Survey; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kessler RC, Mroczek DK. Measuring the effects of medical interventions. Medical Care. 1995;33(4Suppl):109–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Arbuckle JL, Wothke W. AMOS 4.0 Users’ Guide. Chicago: Smallwaters Corporation; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bollen KA. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1989. [Google Scholar]