Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 2003 Mar 1;94(2):115–120. doi: 10.1007/BF03404583

An Evaluation of Think First Saskatchewan

A Head and Spinal Cord Injury Prevention Program

Marni L Wesner 1,
PMCID: PMC6979992  PMID: 12675167

Abstract

Objectives: To identify youth behaviour with regards to injury prevention, to assess the awareness of severity and susceptibility to brain and spinal cord injury, and to evaluate the impact of the Think First Saskatchewan school visit program on students’ knowledge of brain and spinal cord injury prevention.

Methods: A controlled, pre- and post-test design, self-report questionnaire was administered to 1,257 grade 6 and 7 students. Descriptive statistics and chi-square were used for data analysis. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Results: Saskatchewan youth participate in activities that put them at risk for brain and spinal cord injury. The Think First Saskatchewan school visit program statistically improved self-reported knowledge of the students receiving the Think First message.

Discussion: Think First Saskatchewan is a brain and spinal cord injury prevention program that significantly improves youth knowledge pertaining to injury prevention. Further evaluation of the program to include a more delayed survey of retention of knowledge, changes to behaviour, and reduction of brain and spinal cord injury are necessary.

Footnotes

This research was funded by a grant from Think First Saskatchewan.

References

  • 1.Smartrisk Foundation. The economic burden of unintentional injury in Canada. 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baker SP, O’Neill B, Karpf RS. The Injury Fact Book. Lexington, KY: DC Heath & Company; 1984. pp. 219–49. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Finn FP, Bragg BWE. Perception of the risk of an accident by young and older drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 1986;18:289–98. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(86)90043-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Committee on Trauma Research, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council, Institute of Medicine. Injury in America: A Continuing Public Health Problem. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1985. p. 164. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Saskatchewan Health, Reference and Statistics Department.
  • 6.Think First Foundation. Think First for Kids, Elementary School Teacher Resource Book. 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wright GN. Total Rehabilitation. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and, Co.; 1980. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Damba C, Sam EP, Despres A, Edmonds V, Tator CH. Think First/Pensez d’Abord — An impact evaluation of the Think First brain and spinal cord injury prevention school program in Ontario. The Toronto Hospital — Western Division. 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Warnell P. Axon. 1997. Injury prevention programs: Do they really make a difference? pp. 6–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Avolio AEC, Ramsey FL, Neuwelt EA. Evaluation of a program to prevent head and spinal cord injuries: A comparison between middle school and high school. Neurosurgery. 1992;31(3):557–61. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199209000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Neuwelt EA, Coe MF, Wilkinson AM, Avolio ACE. Oregon head and spinal cord injury prevention program and evaluation. Neurosurgery. 1989;24(3):453–58. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198903000-00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lechman BC, Bonwich EB. SCI Dig. 1981. Evaluation of an education program for spinal cord injury prevention: Some preliminary findings; pp. 27–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lambert EC. College students’ knowledge of human papillomavirus and effectiveness of a brief educational intervention. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2001;14(3):178–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Peel GR, Booth ML. Impact evaluation of the Royal Australian Air Force health promotion program. Aviation Space & Environmental Medicine. 2001;72(1):44–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rissel C, Salmon A, Hughes AM. Evaluation of a (pilot) stage-tailored brief smoking cessation intervention among hospital patients presenting to a hospital pre-admission clinic. Australian Health Review. 2000;23(3):83–93. doi: 10.1071/AH000083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Berwick M, Oliveria S, Luo ST, Headley A, Bolognia JL. A pilot study using nurse education as an intervention to increase skin self-examination for melanoma. J Cancer Educ. 2000;15(1):38–40. doi: 10.1080/08858190009528651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Taylor SE. Health Psychology. 3rd. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shaw LR, McMahon BT, Bruce JH. The Florida approach to spinal cord injury prevention. Rehabilitation Literature. 1984;45:85–89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cain K, Saxton C. Instruction Guide for Conducting the National Head and Spinal Cord Injury Prevention Project of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. 1st 1986. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES