Skip to main content
PMC home page
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2002 Sep 1;93(Suppl 1):S57–S61. doi: 10.1007/BF03405120

Sentinel Human Health Indicators: To Evaluate the Health Status of Vulnerable Communities

Heraline E Hicks 1,✉, Christopher T De Rosa 1
PMCID: PMC6979980  PMID: 12425177

Abstract

The presence of toxic substances in the Great Lakes (GL) basin continues to be a significant concern. In the United States, some 70,000 commercial and industrial compounds are now in use. More than 30,000 are produced or used in the Great Lakes ecosystem. These substances include organochlorines (e.g., polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dioxins, furans, dieldrin, etc.), heavy metals such as methylmercury, and alkylated lead, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (e.g., benzo[a]pyrene). The IJC has identified 42 locations in the GL basin of the United States and Canada as Areas of Concern (AOCs) because of high concentrations of these toxic substances. In 1990 the U.S. Congress amended the Great Lakes Critical Programs Act to create The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) Great Lakes Human Health Effects Research Program (GLHHERP) to begin to address these issues. This program characterizes exposures to contaminants via consumption of GL fish and investigates the potential for short- and long-term adverse health effects. This paper reviews the GLHHERP program and indicators established to monitor and address the risks posed by these substances to vulnerable populations in the Great Lakes ecosystem.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements: The authors appreciate the editorial assistance of Wallace Sagendorph and Anne Olin, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

References

  • 1.US Environmental Protection AgencyGovernment of Canada. The Great Lakes: An Environmental Atlas and Resource Book. 3rd 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hicks HE. The Great Lakes: A historical overview. Toxicol Ind Health. 1996;12:467–76. doi: 10.1177/074823379601200318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Colborn T, Davidson A, Green SN, Hodge RA, Jackson CI, Liroff RA. Great Lakes, Great Legacy. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation and the Institute for Research on Public Policy; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jacobson JL, Jacobson SW. New methodologies for assessing the effects of prenatal toxic exposure on cognitive functioning in humans. In: Evans MS, editor. Toxic Contaminants and Ecosystem Health: A Great Lakes Focus. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1988. pp. 373–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jacobson JL, Jacobson SW, Humphrey HEB. Effects of in utero exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and related contaminants on cognitive functioning in young children. J Pediatr. 1990;116:38–46. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)81642-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.De Rosa CT, Johnson BL. Strategic elements of ATSDR’s Great Lakes Human Health Effects Research Program. Toxicol Ind Health. 1996;12:315–25. doi: 10.1177/074823379601200304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Weisglas-Kuperus N, Sas TCJ, Koopman-Esseboom C, Van der Zwan CW, de Ridder MAJ, Beishuizen A, et al. Immunologic effects of background prenatal and postnatal exposure to dioxins and polychlorinated biphenyls in Dutch infants. Pediatric Research. 1995;38(3):404–10. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199509000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.International Joint Commission. An Inventory of Chemical Substances Identified in the Great Lakes Ecosystem. Vol 1–6. Windsor, ON: International Joint Commission, 1983.
  • 9.National HealthWelfare Canada. Toxic Chemicals in the Great Lakes and Associated Effects. 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Birmingham B, Gilman A, Grant D, Salminen J, Boddington M, Thorpe B, et al. PCDD/PCDF multimedia exposure analysis for the Canadian population: Detailed exposure estimation. Chemosphere. 1989;19(1–6):637–42. doi: 10.1016/0045-6535(89)90383-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Humphrey HEB. Population studies of PCBs in Michigan residents. In: D’Itri FM, Kamrin MA, editors. PCBs: Human and Environmental Hazards. Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Science Press; 1983. pp. 299–310. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Janz NK, Becker MH. The health belief model: A decade later. Health Educ Q. 1984;11(1):1–47. doi: 10.1177/109019818401100101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ Q. 1988;15:175–83. doi: 10.1177/109019818801500203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hanrahan LP, Falk C, Anderson HA, Draheim L, Kanarek MS, Olson J, et al. Serum PCB and DDE levels of frequent Great Lakes sport fish consumers - a first look. Environ Res. 1999;80(Suppl2):26–37. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1998.3914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stewart P, Darvill T, Lonky E, Reihman J, Pagano J, Bush B. Assessment of prenatal exposure of PCBs from maternal consumption of Great Lakes fish: An analysis of PCB pattern and concentration. Environ Res. 1999;80(Suppl2):87–96. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1998.3905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schantz SL, Gardiner JC, Gasior DM, Sweeney AM, Humphrey HEB, McCaffrey RJ. Motor functioning in aging Great Lakes fisheaters. Environ Res. 1999;80(Suppl2):46–56. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1998.3904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Johnson BL, Hicks HE, Jones DE, Cibulas W, Wargo A, De Rosa CT. Public health implications of persistent toxic substances in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence basins. J Great Lakes Res. 1998;24(2):698–722. doi: 10.1016/S0380-1330(98)70855-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Anderson HA, Falk C, Hanrahan L, Olson J, Burse V, Needham L, et al. Profiles of Great Lakes critical pollutants: A sentinel analysis of human blood and urine -The Great Lakes Consortium. Environ Health Perspect. 1998;106(5):279–89. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dellinger JA, Meyers RM, Gebhardt KJ, Hansen LK. The Ojibwa health study: Fish residue comparisons for Lakes Superior, Michigan, and Huron. Toxicol Ind Health. 1996;12:393–402. doi: 10.1177/074823379601200311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fitzgerald EF, Deres DA, Hwang S-A, Bush B, Yang B-Z, Tarbell A, Jacobs A. Local fish consumption and serum PCB concentrations among Mohawk men at Akwesasne. Environ Res. 1999;80(Suppl2):97–103. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1998.3908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lonky E, Reihman J, Darvill T, Mather J, Daly H. Neonatal behavioural assessment scale performance in humans influenced by maternal consumption of environmentally contaminated Lake Ontario fish. J Great Lakes Res. 1996;22(2):98–212. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dellinger JA, Kmiecek N, Gerstenberger S, Gnu H. Mercury contamination of fish in the Ojibwa diet: I. Walleye fillets and skin on versus skin off sampling. Water Air Soil Pollution. 1995;80:69–76. doi: 10.1007/BF01189654. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Courval JM, DeHoog JV, Holzman CB, Tay EM, Fischer L, Humphrey HEB, et al. Fish consumption and other characteristics of reproductive-aged Michigan anglers - a potential population for studying the effects of consumption of Great Lakes fish on reproductive health. Toxicol Ind Health. 1996;12:347–59. doi: 10.1177/074823379601200307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Courval JM, DeHoog JV, Stein AD, Tay EM, He J, Humphrey HEB, Paneth N. Sport-caught fish consumption and conception delay in licensed Michigan anglers. Environ Res. 1999;80(Suppl2):183–88. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1998.3909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Falk L, Hanrahan L, Anderson HA, Kanarek MS, Draheim L, Needham L, et al. Body burdens levels of dioxins, furans, and PCBs among frequent consumers of Great Lakes sport fish. Environ Res. 1999;80(Suppl2):19–25. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1998.3906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Waller DP, Presperin C, Drum ML, Negrusz A, Larsen AK, van der Ven H, Hibbard J. Great Lakes fish as a source of maternal and fetal exposure to chlorinated hydrocarbons. Toxicol Ind Health. 1996;12:335–45. doi: 10.1177/074823379601200306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tilden J, Hanrahan L, Anderson HA, Palit C, Olson J, MacKenzie W. Health advisories for consumers of Great Lakes sport fish: Is the message being received? Environ Health Perspect. 1997;105(12):1360–65. doi: 10.1289/ehp.971051360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mendola P, Buck GM, Sever LE, Zieiezny M, Vena JE. Consumption of PCB-contaminated freshwater fish and shortened menstrual cycle length. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;146(11):955–60. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stewart P, Reihman J, Lonky E, Darvill T, Pagano J. Prenatal PCB exposure and neonatal behavioural assessment scale (NBAS) performance. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2000;22:21–29. doi: 10.1016/S0892-0362(99)00056-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stewart P, Darvill T, Lonky E, Reihman J. Behavioural effects of consumption of Lake Ontario fish: Two methodological approaches — Progress Report to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Darvill T, Lonky E, Reihman J, Stewart P, Pagano J. Prenatal exposure to PCBs and infants’ performance on the Fagan Test of Intelligence. Neurotoxicol. 2000;21(6):1029–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dellinger JA, Gerstenberger SL, Hansen LK, Malek LL. Ojibwa Health Study: Assessing the Health Risks from Consuming Contaminated Great Lakes Fish; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dellinger JA, Gerstenberger SL, Hansen LK, Kmiecek N, Meyers RM, Gebhardt KJ, Malek LL. An assessment of a human population at risk: The impact of consuming contaminated Great Lakes fish on Native Americans — Progress Report to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schantz SL, Gasior DM, Polverejan E, McCaffrey RJ, Sweeney AM, Humphrey HEB, Gardiner JC. Impairments of memory and learning in older adults exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls via consumption of Great Lakes fish. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109(6):605–11. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hicks HE, De Cibulas W R C T. The impact of environmental epidemiology/toxicology and public health practice in the Great Lakes. Environ Epidemiol Toxicol. 2000;2:8–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fitzgerald EF, Hwang S, Cook K, Worswick P. Fish consumption and breast milk PCB concentrations among Mohawk women at Akwesasne. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:164–72. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.DeVito MJ, Birnbaum LS, Farland WH, Gaslewicz TA. Comparisons of estimated human body burdens of dioxin-like chemicals and TCDD body burdens in experimentally exposed animals. Environ Health Perspect. 1995;103:820–31. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.World Health Organization. Levels of PCBs, PCDDs, and PCDFs in Breast Milk. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gilbertson M. Guest Commentary. Great Lakes Research Review. 1995;1(2):3–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Jacobson JL, Jacobson SW. Intellectual impairment in children exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls in utero. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(11):783–89. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199609123351104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES